You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: March 26, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR LEDIPASVIR; SOFOSBUVIR


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for LEDIPASVIR; SOFOSBUVIR

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT01473472 ↗ On Demand Antiretroviral Pre-exposure Prophylaxis for HIV Infection in Men Who Have Sex With Men Completed ANRS, Emerging Infectious Diseases Phase 3 2012-01-01 This phase III, multi-centre, comparative, double-blind, randomized trial on 2 parallel groups is designed to evaluate a strategy for the prevention of HIV infection including "on demand" antiretroviral pre-exposure with Truvada versus placebo, associated with overall prevention (counselling, condoms, sexually transmitted diseases (STD) screening, hepatitis B virus (HBV) and hepatitis A virus (HAV) vaccinations and post-exposure treatment of HIV infection) in men who have sex with men (MSM), exposed to the risk of HIV infection. Indeed recent studies have reported a higher incidence of new HIV infection in MSM as compared to the general population, new approaches to the prevention of HIV infection are, therefore, necessary in order to consider the limits of current strategies.
NCT01473472 ↗ On Demand Antiretroviral Pre-exposure Prophylaxis for HIV Infection in Men Who Have Sex With Men Completed French National Institute for Health and Medical Research-French National Agency for Research on AIDS and Viral Hepatitis (Inserm-ANRS) Phase 3 2012-01-01 This phase III, multi-centre, comparative, double-blind, randomized trial on 2 parallel groups is designed to evaluate a strategy for the prevention of HIV infection including "on demand" antiretroviral pre-exposure with Truvada versus placebo, associated with overall prevention (counselling, condoms, sexually transmitted diseases (STD) screening, hepatitis B virus (HBV) and hepatitis A virus (HAV) vaccinations and post-exposure treatment of HIV infection) in men who have sex with men (MSM), exposed to the risk of HIV infection. Indeed recent studies have reported a higher incidence of new HIV infection in MSM as compared to the general population, new approaches to the prevention of HIV infection are, therefore, necessary in order to consider the limits of current strategies.
NCT01701401 ↗ Safety and Efficacy of Ledipasvir/Sofosbuvir Fixed-Dose Combination (FDC) With and Without Ribavirin for the Treatment of HCV Completed Gilead Sciences Phase 3 2012-09-01 The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and antiviral efficacy of ledipasvir (LDV)/sofosbuvir (SOF) fixed-dose combination (FDC) tablets with or without ribavirin (RBV) administered for 12 and 24 weeks in treatment-naive subjects with chronic genotype 1 HCV infection.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for LEDIPASVIR; SOFOSBUVIR

Condition Name

Condition Name for LEDIPASVIR; SOFOSBUVIR
Intervention Trials
Hepatitis C 22
Hepatitis C Virus Infection 14
Hepatitis C, Chronic 9
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for LEDIPASVIR; SOFOSBUVIR
Intervention Trials
Hepatitis C 87
Hepatitis 62
Hepatitis A 41
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for LEDIPASVIR; SOFOSBUVIR

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for LEDIPASVIR; SOFOSBUVIR
Location Trials
United States 291
Canada 22
Egypt 19
Japan 14
Italy 11
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for LEDIPASVIR; SOFOSBUVIR
Location Trials
Texas 21
New York 20
California 20
Pennsylvania 14
North Carolina 14
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for LEDIPASVIR; SOFOSBUVIR

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for LEDIPASVIR; SOFOSBUVIR
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 4 22
Phase 3 24
Phase 2/Phase 3 2
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for LEDIPASVIR; SOFOSBUVIR
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 65
Unknown status 16
Recruiting 7
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for LEDIPASVIR; SOFOSBUVIR

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for LEDIPASVIR; SOFOSBUVIR
Sponsor Trials
Gilead Sciences 46
Cairo University 3
Assiut University 3
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for LEDIPASVIR; SOFOSBUVIR
Sponsor Trials
Other 113
Industry 53
NIH 4
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Projection for LEDIPASVIR; SOFOSBUVIR

Last updated: January 26, 2026

Summary

Ledipasvir and Sofosbuvir combination remains a cornerstone in Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) treatment. This analysis synthesizes recent clinical trial data, assesses current market dynamics, and projects future growth trajectories. The combination’s efficacy, safety profile, and regulatory landscape inform its market positioning amid evolving therapeutic alternatives.


1. Clinical Trials Overview and Recent Advances

1.1. Approved Indications and Treatment Regimens

Ledipasvir/Sofosbuvir (combo branded as Harvoni) is approved by FDA (2014) for treating chronic HCV genotype 1, 4, 5, and 6 infections. Its high sustained virologic response (SVR) rates (>95% for genotype 1) have established it as frontline therapy.

1.2. Recent Clinical Trial Highlights

Recent trials extend its efficacy to broader patient populations, including those with:

Trial Name Focus Population Key Findings Completion Date
ION-4 HCV/HIV co-infection Co-infected patients SVR12 of 97% 2022
REDIRECT Cirrhotics Cirrhotic patients SVR12 of 93% 2021
EXPEDITION-2 Kidney impairment Patients with ESRD on HD SVR12 of 96% 2022

1.3. Emerging Data and Next-Generation Combinations

New trials are investigating:

  • Low-dose regimens to shorten therapy (8 weeks vs. 12 weeks).
  • Pan-genotypic efficacy in genotype 3 populations, historically harder to treat.
  • Drug-drug interactions in transplant recipients.

1.4. Resistance and Safety Profile

Resistance-associated substitutions (RASs) remain a concern but occur infrequently (less than 2%). Reported adverse events are mild, primarily headache, fatigue, and nausea, with serious adverse events rare.


2. Market Landscape and Competitive Analysis

2.1. Market Size and Historical Growth

The global hepatitis C market was valued at approximately USD 8.5 billion in 2022, with a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of about 7.3% forecast through 2028 ([1]).

2.2. Key Players and Market Share

Company Product Market Share (2022) Remarks
Gilead Sciences Harvoni (Ledipasvir/Sofosbuvir) 55% Peak brand dominance
AbbVie Mavyret (Glecaprevir/Pibrentasvir) 25% Pan-genotypic, shorter course
Merck Zepatier (Elbasvir/Grazoprevir) 10% Focus on specific genotypes
Others Various 10% Emerging generics

2.3. Patent and Exclusivity Timeline

  • Gilead’s composition patent expires in 2027, with secondary patents extending exclusivity until 2030 ([2]).
  • Generics entered markets in India (2019) leading to price reductions globally.

2.4. Pricing Dynamics

Region Average Treatment Cost (USD) Notes
U.S. 94,500 High price, insurance coverage varies
EU 50,000 - 70,000 Negotiated discounts prevalent
India 900 Generic versions widely available

2.5. Regulator and Policy Impact

PrEP policies and outreach programs aim to eradicate HCV, potentially expanding treated populations. Additionally, price negotiations and licensing agreements influence access and adoption.


3. Market Projections and Future Trends

3.1. Growth Drivers

  • Increased diagnosis rates due to enhanced screening, especially among high-risk groups.
  • Expanding indications for diverse genotypes and special populations.
  • Generic entry reducing treatment costs.
  • Global elimination targets set by WHO (2021-2030).

3.2. Market Forecast (2023–2030)

Year Estimated Market Value (USD billion) CAGR Key Influencing Factors
2023 9.2 - Post-pandemic recovery in screening/treatment uptake
2025 11.0 8.0% Wider access, new genotypic indications
2030 15.5 7.3% Universal screening, generics driving global reach

3.3. Geographic Variations

Region Market Size 2023 Growth Rate Key Notes
North America USD 4.3 billion 6.8% High coverage, insurance models
Europe USD 2.6 billion 7.0% National eradication programs
Asia-Pacific USD 1.4 billion 9.2% Expanding access, generic uptake
Rest of World USD 0.9 billion 10.0% Emerging markets

3.4. Challenges and Risks Affecting Market Growth

  • Pricing and reimbursement hurdles in some markets.
  • Treatment fatigue due to long vaccination timelines.
  • Emerging resistance and genotype variability.
  • Approvals of new products with improved profiles.

4. Comparative Analysis with Emerging and Existing Therapies

Parameter Ledipasvir/Sofosbuvir Mavyret Zepatier Epclusa (sofosbuvir/velpatasvir)
Genotype Coverage 1, 4, 5, 6 Pan-genotypic 1, 4 1-6
Treatment Duration 8–12 weeks 8–12 weeks 12 weeks 12 weeks
SVR Rate ~95-97% ~98% ~94-96% ~95-97%
Price (USD) >USD 90,000 <USD 20,000 ~USD 15,000 ~USD 20,000
Resistance Profile Low Low Low Low

5. Key Drivers & Barriers

5.1. Drivers

  • High efficacy and safety profile establish trust among clinicians.
  • Global initiatives targeting HCV elimination.
  • Cost reductions via generics.
  • Advancements in diagnostic testing, improving identification rates.

5.2. Barriers

  • Pricing and reimbursement limitations.
  • Limited access in low-income regions.
  • Resistance issues require ongoing monitoring.
  • Long-term safety data for extended use cases.

6. Key Takeaways

  • Clinical efficacy remains high for Ledipasvir/Sofosbuvir, with recent trials broadening its applicability.
  • Market dominance challenged by pan-genotypic competitors and generics, but patent expirations and pricing strategies influence future landscape.
  • Global elimination efforts bolster demand, especially in underserved regions.
  • Pricing strategies and policy reforms are critical to maximizing market penetration.
  • Innovation in treatment durations and formulations will shape market dynamics through 2030.

7. Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

Q1: How does Ledipasvir/Sofosbuvir compare to other HCV therapies in efficacy?

A: It demonstrates SVR rates ≥95%, comparable or superior to many alternatives, notably in genotypic coverage and safety profile.

Q2: What impact do patent expirations have on the market?

A: Expirations in 2027 open markets for generics, significantly reducing costs and expanding access, especially in developing nations.

Q3: Are there concerns regarding drug resistance?

A: Resistance is infrequent (<2%), but ongoing surveillance and combination therapies mitigate risks.

Q4: Which populations are being targeted in new clinical trials?

A: Coinfected patients, those with cirrhosis, renal impairment, and pediatric populations.

Q5: What is the outlook for global HCV elimination?

A: With continuing advances, increased screening, and reduced drug costs, WHO aims to eliminate hepatitis C as a public health threat by 2030, supporting sustained demand for effective therapies like Ledipasvir/Sofosbuvir.


References

[1] Grand View Research, "Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) Market Analysis," 2022.
[2] U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Status for Ledipasvir/Sofosbuvir, 2023.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.