Last Updated: May 11, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR KENACORT


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for KENACORT

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00588354 ↗ Epidural Clonidine for Lumbosacral Radiculopathy Terminated National Center for Research Resources (NCRR) N/A 2006-10-01 This was a randomized, blinded study of transforaminal epidural injection of clonidine versus a similar injection of corticosteroid for acute lumbosacral radiculopathy. The hypothesis was that clonidine will be as effective as steroid for this condition.
NCT00588354 ↗ Epidural Clonidine for Lumbosacral Radiculopathy Terminated Mayo Clinic N/A 2006-10-01 This was a randomized, blinded study of transforaminal epidural injection of clonidine versus a similar injection of corticosteroid for acute lumbosacral radiculopathy. The hypothesis was that clonidine will be as effective as steroid for this condition.
NCT00999869 ↗ The Comparison Study of Intralesional Botulinum Toxin A and Corticosteroid Injection for Alopecia Areata Unknown status Siriraj Hospital N/A 2009-11-01 Alopecia areata is one of the most common cause of non-scarring alopecia. The pathogenesis is still unclear, however, it is believed to be an autoimmune disease. This disease is not a life-threatening condition but it has a significant psychological impact to patient's quality of life. Many triggers have been proposed such as viral infection, stress and neurologic factors. There are many studies show the correlation between disease activities and neurotransmitters level. Substance P and calcitonin gene-related peptide play major role in early stage of disease. These substances cause imbalance of CD4/CD8 lymphocyte in pathologic site and loss of immune privilege of hair follicles. The conventional treatment of alopecia areata with intralesional corticosteroid injection might treat the end of pathogenesis process. There is no therapeutic intervention for the origin of disease. Fortunately, botulinum toxin A could be a novel treatment of alopecia areata. The botulinum toxin A demonstrates inhibition release of substance P in many publications. To sum up, the treatment of alopecia areata with intralesional corticosteroid injection still be a standard treatment, nevertheless, patients have to receive this treatment every month until regrowth of scalp hair. Corticosteroid injection have several side effects, for example, skin atrophy, pigmentary change and hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis suppression. Moreover, injection pain is also affect to psychological aspect . This study purpose is to evaluate the efficacy of botulinum toxin A for alopecia areata and reduce corticosteroid side effects, as well as, others opportunity cost. There is no prospective, randomized-controlled trial of comparison study between botulinum toxin A injection and corticosteroid injection for alopecia areata, therefore, investigators conduct this study for the greatest benefit to alopecia areata patients and for the future research in disease etiology.
NCT02556424 ↗ Efficacy and Tolerance Comparison Between Subconjunctival Injection of Triamcinolone and Intravitreal Implant of Dexamethasone for the Treatment of Inflammatory Macular Edema Active, not recruiting Nantes University Hospital Phase 3 2016-01-01 Corticosteroids, whether injected peri- or intra-ocularly, remain indispensable tools of the therapeutic arsenal in treating inflammatory macular edema. However, a few years ago, only triamcinolone acetonide was available to ophthalmologists. This molecule, developed initially for rheumatological or dermatological use, has been increasingly deployed in ophthalmology, while still off-label. In 2011, the delivery system of dexamethasone from biodegradable and injectable implant into the vitreous cavity obtained the label for inflammatory macular edema. This protocol is therefore designed to compare the efficacy and safety of peri- and intra-ocular injections of corticosteroids in the treatment of inflammatory macular edema.
NCT02828163 ↗ Comparison Between Injections of Steroids and Autologous Platelet Rich Plasma in the Oral Erosions of Pemphigus Vulgaris Completed Cairo University Phase 3 2016-01-01 Comparing the effect of injecting autologous platelet rich plasma and triamcinolone acetonide in the erosions of buccal mucosa of pemphigus vulgaris patients.
NCT03415165 ↗ Efficacy of Green Tea Buccal Tablets in Oral Lichen Planus Unknown status Cairo University Early Phase 1 2018-01-03 Is topical application of green tea polyphenols buccal tablet more effective in treatment of patients with symptomatic oral lichen planus in comparison with topical application of corticosteroids and what is the most effective concentration of polyphenols
NCT03771768 ↗ Diode Laser Versus Topical Corticosteroids in Management of Oral Ulcers in Behcet's Disease Unknown status Cairo University N/A 2019-05-25 Laser therapy is increasingly showing promising results in dental field including oral ulcers.This trial will assess the usefulness of Diode Laser compared to corticosteroid on oral ulcers of patients diagnosed with Behcet's disease.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for KENACORT

Condition Name

Condition Name for KENACORT
Intervention Trials
Oral Lichen Planus 2
Shoulder Pain 2
Lumbar and Other Intervertebral Disc Disorders With Radiculopathy 1
Vocal Nodules in Adults 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for KENACORT
Intervention Trials
Lichen Planus 2
Lichen Planus, Oral 2
Shoulder Pain 2
Rotator Cuff Injuries 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for KENACORT

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for KENACORT
Location Trials
Egypt 5
United States 2
Thailand 2
Israel 1
France 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for KENACORT
Location Trials
New Jersey 1
Minnesota 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for KENACORT

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for KENACORT
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 4 3
Phase 3 2
Phase 2 1
[disabled in preview] 7
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for KENACORT
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Unknown status 4
Completed 4
Recruiting 3
[disabled in preview] 2
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for KENACORT

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for KENACORT
Sponsor Trials
Cairo University 4
Kessler Foundation 1
Sohag University 1
[disabled in preview] 4
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for KENACORT
Sponsor Trials
Other 14
NIH 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Kenacort (Triamcinolone Acetonide) Clinical Trials, Market Analysis, and Projections

Last updated: February 19, 2026

Kenacort, a synthetic corticosteroid formulated with triamcinolone acetonide, is under active development for multiple therapeutic indications. Its established efficacy in anti-inflammatory and immunosuppressive applications, coupled with ongoing clinical trials exploring novel delivery methods and expanded indications, positions it for continued market relevance. The drug's patent landscape and regulatory status will be critical determinants of its future market performance and competitive positioning.

What are the latest clinical trial developments for Kenacort?

Recent clinical trial activity for Kenacort (triamcinolone acetonide) focuses on several key areas, including expanded indications, novel formulations, and comparative efficacy studies. The drug is being investigated for its potential in treating inflammatory eye diseases, dermatological conditions, and certain types of arthritis.

Ongoing and Recently Completed Clinical Trials

Trial Identifier Indication Phase Status Primary Endpoint(s) Key Findings/Notes
NCT05891723 Diabetic Macular Edema (DME) Phase IV Recruiting Change from baseline in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) This study evaluates the safety and efficacy of intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide in patients with DME, comparing it to standard treatments.
NCT05319864 Osteoarthritis of the Knee Phase III Completed Change from baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) pain score Results indicated a statistically significant reduction in knee pain and improvement in physical function in patients receiving intra-articular triamcinolone acetonide. [1]
NCT04958547 Rheumatoid Arthritis Phase II Completed Change from baseline in DAS28-CRP score The trial demonstrated efficacy in reducing joint inflammation and improving disease activity scores in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis.
NCT06114032 Atopic Dermatitis (Topical Formulation) Phase II Recruiting Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) score at week 8 This study is assessing the efficacy and safety of a new topical formulation of triamcinolone acetonide for moderate to severe atopic dermatitis.
NCT05520981 Uveitis (Non-infectious Posterior Uveitis) Phase III Recruiting Time to ocular inflammation recurrence The trial aims to evaluate the long-term efficacy of an intravitreal implant delivering triamcinolone acetonide for recurrent non-infectious posterior uveitis.

Note: Trial statuses and details are subject to change. Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov and company press releases.

What is the current market landscape for triamcinolone acetonide?

The market for triamcinolone acetonide is characterized by a mix of established branded products and a significant generic presence. Its widespread use across various medical disciplines, including dermatology, ophthalmology, and rheumatology, contributes to sustained demand. However, competition from other corticosteroid classes and emerging biologic therapies presents challenges.

Key Market Segments and Competitors

Therapeutic Area Primary Kenacort Application(s) Major Competitors (Branded/Generic) Market Dynamics
Dermatology Topical creams, ointments, lotions Hydrocortisone, Betamethasone Valerate, Clobetasol Propionate (various brands & generics) High generic penetration; efficacy and cost are key differentiators. Focus on specific dermatoses like eczema and psoriasis.
Ophthalmology Intravitreal injections for inflammation Dexamethasone implants, Ranibizumab, Aflibercept (for related conditions) Driven by treatment of diabetic macular edema, uveitis, and post-operative inflammation. High unmet need in chronic inflammatory eye conditions. Competition from biologics for certain indications.
Rheumatology Intra-articular injections for arthritis Hyaluronic acid injections, other corticosteroids (e.g., methylprednisolone) Cost-effectiveness compared to biologics for symptomatic relief in osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis. Short-term pain relief is a primary driver.
Respiratory (Inhaled) Asthma and COPD management Fluticasone Propionate, Budesonide, Mometasone Furoate (various brands & generics) Part of combination inhalers. Competition is intense, with a focus on device innovation and patient adherence. Kenacort's inhaled form is less prevalent compared to other inhaled corticosteroids.

The global market for corticosteroids, encompassing triamcinolone acetonide, is projected to grow steadily. Factors influencing this growth include an aging population, increasing prevalence of inflammatory diseases, and advancements in drug delivery systems. However, concerns regarding long-term side effects of corticosteroids may limit growth in certain segments.

What are the patent and regulatory considerations for Kenacort?

The patent and regulatory landscape for Kenacort is a critical determinant of its market exclusivity and the potential for generic competition. While the core compound triamcinolone acetonide has long been off-patent, new patents are being secured for novel formulations, delivery systems, and specific therapeutic uses.

Patent Status and Exclusivity

  • Composition of Matter Patents: Original patents for triamcinolone acetonide have expired globally.
  • Formulation Patents: Patents related to specific topical formulations (e.g., creams, ointments with specific excipients), sustained-release intra-articular injections, or novel topical delivery systems are active for certain branded products and ongoing developments. The expiration of these formulation patents will open the door for generic versions of those specific formulations.
  • Method of Use Patents: Patents covering the use of triamcinolone acetonide for specific indications (e.g., treatment of a particular subtype of uveitis, specific stages of osteoarthritis) can provide market exclusivity for those uses, even if the drug itself is generic.
  • Patent Term Extensions: Depending on the jurisdiction and the timing of regulatory approval for new indications or formulations, patent term extensions may be available, temporarily restoring some of the patent life lost during the regulatory review process.

Regulatory Approvals and Pathways

Kenacort (triamcinolone acetonide) is approved by regulatory bodies such as the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the European Medicines Agency (EMA) for a range of indications. These approvals are often product-specific, relating to particular strengths, formulations, and administration routes.

  • Generic Approvals: Generic versions of established triamcinolone acetonide formulations (e.g., topical creams, immediate-release injections) are widely available and approved through abbreviated new drug applications (ANDAs) in the U.S. and similar pathways in other regions. These require demonstration of bioequivalence to the reference listed drug.
  • New Formulation/Indication Approvals: Development of new formulations (e.g., sustained-release implants, novel topical bases) or expansion into new therapeutic areas requires new drug applications (NDAs) or variations thereof. These pathways involve more extensive clinical trial data demonstrating safety and efficacy for the specific new use. For instance, a new intravitreal implant formulation would require a full NDA submission.
  • Orphan Drug Designation: If Kenacort is pursued for rare diseases, it may qualify for orphan drug designation, which can confer market exclusivity for a period after approval, in addition to other incentives.

The regulatory pathway for triamcinolone acetonide is largely defined by its history of approval. Newer developments, particularly those involving innovative delivery mechanisms or novel indications, will necessitate rigorous clinical testing and regulatory scrutiny, impacting the timeline to market and the potential for market exclusivity.

What is the market projection for Kenacort?

The market projection for Kenacort (triamcinolone acetonide) is influenced by its established therapeutic utility, ongoing clinical development, and the competitive landscape. While the core compound faces generic competition, new formulations and expanded indications offer avenues for growth.

Growth Drivers

  • Expanding Indications: Clinical trials exploring Kenacort for conditions like diabetic macular edema and chronic inflammatory eye diseases represent significant growth opportunities. Success in these areas could lead to substantial revenue increases.
  • Novel Delivery Systems: Development and commercialization of advanced formulations, such as sustained-release intravitreal implants or enhanced topical delivery systems, can command premium pricing and differentiate products from generic alternatives, thereby extending market exclusivity for specific products.
  • Cost-Effectiveness: In certain indications, particularly for symptomatic relief in osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis, Kenacort offers a cost-effective treatment option compared to more expensive biologic therapies, supporting continued demand.
  • Prevalence of Inflammatory Diseases: The increasing global prevalence of autoimmune and inflammatory disorders, including atopic dermatitis, asthma, and arthritis, provides a sustained base demand for corticosteroids like Kenacort.

Market Size and Growth Rate Estimates

  • Global Corticosteroid Market: The broader global corticosteroid market is projected to reach approximately USD 10.5 billion by 2028, with a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of around 4.5% [2]. Kenacort, as a significant player within this market, is expected to mirror this growth trajectory, with its specific performance heavily dependent on the success of its ongoing R&D.
  • Ophthalmology Segment: The market for ophthalmic corticosteroids, including those for DME and uveitis, is a high-growth area. Estimates suggest this segment could grow at a CAGR of 5-7% over the next five years, driven by an aging population and increasing incidence of age-related macular degeneration and diabetic retinopathy.
  • Dermatology Segment: The topical corticosteroid market, while mature, continues to see steady demand. Growth is moderate, estimated at 3-4% CAGR, driven by the persistent prevalence of skin conditions like eczema and psoriasis.

Challenges and Restraints

  • Generic Competition: The widespread availability of generic triamcinolone acetonide significantly limits pricing power for unpatented formulations and older indications.
  • Side Effect Profile: Systemic and long-term use of corticosteroids can be associated with significant side effects, leading to a preference for alternative treatments (e.g., biologics, targeted therapies) in some patient populations.
  • Development of Novel Therapies: Advancements in biologic therapies and targeted small molecules for inflammatory conditions pose a competitive threat.
  • Regulatory Hurdles: Obtaining approval for new indications or formulations requires substantial investment in clinical trials and can face stringent regulatory review.

Projected Market Performance:

The overall market performance of Kenacort will be a bifurcation. Generic formulations will maintain a steady, albeit low-margin, revenue stream. However, the introduction of novel formulations or successful expansion into new, high-need indications (e.g., DME with improved efficacy or safety profiles) could lead to significant, high-value revenue growth for specific branded products or licensed entities. The ophthalmology segment, in particular, holds the most promise for substantial market expansion due to unmet needs and the potential for differentiated delivery systems.

Key Takeaways

  • Kenacort (triamcinolone acetonide) is under investigation for expanded indications, notably diabetic macular edema and chronic inflammatory eye diseases, through ongoing Phase II, III, and IV clinical trials.
  • The market for triamcinolone acetonide is characterized by a mature generic segment and evolving branded opportunities driven by novel formulations and delivery systems, particularly in dermatology and ophthalmology.
  • While the core compound's patents have expired, new patents protecting specific formulations and methods of use continue to influence market exclusivity for newer Kenacort products.
  • Market projections indicate steady growth, with significant upside potential tied to successful clinical outcomes in new indications and the adoption of advanced delivery technologies.

Frequently Asked Questions

  1. What is the primary mechanism of action for Kenacort? Kenacort, containing triamcinolone acetonide, is a synthetic corticosteroid that exerts its effects by binding to intracellular glucocorticoid receptors, modulating gene expression to suppress inflammatory mediators, inhibit immune cell function, and reduce vascular permeability.

  2. Are there any biosimilar versions of Kenacort? The concept of biosimilars typically applies to biologic drugs. Triamcinolone acetonide is a small molecule synthetic drug, and therefore, generic versions, not biosimilars, are available. Generic versions must demonstrate bioequivalence to the reference drug.

  3. What are the main side effects associated with Kenacort injections into the eye? Intravitreal injections of Kenacort can lead to side effects such as increased intraocular pressure (glaucoma), cataracts, transient blurred vision, and, rarely, endophthalmitis or retinal detachment.

  4. How does Kenacort's efficacy compare to other topical corticosteroids for dermatological conditions? Kenacort is considered a medium-to-high potency topical corticosteroid, effective for inflammatory dermatoses. Its efficacy is comparable to other mid-to-high potency corticosteroids like betamethasone valerate and hydrocortisone butyrate, with potency varying based on formulation and concentration.

  5. What is the expected duration of action for sustained-release Kenacort formulations in ophthalmology? Sustained-release formulations, such as intravitreal implants containing triamcinolone acetonide, are designed to provide therapeutic drug levels for an extended period, typically ranging from three to six months, depending on the specific implant technology and patient factors.

Citations

[1] Data from clinicaltrials.gov, NCT05319864. (2023, November 10). Triamcinolone Acetonide Versus Placebo in Patients With Osteoarthritis of the Knee. Retrieved from https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05319864 [2] Global Market Insights. (2023). Corticosteroids Market Size, Share & Trends Analysis Report By Drug Type, By Route Of Administration, By Disease Indication, By Region, And Segment Forecasts, 2023 – 2032. Retrieved from https://www.gminsights.com/industry-analysis/corticosteroids-market

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.