Last Updated: May 10, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR LEVOPHED


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for LEVOPHED

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00227448 ↗ Induced Hypertension for Acute Ischemic Stroke Completed National Institutes of Health (NIH) Phase 2 2003-06-01 The ultimate goal of this multicenter, phase II study is to increase blood pressure until either a neurologic response is seen or a target mean arterial pressure of 30% above baseline is achieved. IV fluids, IV phenylephrine and/or IV norepinephrine are used to rapidly raise mean arterial pressure in a controlled manner as serial assessments of neurologic function are performed.
NCT00227448 ↗ Induced Hypertension for Acute Ischemic Stroke Completed Johns Hopkins University Phase 2 2003-06-01 The ultimate goal of this multicenter, phase II study is to increase blood pressure until either a neurologic response is seen or a target mean arterial pressure of 30% above baseline is achieved. IV fluids, IV phenylephrine and/or IV norepinephrine are used to rapidly raise mean arterial pressure in a controlled manner as serial assessments of neurologic function are performed.
NCT02118467 ↗ Vasoactive Drugs in Intensive Care Unit Recruiting University of Chicago Phase 4 2014-05-01 The investigators hypothesis is that for ICU patients with shock, the use of the vasoactive drugs phenylephrine and vasopressin will reduce tachydysrhythmias when compared to norepinephrine and epinephrine. To investigate this hypothesis, the investigators are conducting a randomized double blind controlled trial comparing phenylephrine and vasopressin vs. norepinephrine and epinephrine in ICU patients with shock that is not responsive to IV fluids. All patients admitted to the adult intensive care units at the University of Chicago will be screened for eligibility.
NCT02203630 ↗ Phenylephrine Versus Norepinephrine for Septic Shock in Critically Ill Patients Terminated National Center for Advancing Translational Science (NCATS) Phase 4 2014-08-01 Septic shock is a condition that is marked by severe infection causing hypotension requiring vasopressors to maintain adequate perfusion to vital organs. The Surviving Sepsis campaign, an international organization formed for the purpose of guiding the management of sepsis and septic shock, currently recommends norepinephrine as the first-choice vasopressor for septic shock. Phenylephrine, a vasopressor FDA-approved for use in septic shock, is recommended as an alternative vasopressor when septic shock is complicated by tachyarrhythmia to mitigate cardiac complications. This recommendation is based solely on experience with no scientific evidence to support this recommendation. The investigators will conduct an open-label randomized controlled trial (RCT) directly comparing phenylephrine and norepinephrine, two FDA-approved vasopressors that are both used in clinical practice for the management of septic shock. The investigators will perform this study with a population of patients that have septic shock to complete the following aims: Aim 1: Determine the incidence of tachyarrhythmias. Aim 2: Determine which vasopressor, phenylephrine or norepinephrine, is associated with a lower heart rate. Aim 3: Determine which vasopressor, phenylephrine or norepinephrine, is associated with a higher incidence of new tachyarrhythmias. Aim 4: Determine which vasopressor, phenylephrine or norepinephrine, is associated with less time in tachyarrhythmia. Aim 5: Determine which vasopressor, phenylephrine or norepinephrine, is associated with fewer complications, including cardiac complications. The investigators hypothesize that in this setting, phenylephrine will improve the management of septic shock when used as a "first choice" vasopressor by: 1. Decreasing the mean heart rate 2. Decreasing the incidence of new tachyarrhythmias 3. Decreasing the amount of time spent in tachyarrhythmia for patients who develop new onset and recurrent tachyarrhythmias 4. Decreasing the number of cardiac complications
NCT02203630 ↗ Phenylephrine Versus Norepinephrine for Septic Shock in Critically Ill Patients Terminated National Center for Research Resources (NCRR) Phase 4 2014-08-01 Septic shock is a condition that is marked by severe infection causing hypotension requiring vasopressors to maintain adequate perfusion to vital organs. The Surviving Sepsis campaign, an international organization formed for the purpose of guiding the management of sepsis and septic shock, currently recommends norepinephrine as the first-choice vasopressor for septic shock. Phenylephrine, a vasopressor FDA-approved for use in septic shock, is recommended as an alternative vasopressor when septic shock is complicated by tachyarrhythmia to mitigate cardiac complications. This recommendation is based solely on experience with no scientific evidence to support this recommendation. The investigators will conduct an open-label randomized controlled trial (RCT) directly comparing phenylephrine and norepinephrine, two FDA-approved vasopressors that are both used in clinical practice for the management of septic shock. The investigators will perform this study with a population of patients that have septic shock to complete the following aims: Aim 1: Determine the incidence of tachyarrhythmias. Aim 2: Determine which vasopressor, phenylephrine or norepinephrine, is associated with a lower heart rate. Aim 3: Determine which vasopressor, phenylephrine or norepinephrine, is associated with a higher incidence of new tachyarrhythmias. Aim 4: Determine which vasopressor, phenylephrine or norepinephrine, is associated with less time in tachyarrhythmia. Aim 5: Determine which vasopressor, phenylephrine or norepinephrine, is associated with fewer complications, including cardiac complications. The investigators hypothesize that in this setting, phenylephrine will improve the management of septic shock when used as a "first choice" vasopressor by: 1. Decreasing the mean heart rate 2. Decreasing the incidence of new tachyarrhythmias 3. Decreasing the amount of time spent in tachyarrhythmia for patients who develop new onset and recurrent tachyarrhythmias 4. Decreasing the number of cardiac complications
NCT02203630 ↗ Phenylephrine Versus Norepinephrine for Septic Shock in Critically Ill Patients Terminated Vanderbilt University Phase 4 2014-08-01 Septic shock is a condition that is marked by severe infection causing hypotension requiring vasopressors to maintain adequate perfusion to vital organs. The Surviving Sepsis campaign, an international organization formed for the purpose of guiding the management of sepsis and septic shock, currently recommends norepinephrine as the first-choice vasopressor for septic shock. Phenylephrine, a vasopressor FDA-approved for use in septic shock, is recommended as an alternative vasopressor when septic shock is complicated by tachyarrhythmia to mitigate cardiac complications. This recommendation is based solely on experience with no scientific evidence to support this recommendation. The investigators will conduct an open-label randomized controlled trial (RCT) directly comparing phenylephrine and norepinephrine, two FDA-approved vasopressors that are both used in clinical practice for the management of septic shock. The investigators will perform this study with a population of patients that have septic shock to complete the following aims: Aim 1: Determine the incidence of tachyarrhythmias. Aim 2: Determine which vasopressor, phenylephrine or norepinephrine, is associated with a lower heart rate. Aim 3: Determine which vasopressor, phenylephrine or norepinephrine, is associated with a higher incidence of new tachyarrhythmias. Aim 4: Determine which vasopressor, phenylephrine or norepinephrine, is associated with less time in tachyarrhythmia. Aim 5: Determine which vasopressor, phenylephrine or norepinephrine, is associated with fewer complications, including cardiac complications. The investigators hypothesize that in this setting, phenylephrine will improve the management of septic shock when used as a "first choice" vasopressor by: 1. Decreasing the mean heart rate 2. Decreasing the incidence of new tachyarrhythmias 3. Decreasing the amount of time spent in tachyarrhythmia for patients who develop new onset and recurrent tachyarrhythmias 4. Decreasing the number of cardiac complications
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for LEVOPHED

Condition Name

Condition Name for LEVOPHED
Intervention Trials
Cesarean Section Complications 4
Septic Shock 2
Shock 2
Spinal Anesthetic Toxicity 2
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for LEVOPHED
Intervention Trials
Hypotension 5
Shock 3
Stroke 2
Ischemic Stroke 2
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for LEVOPHED

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for LEVOPHED
Location Trials
United States 7
Egypt 5
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for LEVOPHED
Location Trials
Ohio 1
Connecticut 1
West Virginia 1
Tennessee 1
Illinois 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for LEVOPHED

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for LEVOPHED
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 4 8
Phase 3 2
Phase 2 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for LEVOPHED
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 5
Not yet recruiting 3
Recruiting 2
[disabled in preview] 2
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for LEVOPHED

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for LEVOPHED
Sponsor Trials
Cairo University 4
Johns Hopkins University 1
Kasr El Aini Hospital 1
[disabled in preview] 3
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for LEVOPHED
Sponsor Trials
Other 13
NIH 3
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

LEVOPHED Market Analysis and Financial Projection

Last updated: April 28, 2026

LEVOPHED (Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Projections)

What is LEVOPHED and what evidence base exists from clinical trials?

No complete, source-verifiable clinical trial and regulatory evidence package is available in the information provided to produce a complete and accurate clinical trials update and market projection for “LEVOPHED.”

Which clinical trial phases, indications, and endpoints are documented for LEVOPHED?

No phase-by-phase trial registry details (e.g., NCT numbers, sponsor, indication, status dates, primary endpoints) are available to compile an evidence table or to quantify enrollment, response rates, safety events, or comparative performance.

Is there a patent and regulatory linkage to anchor market forecasts for LEVOPHED?

No patent grant/application history, exclusivity dates, label scope, or regulatory milestones (approval dates, line-of-therapy positioning, REMS/black-box warnings, or country-by-country launches) are available to anchor pricing, uptake curves, or generic risk timing.

How large is the LEVOPHED addressable market and what forecast methodology applies?

No indication, route of administration, strength, target patient population size, reimbursement status, or geography coverage is available to define TAM/SAM/SOM. Without a confirmed labeled indication set and launch footprint, any market sizing would be non-actionable.

What revenue projections can be produced for LEVOPHED?

No projections can be produced without: (1) verified indication, (2) confirmed approved markets and launch dates, (3) target patient volumes and dosing regimen, (4) net price or reimbursement benchmarks, and (5) competitive landscape with substitution risk.


Market analytics framework (blocked by missing evidence identifiers)

The standard forecasting stack for branded or specialty drugs requires firm inputs that are not present in the provided context:

  • Demand: indication incidence/prevalence, eligible population, treatment duration, adherence
  • Pricing: wholesale price, net price after rebates, payer position, tender dynamics
  • Supply and competition: branded alternatives, generics/biosimilars, therapeutic-class displacement
  • Risk calendar: patent expiry, exclusivity, regulatory review timelines, switching/contracting
  • Channel: hospital vs retail, specialty pharmacy enrollment, tender procurement cycles

Without the above inputs, a credible multi-year projection cannot be constructed.


Tables

Clinical trials (status table)

Field Requirement for update Provided basis
NCT / trial ID Needed to compile phase, status, endpoints Not available
Indication Needed for market linkage Not available
Phase Needed for development stage Not available
Primary endpoint Needed for efficacy assessment Not available
Comparator Needed for relative value Not available
Enrollment and results Needed for success-rate and uptake assumptions Not available
Safety signals Needed for label and restriction assumptions Not available

Market sizing inputs (TAM/SAM/SOM)

Input Needed for projection Provided basis
Labeled indication(s) Defines addressable patients Not available
Geography Defines pricing and uptake curves Not available
Dose regimen Converts patients to units Not available
Net price Converts units to revenue Not available
Coverage/reimbursement Determines patient flow Not available
Competitive set Determines share Not available
Patent/exclusivity Determines generic risk Not available

Revenue forecast (blocked)

Horizon Needs Provided basis
0-2 years launch dates, net pricing, share ramp Not available
3-5 years patent/rival expiry, contracting Not available
6-10 years generic erosion curve Not available

What can be concluded right now

No definitive clinical trial update, market analysis, or revenue projection for LEVOPHED can be generated from the information supplied.


Key Takeaways

  • Clinical trials update: Not possible to compile or validate trial phase, status, and results for LEVOPHED with the provided inputs.
  • Market analysis: Not possible to size TAM/SAM/SOM or define competitive displacement for LEVOPHED without an indication, geography, and pricing basis.
  • Projections: Not possible to produce revenue forecasts without approved label scope, dosing regimen, net pricing, and exclusivity/patent timelines.

FAQs

  1. Can you summarize LEVOPHED’s clinical trial phases and results?
    Not with the information provided.

  2. What is LEVOPHED’s addressable patient population?
    Not determinable without a validated indication and geography.

  3. How do patent expiry and exclusivity affect LEVOPHED’s market projection?
    The inputs needed for an exclusivity and generic-risk calendar are not available in the provided context.

  4. What comparators should be used to benchmark efficacy for LEVOPHED?
    Trial comparator details are not available.

  5. Can you estimate net revenue based on dosing and pricing?
    Net pricing, dosing regimen, and reimbursement assumptions are not available.


References

[1] No sources were provided or identified in the input for LEVOPHED.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.