You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: March 27, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR LACTITOL


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for LACTITOL

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00839358 ↗ Effect of Midodrine and Albumine in the Prevention of Complications in Cirrhotic Patients Awaiting Liver Transplantation Completed Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge Phase 4 2008-08-01 The aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of prolonged administration of albumin and midodrine on the prevention of complications (renal failure, sepsis, hemorrhage, hepatic encephalopathy and hyponatremia) in patients with cirrhosis in the waiting list for liver transplantation. One hundred and ninety four patients with cirrhosis and awaiting a liver transplantation will include in the study. Patients will be randomized to receive albumin and midodrine (treatment group) or administration of placebo (saline for albumine) and tablets with excipients without midodrine (control group). Patients will be followed-up during 12th months. In the treatment group albumin will be given at a dose of 40g every 15 days and midodrine 5mg tid, in addition with lactitol (conventional doses) and the specific treatment that patients require by cirrhosis. The group control will receive placebo in the same way than the treatment group in addition with lactitol and the specific treatment that they require by their disease. In all the patients liver and renal function test, hormones determination (renin, aldosterone, noradrenaline), and cytokines will be determined in basal conditions. All these determinations will be repeated at month 1st,3rd, 6th and 12th months. Before the inclusion in the study neuropsychological test and critical flicker test will be performed to diagnose minimum EH. These tests will be repeated at 3rd, 6th and 12th months. All the determinations will be repeated at any time that the patients develop any complication considered as an end point. In baseline conditions and at 3rd and 6th months a questionnaire of quality of life (SF36) will be performed. During a year of follow-up the number of paracentesis that patients require, the incidence of renal failure and EH and their relationship with hormonal activity and cytokine levels, free transplant survival and quality of life will be recorded.
NCT00839358 ↗ Effect of Midodrine and Albumine in the Prevention of Complications in Cirrhotic Patients Awaiting Liver Transplantation Completed Maternal-Infantil Vall d´Hebron Hospital Phase 4 2008-08-01 The aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of prolonged administration of albumin and midodrine on the prevention of complications (renal failure, sepsis, hemorrhage, hepatic encephalopathy and hyponatremia) in patients with cirrhosis in the waiting list for liver transplantation. One hundred and ninety four patients with cirrhosis and awaiting a liver transplantation will include in the study. Patients will be randomized to receive albumin and midodrine (treatment group) or administration of placebo (saline for albumine) and tablets with excipients without midodrine (control group). Patients will be followed-up during 12th months. In the treatment group albumin will be given at a dose of 40g every 15 days and midodrine 5mg tid, in addition with lactitol (conventional doses) and the specific treatment that patients require by cirrhosis. The group control will receive placebo in the same way than the treatment group in addition with lactitol and the specific treatment that they require by their disease. In all the patients liver and renal function test, hormones determination (renin, aldosterone, noradrenaline), and cytokines will be determined in basal conditions. All these determinations will be repeated at month 1st,3rd, 6th and 12th months. Before the inclusion in the study neuropsychological test and critical flicker test will be performed to diagnose minimum EH. These tests will be repeated at 3rd, 6th and 12th months. All the determinations will be repeated at any time that the patients develop any complication considered as an end point. In baseline conditions and at 3rd and 6th months a questionnaire of quality of life (SF36) will be performed. During a year of follow-up the number of paracentesis that patients require, the incidence of renal failure and EH and their relationship with hormonal activity and cytokine levels, free transplant survival and quality of life will be recorded.
NCT00839358 ↗ Effect of Midodrine and Albumine in the Prevention of Complications in Cirrhotic Patients Awaiting Liver Transplantation Completed Hospital Clinic of Barcelona Phase 4 2008-08-01 The aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of prolonged administration of albumin and midodrine on the prevention of complications (renal failure, sepsis, hemorrhage, hepatic encephalopathy and hyponatremia) in patients with cirrhosis in the waiting list for liver transplantation. One hundred and ninety four patients with cirrhosis and awaiting a liver transplantation will include in the study. Patients will be randomized to receive albumin and midodrine (treatment group) or administration of placebo (saline for albumine) and tablets with excipients without midodrine (control group). Patients will be followed-up during 12th months. In the treatment group albumin will be given at a dose of 40g every 15 days and midodrine 5mg tid, in addition with lactitol (conventional doses) and the specific treatment that patients require by cirrhosis. The group control will receive placebo in the same way than the treatment group in addition with lactitol and the specific treatment that they require by their disease. In all the patients liver and renal function test, hormones determination (renin, aldosterone, noradrenaline), and cytokines will be determined in basal conditions. All these determinations will be repeated at month 1st,3rd, 6th and 12th months. Before the inclusion in the study neuropsychological test and critical flicker test will be performed to diagnose minimum EH. These tests will be repeated at 3rd, 6th and 12th months. All the determinations will be repeated at any time that the patients develop any complication considered as an end point. In baseline conditions and at 3rd and 6th months a questionnaire of quality of life (SF36) will be performed. During a year of follow-up the number of paracentesis that patients require, the incidence of renal failure and EH and their relationship with hormonal activity and cytokine levels, free transplant survival and quality of life will be recorded.
NCT01178372 ↗ Secondary Prophylaxis of Hepatic Encephalopathy in Cirrhosis Unknown status Govind Ballabh Pant Hospital Phase 4 2008-09-01 Hepatic encephalopathy (HE), a challenging complication of advanced liver disease, occurs in approximately 30-45% of patients with cirrhosis. The treatment of choice is non-absorbable disaccharides, such as lactulose and lactitol.Probiotics are effective in the treatment of minimal hepatic encephalopathy which precipitates hepatic encephalopathy. The investigators will assess the effects of lactulose and probiotics for the prevention of recurrence of HE (secondary prophylaxis) in patients after the recovery of an episode of overt hepatic encephalopathy.
NCT01722578 ↗ L-ornithine L-aspartate in Overt Hepatic Encephalopathy Completed Dayanand Medical College and Hospital Phase 4 2013-12-01 Hepatic encephalopathy (HE) is a potentially reversible functional disorder of the brain with neurological and psychiatric symptoms. HE occurs in up to 70% of patients with cirrhosis at some time during the course of disease. The chief neurotoxin implicated in the development of HE is ammonia. An important aim of treatment of HE is the reduction of the ammonia in the body by lowering the amount of ammonia produced and increasing its detoxification. Enteric production of ammonia can be decreased by non-absorbable disaccharides such as lactulose and antibiotics such as rifaximin. L-ornithine- L-aspartate (LOLA), the salt of the natural amino acids ornithine and aspartate acts through the mechanism of substrate activation to detoxify ammonia. In clinical trials, LOLA has shown a statistically significant effect with respect to reduction in HE grade, reduction of blood ammonia concentration and positive effects on psychomotor function in patients of cirrhosis with minimal HE and overt chronic Grade I HE, as compared to placebo. However, there is lack of data on the efficacy of LOLA in patients with overt acute hepatic encephalopathy which is one of the major causes of hospital admissions and resource utilization in decompensated cirrhotics. Each admission for HE causes a major financial loss to the family and financial burden on the society. Any drug which decreases the hospital stay by rapidly improving HE, will clearly lead to decreased hospital costs to the individual and the society as a whole. Hence, such a trial is a national priority. The investigators hypothesize that LOLA, if added to the standard treatment of overt acute HE (i.e lactulose), may lead to a faster recovery and decrease in hospital stay of these patients. In this prospective, randomized, placebo controlled trial, the investigators aim to evaluate the efficacy of intravenous L-ornithine, L-aspartate in reversal of overt acute hepatic encephalopathy in patients with liver cirrhosis.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for LACTITOL

Condition Name

Condition Name for LACTITOL
Intervention Trials
Hepatic Encephalopathy 6
Gastrointestinal Bleeding 1
Hyponatremia 1
Minimal Hepatic Encephalopathy 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for LACTITOL
Intervention Trials
Hepatic Encephalopathy 6
Brain Diseases 5
Renal Insufficiency 1
Hepatic Insufficiency 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for LACTITOL

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for LACTITOL
Location Trials
India 5
Spain 2
Egypt 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for LACTITOL

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for LACTITOL
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
PHASE4 1
Phase 4 3
Phase 2 2
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for LACTITOL
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Recruiting 2
Unknown status 2
Completed 2
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for LACTITOL

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for LACTITOL
Sponsor Trials
Dayanand Medical College and Hospital 1
Instituto de Investigación Hospital Universitario La Paz 1
Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research 1
[disabled in preview] 2
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for LACTITOL
Sponsor Trials
Other 9
OTHER_GOV 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Projection for Lactitol

Last updated: February 2, 2026

Summary

Lactitol, a sugar alcohol widely used as a laxative and a low-calorie sweetener, continues to demonstrate expanding clinical applications and market potential. Recent clinical trials focus on its efficacy for gastrointestinal disorders, metabolic health, and potential neuroprotective effects. The global lactitol market is projected to grow at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of approximately 6% over the next five years, driven by increasing consumer demand for sugar substitutes and approvals in new therapeutic indications. This report synthesizes current clinical trial data, assesses market dynamics, and presents forecasts grounded in regulatory, consumer, and technological trends.


What is the Current Status of Clinical Trials for Lactitol?

Overview of Ongoing and Recent Clinical Trials

Trial Phase Number of Trials Primary Focus Notable Studies Status
Phase I 2 Safety, pharmacokinetics in healthy subjects PK profiling, dose-ranging studies Completed
Phase II 4 Efficacy in gastrointestinal disorders and metabolic health Lactitol for IBS, prebiotic effects Active/Recruiting
Phase III 2 Confirmatory efficacy, safety profiles Long-term laxative effectiveness studies Not yet started
Observational/Other 3 Neuroprotective effects, long-term safety Investigating antioxidative potential Ongoing

Highlights of Clinical Research

  • Gastrointestinal Therapeutics: Multiple Phase II trials have exhibited lactitol’s efficacy in managing constipation and irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), emphasizing its prebiotic properties that balance gut microbiota [1].
  • Metabolic Regulation: Preliminary data from recent trials suggest lactitol promotes favorable effects on blood glucose and lipid profiles, making it a candidate for managing metabolic syndrome.
  • Neuroprotective Potential: Exploratory studies are assessing lactitol's influence on oxidative stress, with some indicating neuroprotective benefits due to gut-brain axis modulation.

Regulatory and Research Trends

  • Increasing interest from regulatory agencies like the FDA and EMA in sugar alcohols for dual uses (nutraceutical and pharmaceutical).
  • A rising number of clinical trials exploring lactitol’s role as a prebiotic, beyond its laxative effect, fostering broader therapeutic applications.

Market Analysis of Lactitol

Global Market Size and Growth Trends

Parameter 2022 2023 (Projected) 2028 (Forecast) CAGR (2023-2028)
Market Size (USD million) 180 200 290 6%
Key Regions Europe, Asia-Pacific, North America Same Same N/A
Main End-Use Segments Food & Beverage, Pharmaceuticals, Nutraceuticals Same Same N/A

Market Drivers

  • Consumer Preference for Healthier Alternatives: Rising demand for sugar substitutes due to sugar reduction initiatives (e.g., global sugar tax policies) [2].
  • Expanding Therapeutic Uses: Growing clinical evidence supporting lactitol’s therapeutic benefits in functional gastrointestinal disorders.
  • Regulatory Approvals: Regulatory acceptance in multiple jurisdictions enhances commercial deployment prospects.

Market Barriers

  • Pricing and Production Costs: Higher than some alternatives, impacting price competitiveness.
  • Consumer Awareness: Limited education around lactitol’s benefits compared to traditional sweeteners.
  • Regulatory Variations: Differing approval statuses across markets can slow expansion.

Key Market Players

Company Market Share Strategic Focus Notable Actions
Roquette 35% Ingredient innovation; food and pharma applications Expanding production capacity; R&D on functional benefits
Cargill 25% Food ingredients; combinatorial product development Partnership with biotech firms for advanced formulations
Ingredion 15% Specialty sweeteners Diversification into prebiotics and nutraceuticals
Others 25% Regional players Focused on niche markets and R&D

Market Segments and Applications

Segment 2022 Market Share (%) Predicted 2028 Share (%) Key Features
Food & Beverage 50% 45% Sugar replacer in confectionery, baked goods, dairy products
Pharmaceuticals 30% 35% Laxatives, prebiotics, drug excipient
Nutraceuticals 20% 20% Dietary supplements, functional foods

Market Projections and Future Outlook

The global lactitol market is expected to reach approximately USD 290 million by 2028, growing steadily at 6% CAGR. Catalysts include expanding clinical evidence, increasing regulatory acceptance for new therapeutic indications, and rising consumer demand for low-calorie, functional ingredients.

Key Opportunities

  • Therapeutic Expansion: Approvals for lactitol in managing specific intestinal disorders can diversify revenue streams.
  • Geographic Growth: Increased adoption in emerging markets such as China and India, driven by urbanization and health consciousness.
  • Product Innovation: Development of combined formulations incorporating lactitol for targeted health benefits.

Potential Challenges

  • Regulatory hurdles in certain jurisdictions.
  • Competition from other prebiotics and sweeteners like erythritol and stevia.
  • Cost management amid supply chain disruptions.

Comparison of Lactitol with Similar Sugar Alcohols

Characteristic Lactitol Erythritol Sorbitol Mannitol
Caloric Content (kcal/g) 2.4 0.2 2.6 1.6
Glycemic Index ~3 0 9 15
Laxative Effect Mild Rare Moderate Strong
Typical Uses Baked goods, pharma, prebiotics Confectionery, drinks Diabetic foods, sweets Pharmaceutical excipient
Maximum Tolerance* 50 g/day (adults) 50 g/day 20-30 g/day Variable

*Tolerance levels vary based on individual health conditions.


Key Takeaways

  • FDA and EMA Approvals: Ongoing clinical trials and regulatory evaluations are vital for expanding lactitol’s therapeutic indications.
  • Market Growth Drivers: Health-conscious consumers, sugar reduction policies, and clinical validations underpin growth.
  • Competitive Landscape: Dominated by a few key players investing in R&D and production capacity; innovations are crucial.
  • Regulatory and Policy Environment: Harmonization of standards and approvals will accelerate market penetration, especially in emerging markets.
  • Product Development: Emphasis on functional foods, nutraceuticals, and pharmaceuticals integrating lactitol.

FAQs

1. What are the primary therapeutic applications under clinical investigation for lactitol?

Beyond its traditional use as a laxative, lactitol is being studied for its prebiotic effects, potential in managing irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), and metabolic health benefits, including blood glucose regulation and lipid profile improvement.

2. How does lactitol compare to other sugar alcohols in terms of safety and tolerability?

Lactitol exhibits a mild laxative effect at higher doses and is generally well tolerated at moderate intake levels. It has a favorable glycemic index, making it suitable for diabetics, similar to erythritol, but with a slightly higher caloric content. Adverse effects are minimal when consumed within recommended limits [3].

3. What are the main regulatory hurdles for expanding lactitol’s therapeutic indications?

Regulatory agencies require comprehensive clinical data demonstrating safety and efficacy, especially for novel applications. Approval processes differ by jurisdiction; in some regions, lactitol's use is restricted to dietary or pharmaceutical excipients, limiting its broader spectrum of applications.

4. Which regions present the most growth opportunities for lactitol?

While Europe and North America are mature markets, Asia-Pacific countries like China, India, and Japan are experiencing rapid growth due to increasing health awareness, regulatory approvals, and expanding manufacturing capacities.

5. What are the key factors influencing the cost and supply chain of lactitol?

Production costs are impacted by the complexity of manufacturing processes, raw material availability (lactose source), energy prices, and regulatory compliance. Supply chain disruptions can arise from raw material shortages and geopolitical factors.


References

[1] Zhang, Y., et al. (2022). "Prebiotic effects of lactitol on gut microbiota: A randomized controlled trial." Journal of Gastroenterology.

[2] World Health Organization (2021). "Sugar Reduction Policies and Their Impact." WHO Report.

[3] European Food Safety Authority (EFSA). (2019). "Scientific opinion on the safety of lactitol." EFSA Journal.


In summary, lactitol stands at a pivotal point, with ongoing clinical trials promising expanded therapeutic uses and a robust market trajectory driven by consumer demand and regulatory shifts. Strategic investments in research, regulatory pathways, and product innovation can position stakeholders for sustained growth.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.