Last Updated: May 11, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR KEFLEX


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for KEFLEX

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00300092 ↗ Pediatric Fingertip Injuries:Are Antibiotics Required? Completed Children's Hospital Los Angeles Phase 2 2000-09-01 Study objective: Fingertip injuries are common in the pediatric population. Considerable controversy exists about whether prophylactic antibiotics are necessary after repair of such injuries. Our goals were to estimate the rate of bacterial infection among pediatric patients with distal fingertip injuries overall and to compare the rate of bacterial infections among subgroups treated with and without prophylactic antibiotics. Methods: This was prospective randomized control study of pediatric patients presenting to an urban children's hospital with trauma to the distal fingertip requiring repair. Patients were randomized to two groups: those receiving prophylactic antibiotics (Cephalexin) and those who did not receive antibiotic therapy. Repairs were performed in a standardized fashion and all patients were re-evaluated in the same emergency department in 48 hours and by phone 7 days later. The primary outcome of this study was the incidence of infection.
NCT00352612 ↗ Comparison of Cephalexin Versus Clindamycin for Suspected CA-MRSA Skin Infections Completed Johns Hopkins University Phase 4 2006-09-01 The purpose of this study is to help define the role of antibiotics in the treatment of pediatric skin infections caused by community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (CA-MRSA). The investigators hypothesize that treatment with cephalexin, a penicillin-like antibiotic to which CA-MRSA would be expected to be resistant, does not result in poorer outcomes than treatment with clindamycin, an antibiotic to which CA-MRSA is most often susceptible.
NCT00352612 ↗ Comparison of Cephalexin Versus Clindamycin for Suspected CA-MRSA Skin Infections Completed Thrasher Research Fund Phase 4 2006-09-01 The purpose of this study is to help define the role of antibiotics in the treatment of pediatric skin infections caused by community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (CA-MRSA). The investigators hypothesize that treatment with cephalexin, a penicillin-like antibiotic to which CA-MRSA would be expected to be resistant, does not result in poorer outcomes than treatment with clindamycin, an antibiotic to which CA-MRSA is most often susceptible.
NCT00352612 ↗ Comparison of Cephalexin Versus Clindamycin for Suspected CA-MRSA Skin Infections Completed Aaron Chen Phase 4 2006-09-01 The purpose of this study is to help define the role of antibiotics in the treatment of pediatric skin infections caused by community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (CA-MRSA). The investigators hypothesize that treatment with cephalexin, a penicillin-like antibiotic to which CA-MRSA would be expected to be resistant, does not result in poorer outcomes than treatment with clindamycin, an antibiotic to which CA-MRSA is most often susceptible.
NCT00676130 ↗ Study of New Antibiotic Regimen for the Treatment of Uncomplicated Cellulitis in Emergency Department Patients Completed Brigham and Women's Hospital N/A 2007-05-01 The primary aim of this study is to quantify the effectiveness of Bactrim as additional therapy for the treatment of uncomplicated cellulitis in adults, by comparing: standard therapy plus Bactrim, versus standard therapy plus placebo. The primary hypothesis of this study is that, in light of increasing CA-MRSA prevalence, subjects treated with standard therapy plus Bactrim will have higher cure rates than those treated with standard therapy plus placebo.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for KEFLEX

Condition Name

Condition Name for KEFLEX
Intervention Trials
Healthy Volunteers 4
Infections, Respiratory Tract 3
Anti-Infective Agents 3
Urinary Tract Infections 2
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for KEFLEX
Intervention Trials
Infections 6
Infection 5
Respiratory Tract Infections 3
Urinary Tract Infections 3
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for KEFLEX

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for KEFLEX
Location Trials
United States 15
Mexico 8
Austria 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for KEFLEX
Location Trials
Pennsylvania 3
California 3
Michigan 2
Texas 1
West Virginia 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for KEFLEX

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for KEFLEX
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 4 5
Phase 2 4
Phase 1 14
[disabled in preview] 5
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for KEFLEX
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 19
Terminated 3
Not yet recruiting 3
[disabled in preview] 3
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for KEFLEX

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for KEFLEX
Sponsor Trials
Investigacion Farmacologica y Biofarmaceutica, S.A. de C.V. 5
Eli Lilly and Company 5
Bayer 3
[disabled in preview] 6
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for KEFLEX
Sponsor Trials
Other 29
Industry 15
NIH 2
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Keflex (cephalexin): clinical trial status, market assessment, and projection

Last updated: April 30, 2026

Is Keflex still in active clinical trials?

No current, public, active Phase 2 or Phase 3 trials were identified as of the latest available registry records. Keflex is an established, off-patent oral cephalosporin (generally marketed as an immediate-release capsule/tablet formulation), and the available public clinical trial landscape is dominated by (i) historical registries, (ii) small comparative/bioequivalence studies for generics, and (iii) observational or post-marketing studies rather than new pivotal efficacy programs.

What kinds of trials still show up for cephalexin products?

In practice, for established antibiotics like cephalexin, ongoing activity typically clusters into:

  • Bioequivalence (BE) studies for generic products, which support abbreviated approvals rather than new indications.
  • Observational/retrospective studies evaluating real-world prescribing patterns, resistance signals, or adherence.
  • Protocol-driven infection studies that are usually small, often focused on endpoints such as clinical cure and microbiological outcomes, but rarely conducted at large scale for mature assets unless there is a new formulation or a new label opportunity.

Implication for development strategy: For Keflex as a brand and for cephalexin as a molecule, the remaining clinical “value” usually sits in formulation, dosing convenience, and label-expansion work rather than brand-new efficacy evidence at scale.


What is the market position for Keflex and cephalexin?

Keflex tracks as a mature, low-to-mid single-digit share contributor within the oral cephalosporin segment and the broader outpatient antibiotic market. Cephalexin competes primarily with other generics in oral β-lactams and with newer agents in selected settings, while its core use remains community-acquired skin and soft tissue infections, uncomplicated bacterial infections, and dental/ENT-associated bacterial infections depending on local stewardship guidance.

Market drivers

  1. Stewardship and guideline alignment
    • Oral first-line choices for uncomplicated infections often depend on local resistance and guideline pathways. Cephalexin is frequently used in guideline-based first-line or step-down regimens where susceptible pathogens predominate.
  2. Generic penetration
    • Extensive generic competition compresses pricing and keeps the brand value limited.
  3. Low resistance pressure relative to broader classes (setting-dependent)
    • Cephalexin targets typical gram-positive organisms; clinical positioning remains strongest where staphylococcal susceptibility to first-generation cephalosporins is maintained.

Key competitive set (practical)

  • Other oral first-generation cephalosporins (primarily generic cephalexin manufacturers and authorized generics).
  • Penicillins and aminopenicillins where appropriate.
  • Macrolides (where used for penicillin allergy or atypical coverage strategies).
  • Clindamycin in selected skin and soft tissue infection pathways.
  • Other β-lactams depending on local formularies and susceptibility.

What is the current pricing and reimbursement dynamic?

Because Keflex is mature and heavily generic-substituted, pricing power is structurally constrained:

  • Wholesale and pharmacy reimbursement rates track closely to generic benchmarks rather than brand premium.
  • Formulary inclusion is typically stable but tends to favor the lowest cost equivalent in tender or rebate environments.

Net effect: The brand’s commercial outcomes are tied more to contracted channel economics and adherence to guideline-prescribed first-line use than to brand-level differentiation.


How should investors project the market for Keflex over the next 5 years?

Base-case projection: modest volume-led growth with continued price erosion or flat-to-declining net price. Total market dollars may grow slowly if volume expands, but category economics remain sensitive to:

  • antibiotic utilization trends,
  • stewardship tightening,
  • generic pricing competition, and
  • local resistance shifts impacting guideline favorability.

Projection framework (market value mechanics)

For mature oral antibiotics, the market’s value equation is typically:

  • Market value = volume × net price
  • Volume depends on infection incidence and prescribing rates under stewardship.
  • Net price depends on generic market structure, rebates, and tender dynamics.

5-year directional outlook (qualitative)

  • Volume: Slight growth to flat in many geographies, with occasional step-downs when stewardship tightens or when infection patterns shift.
  • Net price: Continued downward pressure or stabilization at low levels due to generic competition.
  • Overall dollars: Low single-digit CAGR is plausible in stable utilization environments; stronger growth requires either guideline-driven expansion or formulation/lifecycle events that raise utilization.

Business takeaway

The growth case for Keflex is not label expansion at scale; it is channel retention, stable utilization, and execution against cost-per-treatment economics. Any upside generally comes from supply stability, contract wins, and localized prescribing patterns rather than from clinical differentiation.


What do the patent and lifecycle factors imply for future commercialization?

For Keflex (cephalexin) the molecule and typical dosage forms are long matured. The market remains open and competitive, which implies:

  • No near-term exclusivity-led inflection
  • Commercial differentiation is formulation and supply-chain execution

Execution levers that matter now

  • Manufacturing reliability and cost positioning (especially where hospital formularies award by acquisition cost).
  • Payer and PBM contracting.
  • Product availability during shortages or supply interruptions.

Clinical trial outlook: where the next incremental studies could emerge

Even with the lack of large pivotal programs, cephalexin can still see targeted clinical work if sponsors pursue:

  • alternative formulations (extended release or improved dissolution profiles),
  • adherence improvements (dose convenience),
  • narrow label refinements aligned with susceptibility patterns.

But absent a new clinical differentiation plan, the practical probability remains that most future “trial activity” will be BE and small observational studies that do not materially change market structure.


Key takeaways

  • Active large-scale Phase 2/Phase 3 development for Keflex/cephalexin is not evident in the current public clinical trial landscape. Remaining studies are mostly BE or observational work consistent with an established generic antibiotic.
  • Market value is structurally capped by generic competition. Commercial outcomes depend on channel economics, formulary access, and stable utilization rather than on brand differentiation.
  • 5-year outlook is likely modest: flat-to-slightly growing volume with continued net price pressure, translating into low single-digit market value movement rather than a step-change.

FAQs

  1. What is Keflex’s therapeutic class and core use?
    Keflex is oral cephalexin, a first-generation cephalosporin used for susceptible bacterial infections, commonly including skin and soft tissue indications in guideline-based pathways.

  2. Why do clinical trials for cephalexin look limited compared with newer antibiotics?
    The asset is mature and off-patent, so large pivotal trials are less common; generic products use bioequivalence studies and post-marketing/observational research rather than new efficacy pillars.

  3. Does generic substitution materially affect Keflex revenue?
    Yes. Extensive generic penetration compresses net price and reduces brand premium, making contracting and supply execution the main drivers.

  4. What drives cephalexin market growth if pricing is pressured?
    Utilization trends under stewardship, infection incidence, and formulary prescribing patterns drive volume; net price tends to remain constrained.

  5. What could change the market outlook for Keflex?
    A meaningful label expansion, a clinically differentiated formulation with a distinct dosing advantage that changes prescribing behavior, or a major resistance-driven shift in guideline preference.


References

[1] U.S. Food and Drug Administration. (n.d.). Drugs@FDA: Keflex (cephalexin) approval and labeling information. https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cder/daf/
[2] ClinicalTrials.gov. (n.d.). cephalexin clinical trials (registry records). https://clinicaltrials.gov/
[3] World Health Organization. (2014). Antibiotic resistance: global report on surveillance. https://www.who.int/
[4] EU Clinical Trials Register. (n.d.). cephalexin trials (registry search). https://www.clinicaltrialsregister.eu/

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.