Last Updated: June 26, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR JUNIOR STRENGTH ADVIL


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for JUNIOR STRENGTH ADVIL

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00435500 ↗ Fluoride Varnish in the Prevention of Dental Caries in Aboriginal and Non-aboriginal Children Unknown status Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) Phase 3 2003-06-01 The purpose of this study is to determine whether semi-annual fluoride varnish applications combined with caregiver counseling are effective in preventing and reducing a severe form of dental decay, known as early childhood caries, in native and non-native children aged 6 months to 5 years.
NCT00435500 ↗ Fluoride Varnish in the Prevention of Dental Caries in Aboriginal and Non-aboriginal Children Unknown status The Hospital for Sick Children Phase 3 2003-06-01 The purpose of this study is to determine whether semi-annual fluoride varnish applications combined with caregiver counseling are effective in preventing and reducing a severe form of dental decay, known as early childhood caries, in native and non-native children aged 6 months to 5 years.
NCT00435500 ↗ Fluoride Varnish in the Prevention of Dental Caries in Aboriginal and Non-aboriginal Children Unknown status University of Toronto Phase 3 2003-06-01 The purpose of this study is to determine whether semi-annual fluoride varnish applications combined with caregiver counseling are effective in preventing and reducing a severe form of dental decay, known as early childhood caries, in native and non-native children aged 6 months to 5 years.
NCT00931398 ↗ Treatment of College Students With Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) Using OROS Methylphenidate Withdrawn Ortho-McNeil Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC Phase 4 2010-04-01 The purpose of the proposed study is to determine the effectiveness of methylphenidate HCl (Concerta) in college students with ADHD. This study will consist of 110 college students between the ages of 18 and 25 who are enrolled full-time in a local or junior college. The study consists of an 8-week double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of placebo versus methylphenidate HCl (Concerta®) followed by a 10-week extension of open label methylphenidate HCl (Concerta®).
NCT00931398 ↗ Treatment of College Students With Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) Using OROS Methylphenidate Withdrawn University of Pittsburgh Phase 4 2010-04-01 The purpose of the proposed study is to determine the effectiveness of methylphenidate HCl (Concerta) in college students with ADHD. This study will consist of 110 college students between the ages of 18 and 25 who are enrolled full-time in a local or junior college. The study consists of an 8-week double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of placebo versus methylphenidate HCl (Concerta®) followed by a 10-week extension of open label methylphenidate HCl (Concerta®).
NCT01566409 ↗ Maintenance Treatment for Children With Constipation Completed Kolding Sygehus N/A 2013-09-01 Constipation is a common problem among children. The majority of children suffering from constipation have no underlying disease. Although constipation has no basis in underlying disease, it often leads to a reduced quality of life of children who are on par with or worse than for children suffering from serious diseases such as cardiovascular and rheumatic diseases. Despite the high frequency of constipation among children, little is known about the causes and treatment of constipation. Treatment consists of symptomatic treatment with various laxatives. Movicol and Movicol junior has proven very effective and are therefore widely used in children as disimpaction and maintenance treatment. There is currently no research to prove the need for and length of maintenance treatment with laxative medications in children. The purpose is to examining the effectiveness of maintenance treatment with Movicol. Additional til study will examine how the anal diameter change during a course of treatment and the degree to which it can be used as an indicator of treatment efficacy. The study will test the following: • What is the effect of maintenance treatment with PEG compared to placebo? The results from this study are expected to form the basis for an evidence-based approach to the use of maintenance therapy and the use of ultrasound of the rectum in children with constipation.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for JUNIOR STRENGTH ADVIL

Condition Name

Condition Name for JUNIOR STRENGTH ADVIL
Intervention Trials
Constipation 3
Venous Thromboembolism 2
Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) 1
Prolonged First Stage Labor - Prevention 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for JUNIOR STRENGTH ADVIL
Intervention Trials
Constipation 3
Hypotension 2
Venous Thromboembolism 2
Thromboembolism 2
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for JUNIOR STRENGTH ADVIL

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for JUNIOR STRENGTH ADVIL
Location Trials
United States 33
Germany 12
Austria 8
United Kingdom 8
Italy 7
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for JUNIOR STRENGTH ADVIL
Location Trials
Pennsylvania 4
Illinois 3
Georgia 3
Indiana 2
Florida 2
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for JUNIOR STRENGTH ADVIL

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for JUNIOR STRENGTH ADVIL
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 4 12
Phase 3 3
Phase 2/Phase 3 2
[disabled in preview] 5
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for JUNIOR STRENGTH ADVIL
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 14
Unknown status 5
Recruiting 4
[disabled in preview] 7
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for JUNIOR STRENGTH ADVIL

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for JUNIOR STRENGTH ADVIL
Sponsor Trials
Ain Shams University 4
Bayer 3
Janssen Research & Development, LLC 2
[disabled in preview] 6
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for JUNIOR STRENGTH ADVIL
Sponsor Trials
Other 45
Industry 15
U.S. Fed 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial
Last updated: May 9, 2026

Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Projection: Junior Strength Advil (OTC ibuprofen)

Summary: “Junior Strength Advil” is a branded over-the-counter (OTC) pediatric ibuprofen product. Public clinical-trials visibility is limited because ibuprofen is an established active ingredient and because OTC branding typically does not map to a single modern, sponsor-owned Phase 2/3 clinical program. Market outlook is driven by pediatric pain and fever demand, OTC trade channels, generics share, regulatory labeling, and competitive penetration of alternative OTC antipyretics/analgesics (notably acetaminophen-based products). Forward sales trajectories depend more on distribution and category dynamics than on new ibuprofen efficacy/safety trials.


What clinical trials exist behind “Junior Strength Advil”?

What the brand maps to

  • Active ingredient: ibuprofen
  • Regulatory status: OTC (pediatric “Junior Strength” presentation)
  • Clinical-program pattern for established OTC drugs: Most “new” clinical evidence for ibuprofen is ingredient-level (comparative tolerability, pediatric dosing verification, formulations, or label updates) rather than brand-specific Phase 2/3 programs tied to “Junior Strength Advil.”

Why brand-level trial tracking is sparse

“Junior Strength Advil” is a marketing presentation for a mature molecule. In practice, the clinical-trials record you can reliably attribute to the brand typically consists of:

  • Older pediatric PK/safety and dosing studies supporting labeling (often not sponsor-branded in a way that isolates “Junior Strength Advil”).
  • Ingredient-level evidence (ibuprofen in children) that informs OTC monographs and labeling rather than ongoing, brand-driven late-stage trials.

What’s typically updated in OTC clinical evidence

For pediatric ibuprofen, ongoing evidence is usually aimed at:

  • Dosing accuracy and administration (suspension/pediatric formulation behavior).
  • Safety outcomes in real-world pediatric use (GI effects, renal risk in dehydration, asthma exacerbation in sensitive patients).
  • Comparative outcomes vs acetaminophen for fever and pain resolution times and failure rates (often pragmatic, small to mid-size studies).

Bottom line: For “Junior Strength Advil,” clinical trials activity is less about a current, identifiable Phase 3 pipeline and more about a long-established ingredient safety-and-efficacy base that supports an OTC labeling and ongoing product availability.


What is the current market landscape for pediatric OTC ibuprofen?

Category drivers

Pediatric OTC pain/fever demand is pulled by:

  • Seasonal respiratory illness cycles (cold/flu season)
  • Pediatric acute pain indications (ear pain, sore throat pain, teething pain, post-vaccination discomfort)
  • Caregiver switching behavior between ibuprofen and acetaminophen based on:
    • perceived effectiveness
    • onset and duration
    • prior adverse reactions
    • dosing convenience and product familiarity

Competitive structure

The OTC pediatric analgesic category has three dominant competitive dimensions:

  • Active ingredient competition: ibuprofen vs acetaminophen
  • Form factor: liquids/suspensions vs chewables vs drops (where applicable)
  • Brand vs private label/generics: generics typically compress price and share, especially once labeling and supply are stable

Market-share mechanics (how “Junior Strength” wins)

For a branded pediatric ibuprofen product, share tends to be shaped by:

  • Shelf execution: planogram placement and retailer preference
  • Consumer brand trust: prior pediatric use and pharmacy/counter recommendations
  • Promotion cadence: seasonal spikes, multibuy promotions, and retailer markdowns
  • Dosing ease: syringe/cup compatibility, dosing accuracy tools, caregiver education

Business implication: The category is competitive and price-sensitive. Brand moat is usually distribution plus consumer familiarity, not differentiated clinical data.


How big is the addressable market (TAM/SAM) for pediatric OTC ibuprofen?

TAM (category-level) logic

Pediatric OTC ibuprofen is a subset of:

  1. OTC pediatric fever/pain analgesics
  2. Pediatric consumer healthcare
  3. Retail pharmacy and mass channel OTC spend

Because “Junior Strength Advil” is OTC, TAM estimation for market projection is typically modeled using:

  • Pediatric incidence of fever/pain episodes in the U.S. (seasonal)
  • OTC penetration of caregiving behavior
  • Share of ibuprofen within the pediatric antipyretic/analgesic mix

SAM (product-level) logic

SAM for “Junior Strength Advil” narrows to:

  • Pediatric ibuprofen users selecting a brand (rather than private label/generic)
  • Caregivers using liquid formulations and dosing tools that match “Junior Strength” presentation preferences
  • Retail segments where brand promotions and shelf execution are strongest (drugstores, big-box, mass, and online OTC)

Key point for projection: For mature OTC brands, market size is less elastic on efficacy and more elastic on pricing, promotion, and channel mix.


What does the future growth outlook look like?

2026-2029 growth drivers

  1. Volume resilience from pediatric seasonal demand
    • Ibuprofen does not require prescription, so growth can be sustained through category turnover.
  2. Share stability through caregiver switching patterns
    • Caregivers often alternate acetaminophen and ibuprofen based on perceived control and guidance.
  3. Promotion and trade investment
    • OTC branded product performance typically tracks with retailer promotion intensity and planogram outcomes.

2026-2029 growth headwinds

  1. Generic and private label price pressure
    • Competitive compression can limit revenue growth even when volume holds.
  2. Consumer substitution within the same category
    • If acetaminophen is promoted more heavily (or vice versa), switch rates can shift mix.
  3. Regulatory or labeling constraints (rare but impactful)
    • If warnings, dosing instructions, or packaging requirements change, compliance costs and consumer trust can shift quickly.

Market projection framework for “Junior Strength Advil” (what to model)

Since “Junior Strength Advil” is OTC, a realistic projection model uses three primary levers:

1) Volume

  • Seasonal unit demand
  • Retail distribution breadth and velocity
  • OTC category recurrence rate (care episode frequency)

2) Price

  • Net price after trade (promotions, coupons, retailer allowances)
  • Mix shift between brand and private label
  • Package size impacts (dollars per unit of pain episode)

3) Channel mix

  • Pharmacy vs mass vs online
  • Online share growth and promo mechanics
  • Retailer planogram changes

Projection approach:

  • Build a base case on stable pediatric seasonal demand.
  • Apply a mid-single-digit volume CAGR only if distribution and form-factor remain supported.
  • Use net price assumptions that reflect OTC promotion and generic pressure (often near-flat to low growth for branded OTC).

Actionable view: what matters for business decisions

Where the brand typically concentrates growth

  • Seasonal peak execution: ensuring inventory availability and promotional readiness before respiratory season.
  • Dosing tool differentiation: reducing caregiver dosing error risk.
  • Trade relationships: maintaining shelf placement versus generics/private label.

Where differentiation is limited

  • Clinical differentiation: ibuprofen efficacy is established; brand-level late-stage differentiation is unlikely to drive incremental demand at this stage.
  • Regulatory differentiation: OTC labeling is usually stable for established actives.

Key Takeaways

  • “Junior Strength Advil” is an OTC pediatric ibuprofen brand, so clinical-trial updates are generally ingredient-level and not tied to an ongoing brand-specific Phase 2/3 pipeline.
  • Market performance is driven by pediatric fever/pain category demand, seasonality, and retailer promotion and shelf execution, with generic/private label pressure limiting sustainable net price growth.
  • The most decision-relevant projection levers are volume (seasonal + distribution), net price (trade/promo + mix), and channel shift (pharmacy vs mass vs online).
  • Near-term growth is most likely to come from share maintenance and trade investment, not from incremental clinical evidence.

FAQs

1) Is “Junior Strength Advil” supported by new Phase 3 clinical trials?

No brand-specific modern Phase 2/3 program is typically visible for an established OTC ibuprofen presentation; evidence is usually ingredient-level supporting labeling rather than an active, sponsor-led late-stage pipeline.

2) What determines whether pediatric caregivers switch from ibuprofen to acetaminophen (or vice versa)?

Perceived effectiveness, prior experience, tolerability history, dosing convenience, and retailer/promo visibility at the point of purchase.

3) What is the largest commercial risk for branded pediatric ibuprofen?

Net price compression from generics/private label and trade intensity that caps revenue growth even if units hold.

4) What is the most important time window for demand?

Cold/flu season and other pediatric respiratory peaks when fever and acute pain presentations rise.

5) How do channels change growth for OTC pediatric products?

Online can increase availability and convenience but also increases promo intensity and price transparency, which can pressure net price versus traditional retail.


References

[1] U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). OTC Drug Products Labeling and Regulatory Information. FDA. https://www.fda.gov/drugs/
[2] U.S. National Library of Medicine. ClinicalTrials.gov. https://clinicaltrials.gov/
[3] FDA. Over-the-Counter (OTC) Monograph System and related OTC drug labeling resources. https://www.fda.gov/drugs/development-approval-process-drugs/over-counter-otc-drugs

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.