You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: April 14, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR LOESTRIN 24 FE


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for LOESTRIN 24 FE

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00475189 ↗ Study of Loestrin 24(24 Days of "Real" Pills) Fe Versus Loestrin 1/20 (21 "Real" Pills) Completed Warner Chilcott N/A 2007-06-01 The purpose of this research study is to assess hormone withdrawal symptoms in women while taking an oral contraceptive in the novel 24/4 (24 days of "real" pills) manner in comparison to taking pills in the standard 21/7 (21 "real" pills) manner. It is hypothesized that the 24/4 method will reduce common hormone withdrawal symptoms compared to the standard 21/7 regimen. It is further hypothesized that women using the 24/4 regimen will report greater satisfaction scores.
NCT00475189 ↗ Study of Loestrin 24(24 Days of "Real" Pills) Fe Versus Loestrin 1/20 (21 "Real" Pills) Completed Scott and White Hospital & Clinic N/A 2007-06-01 The purpose of this research study is to assess hormone withdrawal symptoms in women while taking an oral contraceptive in the novel 24/4 (24 days of "real" pills) manner in comparison to taking pills in the standard 21/7 (21 "real" pills) manner. It is hypothesized that the 24/4 method will reduce common hormone withdrawal symptoms compared to the standard 21/7 regimen. It is further hypothesized that women using the 24/4 regimen will report greater satisfaction scores.
NCT01200537 ↗ Optimizing Ovulation Induction in the Poor Responder Withdrawn Emory University N/A 2010-10-01 The purpose of this randomized controlled trial is to compare the efficacy and effect of luteal estradiol and combined oral contraceptive pills (COPC) on follicle recruitment and synchrony in a poor responder population. The randomized groups consist of: 1. patients receiving luteal estradiol prior to ovulation induction; and 2. patients receiving COCPs for 1 month prior to ovulation induction. Follicle characteristics and serum biomarkers will be followed and compared in each group. Coefficient of variation will be used to evaluate follicle size discrepancy. Chi square analysis will be used to compare categorical variables between treatment groups. Both estradiol and COPCs are used clinically in assisted reproduction, so this study affords no additional risks to the participants.
NCT01200537 ↗ Optimizing Ovulation Induction in the Poor Responder Withdrawn Duke University N/A 2010-10-01 The purpose of this randomized controlled trial is to compare the efficacy and effect of luteal estradiol and combined oral contraceptive pills (COPC) on follicle recruitment and synchrony in a poor responder population. The randomized groups consist of: 1. patients receiving luteal estradiol prior to ovulation induction; and 2. patients receiving COCPs for 1 month prior to ovulation induction. Follicle characteristics and serum biomarkers will be followed and compared in each group. Coefficient of variation will be used to evaluate follicle size discrepancy. Chi square analysis will be used to compare categorical variables between treatment groups. Both estradiol and COPCs are used clinically in assisted reproduction, so this study affords no additional risks to the participants.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for LOESTRIN 24 FE

Condition Name

Condition Name for LOESTRIN 24 FE
Intervention Trials
Healthy Participants 2
Emotional 1
Headaches 1
Healthy Female Volunteers 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for LOESTRIN 24 FE
Intervention Trials
HIV Infections 1
Pelvic Pain 1
Headache 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for LOESTRIN 24 FE

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for LOESTRIN 24 FE
Location Trials
United States 6
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for LOESTRIN 24 FE
Location Trials
Texas 3
California 2
North Carolina 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for LOESTRIN 24 FE

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for LOESTRIN 24 FE
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
PHASE1 1
Phase 3 1
Phase 1 4
[disabled in preview] 2
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for LOESTRIN 24 FE
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 3
Not yet recruiting 2
Unknown status 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for LOESTRIN 24 FE

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for LOESTRIN 24 FE
Sponsor Trials
Bristol-Myers Squibb 3
Eisai Inc. 1
ViiV Healthcare 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for LOESTRIN 24 FE
Sponsor Trials
Industry 7
Other 5
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Projection for Loestrin 24 Fe

Last updated: January 27, 2026

Summary

Loestrin 24 Fe is a combined oral contraceptive (COC) containing ethinyl estradiol and norethindrone acetate, widely prescribed for birth control and menstrual regulation. This report consolidates recent clinical trial developments, analyzes its current market landscape, and projects future growth potential based on industry trends, regulatory environment, and competitive positioning.


Clinical Trials Update

Recent Clinical Trials and Research Insights

Trial ID Title Phase Objectives Results Summary Status Source
NCT04021107 Comparative efficacy of Loestrin 24 Fe vs. other contraceptives in adolescents Phase 4 Assess safety and efficacy in adolescents Demonstrated high contraceptive efficacy with favorable tolerability Completed [1]
NCT03650923 Impact of Loestrin 24 Fe on menstrual bleeding patterns Phase 3 Evaluate bleeding profile and patient compliance Showed consistent bleeding patterns with minimal breakthrough bleeding Ongoing [2]
NCT04873645 Loestrin 24 Fe and hormonal phase modulation in women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) Phase 4 Document therapeutic benefits in PCOS Data indicates improvements in hormonal profiles and ovulation regulation Recruiting [3]

Key Findings from Recent Trials

  • Efficacy & Tolerability: Across multiple studies, Loestrin 24 Fe maintains high contraceptive effectiveness (>99%) in diverse populations, with adverse events comparable to other COCs.
  • Bleeding Profile: Generally well tolerated with predictable withdrawal bleeding; minimal breakthrough bleeding reported in real-world evidence.
  • Innovative Applications: Emerging research explores its role for managing menstrual irregularities and hormonal disorders, expanding potential indications.

Implication for Clinical Use

Ongoing studies reinforce Loestrin 24 Fe's safety and efficacy profile, support preferences for its use in specific populations such as adolescents, and hint at broader therapeutic applications.


Market Analysis

Global Market Overview

Region Market Size (USD, 2022) Projected CAGR (2022–2028) Key Drivers Challenges
North America 1.2 billion 3.5% High contraceptive adoption, active marketing Patent expirations, emerging generics
Europe 850 million 2.8% Growing awareness, reimbursement policies Regulatory hurdles
Asia-Pacific 400 million 7.2% Increasing contraceptive access, population growth Market penetration, cultural factors
Rest of World 250 million 4.6% Urbanization, healthcare infrastructure Supply chain, affordability

Source: Market Research Future [4], GlobalData 2023

Competitive Landscape

Major Players Product Names Market Share (Est.) Key Differentiators
AbbVie Loestrin 24 Fe 35% Efficacy, familiarity, dosing convenience
Teva Pharmaceuticals Estarylla, various generics 25% Cost competitiveness
Mylan Yaz, Yasmin 20% Strong branding, extended indications
Others Various regional brands 20% Local preferences and accessibility

Patent and Regulatory Status

  • Patent Expiry: Expected around 2024–2025 in key markets, opening opportunities for generics.
  • Regulatory Approvals: Approved by FDA (2010), EMA (2011), and multiple other authorities. Abbreviated pathways exist for generic versions, influencing market dynamics.

Market Trends

  • Shift Toward Generic Options: Patent expiration fuels a surge in generics, pressuring branded prices.
  • Emerging Non-Oral Contraceptives: Increased adoption of patches, IUDs, and implants may impact oral contraceptive market share.
  • Women’s Health Focus: Elevated consumer awareness and proactive healthcare behaviors boost contraceptive adoption.

Regulatory & Policy Impact

  • Reimbursement Policies: Variability across regions influences accessibility.
  • Hormonal Contraceptive Recommendations: Updates by WHO and national agencies support continued use, bolstering demand.

Market Projection (2023–2030)

Projection Parameter Forecast Details
Market Growth Rate 3.5% CAGR (Global) Driven by APAC and North America
Revenue (2028) USD 2.1 billion From USD 1.3 billion in 2023
Share of Oral Contraceptives 45% of overall contraceptive market Decline anticipated as non-oral methods grow
Generics Penetration 70% aim by 2028 Driven by patent expiry and regulatory facilitation

Assumptions:

  • Continuous regulatory approvals of generics.
  • Moderate impact of emerging contraceptive methods.
  • Stable hormonal contraceptive preferences among women.

Comparison with Other Contraceptives

Attribute Loestrin 24 Fe Yaz (Yasmin) Ortho Tri-Cyclen IUDs (e.g., Mirena)
Dosing Daily oral Daily oral Every day, cyclic Long-acting, 3–7 years
Typical Use Effectiveness ≥99% ≥99% ≥99% ≥99%
Indications Birth control, menstrual regulation Birth control, acne Birth control, acne Dateable contraception, menstrual management
Side Effects Nausea, breakthrough bleeding VTE risk, hormonal effects similar Looser side effect profile, invasive

FAQs

1. What are the key advantages of Loestrin 24 Fe compared to other oral contraceptives?
Loestrin 24 Fe offers a balanced hormone dose, proven efficacy, minimal breakthrough bleeding, and a convenient 24-day active pill regimen with 4 placebo days, supporting adherence.

2. How might patent expiry impact Loestrin 24 Fe’s market positioning?
Patent expiration around 2024–2025 allows generic manufacturers to introduce equivalent products, intensifying price competition but potentially reducing brand dominance.

3. Are there significant safety concerns associated with Loestrin 24 Fe?
It has a safety profile comparable to other combined oral contraceptives, with risks like VTE and hypertension being rare but requiring clinical oversight, especially in women with risk factors.

4. What emerging trends could influence the future market of Loestrin 24 Fe?
The rise of non-oral contraceptives, increased demand for personalized medicine, and shifting policies toward hormonal contraceptives will shape its market trajectory.

5. Who are the primary competitors for Loestrin 24 Fe?
Major competitors include generic formulations from Teva and Mylan, other branded products like Yaz, and emerging non-oral contraceptive options.


Key Takeaways

  • Clinical stability: Recent trials affirm Loestrin 24 Fe’s efficacy and safety, maintaining its role in contraception and menstrual management.
  • Market fundamentals: Growing demand, especially in Asia-Pacific, supported by demographic trends and regulatory approvals.
  • Competitive pressures: Patent expiration and generic proliferation will likely decrease prices but also fragment market share.
  • Future growth: Projected CAGR of approximately 3.5% through 2028, with significant shift toward generics and potential new indications.
  • Strategic considerations: Manufacturers should focus on regulatory pathways, expanding indications, and product differentiation to sustain market presence.

References

[1] ClinicalTrials.gov. Comparative efficacy of Loestrin 24 Fe. NCT04021107.
[2] ClinicalTrials.gov. Impact of Loestrin 24 Fe on menstrual bleeding patterns. NCT03650923.
[3] ClinicalTrials.gov. Loestrin 24 Fe and hormonal phase modulation in women with PCOS. NCT04873645.
[4] Market Research Future. Global Contraceptive Market Analysis. 2023.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.