You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 31, 2025

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR LAMIVUDINE, NEVIRAPINE AND ZIDOVUDINE


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for LAMIVUDINE, NEVIRAPINE AND ZIDOVUDINE

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00000896 ↗ A Study to Compare the Effectiveness of a Four Drug Anti-HIV Regimen Given Alone or in Combination With GM-CSF or IL-12 to HIV-Positive Patients Completed National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) N/A 1969-12-31 The purpose of this study is to examine how the level of HIV is reduced in the blood when anti-HIV therapy is initiated. This study will also evaluate whether adding GM-CSF or IL-12 to the anti-HIV drug regimen will increase the rate that HIV is reduced. The anti-HIV drugs used in this study will include lamivudine (3TC), zidovudine (ZDV), indinavir (IDV), nevirapine (NVP), and stavudine (d4T). All have been used successfully to treat HIV. GM-CSF has been used to treat certain blood disorders; it will be used as an experimental drug in this study. IL-12 (interleukin-12) is a protein found naturally in the body that is thought to boost the immune system. Although GM-CSF and IL-12 have no direct effect against HIV, these drugs may improve the ability of the immune system to fight the virus.
NCT00000902 ↗ A Study on the Management of Combination Anti-HIV Drug Therapy in HIV-Positive Children With Prior Treatment Completed National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) Phase 1 1969-12-31 The purpose of this study is to determine the value of changing anti-HIV medications in children with progressive HIV disease who have received previous treatment. Plasma viral load (the level of HIV in the blood) is probably most effectively reduced by giving patients anti-HIV drugs which affect the virus at various stages of development. Changing the medications may enhance the results of treatment.
NCT00001083 ↗ Comparison of New Anti-HIV Drug Combinations in HIV-Infected Children Who Have Taken Anti-HIV Drugs Completed National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) Phase 2 1969-12-31 For PRAM-1: To evaluate zidovudine (ZDV) + lamivudine (3TC) vs. stavudine (d4T) + ritonavir vs. ZDV + 3TC + ritonavir with respect to the change in plasma HIV-1 RNA copy number from baseline to 48 weeks [AS PER AMENDMENT 1/5/98: 72 weeks; AS PER AMENDMENT 7/17/98: 48 weeks] in stable HIV-infected children with >= 16 weeks of prior continuous antiretroviral therapy. To evaluate the safety and tolerance of ZDV + 3TC vs. d4T + ritonavir vs. ZDV + 3TC + ritonavir based upon laboratory and clinical toxicities. AS PER AMENDMENT 10/20/97: For PRAM-1, Step 2: To evaluate d4T + nevirapine + ritonavir with respect to change in plasma HIV-1 RNA copy number from baseline to 48 weeks in children who have received at least 12 weeks of therapy on the PRAM-1 ZDV/3TC arm and have over 10,000 viral copies at weeks 12, 24, or 36. To evaluate the safety and tolerance of d4T + nevirapine + ritonavir based upon laboratory and clinical toxicities. [AS PER AMENDMENT 10/23/98: To evaluate safety and tolerance of a switch from d4T + ritonavir vs. ZDV + 3TC + ritonavir to d4T + indinavir vs. ZDV + 3TC + indinavir in stable, HIV-infected children with RNA values = 10,000 the opportunity to change to a novel therapeutic regimen (d4T + nevirapine + ritonavir).
NCT00001085 ↗ A Study of 141W94 Used Alone or in Combination With Zidovudine Plus 3TC in HIV-Infected Patients Completed National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) Phase 2 1969-12-31 To determine the proportion of patients whose plasma HIV-1 RNA level remains below a detectable level (less than 500/ml) after 24 weeks of study therapy with either 141W94 monotherapy or 141W94 plus zidovudine (ZDV) and lamivudine (3TC). To determine the safety and tolerability of 141W94 monotherapy and the combination of 141W94 plus 3TC in patients with HIV infection. Although dramatic inhibition of HIV-1 replication is achieved with ritonavir or indinavir monotherapy, in both cases maximum suppression required combination treatment together with nucleoside analog RT inhibitors. This study tests the hypothesis that monotherapy with 141W94 doses that result in Cmin levels far in excess of the IC90 corrected for plasma protein binding for HIV-1 can achieve the same virologic and immunologic effects in terms of magnitude and durability, as has been observed with combinations of other protease inhibitors plus nucleoside analogs.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for LAMIVUDINE, NEVIRAPINE AND ZIDOVUDINE

Condition Name

Condition Name for LAMIVUDINE, NEVIRAPINE AND ZIDOVUDINE
Intervention Trials
HIV Infections 29
HIV 8
HIV Infection 2
NVP Plasma Level 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for LAMIVUDINE, NEVIRAPINE AND ZIDOVUDINE
Intervention Trials
HIV Infections 32
Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome 7
Infections 6
Infection 5
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for LAMIVUDINE, NEVIRAPINE AND ZIDOVUDINE

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for LAMIVUDINE, NEVIRAPINE AND ZIDOVUDINE
Location Trials
United States 132
South Africa 15
Thailand 10
India 9
Canada 7
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for LAMIVUDINE, NEVIRAPINE AND ZIDOVUDINE
Location Trials
California 10
Florida 8
New York 8
Illinois 7
Texas 7
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for LAMIVUDINE, NEVIRAPINE AND ZIDOVUDINE

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for LAMIVUDINE, NEVIRAPINE AND ZIDOVUDINE
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 4 9
Phase 3 14
Phase 2/Phase 3 3
[disabled in preview] 9
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for LAMIVUDINE, NEVIRAPINE AND ZIDOVUDINE
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 39
Unknown status 3
Terminated 2
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for LAMIVUDINE, NEVIRAPINE AND ZIDOVUDINE

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for LAMIVUDINE, NEVIRAPINE AND ZIDOVUDINE
Sponsor Trials
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) 17
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD) 9
Boehringer Ingelheim 4
[disabled in preview] 3
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for LAMIVUDINE, NEVIRAPINE AND ZIDOVUDINE
Sponsor Trials
Other 55
NIH 28
Industry 13
[disabled in preview] 2
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Projection for Lamivudine, Nevirapine, and Zidovudine

Last updated: October 29, 2025

Introduction

Lamivudine, Nevirapine, and Zidovudine are cornerstone antiretroviral drugs employed primarily in the management of Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) infections. These agents form part of combination regimens that optimize viral suppression, enhance patient outcomes, and mitigate resistance development. This article provides a comprehensive update on the clinical trial landscape, market dynamics, and future projections for these drugs, essential for stakeholders in pharmaceuticals, healthcare policy, and investment.


Clinical Trials Landscape for Lamivudine, Nevirapine, and Zidovudine

Current Clinical Trial Focus

Recent clinical trial activity primarily targets several key areas:

  • Drug efficacy in combination therapies: Trials assess optimized regimens incorporating these agents to improve viral suppression and reduce adverse effects [1].
  • Drug resistance studies: Investigations aim to understand resistance mechanisms, particularly in the context of widespread long-term use [2].
  • New formulations and delivery systems: Advances include fixed-dose combinations, long-acting injectables, and formulations suitable for pediatric or resource-limited settings.
  • Safety and tolerability: Ongoing studies focus on long-term safety, particularly hepatotoxicity with Nevirapine and hematologic effects with Zidovudine.
  • Treatment in special populations: Trials evaluate pediatric, pregnant, and co-infected populations.

Notable Clinical Trials

  • Lamivudine: Recent trials explored its efficacy when combined with Tenofovir or Emtricitabine in fixed-dose combinations, showing comparable or superior viral suppression with favorable safety profiles [3].
  • Nevirapine: Multiple studies examine its use in pregnancy to prevent mother-to-child transmission and explore resistance patterns post-exposure [4].
  • Zidovudine: Clinical efforts investigate its role in initial therapy, especially in low-resource settings due to cost advantages, with ongoing assessments of toxicity and long-term outcomes [5].

Emerging Trends

The pivot towards integrase strand transfer inhibitors (e.g., Dolutegravir) has led to reduced reliance on Zidovudine and Nevirapine, but these drugs remain critical where access to newer agents is limited.


Market Analysis

Global Market Dynamics

The global antiretroviral drugs market has experienced consistent growth driven by:

  • Rising HIV prevalence: Approximately 38 million people worldwide live with HIV, with significant treatment gaps in sub-Saharan Africa [6].
  • Expanding ART coverage: UNAIDS reports over 28 million on antiretroviral therapy (ART), fueling demand for existing drugs like Lamivudine, Nevirapine, and Zidovudine, especially in low-income countries [7].
  • Generic manufacturing: The proliferation of generics has made these drugs more accessible and affordable, particularly in developing nations.

Regional Market Breakdown

  • North America and Europe: Market share primarily from established regimens, with declining utilization of Zidovudine and Nevirapine due to newer agents.
  • Africa and Asia-Pacific: Heavy reliance on Zidovudine and Nevirapine, owing to cost-effectiveness and existing infrastructure.
  • Emerging markets: Increasing adoption of combination pills containing these drugs due to policy shifts and clinical guidelines endorsing their use.

Competitive Landscape

Major pharmaceutical players like Gilead Sciences, Viiv Healthcare, and generic drug manufacturers dominate the market. Patent expirations and the push for affordable generics have intensified competition, leading to lower prices and expanded access.


Market Projection

Short-term Outlook (Next 3-5 Years)

  • Decline in demand for Zidovudine and Nevirapine in high-income regions: As newer agents with better tolerability and less resistance emerge, market share diminishes.
  • Sustained demand in low-resource settings: Continued reliance on these drugs due to affordability and existing supply chains.
  • Innovation in formulations: Fixed-dose combinations incorporating these drugs will maintain relevance, especially in pediatric and pregnancy indications.

Long-term Outlook (Beyond 5 Years)

  • Gradual phase-out in favor of newer agents: Introduction of long-acting injectables (e.g., Cabotegravir) and integrase inhibitors will likely reduce the use of Zidovudine and Nevirapine [8].
  • Market stabilization in underserved markets: As access expands, the demand for generics containing these drugs will persist.
  • Potential repurposing opportunities: Ongoing research may identify new therapeutic roles, potentially broadening market scope.

Market Valuation Estimates

Analysts project the global antiretroviral drugs market to reach approximately USD 30 billion by 2027, with Lamivudine, Nevirapine, and Zidovudine collectively constituting about 10-15% of the market share, primarily driven by demand in emerging regions [9].


Strategic Implications

  • For Pharmaceutical Developers: Focus on novel formulations, fan-out of combination therapies, and formulation innovations to extend lifecycle.
  • For Policymakers and NGOs: Emphasize access programs for low-income populations, leveraging cost-effective generics.
  • For Investors: Target emerging markets and companies innovating in drug delivery systems, while monitoring patent expiration timelines.

Key Takeaways

  • Clinical trials increasingly explore combinational efficacy, resistance, and safety profiles for Lamivudine, Nevirapine, and Zidovudine.
  • Supply and demand dynamics are heavily influenced by regional economic factors, healthcare infrastructure, and evolving treatment guidelines.
  • While high-income countries are transitioning toward newer antiretrovirals, low-resource settings continue to rely on these legacy drugs.
  • Long-term projections suggest a gradual decline in market share for Zidovudine and Nevirapine, supplanted by long-acting and integrase inhibitor therapies.
  • Stakeholders should adapt by investing in formulation innovation, expanding access, and monitoring emerging clinical evidence favoring newer agents.

FAQs

1. Are Lamivudine, Nevirapine, and Zidovudine still the first-line treatments for HIV?
While these drugs have historically been frontline options, global guidelines favor newer agents like Dolutegravir-based regimens due to better tolerability, fewer resistance issues, and simplified dosing. However, they remain important in resource-limited settings.

2. What are the primary safety concerns associated with these drugs?
Zidovudine can cause hematologic toxicity, Nevirapine is associated with hepatotoxicity and severe skin reactions, and Lamivudine generally exhibits favorable safety but can still cause minor side effects.

3. How are clinical trials shaping future use?
Trials exploring fixed-dose combinations and long-acting formulations aim to improve adherence and reduce side effects, potentially extending the relevance of these drugs in combination regimens.

4. What is the impact of patent expirations on these drugs?
Patent expirations facilitate generic manufacturing, significantly reducing costs, increasing accessibility, and leading to a broader market presence predominantly in developing countries.

5. Will these drugs be replaced entirely in the future?
Complete replacement is unlikely in the near term, especially in low-resource settings with limited access to newer agents. However, their role will diminish as newer drugs become more affordable and widely available.


References

[1] World Health Organization. (2022). Consolidated guidelines on HIV prevention, testing, treatment, service delivery and monitoring.
[2] Rhee, S. Y., et al. (2015). THE ROLE OF HIV RESISTANCE MUTATIONS IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF TREATMENT FAILURE. J Infect Dis.
[3] Smith, K. et al. (2021). Efficacy of fixed-dose combination antiretroviral therapy in HIV treatment. Lancet Infect Dis.
[4] Patel, P. et al. (2020). Nevirapine use in pregnant women: Resistance and safety profile. AIDS.
[5] WHO. (2018). HIV/AIDS treatment guidelines in low-resource settings.
[6] UNAIDS. (2022). Global HIV & AIDS statistics — 2022 fact sheet.
[7] UNAIDS. (2022). Global HIV Treatment Coverage.
[8] Ford, N., et al. (2019). Long-acting injectable antiretrovirals for HIV treatment. Clin Infect Dis.
[9] MarketsandMarkets. (2022). Antiretroviral drugs market forecast.


This comprehensive review provides stakeholders with a strategic understanding of current clinical investments, market positioning, and future trajectory for Lamivudine, Nevirapine, and Zidovudine, facilitating informed decision-making.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.