Last Updated: August 10, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR KANAMYCIN


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for KANAMYCIN

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00004689 ↗ Phase II Study of Amithiozone (Thiacetazone) for Patients With Mycobacterium Avium Complex Pulmonary Disease Completed National Jewish Health Phase 2 1991-01-01 OBJECTIVES: I. Determine the bacteriological activity of amithiozone against Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC) pulmonary disease. II. Define the ability of amithiozone to improve clinical outcomes in patients with MAC infection. III. Determine the safety and tolerance of amithiozone with chronic dosing in these patients. IV. Assess the contribution of clarithromycin, streptomycin, rifampin, ethambutol, kanamycin, and amithiozone in the treatment of pulmonary MAC infection.
NCT00042289 ↗ Pharmacokinetic Study of Antiretroviral Drugs and Related Drugs During and After Pregnancy Completed Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD) 2003-03-01 The purpose of this study is to evaluate the pharmacokinetics (PKs) of antiretroviral (ARV) and tuberculosis (TB) medications in pregnant women and their infants. (Pharmacokinetics are the various interactions between a drug and the body.) This study will also evaluate the PKs of certain ARVs in postpartum women before and after starting hormonal contraceptives. The PKs of these drugs will be evaluated by measuring the amount of medicine present in blood and/or vaginal secretions.
NCT00042289 ↗ Pharmacokinetic Study of Antiretroviral Drugs and Related Drugs During and After Pregnancy Completed National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) 2003-03-01 The purpose of this study is to evaluate the pharmacokinetics (PKs) of antiretroviral (ARV) and tuberculosis (TB) medications in pregnant women and their infants. (Pharmacokinetics are the various interactions between a drug and the body.) This study will also evaluate the PKs of certain ARVs in postpartum women before and after starting hormonal contraceptives. The PKs of these drugs will be evaluated by measuring the amount of medicine present in blood and/or vaginal secretions.
NCT00579956 ↗ A Randomized Double Blinded Comparison of Ceftazidime and Meropenem in Severe Melioidosis Unknown status Mahidol University N/A 2007-12-01 Melioidosis, an infection caused by the bacterium Burkholderia pseudomallei, is a major cause of community-acquired septicaemia in northeast Thailand. Common manifestations include cavitating pneumonia, hepatic and splenic abscesses, and soft tissue and joint infections. Despite improvements in diagnostic procedures and treatment, the mortality of severe melioidosis remains unacceptably high - approximately 35% with currently used antibiotics (ceftazidime or co-amoxiclav). There is clear evidence that antibiotics can affect mortality; the use of ceftazidime rather than previous regimens (doxycycline + chloramphenicol + co-trimoxazole) led to a 50% reduction in mortality from 80% to 35%. However, the mortality in the first 48 hours has not been altered by any treatment regimen. A key question is whether alternative antibiotics could improve early outcome. The hypothesis tested is that meropenem is superior to ceftazidime in terms of mortality for the treatment of melioidosis.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for KANAMYCIN

Condition Name

Condition Name for KANAMYCIN
Intervention Trials
Tuberculosis 3
Multidrug Resistant Tuberculosis 2
Healthy 1
Mycobacterium Avium-intracellulare Infection 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for KANAMYCIN
Intervention Trials
Tuberculosis 8
Tuberculosis, Multidrug-Resistant 5
Mycobacterium Infections 2
Intestinal Obstruction 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for KANAMYCIN

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for KANAMYCIN
Location Trials
United States 21
Thailand 7
South Africa 6
Brazil 4
Korea, Republic of 3
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for KANAMYCIN
Location Trials
Kentucky 1
Washington 1
Texas 1
Tennessee 1
Pennsylvania 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for KANAMYCIN

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for KANAMYCIN
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 4 1
Phase 3 2
Phase 2/Phase 3 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for KANAMYCIN
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 5
Unknown status 3
Withdrawn 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for KANAMYCIN

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for KANAMYCIN
Sponsor Trials
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) 2
Janssen Infectious Diseases BVBA 2
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD) 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for KANAMYCIN
Sponsor Trials
Other 27
NIH 3
Industry 2
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial
Last updated: May 20, 2026

Kanamycin clinical trials update, market analysis, and launch-and-exclusivity projection (2026)

Kanamycin remains an established, off-patent aminoglycoside used for specific serious bacterial infections and as an oral agent for enteric decontamination in some regimens. Public sources do not support a current, drug-development-stage “clinical trials update” for a new kanamycin brand or novel formulation at scale, and no widely recognized 2026 product-specific exclusivity or blockbuster-like revenue trajectory can be substantiated from available public trial registries and commercial disclosures. Market opportunity is therefore best framed as steady, low-to-mid single digit volume demand in legacy indications, with downside from resistance, hospital formulary tightening, and substitution by newer aminoglycosides or alternative regimens.

Are there active clinical trials for kanamycin in 2026?

Answer: Public trial registries show limited to no signal of late-stage, large-scale kanamycin development in 2024-2026; most visible activity is typically investigator-initiated studies, microbiology/resistance work, or older protocol follow-ons rather than registrational programs.

What trial types appear for kanamycin

  • Antibiotic susceptibility and resistance surveillance linked to aminoglycoside use
  • Pharmacokinetic or therapeutic drug monitoring studies in special populations
  • Non-registrational comparative microbiology work (agar methods, breakpoints, synergy)
  • Historical or protocol-completion updates rather than new Phase 3 efficacy programs

What would qualify as a “registrational” signal

A registrational readout would typically be a Phase 3 trial, or Phase 2 with a clear pivotal endpoint tied to an approved label expansion, plus an FDA interaction timeline. For kanamycin, no consistent pattern of that type is evident in public listing activity in the current period.

What is the current market for kanamycin (global and US framing)?

Answer: Kanamycin is a legacy antibiotic with market demand concentrated in hospital use and select oral decontamination protocols. It does not show characteristics of a modern, high-revenue blockbuster market, and growth expectations are low absent a new approved indication or a novel delivery platform.

Demand drivers

  • Persistent need for aminoglycosides in severe infections when organisms remain susceptible
  • Hospital stewardship protocols that maintain narrow-spectrum options for specific pathogens
  • Continued use in settings where alternative agents are contraindicated or unavailable

Downside risks

  • Aminoglycoside resistance and cross-resistance patterns
  • Safety and monitoring burdens, especially nephrotoxicity and ototoxicity concerns
  • Formularies shifting to other aminoglycosides or non-aminoglycoside combinations
  • Competitive pressure from widely available generics

Commercial structure

Kanamycin market economics typically reflect:

  • Multiple generic suppliers
  • Low differentiation across products (same active, similar dosing forms)
  • Price competition and tender-based procurement

How much revenue could kanamycin generate through 2030?

Answer: Without a new product lifecycle event (label expansion, novel formulation, or specialty delivery), revenue projections are best modeled as stable-to-slightly-declining. A plausible base-case outlook is flat to low-single-digit CAGR in nominal terms globally, with the US likely remaining modest due to competitive generic penetration.

Projection logic (market mechanics, not a new launch)

  • Generic competition caps price
  • Use intensity is limited by safety monitoring and resistance
  • Any growth must come from incremental stewardship adoption, local outbreaks with susceptible pathogens, or substitution when other antibiotics face shortages

Where upside could come from (rare for legacy kanamycin)

  • New indication approvals tied to specific resistant gram-negative profiles
  • A differentiated oral or topical delivery platform that changes pharmacokinetics or reduces systemic exposure
  • A major payer or guideline change that restores use for defined populations

No such catalysts are supported by publicly visible development signals at scale in the current period.

What patents protect kanamycin, and when do they expire?

Answer: Kanamycin itself is an old molecule. Patent estates for the active ingredient are largely expired. What can remain are secondary patents for:

  • Specific formulations (e.g., particular oral dosage strengths or stabilizing excipients)
  • Manufacturing processes
  • Method-of-use in narrow clinical contexts
  • Salt/form variants (less common for kanamycin as marketed historically) Given the generic nature of the market, multiple ANDA approvals typically exist with minimal remaining exclusivity at the product level.

Patent landscape characteristics for legacy antibiotics

  • Active ingredient patents expired decades ago
  • Product-specific IP is fragmented across generics
  • Method-of-use patents, where present, are more often litigated or quietly allowed to expire than maintained with strong commercial blocking power

What is the Orange Book status of kanamycin in the US?

Answer: Kanamycin products are generally multiple generics with no lasting primary exclusivity. Orange Book listings (where applicable) typically show:

  • Approved ANDAs
  • Short-lived or expired exclusivity periods
  • Limited remaining application-specific exclusivity for formulation changes

A current, drug-product-level exclusivity block strong enough to deter generic entry is not a typical feature of kanamycin’s commercial profile.

What generic entry risks exist for kanamycin?

Answer: Generic entry risk is structurally low for new entrants because kanamycin is widely available and mature. Where risks exist, they usually relate to:

  • Narrow formulation patents still in force for specific products
  • Method-of-use patents that could trigger litigation
  • Variant dosage forms or delivery technologies that create product-specific IP

Likely litigation posture in a mature generic market

Legacy antibiotic IP disputes tend to be:

  • Short-term and product-specific
  • Settlement-driven when a formulation or method-of-use patent creates a specific blocking risk
  • More likely to resolve around design-around rather than proving core infringement

Which companies manufacture and sell kanamycin?

Answer: The market is dominated by generic manufacturers supplying injectable and sometimes oral formulations depending on geography and specific approved products. Exact “who sells what” depends on:

  • Dosage form availability (injectable vs oral)
  • Country-level registration status
  • Tender contracts and wholesaler mix

A company-level competitive map for 2026 requires product-specific Orange Book and national registries cross-checking, which is not confirmable from the information available in this request context.

How strong is the patent estate for kanamycin compared with other aminoglycosides?

Answer: Patent estate strength is generally weak at the active ingredient level compared with newer aminoglycoside candidates, because kanamycin is mature and generics dominate. Relative strength typically favors:

  • Newer proprietary aminoglycoside derivatives or engineered formulations, where more recent IP exists
  • Modified dosing or delivery mechanisms in next-gen products

For business planning, kanamycin should be treated as a baseline generic market unless a specific formulation or method-of-use patent is identified as currently in force for a targeted product.

What manufacturing and IP barriers affect kanamycin supply?

Answer: The barriers are primarily non-IP and operational:

  • Quality system capability and aseptic manufacturing (injectables)
  • Antibiotic handling controls and cross-contamination prevention
  • Raw material sourcing
  • Tender-based capacity allocation

IP barriers, if any, tend to be limited to product-specific formulation patents rather than core molecule protection.

What FDA regulatory pathway issues matter for kanamycin development?

Answer: For generics, the key regulatory pathway is ANDA (with bioequivalence and quality requirements). For new development, any registrational program would likely require:

  • Clinical safety and efficacy evidence for the new indication or formulation performance
  • Chemistry, manufacturing, and controls sufficient for the proposed dosage form and route

In practice, kanamycin’s mature profile means incremental entrants either file generics or pursue narrow formulation or use-case differentiation.

Market projection scenarios for kanamycin through 2030

Base case: stable-to-soft decline

  • Continued generic price pressure
  • Hospital use persists for susceptible organisms
  • Resistance trends limit broader expansion

Downside scenario: formulary contraction and antimicrobial rotation

  • More restrictive stewardship for aminoglycosides
  • Faster switching to alternative combinations and newer agents
  • Reduced use for older enteric decontamination practices

Upside scenario: renewed targeted use

  • Guideline changes for defined resistant gram-negative settings
  • Short-term demand spikes due to localized outbreaks
  • Specific product differentiation that improves usability or safety monitoring

Key Takeaways

  • Kanamycin is a mature, widely generic aminoglycoside; public evidence does not support a large-scale, late-stage clinical development surge in 2024-2026.
  • The market profile is steady demand with limited growth potential; projections through 2030 are best treated as flat to low growth or mild decline without a new label-changing catalyst.
  • Core kanamycin active-ingredient patent protection is effectively expired; any remaining IP is likely product-specific (formulation or niche method-of-use), which makes the market competitive and low-blocking.
  • Business planning should focus on supply-chain economics, formulary access, and product differentiation at the formulation/manufacturing level rather than on expecting strong molecule-level exclusivity.

FAQs

  1. Is kanamycin still used for enteric decontamination, and what drives current protocol adoption?
  2. Do any kanamycin formulations have product-specific exclusivity that could delay generic substitution?
  3. How does aminoglycoside resistance affect expected kanamycin demand by region?
  4. What safety monitoring requirements most constrain kanamycin use in hospitals?
  5. How do kanamycin’s pricing and tender dynamics compare with gentamicin and tobramycin in generic hospital procurement?

References (APA)

No citable sources were provided or accessible within the constraints of this request.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.