Last Updated: May 10, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR KETALAR


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for KETALAR

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00129597 ↗ Effect of Ketalar to Prevent Postoperative Chronic Pain After Mastectomy Unknown status Hospices Civils de Lyon Phase 4 2004-12-01 Prevalence of chronic pain after mastectomy is beyond 50% 3 months after surgery. This pain is related to a sensitization of the central nervous system through N-methyl-D-asparate (NMDA) receptors. Ketalar might prevent the occurrence of chronic pain by anti-NMDA properties after mastectomy.
NCT00205712 ↗ Prevention of N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) Antagonist-induced Psychosis in Kids Completed National Alliance for Research on Schizophrenia and Depression Phase 4 2003-02-01 Ketamine, an FDA approved anesthetic agent, is becoming the sedative/analgesic of choice for emergency sedation in children because it causes deep sedation with minimal respiratory depression in comparison to other available agents. However, emergence reactions are an important adverse effect of ketamine, characterized by transient changes in cognitive function, dissociation and mild schizophrenia-like symptoms. These cognitive and behavioral effects are dose-dependently induced by ketamine and other antagonists of the N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) glutamate receptor. NMDA receptor hypofunction can disinhibit excitatory (cholinergic/glutamatergic) projections in key areas of the brain, and this has been proposed to explain key features of schizophrenia. Several treatments that block excessive excitatory transmitter release have also been shown to prevent cognitive and behavioral effects of ketamine-induced NMDA receptor hypofunction in humans. Alpha-2 adrenergic agonists, which can presynaptically inhibit acetylcholine release, can prevent mild ketamine-induced behavioral and cognitive symptoms in healthy human adults. However, this prevention strategy has not been evaluated in children. Children currently receive clinically-indicated treatment with the NMDA antagonist, ketamine, and this age group is an important target for pharmacological strategies aimed at the prevention of schizophrenia. This application proposes a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized trial to test the safety and effectiveness of dexmedetomidine, an FDA approved alpha-2 adrenergic agonist, in preventing ketamine-induced mental symptoms in children. Planned primary analyses will evaluate effects of the hypothesized prevention treatment on clinical and cognitive variables using analysis of variance (ANOVA). The proposed experiments are relevant to future prevention trials for individuals at risk for schizophrenia, and to preventing adverse effects of NMDA antagonist anesthetic agents (ketamine, nitrous oxide).
NCT00205712 ↗ Prevention of N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) Antagonist-induced Psychosis in Kids Completed Washington University School of Medicine Phase 4 2003-02-01 Ketamine, an FDA approved anesthetic agent, is becoming the sedative/analgesic of choice for emergency sedation in children because it causes deep sedation with minimal respiratory depression in comparison to other available agents. However, emergence reactions are an important adverse effect of ketamine, characterized by transient changes in cognitive function, dissociation and mild schizophrenia-like symptoms. These cognitive and behavioral effects are dose-dependently induced by ketamine and other antagonists of the N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) glutamate receptor. NMDA receptor hypofunction can disinhibit excitatory (cholinergic/glutamatergic) projections in key areas of the brain, and this has been proposed to explain key features of schizophrenia. Several treatments that block excessive excitatory transmitter release have also been shown to prevent cognitive and behavioral effects of ketamine-induced NMDA receptor hypofunction in humans. Alpha-2 adrenergic agonists, which can presynaptically inhibit acetylcholine release, can prevent mild ketamine-induced behavioral and cognitive symptoms in healthy human adults. However, this prevention strategy has not been evaluated in children. Children currently receive clinically-indicated treatment with the NMDA antagonist, ketamine, and this age group is an important target for pharmacological strategies aimed at the prevention of schizophrenia. This application proposes a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized trial to test the safety and effectiveness of dexmedetomidine, an FDA approved alpha-2 adrenergic agonist, in preventing ketamine-induced mental symptoms in children. Planned primary analyses will evaluate effects of the hypothesized prevention treatment on clinical and cognitive variables using analysis of variance (ANOVA). The proposed experiments are relevant to future prevention trials for individuals at risk for schizophrenia, and to preventing adverse effects of NMDA antagonist anesthetic agents (ketamine, nitrous oxide).
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for KETALAR

Condition Name

Condition Name for KETALAR
Intervention Trials
Depression 13
Pain 12
Major Depressive Disorder 10
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for KETALAR
Intervention Trials
Depression 39
Depressive Disorder 35
Depressive Disorder, Major 17
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for KETALAR

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for KETALAR
Location Trials
United States 103
Egypt 13
Canada 10
Israel 7
Turkey 6
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for KETALAR
Location Trials
California 15
New York 13
Pennsylvania 8
Missouri 7
Ohio 7
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for KETALAR

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for KETALAR
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
PHASE1 1
Phase 4 53
Phase 3 14
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for KETALAR
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 79
Recruiting 19
Not yet recruiting 16
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for KETALAR

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for KETALAR
Sponsor Trials
Mayo Clinic 7
Washington University School of Medicine 6
National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) 6
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for KETALAR
Sponsor Trials
Other 237
NIH 10
Industry 6
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

KETALAR Market Analysis and Financial Projection

Last updated: May 4, 2026

KETALAR (ketamine) — Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Revenue Projection

KETALAR (ketamine) is an established general anesthetic and a controlled substance with a long clinical record across anesthesia and procedural sedation. Commercial dynamics today are driven by supply chain reliability, controlled-substance scheduling and diversion controls, hospital formulary behavior, and the competitive set that includes other anesthetics plus newer ketamine formulations where available. This update covers the current clinical-trial landscape to the extent it can be substantiated from publicly citable records, and it frames market sizing and projection using observable market behavior and standard forecast logic for mature products.


What is the current clinical-trials signal for KETALAR (ketamine)?

What trial types show activity

Public clinical activity for ketamine clusters into four recurring categories that affect the near-term pipeline impact for KETALAR-branded ketamine:

  1. Psychiatry and mood disorders
    Trials typically evaluate ketamine (or ketamine-like regimens) for treatment-resistant depression and related indications. While these efforts may use ketamine formulations that are not necessarily KETALAR-branded, the underlying active ingredient is ketamine, so the trial signal still affects class-wide market expectations for ketamine-based therapies.

  2. Pain and anesthesia-adjacent indications
    Studies include perioperative analgesia, opioid-sparing strategies, neuropathic pain signals, and procedural sedation comparisons. These are the most directly connected to anesthesia and hospital procurement channels.

  3. Safety, dosing, and administration route comparisons
    Trials focus on dosing regimens, infusion protocols, reconstitution handling, and comparative safety. These studies tend to be incremental for a mature molecule like ketamine.

  4. Special populations
    Trials in pediatrics, geriatrics, and medically complex cohorts are common. These influence hospital protocols more than they do commercial brand switching.

How trials translate to KETALAR commercial lift

For KETALAR specifically, the main commercial linkage from clinical trials is indirect:

  • Hospital protocol updates that increase utilization volume of ketamine in anesthesia and sedation.
  • Regulatory and payer acceptance of ketamine-based regimens that keep the active ingredient entrenched in formularies.
  • Competitive positioning: trial outcomes that favor ketamine over alternatives can support volume growth, even if trials do not involve KETALAR brand presentations.

What does the market look like for ketamine, and where does KETALAR fit?

Market structure

The ketamine market is mature and procurement-led. Demand comes primarily from:

  • Hospitals and ambulatory surgery centers using ketamine as an anesthetic and sedative.
  • Emergency and procedural units using ketamine for procedural sedation, where protocols exist.
  • Inpatient and outpatient psychiatric pathways where ketamine is used off-label in many jurisdictions and where approved indications exist for ketamine-derived products in some markets.

KETALAR, as an injectable ketamine product, is strongest in anesthesia and procedural sedation channels. Psychiatry-driven demand is more likely to accrue to specialized ketamine products, but it can still pull class-wide utilization through training, protocol standardization, and clinician familiarity.

Demand drivers

  • Surgical and procedure volumes: anesthesia spend tracks procedure volumes.
  • Cost and availability: ketamine is often selected on cost and reliable availability when alternatives are constrained.
  • Controlled-substance compliance: procurement depends on manufacturers and distributors that can meet recordkeeping and controlled-substance handling requirements.
  • Treatment adoption: in jurisdictions with structured ketamine pathways for depression, utilization increases class-wide.

Key competitive set

KETALAR competes in anesthesia and sedation with:

  • Other injectable anesthetics and sedatives (for example, propofol, etomidate, benzodiazepine-based sedation strategies, and opioid-adjunct regimens).
  • In psychiatry, ketamine-derived products and alternative rapid-acting antidepressant classes.
  • Where used for anesthesia, competitive pressure often comes less from “ketamine brand” and more from “sedation protocol choice” and supply reliability.

Market sizing: what can be projected for KETALAR through 2030?

Projection approach for a mature injectable

Because KETALAR’s active ingredient is widely used and already established, the model’s backbone is:

  • Base demand anchored to hospital and procedural sedation usage, grown by procedure volumes and protocol adoption.
  • Low-to-moderate category growth from expanded non-psychiatric and psychiatry-adjacent use cases, offset by competition and controlled-substance friction.
  • Brand share stability: in mature anesthetic markets, branded share can fluctuate, but the active ingredient tends to retain utilization.

Five-year outlook (directional revenue drivers)

Below is a projection framework expressed as a revenue growth band rather than a single-point number, because KETALAR’s brand-level revenue depends heavily on country distribution, payer structure, and tender dynamics.

Time window Category direction (ketamine injectables + ketamine-class utilization) Primary uplift contributors Primary headwinds
2024-2026 Low to moderate growth Procedure utilization, protocol standardization, supply normalization Controlled-substance administrative burden, substitution by other sedatives
2026-2028 Low to moderate growth Continued adoption in procedural sedation, incremental pain use Competitive anesthetic pricing, capacity constraints if supply tightens
2028-2030 Flat to low growth Maturity effects; psychiatry-related spillover Formularies and payer controls for non-approved pathways

Global market projection (ketamine class-level)

Using a mature-molecule forecasting structure, the ketamine class is expected to show flat-to-low growth in the 2028 to 2030 window as it reaches saturation in anesthesia procurement and faces incremental conversion bottlenecks in psychiatry adoption pathways.

A practical assumption for planning is:

  • 2024-2026: +3% to +6% CAGR
  • 2026-2028: +2% to +5% CAGR
  • 2028-2030: +0% to +3% CAGR

KETALAR’s realized CAGR will be constrained by (1) its brand share within injectable ketamine tendering and (2) regional controlled-substance and procurement compliance performance.


What regulatory and supply dynamics matter most for KETALAR?

Controlled-substance handling

KETALAR is a controlled substance in the US and is subject to strict storage, inventory, prescribing, and dispensing requirements. These constraints shape:

  • Distributor allocations
  • Hospital purchasing practices
  • Use in settings that can meet compliance requirements

The net effect is that supply reliability and compliance capability affect utilization as much as clinical preference.

Labeling and indication constraints

For forecasting, consider that KETALAR’s commercial ceiling in psychiatry is often capped by jurisdiction-specific approvals and reimbursement structures. Anesthesia and procedural sedation utilization is comparatively less sensitive to payer restrictions because it is embedded in perioperative care pathways.


What actionable investment or R&D implications follow from the clinical and market setup?

If you are funding R&D around ketamine

Clinical and commercial signals imply that the highest ROI is usually tied to:

  • Improving usability (dose handling, stability, administration protocols) for injectable ketamine products
  • Reducing operational friction in controlled-substance workflow (packaging, labeling clarity, distribution readiness)
  • Clinical proof that shifts hospital protocols toward ketamine in perioperative and procedural settings

If you are underwriting KETALAR commercial performance

Commercial performance is most sensitive to:

  • Supply continuity (allocation, backorders, manufacturing uptime)
  • Hospital tender wins and formulary renewals for injectable anesthetics
  • Therapeutic substitution risk when procurement committees shift anesthesia protocols

Key Takeaways

  • KETALAR’s clinical-trials relevance is primarily protocol and practice-shift driven, not brand-new molecule replacement. Trial activity in the ketamine class influences how often ketamine gets used in anesthesia, procedural sedation, and psychiatry-adjacent settings.
  • The ketamine market is mature and procurement-led, so near-term growth is constrained by controlled-substance dynamics, hospital formulary cycles, and competitive substitution by other sedatives.
  • Through 2030, the ketamine category is best framed as flat to low-growth, with the strongest upside tied to procedure volumes and protocol standardization rather than step-change indication breakthroughs.
  • For KETALAR brand-level forecasting, the most important variables are tender share, supply continuity, and controlled-substance operational performance.

FAQs

1) Is KETALAR expected to see growth from psychiatry trials?

Only indirectly. Psychiatry trials can expand ketamine familiarity and protocols, but KETALAR brand lift depends on whether the trial-driven pathway uses ketamine presentations comparable to KETALAR and whether payers and formularies translate trial outcomes into purchases.

2) What matters more for KETALAR revenue: trial results or supply reliability?

Supply reliability and procurement access usually dominate in mature anesthetic markets. Clinical updates affect utilization, but allocations and controlled-substance compliance determine whether utilization can occur.

3) Which competitor set pressures ketamine injectables the most?

Injectable anesthetics and sedation protocols used in perioperative care. Competition tends to be protocol-level substitution rather than direct brand-to-brand replacement.

4) What growth range should investors plan for through 2030?

A planning range of low to flat growth is appropriate for the ketamine class, with KETALAR constrained by brand share and tender dynamics.

5) Does controlled-substance status cap market size?

It constrains utilization to settings that can meet compliance requirements and slows adoption in some care environments, but it does not eliminate demand in established hospital anesthetic workflows.


References

[1] U.S. Food and Drug Administration. “KETALAR (ketamine hydrochloride) prescribing information.” FDA label documents. (Accessed via FDA drug labeling databases).
[2] U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration. “Controlled Substances Act; schedules and controlled substance information.” DEA resources on scheduling and compliance.
[3] World Health Organization. “International drug monitoring and controlled substances guidance” and related WHO references on controlled medicines (general background).
[4] ClinicalTrials.gov. “Ketamine” search results for interventional studies (trial types and status tracking).

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.