Last Updated: November 8, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR JELMYTO

« Back to Dashboard


505(b)(2) Clinical Trials for JELMYTO

This table shows clinical trials for potential 505(b)(2) applications. See the next table for all clinical trials
Trial Type Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
New Formulation NCT06774131 ↗ A Phase 3 Single-arm Study of UGN-104 for the Treatment of Low-grade Upper Tract Urothelial Cancer RECRUITING UroGen Pharma Ltd. PHASE3 2025-05-02 This study will evaluate the efficacy and safety of UGN-104, a new formulation of UGN-101 (approved in the United States and Israel as JELMYTO \[mitomycin\] for pyelocalyceal solution), instilled in the upper urinary tract (UUT) of patients with low-grade upper tract urothelial cancer (LG-UTUC).
>Trial Type >Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

All Clinical Trials for JELMYTO

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT01004978 ↗ Chemoembolization With or Without Sorafenib Tosylate in Treating Patients With Liver Cancer That Cannot Be Removed by Surgery Active, not recruiting National Cancer Institute (NCI) Phase 3 2009-10-28 This randomized phase III trial studies chemoembolization and sorafenib tosylate to see how well they work compared with chemoembolization alone in treating patients with liver cancer that cannot be removed by surgery. Drugs used in chemotherapy, such as doxorubicin hydrochloride, mitomycin, and cisplatin, work in different ways to stop the growth of tumor cells, either by killing the cells, by stopping them from dividing, or by stopping them from spreading. Chemoembolization kills tumor cells by carrying drugs directly into blood vessels near the tumor and then blocking the blood flow to allow a higher concentration of the drug to reach the tumor for a longer period of time. Sorafenib tosylate may stop the growth of tumor cells by blocking some of the enzymes needed for cell growth. It is not yet known whether giving chemoembolization together with sorafenib tosylate is more effective than chemoembolization alone in treating patients with liver cancer.
NCT03775265 ↗ Chemoradiotherapy With or Without Atezolizumab in Treating Patients With Localized Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer Recruiting National Cancer Institute (NCI) Phase 3 2019-04-19 This phase III trial studies how well chemotherapy and radiation therapy work with or without atezolizumab in treating patients with localized muscle invasive bladder cancer. Radiation therapy uses high energy rays to kill tumor cells and shrink tumors. Chemotherapy drugs, such as gemcitabine, cisplatin, fluorouracil and mitomycin-C, work in different ways to stop the growth of cancer cells, either by killing the cells, by stopping them from dividing, or by stopping them from spreading. Giving chemotherapy with radiation therapy may kill more tumor cells. Immunotherapy with monoclonal antibodies, such as atezolizumab, may help the body's immune system attack the cancer, and may interfere with the ability of tumor cells to grow and spread. Giving atezolizumab with radiation therapy and chemotherapy may work better in treating patients with localized muscle invasive bladder cancer compared to radiation therapy and chemotherapy without atezolizumab.
NCT04216290 ↗ A Study of Chemotherapy and Radiation Therapy Compared to Chemotherapy and Radiation Therapy Plus MEDI4736 (Durvalumab) Immunotherapy for Bladder Cancer Which Has Spread to the Lymph Nodes (The INSPIRE Study) Recruiting National Cancer Institute (NCI) Phase 2 2020-08-25 This phase II trial studies the benefit of adding an immunotherapy drug called MEDI4736 (durvalumab) to standard chemotherapy and radiation therapy in treating bladder cancer which has spread to the lymph nodes. Drugs used in standard chemotherapy work in different ways to stop the growth of tumor cells, either by killing the cells, by stopping them from dividing, or by stopping them from spreading. Radiation therapy uses high-energy x-rays to kill tumor cells and shrink tumors. Immunotherapy with durvalumab may help the body's immune system attack the cancer and may interfere with the ability of tumor cells to grow and spread. Giving chemotherapy and radiation therapy with the addition of durvalumab may work better in helping tumors respond to treatment compared to chemotherapy and radiation therapy alone. Patients with limited regional lymph node involvement may benefit from attempt at bladder preservation, and use of immunotherapy and systemic chemotherapy.
NCT04858009 ↗ Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy for the Treatment of Pancreatic Cancer and Peritoneal Metastasis Not yet recruiting National Cancer Institute (NCI) Phase 2 2021-11-15 This phase II trial studies the effects of hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) in treating patients with pancreatic cancer that has spread to the internal abdominal area (peritoneal metastasis). Chemotherapy drugs, such as mitomycin and cisplatin, work in different ways to stop the growth of tumor cells, either by killing the cells, by stopping them from dividing, or by stopping them from spreading. HIPEC involves "heated" chemotherapy that is placed directly in the abdomen through laparoscopic instruments, instead of through an intravenous injection. This study may help doctors determine how safe and effective HIPEC work in treating patient with pancreatic cancer.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for JELMYTO

Condition Name

Condition Name for JELMYTO
Intervention Trials
Bladder Urothelial Carcinoma 2
Stage III Bladder Cancer AJCC v8 2
Stage IIIA Bladder Cancer AJCC v8 2
Stage II Anal Cancer AJCC v8 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for JELMYTO
Intervention Trials
Urinary Bladder Neoplasms 3
Carcinoma, Transitional Cell 3
Carcinoma 3
Anus Neoplasms 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for JELMYTO

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for JELMYTO
Location Trials
United States 117
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for JELMYTO
Location Trials
Minnesota 4
Florida 4
California 4
Pennsylvania 4
Nebraska 3
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for JELMYTO

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for JELMYTO
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
PHASE3 1
PHASE2 1
Phase 3 2
[disabled in preview] 4
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for JELMYTO
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Recruiting 3
Not yet recruiting 3
NOT_YET_RECRUITING 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for JELMYTO

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for JELMYTO
Sponsor Trials
National Cancer Institute (NCI) 6
UroGen Pharma Ltd. 1
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for JELMYTO
Sponsor Trials
NIH 6
Other 3
INDUSTRY 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

JELMYTO (mitomycin) Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Revenue Projection

Last updated: July 27, 2026

Executive summary: JELMYTO (mitomycin) is commercially established for low-grade upper tract urothelial cancer (LG-UTUC) and remains a major revenue driver for UGN-101 (JELMYTO is the brand). Core clinical and post-approval evidence centers on the phase 3 pivotal trial (RIVER) and ongoing data generation that supports label durability, durability sub-analyses, and expansion of use in real-world practice. Near-to-medium term commercial momentum depends on (1) maintenance of durable response rates across patient subgroups, (2) conversion of treatment capacity via renal pelvis instillation workflows, (3) payer coverage stability, and (4) competitive pressure from alternative intraluminal approaches and systemic immunotherapy patterns in UTUC. Revenue projections hinge on capacity-limited administration, expanding diagnostic identification of eligible LG-UTUC patients, and the time-to-filling of the treatment pathway by urology centers.


What is JELMYTO (mitomycin) and what indication does it cover?

Quick answer: JELMYTO is an intraluminal mitomycin formulation delivered via a ureteral catheter for the treatment of low-grade upper tract urothelial cancer. The pivotal evidence uses the UGN-101 formulation administered after endoscopic preparation.

Drug composition and delivery system

  • Active ingredient: mitomycin
  • Formulation: UGN-101 (commonly described as a mitomycin-based intravesical-like intraluminal gel designed to gel/adhere in the upper tract lumen for sustained contact)

Indication scope and patient selection

  • Target disease: low-grade upper tract urothelial cancer
  • Practical selection drivers in the clinic:
    • Confirmed LG-UTUC histology
    • Upper-tract disease accessible by ureteral catheterization
    • Patient fitness for endoscopic treatment pathway rather than immediate radical surgery

How the label shapes commercial adoption

Commercial uptake is typically constrained by:

  • Need for ureteral access and catheter-based instillation
  • Center experience and scheduling capacity for instillation, imaging follow-up, and re-treatment planning
  • Urothelial cancer surveillance pathways (including endoscopic evaluation and imaging)

What clinical trials support JELMYTO and what is the latest status?

Quick answer: The principal efficacy and durability dataset is from RIVER, a phase 3 trial of UGN-101 in LG-UTUC. The current commercial narrative is built on durable response performance metrics and long-term follow-up reported from RIVER and related publications.

Phase 3 pivotal trial: RIVER

  • Study design: phase 3 clinical trial evaluating intraluminal UGN-101 for LG-UTUC
  • Key endpoints used for regulatory decision-making:
    • Complete response (CR) and overall response (OR) rates
    • Duration of response and durability measures
    • Progression and oncologic outcomes tracked over follow-up

Post-approval clinical evidence still matters commercially

After approval, commercial credibility depends on:

  • Longer follow-up readouts from RIVER
  • Subgroup analyses that clarify durability by lesion characteristics, tumor burden, and renal function context
  • Additional operational data that show real-world feasibility in center workflows

What constitutes a “clinical trials update” for JELMYTO in practice

For a commercially relevant update, the key is whether new data:

  • Improves responder fraction or durability
  • Identifies patient subgroups with stronger outcomes
  • Supports label expansion or new line-of-therapy positioning
  • Improves safety signals or reduces procedural burden

Which clinical endpoints and durability metrics drive JELMYTO adoption?

Quick answer: JELMYTO adoption is driven by complete response rate and durability of response rather than short-term tumor regression alone.

Efficacy endpoints that map to payers and clinicians

  • Complete response rate
  • Overall response rate
  • Duration of complete response
  • Time-to-progression or progression-free measures used in clinical discussions
  • Conversion to systemic therapy or need for radical surgery as downstream measures

Real-world translation

In UTUC practice, durability is a surrogate for:

  • Reduced need for radical surgery
  • Reduced morbidity compared with nephroureterectomy in appropriate patients
  • Ability to preserve renal function in selected patients

When does JELMYTO lose exclusivity and what patent expiry timeline matters for investors?

Quick answer: A complete exclusivity and patent expiry mapping requires the Orange Book patent list and exact patent publication/expiration dates for JELMYTO’s protected:

  • Drug substance and composition
  • Formulation or delivery characteristics
  • Method-of-use

Because this request is limited to “clinical trials update, market analysis and projection” and does not include the required patent/payer registry inputs, a detailed exclusivity timeline is not provided here.


What is the Orange Book status of JELMYTO and how many listed patents protect it?

Quick answer: This requires the latest Orange Book listing for JELMYTO (drug product entry, patent numbers, and expiration dates). Without that listing in the provided inputs, a reliable count and status cannot be stated.


Are there generic or biosimilar risks for JELMYTO (mitomycin) and what does Paragraph IV mean here?

Quick answer: JELMYTO is a small-molecule drug product with a specific delivery/formulation approach; the relevant generic risk depends on whether challengers can achieve legal and technical equivalence to the protected formulation and method-of-use. A Paragraph IV risk assessment requires the current ANDA landscape and any pending litigation details.

A definitive risk ranking cannot be produced from the provided prompt alone.


How strong is the patent estate for JELMYTO (UGN-101) and what formulations are protected?

Quick answer: Determining “how strong” requires:

  • The specific Orange Book-listed patents
  • Whether patents cover formulation (UGN-101 composition or release/gelation behavior), delivery method, and/or method-of-use
  • Jurisdictional coverage and remaining term

A structured patent strength evaluation is not provided here because the necessary patent dataset is not included in the prompt.


What competing treatments affect JELMYTO market share in low-grade upper tract urothelial cancer?

Quick answer: Competitors include alternative intraluminal chemotherapies, endoscopic management strategies, and the broader trend toward systemic immunotherapy in urothelial cancer settings. JELMYTO’s commercial threat is strongest from intraluminal alternatives that match response durability and are administratively simple.

Competitive buckets

  1. Other intraluminal therapies

    • Instillation-based regimens using different chemotherapies or formulations
    • Approaches competing for the same catheter-based treatment pathway
  2. Surgical management and endoscopic surveillance strategies

    • Radical nephroureterectomy versus kidney-sparing endoscopic management
    • Repeat endoscopic resections that may compete on perceived durability
  3. Systemic therapies

    • Immunotherapy and systemic chemotherapy for urothelial cancer lines
    • While not identical to intraluminal therapy, systemic choice can displace intraluminal use in broader treatment sequences

How competition impacts forecasting

Competition typically affects forecast via:

  • Reduced eligible share at centers
  • Payer preference policies or formulary substitution
  • Differences in administrative burden and catheter logistics

What is the current market size for JELMYTO in the US and how is it expected to grow?

Quick answer: A US market forecast requires inputs not included in the prompt: incidence of LG-UTUC, percent eligible for intraluminal therapy, adoption curve by center, and treatment dose cycles per patient. Without those inputs, only a framework can be given, not a numeric projection.

Market drivers

  • Diagnostic identification of LG-UTUC eligible populations
  • Increased urology-oncology center adoption
  • Durable response profile that supports repeat dosing strategy and payer confidence
  • Reimbursement and procedural workflow stabilization

Market constraints

  • Catheter-based administration capacity
  • Patient selection and procedural feasibility
  • Follow-up and retreatment scheduling demands
  • Alternative treatment pathways that reduce utilization

How many patients does JELMYTO treat per year and what are the key utilization assumptions?

Quick answer: This cannot be numerically estimated from the prompt alone because it depends on:

  • Annual incidence of LG-UTUC and disease recurrence patterns
  • Proportion eligible for kidney-sparing intraluminal therapy
  • Retreatment rates and average number of doses per treated patient
  • Conversion rate from diagnosis to instillation treatment pathway

What does a revenue projection model for JELMYTO look like (drivers, sensitivities, and scenario ranges)?

Quick answer: A decision-grade model for JELMYTO revenue is built from:

  • Treatable patient count
  • Eligibility percentage
  • Treatment cycles per patient (including retreatment share)
  • Net price and payer mix
  • Center adoption speed
  • Constraints like procedure capacity and supply chain stability

Because net price and treatment-cycle utilization data are not included in the prompt, no numeric scenario range is provided.

Model components

  1. Total addressable patient pool

    • Annual LG-UTUC cases, recurrence proportion, and eligibility rate
  2. Adoption curve

    • Speed of center onboarding
    • Share capture among intraluminal strategies
  3. Dosing and retreatment

    • Average number of instillation sessions
    • Retreatment rates among responders and non-responders
  4. Pricing and payer

    • List price and net price assumptions
    • Commercial vs Medicare coverage dynamics
    • Prior authorization and step therapy effects

Sensitivity levers (what changes the outcome fastest)

  • Eligibility capture (increases or decreases by patient workup and referral patterns)
  • Retreatment share (changes per patient treatment sessions)
  • Net price pressure (rebates, payer negotiations)
  • Competitive displacement (share loss)

What regulatory milestones and FDA status affect JELMYTO’s commercial outlook?

Quick answer: FDA approvals and postmarketing commitments drive commercial confidence. A current milestone timeline requires specific FDA approval/label history and post-approval filings, which are not included in the prompt.


What clinical or commercial events are most likely to move JELMYTO forecasts over the next 12–24 months?

Quick answer: Forecast movement typically comes from:

  • New RIVER follow-up publications or sub-analyses that update durability estimates
  • Expansion into additional patient subgroups if supported by data
  • Real-world evidence on procedural feasibility and outcomes
  • Payer policy shifts that alter coverage breadth or prior authorization thresholds
  • Intensifying intraluminal competition or clinical practice shifts toward alternative regimens

A specific, dated event list cannot be created from the provided prompt alone.


Key takeaways

  • JELMYTO’s commercial base is anchored in RIVER phase 3 durability evidence in low-grade upper tract urothelial cancer.
  • Near-to-medium term market outcomes are primarily a function of durable-response performance translating into payer confidence and center adoption, plus capacity for catheter-based instillation and follow-up.
  • A numeric revenue projection and exclusivity/patent timeline require Orange Book listing details and dosing utilization and net price assumptions not provided in the prompt; therefore, no figures are stated.

FAQs

  1. How does JELMYTO’s durability of response compare with alternative intraluminal mitomycin approaches?
  2. What is the typical treatment schedule for JELMYTO instillation and how does retreatment affect total cost?
  3. What payer coverage factors most influence JELMYTO net pricing and formulary placement?
  4. How do center experience and catheter instillation workflows affect real-world utilization rates for JELMYTO?
  5. What evidence would most likely support label expansion for JELMYTO beyond the current LG-UTUC population?

References (APA)

  1. UGN-101 (JELMYTO) clinical trial publications and regulatory documentation related to the phase 3 RIVER study (source material not provided in the prompt).
  2. FDA label and approval history for JELMYTO (source material not provided in the prompt).

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.