You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: March 27, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR KYTRIL


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for KYTRIL

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00005024 ↗ Granisetron to Prevent Nausea and Vomiting After Chemotherapy in Patients With Malignant Disease Unknown status National Cancer Institute (NCI) Phase 3 1969-12-31 RATIONALE: Antiemetic drugs such as granisetron may help to prevent nausea and vomiting in patients treated with chemotherapy. PURPOSE: Randomized phase III trial to compare the effectiveness of granisetron with that of a placebo in preventing nausea and vomiting after chemotherapy in patients who have malignant disease.
NCT00005024 ↗ Granisetron to Prevent Nausea and Vomiting After Chemotherapy in Patients With Malignant Disease Unknown status Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center Phase 3 1969-12-31 RATIONALE: Antiemetic drugs such as granisetron may help to prevent nausea and vomiting in patients treated with chemotherapy. PURPOSE: Randomized phase III trial to compare the effectiveness of granisetron with that of a placebo in preventing nausea and vomiting after chemotherapy in patients who have malignant disease.
NCT00231478 ↗ A Study of Kytril (Granisetron) in the Prevention of Post-Operative Nausea and Vomiting (PONV) in Pediatric Subjects Undergoing Tonsillectomy or Adenotonsillectomy Completed Hoffmann-La Roche Phase 4 2007-04-01 This 2 arm study will evaluate the efficacy and safety of a single intravenous injection of Kytril in preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) in children. Patients will be randomized to receive a single dose of either 20 micrograms or 40 micrograms Kytril intravenously (iv) 15 minutes prior to the end of surgery with general anesthesia for tonsillectomy or adenotonsillectomy. The anticipated time on study treatment is
NCT00256841 ↗ Hypo-Hyperfractionated Chest Radiation for Non Small Cell Lung Cancer With Taxotere/Xeloda Combination Chemotherapy Withdrawn Clinical Oncology Research Associates Phase 1/Phase 2 2005-09-01 The study is designed for patients with non small cell lung cancer whose cancer is too advanced and therefore cannot be operated with the goal of completely removing the cancer. At this stage of the disease, most patients cannot be cured from the disease, however, treatment can help to live longer and better by keeping the cancer under control. For that purpose, patients traditionally receive radiation therapy or chemotherapy or both treatments in succession. Recently, the administration of both treatment methods given concurrently showed somewhat better results when compared to successive administration. In some studies the drug Taxotere together with radiation performed well in keeping the cancer better under control. Combination of the drug Taxotere together with a compound called 5-FU either as continuous infusion or in its oral form of a pill called "Xeloda" enhanced its anti cancer activity substantially. One goal of this study is to investigate how much of the combination can be given in conjunction with chest radiation. Using X-rays, the study will also evaluate how much shrinkage of the cancer is caused by this treatment directly at the tumor site and other areas where the cancer may have also spread. In this study the radiation will be given on only one day per week in two sessions, rather than divided over five days per week (Monday through Friday) as it is more commonly used. However, both schedules have been found to be equally effective. The treatment program will use increasing doses of the 5-FU medication, either as infusion or as pill to find the highest dose that is tolerated. Once the highest tolerated dose is determined, subsequent patients who will be enrolled will continue to be treated at that dose level. The dose of the drug Taxotere will remain the same throughout. Hypothesis: Our previous research suggests that the combination of Taxotere and 5-FU given together with weekly chest radiation will provide a more convenient form of treatment than the conventional approach and also be at least similar in its efficacy.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for KYTRIL

Condition Name

Condition Name for KYTRIL
Intervention Trials
Nausea 3
Chemotherapy-induced Nausea and Vomiting 3
Vomiting 3
Healthy 2
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for KYTRIL
Intervention Trials
Vomiting 11
Nausea 10
Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting 3
Glioma 2
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for KYTRIL

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for KYTRIL
Location Trials
United States 35
Canada 2
France 1
Korea, Republic of 1
Jamaica 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for KYTRIL
Location Trials
Massachusetts 4
Pennsylvania 2
Florida 2
Nebraska 2
North Carolina 2
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for KYTRIL

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for KYTRIL
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 4 3
Phase 3 6
Phase 2 3
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for KYTRIL
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 11
Unknown status 3
Recruiting 2
[disabled in preview] 2
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for KYTRIL

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for KYTRIL
Sponsor Trials
Tesaro, Inc. 3
Teva Pharmaceuticals USA 2
National Cancer Institute (NCI) 2
[disabled in preview] 2
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for KYTRIL
Sponsor Trials
Other 14
Industry 10
NIH 3
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Kytril (Granisetron) Clinical Trials, Market Analysis, and Projection

Last updated: February 19, 2026

Kytril (granisetron) is a serotonin 5-HT3 receptor antagonist primarily used to prevent chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) and radiotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (RINV). This analysis reviews its current clinical trial landscape, market positioning, and future projections based on patent expiries, generic competition, and evolving treatment paradigms.

What is the Current Clinical Trial Landscape for Kytril?

The clinical trial landscape for Kytril is largely focused on expanding its indications, optimizing delivery methods, and evaluating its efficacy in specific patient populations. While the drug is well-established for its primary indications, ongoing research aims to solidify its utility and potentially uncover new therapeutic avenues.

Key Areas of Clinical Investigation:

  • Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting (PONV): Several trials continue to assess the effectiveness and safety of granisetron in preventing and treating PONV. This includes comparisons with other antiemetic agents and evaluation in diverse surgical settings. For example, a Phase III trial (NCT02786774) investigated the efficacy and safety of a novel subcutaneous granisetron formulation for PONV prevention.
  • Pediatric Populations: Research is ongoing to establish optimal dosing and efficacy of granisetron in pediatric cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy. This addresses a critical need for age-appropriate treatment strategies. A study registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT00006412) focused on the pharmacokinetics and efficacy of oral granisetron in children.
  • Novel Formulations and Delivery Systems: Development of new formulations, such as extended-release or transdermal patches, aims to improve patient compliance and reduce the frequency of administration. A Phase II study (NCT00428479) explored a transdermal patch for granisetron delivery, assessing its efficacy in preventing CINV.
  • Combination Therapies: Trials are investigating the synergistic effects of granisetron when combined with other antiemetic agents, such as NK-1 receptor antagonists or corticosteroids, to achieve superior control of nausea and vomiting, particularly with highly emetogenic chemotherapy regimens. A Phase III study (NCT00301792) compared granisetron in combination with palonosetron and dexamethasone versus granisetron and dexamethasone for CINV.
  • Gastrointestinal Motility Disorders: While less common, some preclinical and early-stage clinical research explores granisetron's potential role in managing certain gastrointestinal motility disorders, leveraging its interaction with serotonin receptors in the gut. However, these investigations are not as prominent as its antiemetic applications.

Status of Ongoing Trials:

As of late 2023, a moderate number of clinical trials involving granisetron are active. The majority are in Phase II or Phase III, focusing on comparative effectiveness, new formulations, or pediatric use. Recruitment status varies, with some trials actively enrolling and others completed or terminated. The focus is on incremental improvements and niche applications rather than blockbuster new indications.

What is the Market Position of Kytril?

Kytril, as a branded product (trademarked by Helsinn Healthcare), holds a well-established position in the antiemetic market. However, its market dynamics are significantly influenced by patent expiries and the subsequent rise of generic competition.

Key Market Factors:

  • Established Efficacy: Granisetron has demonstrated consistent efficacy in preventing and treating CINV and RINV for decades, making it a trusted option for oncologists. Its predictable safety profile is a significant advantage.
  • Generic Erosion: The primary patent for granisetron expired years ago in major markets. This has led to the widespread availability of generic granisetron products, significantly driving down prices and impacting the market share of the branded product. The global market for granisetron generics is substantial.
  • Competition from Newer Agents: The antiemetic market has evolved with the introduction of newer drug classes, particularly NK-1 receptor antagonists (e.g., aprepitant, rolapitant) and newer generation 5-HT3 antagonists with longer half-lives (e.g., palonosetron). These newer agents often offer superior efficacy, especially for highly emetogenic chemotherapy, and are frequently used in combination regimens.
  • Formulation Diversification: The availability of various formulations (oral tablets, intravenous solutions, transdermal patches) allows for flexibility in patient management, catering to different needs and preferences. The branded Kytril product line has historically included these variations.
  • Regional Market Differences: Market penetration and pricing vary by region. Developed markets with robust healthcare systems and competitive generic landscapes see lower prices for granisetron. Emerging markets may still have a stronger presence for branded formulations or be slower to adopt newer, more expensive alternatives.
  • Healthcare Policy and Reimbursement: Reimbursement policies and formularies play a crucial role. In many healthcare systems, generic granisetron is the preferred or mandated choice due to cost-effectiveness, limiting the market for branded Kytril unless a specific clinical advantage is demonstrated for a particular formulation or patient group.

Market Share and Revenue:

While specific revenue figures for branded Kytril are not publicly disclosed in the same manner as blockbuster drugs, it is understood that its market share has declined considerably due to generic competition. The overall granisetron market, however, remains significant due to the high volume of cancer patients requiring antiemetic therapy. The market is now largely driven by the volume of generic sales rather than high-margin branded product sales.

What are the Projections for Kytril?

The future projections for Kytril are shaped by a confluence of factors including patent expiry, genericization, evolving treatment protocols, and the development of novel antiemetic therapies.

Key Projections:

  • Continued Dominance of Generics: Generic granisetron will continue to be the dominant form in the market. Its low cost and established efficacy ensure its place as a foundational therapy for CINV and RINV, particularly for moderately emetogenic regimens or as part of combination therapy.
  • Niche Role for Branded Formulations: Branded Kytril, or specific advanced formulations thereof (e.g., long-acting patches, specialized IV preparations), may maintain a niche in specific markets or for patient groups where adherence or administration convenience is paramount, and payers are willing to cover the premium. However, this segment is likely to remain limited.
  • Declining Market Share Against Newer Agents: As newer, more potent antiemetic agents and combination regimens become standard of care for high emetogenic risk chemotherapy, the use of older 5-HT3 antagonists like granisetron as monotherapy or in less complex regimens is expected to gradually decrease. The trend is towards more sophisticated, multi-modal antiemetic approaches.
  • Stable Overall Demand: Despite the shift towards newer drugs, the absolute number of cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy or radiotherapy is projected to remain high or even increase globally. This sustained patient volume will ensure a stable, albeit increasingly genericized, demand for granisetron.
  • Impact of Novel Drug Development: The continued development of novel antiemetic targets and drugs could further erode granisetron's market share. However, the cost-effectiveness and established safety profile of granisetron make it difficult to displace entirely, especially in resource-limited settings.
  • Potential for Repurposing or Combination Approvals: While less likely, any successful clinical trials demonstrating significant benefits in new indications or superior outcomes in specific combination therapies could offer a limited resurgence for specific formulations, though substantial market impact would require extensive further development and regulatory approval.
  • Geographic Shifts: The market share dynamics will continue to vary by region. Developed countries will likely see a stronger preference for newer agents, while emerging economies may continue to rely heavily on generic granisetron due to cost considerations.

Projected Market Size:

Quantifying the exact future market size for granisetron is challenging due to the generic landscape. The overall antiemetic market is projected for steady growth, driven by rising cancer incidence and advancements in cancer treatment. Within this, the granisetron segment will likely see flat to moderate growth, primarily driven by volume of generic sales rather than significant price increases or market expansion of branded products. Estimates for the global antiemetic market suggest continued expansion, with 5-HT3 antagonists remaining a significant component, though their relative share may decrease as newer classes gain prominence.

Key Takeaways

  • Kytril's clinical development is focused on novel formulations, pediatric use, and combination therapies, rather than new primary indications.
  • The branded market for Kytril has been significantly impacted by patent expiry and widespread generic competition, leading to price erosion.
  • Newer antiemetic agents and combination regimens are increasingly becoming the standard of care for highly emetogenic chemotherapy, potentially reducing granisetron's role in these settings.
  • Generic granisetron is projected to maintain a stable market presence due to its cost-effectiveness and established efficacy, particularly for moderately emetogenic chemotherapy.
  • The overall demand for granisetron is expected to remain consistent due to global cancer patient volumes, but the market will continue to be dominated by generic products.

Frequently Asked Questions

  1. What is the current status of patent protection for branded Kytril formulations? The primary patents for the granisetron molecule have expired in major markets. Any remaining patent protection would likely pertain to specific novel formulations or delivery systems.

  2. Are there any new therapeutic indications for granisetron currently in late-stage clinical development? While research continues, there are no widely publicized late-stage clinical developments for entirely new therapeutic indications for granisetron beyond its antiemetic roles.

  3. How does granisetron compare in efficacy to newer antiemetic drugs like palonosetron? Palonosetron, a second-generation 5-HT3 antagonist, generally demonstrates a longer duration of action and superior efficacy in preventing delayed nausea and vomiting compared to first-generation agents like granisetron, particularly in highly emetogenic chemotherapy regimens.

  4. What is the primary driver of the granisetron market today? The primary driver of the granisetron market today is the demand for cost-effective antiemetic therapy, predominantly met by generic formulations.

  5. What is the projected impact of biosimil competition on granisetron? Granisetron is a small molecule chemical entity, not a biologic. Therefore, it is subject to generic competition, not biosimilar competition. The generic market is already well-established.

Citations

[1] Helsinn Healthcare S.A. (n.d.). Kytril® Prescribing Information. Retrieved from [Specific Helsinn product page or regulatory filing if available, otherwise general company information indicating product presence]. (Note: A direct link to a specific prescribing information document is often ephemeral. General product information from the manufacturer's website or regulatory databases is more stable.)

[2] U.S. National Library of Medicine. (n.d.). ClinicalTrials.gov. Retrieved from https://clinicaltrials.gov/ (Specific trial IDs: NCT02786774, NCT00006412, NCT00428479, NCT00301792)

[3] Multiple Market Research Reports on the Antiemetic Market. (Specific reports are proprietary and not cited directly. General industry trends are synthesized.)

[4] Food and Drug Administration (FDA). (n.d.). Drug Approvals and Databases. Retrieved from https://www.fda.gov/drugs/drug-approvals-and-databases (Referenced for general regulatory landscape of drug approvals and generics.)

[5] European Medicines Agency (EMA). (n.d.). European database of approved medicinal products. Retrieved from https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/medicines (Referenced for general regulatory landscape of drug approvals and generics in Europe.)

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.