Last Updated: June 24, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR IV PERSANTINE


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


505(b)(2) Clinical Trials for IV PERSANTINE

This table shows clinical trials for potential 505(b)(2) applications. See the next table for all clinical trials
Trial Type Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
New Formulation NCT02273531 ↗ Bioequivalence of a New Asasantin Formulation Extended Release (ER) Compared to the Commercially Available Asasantin Formulation (Aggrenox®; Extended Release) in Healthy Male and Female Volunteers Completed Boehringer Ingelheim Phase 1 2004-01-01 Study to establish the bioequivalence of a new formulation of Asasantin ER compared to the present commercially available Asasantin ER formulation (Aggrenox®)
>Trial Type >Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

All Clinical Trials for IV PERSANTINE

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00003018 ↗ S9700 Combination Chemotherapy in Treating Patients With Stage II or Stage III Pancreatic Cancer Completed National Cancer Institute (NCI) Phase 2 1997-09-01 RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy use different ways to stop tumor cells from dividing so they stop growing or die. Combining more than one drug may kill more tumor cells. Chemotherapy following surgery may be an effective treatment for pancreatic cancer. PURPOSE: Phase II trial to study the effectiveness of combination chemotherapy in treating patients with stage II or stage III pancreatic cancer that has not been surgically removed.
NCT00003018 ↗ S9700 Combination Chemotherapy in Treating Patients With Stage II or Stage III Pancreatic Cancer Completed Southwest Oncology Group Phase 2 1997-09-01 RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy use different ways to stop tumor cells from dividing so they stop growing or die. Combining more than one drug may kill more tumor cells. Chemotherapy following surgery may be an effective treatment for pancreatic cancer. PURPOSE: Phase II trial to study the effectiveness of combination chemotherapy in treating patients with stage II or stage III pancreatic cancer that has not been surgically removed.
NCT00763009 ↗ Persantine: Variation in Response Trial Terminated United States Department of Defense Phase 4 2002-09-01 The primary objective of this study is to understand why different people respond differently to the medication Persantine. The effects of Persantine will be evaluated by performing echocardiograms, blood tests and by measuring the flow of blood in the arteries of the heart in patients undergoing a clinically indicated percutaneous coronary intervention.
NCT00763009 ↗ Persantine: Variation in Response Trial Terminated UConn Health Phase 4 2002-09-01 The primary objective of this study is to understand why different people respond differently to the medication Persantine. The effects of Persantine will be evaluated by performing echocardiograms, blood tests and by measuring the flow of blood in the arteries of the heart in patients undergoing a clinically indicated percutaneous coronary intervention.
NCT00906035 ↗ The Vascular Biology of Dipyridamole in Peripheral Arterial Disease (PAD) Terminated Boehringer Ingelheim N/A 2002-09-01 This research study will evaluate the effects of aspirin and dipyridamole alone and in combination on the blood flow in the vessels of the legs. We will examine how these medications are able to inhibit the clotting of platelets in the vessels of patients with PAD, and thereby affect the blood flow in the legs. Platelets are cells in the blood that have the ability to adhere to each other to form clots.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for IV PERSANTINE

Condition Name

Condition Name for IV PERSANTINE
Intervention Trials
Healthy 2
Coronary Artery Disease 2
Henoch-Schönlein Purpura Nephritis 1
HIV Infection 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for IV PERSANTINE
Intervention Trials
Myocardial Ischemia 2
Coronary Disease 2
Coronary Artery Disease 2
Hypertension 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for IV PERSANTINE

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for IV PERSANTINE
Location Trials
United States 29
China 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for IV PERSANTINE
Location Trials
Pennsylvania 2
Connecticut 2
Washington 1
Utah 1
Texas 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for IV PERSANTINE

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for IV PERSANTINE
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 4 1
Phase 2 1
Phase 1/Phase 2 2
[disabled in preview] 5
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for IV PERSANTINE
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 5
Terminated 2
Not yet recruiting 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for IV PERSANTINE

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for IV PERSANTINE
Sponsor Trials
Boehringer Ingelheim 3
Southwest Oncology Group 1
Children's Hospital of Fudan University 1
[disabled in preview] 2
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for IV PERSANTINE
Sponsor Trials
Other 12
Industry 4
NIH 2
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial
Last updated: May 22, 2026

Iv Persantine clinical trials update, market analysis, and 2025–2030 projection

Executive summary: Iv Persantine (dipyridamole injection, IV) is an older branded dipyridamole product with limited global R&D visibility and no clearly identifiable, ongoing late-stage registrational program for a new IV formulation. Market forecasting is therefore dominated by (1) the availability and pricing of dipyridamole injection generics and (2) guideline-driven demand for pharmacologic stress testing and related uses where dipyridamole remains an alternative. Absent verified, active clinical development and without a substantiated, current commercial revenue base for Iv Persantine specifically, a credible 2025–2030 projection is constrained to scenario ranges driven by underlying dipyridamole injection consumption trends and competitive entry risk from generics.

What is Iv Persantine and what indications drive demand for dipyridamole injection?

Featured snippet answer: Iv Persantine is an IV dipyridamole injection product used as a pharmacologic stress agent, primarily in myocardial perfusion imaging where alternatives exist (including adenosine/regadenoson). Demand tracks cardiac imaging volumes and institutional formulary choices.

Key demand drivers

  • Pharmacologic stress testing volume for myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI)
  • Institutional preference between dipyridamole vs other agents (adenosine, regadenoson)
  • Stock availability and reimbursement dynamics for older branded hospital injectables
  • Competitive pressure from generic dipyridamole injection products

Formulation and use context

  • “Iv” denotes an injection route; dipyridamole is a coronary vasodilator used in stress testing contexts rather than chronic oral therapy.

What clinical trials exist for dipyridamole injection (Iv Persantine) and are any programs active?

Featured snippet answer: No ongoing, late-stage registrational trials for an Iv Persantine-specific IV dipyridamole product can be confirmed from the accessible record base at this time.

How to interpret “no visible trials” in this category

  • Dipyridamole injection is an older active ingredient. Development often shifts toward:
    • generic manufacturing (ANDA-type pathways for small-molecule injectables),
    • formulation consistency and supply continuity,
    • label maintenance rather than new clinical endpoints.

Where clinical activity would typically show up

  • ClinicalTrials.gov records tagged with dipyridamole injection, dipyridamole IV, or myocardial perfusion imaging stress agent trials
  • New device-drug combination trials for imaging workflows
  • Comparative trials versus adenosine or regadenoson for MPI protocols

(When there is no verifiable active trial program, market direction typically becomes “supply and competition” rather than “pipeline upside.”)

When does dipyridamole injection lose exclusivity and what does that mean for Iv Persantine?

Featured snippet answer: For older small-molecule injectables like dipyridamole, branded exclusivity is typically long expired; current brand performance is usually a function of contracting, supply reliability, and remaining IP barriers, not primary patent-protected demand.

Exclusivity mechanics that matter for a hospital IV

  • Market entry is usually governed by:
    • composition-of-matter patents (if any remain, unlikely for older actives),
    • formulation/process patents (rare to block all generics for established injectables),
    • regulatory exclusivity tied to specific labeling (often non-existent once the product is mature).

Commercial impact

  • Once generics are established, branded IV products tend to face:
    • price compression,
    • preference loss unless tendered,
    • higher volatility linked to supply outages in generic channels.

What patents protect Iv Persantine and how strong is the patent estate?

Featured snippet answer: Iv Persantine is a legacy branded dipyridamole injection, and the patent landscape is unlikely to provide meaningful forward protection without verified, current Orange Book listings or active litigation.

What would constitute a meaningful patent estate

  • Listed Orange Book patents for the specific NDA/strength/formulation
  • Active injunction or stay affecting generic entry
  • Ongoing Paragraph IV litigation outcomes

(Without verified listings and active legal records tied to “Iv Persantine” specifically, the practical conclusion is that the estate is not a driver of new market growth.)

What is the Orange Book status of Iv Persantine and what generics are at risk?

Featured snippet answer: Iv Persantine’s status is best treated as “generic-accessible” absent confirmed, current Orange Book blocking listings.

How “Orange Book status” affects forecasting

  • If there are no unexpired listed patents:
    • generics can compete on price and availability,
    • branded shares decline regardless of marketing.
  • If there are unexpired, formulation-specific patents:
    • generics may need design-arounds (different excipients/ratios/process),
    • tendering can still shift based on bioequivalence and supply.

How many clinical development programs exist for dipyridamole IV and what outcomes would change market size?

Featured snippet answer: Only programs that reduce supply risk, expand labeled stress-testing adoption, or improve imaging efficacy versus comparator agents would materially increase market size.

Outcome types that move revenue

  • Comparative efficacy in MPI imaging quality endpoints
  • Improved safety or lower adverse event rates in specific patient subsets
  • Protocol standardization that increases use of dipyridamole relative to alternatives

Outcome types that mainly affect share, not total market

  • Non-inferiority in surrogate biomarkers or imaging artifacts
  • Shorter administration workflows
  • Reconstituted vs premixed handling claims

What is the competitive landscape for dipyridamole injection (brand vs generic) and which companies matter?

Featured snippet answer: Competitive pressure for dipyridamole injection is usually driven by generic manufacturers and supply chain robustness rather than ongoing branded differentiation.

Competition map that typically matters

  • Generic dipyridamole injection suppliers in each geography
  • Hospital group purchasing organizations (GPOs) and tender contracts
  • Alternate stress agents:
    • adenosine,
    • regadenoson,
    • dobutamine (in select contraindication scenarios)

What market size baseline supports a 2025–2030 projection for Iv Persantine?

Featured snippet answer: A credible projection requires starting from dipyridamole injection consumption and applying branded share assumptions under generic competition; without a verified product-level revenue baseline for Iv Persantine, projections must be modeled as share and pricing ranges rather than point forecasts.

Projection framework used in hospital injectables under generic pressure

  • Step 1: Estimate dipyridamole injection demand proxy
    • tied to MPI volume using pharmacologic stress
  • Step 2: Apply branded share trend
    • declining as generics increase formulary penetration
  • Step 3: Apply price erosion
    • branded net price typically tracks generic undercutting and tender outcomes
  • Step 4: Apply supply shocks
    • one-year disruptions in generic supply can temporarily lift branded share

2025–2030 market projection scenarios for Iv Persantine: pricing, share, and demand

Featured snippet answer: In generics-exposed hospital injectables, base-case projections usually assume continued volume stability or modest growth offset by share erosion and pricing pressure. Upside requires supply constraints in generics or restricted procurement to specific products.

Scenario table (directional ranges)

Scenario Assumptions Branded unit demand Net revenue trend (2025–2030)
Base case Stable overall dipyridamole use; ongoing generic share erosion Flat to -5% CAGR -2% to -6%
Downside Faster formulary shift to alternatives; increased generic penetration -10% to -20% CAGR -6% to -12%
Upside Generic supply constraints; tendering favors Iv Persantine +0% to +8% CAGR -1% to +3%

These ranges reflect typical economics for legacy, generic-pressured IV small-molecules. A point forecast is not justified without verified Iv Persantine-specific historical net sales and regional market shares.

What regulatory pathway affects Iv Persantine and how does FDA status influence competition?

Featured snippet answer: For established IV small-molecule products, FDA oversight is mostly about manufacturing compliance (CGMP), labeling maintenance, and bioequivalence where generics enter. FDA status generally influences competition speed via approval of ANDAs and labeling parity.

Key regulatory factors for forecasting

  • Approval activity for generic dipyridamole injection products (new ANDAs)
  • Labeling changes affecting interchangeability in clinical protocols
  • Shortages and enforcement actions influencing supply continuity

What generic entry risks exist for Iv Persantine?

Featured snippet answer: The main generic entry risk is not “new clinical trials” but additional generic approvals and manufacturing expansion that intensify price competition.

How entry risk typically appears

  • Multiple ANDA approvals for the same strength/formulation
  • Consolidation of sourcing by hospitals into lowest-cost SKU
  • Rapid tender resets that reprice branded products downward

How does Iv Persantine compare with adenosine and regadenoson for myocardial perfusion imaging demand?

Featured snippet answer: Regadenoson has often shifted practice patterns in pharmacologic MPI due to dosing convenience; dipyridamole remains used where protocol preferences, contraindications, or institutional practice support it.

Share impact levers

  • Administration convenience and workflow fit
  • Contraindications and patient selection protocols
  • Safety profile differences as applied by institutions
  • Availability and cost of each agent in local markets

What patent litigation or settlements affect market access for Iv Persantine?

Featured snippet answer: No specific, Iv Persantine-linked active litigation or settlement record can be confirmed in the accessible record base at this time.

What litigation would change commercially

  • A stay or injunction that delays generic launch
  • Settlement with delayed effective dates, market exclusivity carve-outs, or supply agreements
  • Labeling or manufacturing design-arounds impacting AB-rated interchangeability

Where does Iv Persantine sell geographically and how does that affect projections?

Featured snippet answer: For legacy IV hospital brands, sales are typically concentrated in markets where:

  • dipyridamole injection is still stocked,
  • reimbursement or tendering preserves continuity,
  • generic penetration is uneven.

Geography-driven variability

  • Regulatory and pharmacy reimbursement rules
  • Tender thresholds by hospital systems
  • Generic supply stability differences across regions

What formulations are protected by patents for dipyridamole injection and which delivery formats matter?

Featured snippet answer: For IV dipyridamole, the practical protection focus, where it exists, is formulation and manufacturing process rather than new delivery platforms.

Formulation categories that can be patent-relevant

  • Excipient composition
  • pH and stabilizer system
  • Manufacturing process steps controlling potency/shelf life

Key takeaways

  • Iv Persantine (IV dipyridamole) sits in a legacy, generic-competitive segment where demand is driven primarily by hospital imaging practice and supply continuity.
  • No verifiable active late-stage or registrational clinical development specific to Iv Persantine is confirmed in the available record base.
  • 2025–2030 market direction is best forecast using scenario modeling on branded share and price erosion rather than pipeline-driven upside.
  • Base case expectation for branded revenue is continued negative trend under ongoing generic penetration, with upside possible only via generic supply constraints or tendering shifts.

FAQs

  1. Is Iv Persantine used for myocardial perfusion imaging stress tests instead of adenosine or regadenoson?
  2. Do generic dipyridamole injections compete directly with Iv Persantine on an AB-rated basis?
  3. What causes short-term branded share spikes in older IV injectables like dipyridamole injection?
  4. How do hospital formulary decisions typically rank dipyridamole versus regadenoson?
  5. What regulatory events would most affect future availability of IV dipyridamole products?

References

  1. [No citable sources were provided in the prompt and no product-specific Orange Book, clinical trial registry, or litigation records for “Iv Persantine” were available in the provided context.]

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.