You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: January 1, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR INVIRASE


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for Invirase

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00002347 ↗ The Safety and Effectiveness of Retrovir Plus HIVID Combined With Either Nevirapine or Invirase in the Treatment of HIV Infection Completed Parexel Phase 2 1969-12-31 To evaluate the tolerance and immunologic and virologic effects of multidrug combinations of antiretrovirals in patients with HIV infection. Specifically, to evaluate zidovudine/zalcitabine ( AZT / ddC ) alone or in combination with either nevirapine or saquinavir ( Ro 31-8959 ). Administration of three-drug combinations for treatment of HIV infection is preferred over monotherapy or duotherapy. A system has been designed to rapidly evaluate current multidrug combinations of antiretrovirals and allow the addition of new agents as they become available.
NCT00051831 ↗ Effect of an Enfuvirtide-based Anti-HIV Drug Regimen on Latent HIV Reservoirs in Treatment Naive Adults Completed AIDS Clinical Trials Group N/A 2003-10-01 HIV replication in resting CD4 cells is so minimal that anti-HIV drugs often fail to destroy the virus in these cells. Enfuvirtide, also known as T-20, is a type of anti-HIV drug called a fusion inhibitor. The purpose of this study is to test the ability of a T-20-enhanced treatment regimen to decrease the number of resting CD4 cells that become infected with HIV.
NCT00051831 ↗ Effect of an Enfuvirtide-based Anti-HIV Drug Regimen on Latent HIV Reservoirs in Treatment Naive Adults Completed National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) N/A 2003-10-01 HIV replication in resting CD4 cells is so minimal that anti-HIV drugs often fail to destroy the virus in these cells. Enfuvirtide, also known as T-20, is a type of anti-HIV drug called a fusion inhibitor. The purpose of this study is to test the ability of a T-20-enhanced treatment regimen to decrease the number of resting CD4 cells that become infected with HIV.
NCT00105079 ↗ GEMINI Study - A Study of Saquinavir/Ritonavir in Treatment-Naive Patients With HIV-1 Infection Completed Hoffmann-La Roche Phase 3 2005-04-01 This 2 arm study will evaluate the efficacy, safety and tolerability of saquinavir/ritonavir or lopinavir/ritonavir in combination with emtricitabine/tenofovir in patients with human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) infection who have received no prior HIV treatment. Patients will be randomized to receive either saquinavir/ritonavir 1000/100mg oral (po) twice daily (bid) + emtricitabine/tenofovir 200/300mg po once daily (qd), or lopinavir/ritonavir 400/100mg po bid + emtricitabine/tenofovir 200/300mg po qd. The anticipated time on study treatment is 3-12 months, and the target sample size is 100-500 individuals.
NCT00145561 ↗ The Pharmacokinetic Study of Saquinavir New Tablet Formulation in HIV-infected Pregnant Women. Completed Hoffmann-La Roche Phase 1/Phase 2 2005-08-01 Pharmacokinetic study of Saquinavir and Ritonavir in HIV-infected pregnant women
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for Invirase

Condition Name

Condition Name for Invirase
Intervention Trials
HIV Infections 12
Directly Observed Therapy 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for Invirase
Intervention Trials
HIV Infections 12
Infections 3
Infection 2
Communicable Diseases 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for Invirase

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for Invirase
Location Trials
United States 26
Spain 4
Thailand 4
United Kingdom 3
Puerto Rico 2
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for Invirase
Location Trials
New York 3
Missouri 3
New Jersey 2
California 2
North Carolina 2
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for Invirase

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for Invirase
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 4 2
Phase 3 2
Phase 2/Phase 3 1
[disabled in preview] 5
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for Invirase
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 11
Withdrawn 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for Invirase

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for Invirase
Sponsor Trials
Hoffmann-La Roche 5
The HIV Netherlands Australia Thailand Research Collaboration 2
Roche Pharma AG 2
[disabled in preview] 2
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for Invirase
Sponsor Trials
Other 13
Industry 8
NIH 3
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Projection for INVIRASE (Saquinavir)

Last updated: October 30, 2025


Introduction

INVIRASE (saquinavir) is a protease inhibitor primarily used in combination antiretroviral therapy (ART) for HIV-1 infection. Introduced in the late 1990s, it marked a significant milestone in HIV treatment, contributing to the shift toward combination therapy and improved patient outcomes. Despite its longstanding presence in the market, ongoing clinical research and emerging competitors influence its role within the antiviral therapeutics landscape. This article provides a current overview of clinical trial developments, market dynamics, and future projections for INVIRASE.


Clinical Trials Landscape

Historical Context and Key Studies

Saquinavir was among the first protease inhibitors approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 1995. Its efficacy established the foundation for subsequent protease inhibitors, but its clinical use has evolved due to pharmacokinetic limitations, including bioavailability issues and drug interactions.

Recent and Ongoing Clinical Trials

In recent years, the focus of clinical investigation around saquinavir has shifted from monotherapy to combination regimens, with trials exploring its potential utility in:

  • Enhancement of existing ART regimens: Several phase II and III trials evaluate saquinavir's tolerability and efficacy when combined with newer agents like integrase inhibitors and nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs).

  • Drug-drug interactions and pharmacokinetics: Studies continue to elucidate saquinavir’s interaction profile, particularly with emerging drugs, to optimize dosing strategies and minimize adverse effects.

  • Formulation developments: Clinical research also targets improving bioavailability, such as the development of softgel capsules and boosted formulations, to address previous limitations regarding absorption and compliance.

None of these studies currently position INVIRASE as a first-line therapy. Instead, they explore niche roles or adjunctive therapies for specific patient populations, such as those with multi-drug resistant HIV.

Regulatory and Clinical Trial Outlook

No recent FDA approvals or new clinical trials for INVIRASE have been announced as of late 2022, with ongoing research primarily conducted in academic settings or as investigational combination studies. This stagnant trial activity indicates a potential decline in its standalone clinical relevance amid newer, more potent agents.


Market Analysis

Current Market Position

Despite its historical significance, INVIRASE's market share has dramatically diminished. The advent of newer protease inhibitors, integrase inhibitors, and fixed-dose combinations (e.g., Biktarvy, Genvoya) has overshadowed saquinavir due to:

  • Reduced bioavailability and tolerability compared to newer formulations.
  • Drug-drug interaction profiles that complicate multi-drug regimens.
  • More convenient dosing schedules associated with modern ART options.

The global HIV therapeutics market is projected to grow considerably, driven by increasing prevalence, improved diagnosis, and enhanced treatment options. The market value was estimated at approximately USD 32 billion in 2021 and is expected to expand at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of around 6% through 2030 [1].

However, INVIRASE currently accounts for less than 0.5% of global HIV pharmaceutical revenue, reflecting its outdated positioning.

Competitive Landscape

The landscape is dominated by combination pills integrating multiple active agents, which streamline therapy and improve adherence. Notable competitors include:

  • Gilead Sciences' Biktarvy (bictegravir/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide)
  • ViiV Healthcare's Tivicay (dolutegravir) and Triumeq (dolutegravir/lamivudine/abacavir)
  • Merck's Isentress (raltegravir)

These newer agents feature higher barriers to resistance, improved pharmacokinetics, and better tolerability profiles.

Pricing and Reimbursement

Generic versions of saquinavir are available in many markets, but limited demand has kept prices low. Payers favor newer agents, which often receive preferential reimbursement due to superior efficacy and safety data, further limiting INVIRASE's market viability.


Future Market Projections

Decline and Niche Opportunities

The long-term outlook for INVIRASE suggests continued market contraction. It may retain limited niche applications, such as salvage therapy in multi-drug resistant cases or clinical research contexts where newer agents are contraindicated.

Potential for Reformulation and Combination Products

Innovations that enhance bioavailability or reduce adverse effects could theoretically bolster its relevance. However, industry trends favor development of new compounds rather than reformulating existing drugs with known limitations.

Strategic Positioning

Given the accelerated adoption of single-tablet regimens with minimal pill burden, INVIRASE’s role will likely evolve further away from mainstream therapy. It may serve as a comparator agent in clinical trials or as an option in regions with limited access to newer medications.


Regulatory Environment and Industry Outlook

While saquinavir remains approved in multiple regions, regulatory focus veers toward newer agents with superior profiles. Patent protections have expired or are nearing expiration in many markets, leading to generic availability. Nonetheless, market share stagnates as clinicians pivot toward more tolerable, simplified therapies.


Conclusion and Recommendations

INVIRASE's clinical trial activity has significantly waned, and its market position continues to diminish in face of modern, more effective HIV therapies. Its current utility is confined to niche, investigational, or salvage scenarios. For stakeholders:

  • Pharmaceutical companies should consider whether investment in reformulation or adjunctive discovery could revitalize its role.
  • Clinicians should prioritize newer, more tolerable agents aligning with current guidelines.
  • Investors should recognize INVIRASE’s declining market relevance but monitor for niche opportunities or potential repositioning strategies.

Key Takeaways

  • Clinical research on INVIRASE has largely stagnated, with current trials focused on combination therapies and pharmacokinetic optimizations rather than new indications.
  • Market share is minimal, owing to the availability of newer, more effective, and better-tolerated antiretroviral agents.
  • Future demand is limited, confined primarily to salvage therapy or research settings, with mainstream HIV treatment favoring fixed-dose, single-tablet regimens.
  • Regulatory and patent expirations further diminish INVIRASE’s market viability.
  • Strategic prospects are weak unless innovation—such as reformulation or combination product development—can revitalize its relevance.

FAQs

1. Why has INVIRASE (saquinavir) lost market share?
The drug's limitations in bioavailability, tolerability, and dosing complexity compared to newer protease inhibitors and integrase inhibitors have led clinicians to prefer alternative agents with improved safety and efficacy profiles.

2. Are there ongoing clinical trials for INVIRASE?
As of late 2022, clinical trials involving INVIRASE are scarce, primarily focusing on combination therapies or pharmacokinetic studies, indicating reduced clinical development interest.

3. Can INVIRASE be considered in current HIV treatment guidelines?
While still FDA-approved in some jurisdictions, INVIRASE is not recommended as a first-line agent in most guidelines due to its pharmacokinetic drawbacks and availability of superior options.

4. What are the prospects for reformulating saquinavir?
Reformulation to improve bioavailability or reduce side effects has been explored but has not gained significant market traction, given the availability of newer drugs with better profiles.

5. Is there potential for INVIRASE in regions with limited access to newer therapies?
Potential exists in low-resource settings where affordability and availability drive continued use, but global demand remains low due to the availability of generics and alternative therapies.


References

[1] Grand View Research. (2022). HIV Therapeutics Market Size, Share & Trends Analysis Report.
[2] U.S. Food and Drug Administration. (1995). Approval of Saquinavir.
[3] Johnson, M. et al. (2021). Advances in Antiretroviral Therapy: A Review. Journal of Infectious Diseases.
[4] IQVIA. (2022). Global HIV Market Dynamics.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.