Last Updated: August 15, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR ISOVUE-M 200


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for ISOVUE-M 200

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00209417 ↗ Renal Effects of Two Iodinated Contrast Media in Patients at Risk Undergoing Computed Tomography Terminated ABX CRO Phase 4 2005-06-01 It is well known that X-ray contrast media can affect kidney function in some patients, especially when administered intra-arterially, and patients who already suffer from reduced kidney function and diabetes mellitus may be at increased risk. It is widely accepted to use low-osmolar or iso-osmolar contrast media, especially in patients at risk for contrast media-induced nephropathy. However, little is known about the intravenous use of X-ray contrast media in risk patients, such as contrast-enhanced CT examinations. The main purpose of this study is to evaluate and compare the effects on kidney function of two contrast media, the iso-osmolar iodixanol and the low-osmolar iopamidol in patients at risk of kidney damage associated with the injection of contrast media. Due to the iso-osmolar feature, it is expected less influence on renal function following administration of iodixanol. A standard hydration procedure, based on available guidelines will be given to all patients to prevent negative effects on the kidneys. Serum creatinine (SCr ) concentrations will be measured before and up to 7 days after contrast media administration to evaluate the effects on renal function.
NCT00209417 ↗ Renal Effects of Two Iodinated Contrast Media in Patients at Risk Undergoing Computed Tomography Terminated ABX-CRO Phase 4 2005-06-01 It is well known that X-ray contrast media can affect kidney function in some patients, especially when administered intra-arterially, and patients who already suffer from reduced kidney function and diabetes mellitus may be at increased risk. It is widely accepted to use low-osmolar or iso-osmolar contrast media, especially in patients at risk for contrast media-induced nephropathy. However, little is known about the intravenous use of X-ray contrast media in risk patients, such as contrast-enhanced CT examinations. The main purpose of this study is to evaluate and compare the effects on kidney function of two contrast media, the iso-osmolar iodixanol and the low-osmolar iopamidol in patients at risk of kidney damage associated with the injection of contrast media. Due to the iso-osmolar feature, it is expected less influence on renal function following administration of iodixanol. A standard hydration procedure, based on available guidelines will be given to all patients to prevent negative effects on the kidneys. Serum creatinine (SCr ) concentrations will be measured before and up to 7 days after contrast media administration to evaluate the effects on renal function.
NCT00209417 ↗ Renal Effects of Two Iodinated Contrast Media in Patients at Risk Undergoing Computed Tomography Terminated Averion International Corporation Phase 4 2005-06-01 It is well known that X-ray contrast media can affect kidney function in some patients, especially when administered intra-arterially, and patients who already suffer from reduced kidney function and diabetes mellitus may be at increased risk. It is widely accepted to use low-osmolar or iso-osmolar contrast media, especially in patients at risk for contrast media-induced nephropathy. However, little is known about the intravenous use of X-ray contrast media in risk patients, such as contrast-enhanced CT examinations. The main purpose of this study is to evaluate and compare the effects on kidney function of two contrast media, the iso-osmolar iodixanol and the low-osmolar iopamidol in patients at risk of kidney damage associated with the injection of contrast media. Due to the iso-osmolar feature, it is expected less influence on renal function following administration of iodixanol. A standard hydration procedure, based on available guidelines will be given to all patients to prevent negative effects on the kidneys. Serum creatinine (SCr ) concentrations will be measured before and up to 7 days after contrast media administration to evaluate the effects on renal function.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for ISOVUE-M 200

Condition Name

Condition Name for ISOVUE-M 200
Intervention Trials
Diabetes Mellitus 2
Peripheral Arterial Occlusive Disease 2
Patient Comfort and Safety 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for ISOVUE-M 200
Intervention Trials
Renal Insufficiency 3
Kidney Diseases 3
Myocardial Ischemia 2
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for ISOVUE-M 200

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for ISOVUE-M 200
Location Trials
United States 17
United Kingdom 1
Canada 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for ISOVUE-M 200
Location Trials
New Jersey 11
New York 1
Texas 1
Nebraska 1
California 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for ISOVUE-M 200

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for ISOVUE-M 200
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 4 13
Phase 3 1
Phase 2 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for ISOVUE-M 200
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 14
Recruiting 3
Terminated 2
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for ISOVUE-M 200

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for ISOVUE-M 200
Sponsor Trials
Bracco Diagnostics, Inc 10
GE Healthcare 4
i3 Statprobe 2
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for ISOVUE-M 200
Sponsor Trials
Industry 21
Other 9
NIH 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

ISOVUE-M 200 Clinical Trials, Market Analysis, Patent Status and 2025-2030 Projection

Last updated: July 31, 2026

ISOVUE-M 200 is Bracco Diagnostics’ intrathecal iopamidol formulation containing 200 mg iodine/mL. It is an established radiographic contrast agent for myelography and contrast-enhanced computed tomography of the central nervous system. The product is mature, with no active development program publicly associated with the marketed formulation, no meaningful branded-drug exclusivity remaining, and competition from generic iopamidol and other low-osmolar iodinated contrast agents. Its commercial outlook depends on hospital procurement, supply reliability, procedure volumes, and pricing rather than clinical differentiation.

What is ISOVUE-M 200 and what is it used for?

ISOVUE-M 200 contains iopamidol, a nonionic, water-soluble, low-osmolar iodinated contrast medium. Each milliliter contains 200 mg of organically bound iodine.

Attribute ISOVUE-M 200
Active ingredient Iopamidol
Iodine concentration 200 mg iodine/mL
Dosage form Sterile injectable solution
Route Intrathecal
Primary manufacturer Bracco Diagnostics Inc.
Therapeutic category Diagnostic radiocontrast agent
Main procedures Myelography and selected CNS CT procedures
FDA regulatory pathway Approved new drug application
Biosimilar relevance None
Generic substitution risk High
Primary customers Hospitals, radiology departments and imaging centers

The product label covers intrathecal administration for adult and pediatric patients undergoing radiographic procedures. Indications include cervical, thoracic, lumbar and total-column myelography, as well as contrast enhancement for CT cisternography and CT ventriculography where clinically appropriate.[1]

ISOVUE-M 200 is not intended for intravenous administration. Its intrathecal formulation and dosing requirements distinguish it from intravenous iopamidol products such as ISOVUE-300 and ISOVUE-370.

What is the FDA regulatory status of ISOVUE-M 200?

ISOVUE-M 200 is an FDA-approved prescription diagnostic product. The approval is based on iopamidol’s established safety and effectiveness as an intrathecal contrast medium. Its regulatory status is different from that of a conventional therapeutic drug because the product is used to improve visualization during imaging rather than to treat disease.

The label contains warnings concerning adverse neurologic reactions, including seizures, encephalopathy, aseptic meningitis-like reactions and other manifestations of contrast-induced neurotoxicity. Patients with seizure disorders, impaired blood-brain barrier function or other neurologic risk factors require particular clinical consideration.[1]

The product is administered by trained medical professionals. Dosing varies by procedure, anatomic region, patient age and imaging requirements. The prescribing information emphasizes use of the lowest effective dose and appropriate patient monitoring.

What is the Orange Book status of ISOVUE-M 200?

ISOVUE-M 200 is not generally treated as a commercially important Orange Book exclusivity product. Its original formulation approval dates to the mature era of iopamidol development, and any original composition, manufacturing or use patents would have expired long ago.

The commercial barriers are therefore regulatory and operational rather than patent-based. A competing manufacturer must establish pharmaceutical equivalence, product quality, sterility, stability and suitability for the intrathecal route. Those requirements can delay entry, but they do not provide long-term exclusivity comparable to an active formulation patent.

The FDA Orange Book should be checked for the current product-specific listing and any approved abbreviated new drug applications because listing status can change with ownership, discontinuation or manufacturing activity.[2]

Are there active clinical trials for ISOVUE-M 200?

No major active clinical development program for the marketed ISOVUE-M 200 formulation is publicly associated with the product. The clinical evidence base is mature and consists primarily of historical clinical studies, regulatory reviews and postmarketing safety data rather than modern pivotal trials.

ClinicalTrials.gov is not a reliable source of a current branded-product development pipeline for ISOVUE-M 200. Studies may identify iopamidol, myelography or intrathecal contrast media without naming the commercial product. A search for the brand should therefore be supplemented with searches for:

  • Iopamidol
  • Intrathecal iopamidol
  • Myelography contrast
  • CT cisternography contrast
  • CT ventriculography contrast
  • Nonionic intrathecal contrast media

The current clinical question is not whether ISOVUE-M 200 can obtain initial approval. It is whether the product retains a favorable safety and supply profile compared with alternative agents. New clinical research is more likely to evaluate imaging protocols, contrast-associated neurotoxicity, procedural safety or comparative use of contrast agents than to support a new indication for this specific brand.[3]

What patents protect ISOVUE-M 200?

No active, commercially material patent estate is expected to protect the core ISOVUE-M 200 product in the United States.

Patent category Current commercial relevance
Iopamidol composition patents Expired
Original intrathecal-use patents Expired or no longer commercially material
Basic formulation patents Expected to be expired
Device patents Not central to the product
Manufacturing know-how Potentially relevant but not publicly equivalent to patent exclusivity
Current Orange Book patent protection No material branded protection identified

Iopamidol is a long-established small-molecule contrast agent. Generic manufacturers can compete through abbreviated regulatory pathways if they meet FDA requirements for quality, strength, purity, sterility and labeling.

The remaining defensible assets are more likely to involve manufacturing controls, validated sterile processes, supplier relationships, inventory management and regulatory history. These assets can create execution advantages, but they do not block generic entry.

Which companies compete with ISOVUE-M 200?

ISOVUE-M 200 competes in two overlapping markets: intrathecal contrast media and the broader hospital iodinated-contrast market.

Direct and near-direct competitors

  • Generic iopamidol products
  • Iohexol products, including intrathecal formulations
  • Iopromide and ioversol products where the approved route and procedure are comparable
  • Other nonionic low-osmolar contrast agents used according to institutional protocols

Iohexol is the most relevant competitive reference because it has established intrathecal use and broad hospital distribution. Competition is usually determined by formulary position, contracted price, clinical familiarity and distributor availability.

How does ISOVUE-M 200 compare with iohexol?

Factor ISOVUE-M 200 Iohexol intrathecal products
Active ingredient Iopamidol Iohexol
Product maturity Mature Mature
Clinical differentiation Limited Limited
Route Intrathecal Intrathecal
Generic competition High High
Main purchasing factor Price, supply and formulary status Price, supply and formulary status
Patent leverage Minimal Minimal
Switching barrier Institutional familiarity and protocol preference Institutional familiarity and protocol preference

Neither product has a conventional high-growth pharmaceutical profile. A hospital may retain a preferred agent because of radiologist familiarity, existing order sets, safety protocols or group purchasing contracts. Those factors can preserve demand even when the underlying molecule is off patent.

What patent litigation and Paragraph IV challenges affect ISOVUE-M 200?

No major branded patent litigation or Paragraph IV dispute is associated with the core ISOVUE-M 200 product in the public record commonly used for pharmaceutical patent monitoring.

Paragraph IV litigation is less commercially significant for this product than for a recently approved therapeutic drug because:

  1. The core active ingredient is long established.
  2. Any original patent protection has expired.
  3. Generic contrast products can compete on a mature regulatory pathway.
  4. The market is driven by institutional procurement rather than consumer prescribing.
  5. The commercial value of litigating residual patent claims is limited.

Potential disputes would more likely involve manufacturing quality, regulatory exclusivity, labeling, supply contracts, product liability or intellectual property covering a delivery device or specialized formulation. Those issues should not be confused with a core composition patent blocking generic iopamidol.

When does ISOVUE-M 200 lose exclusivity?

ISOVUE-M 200 has already lost the exclusivity associated with its original active ingredient and initial product approval. There is no credible basis for projecting a new loss-of-exclusivity event comparable to the 2024-2030 patent cliffs affecting newer specialty drugs.

The commercial timeline is better described as follows:

Period Commercial status
Original launch period Branded product protected by regulatory approval and any then-existing patents
Patent-expiration period Core iopamidol and original product protection expired
Current period Mature branded product competing with generic and alternative contrast agents
2025-2030 Continued erosion risk, offset by supply, formulary and brand-recognition advantages

The relevant question is not the date of patent expiry. It is whether Bracco can maintain contracted hospital volume and reliable supply at a price premium over generic alternatives.

What formulations are protected by ISOVUE-M 200?

The principal product distinction is its intrathecal formulation at 200 mg iodine/mL. The formulation is designed for administration into the cerebrospinal fluid and differs from higher-concentration intravenous products.

The formulation’s commercial value comes from:

  • Sterile injectable presentation
  • Intrathecal labeling
  • Controlled iodine concentration
  • Established compatibility with myelographic procedures
  • Regulatory history and physician familiarity
  • Bracco’s manufacturing and distribution infrastructure

These attributes may create a practical switching barrier. They do not create meaningful modern patent exclusivity unless supported by an unexpired claim, which is not expected for the core product.

What is the market outlook for ISOVUE-M 200?

ISOVUE-M 200 belongs to a mature, low-growth diagnostic contrast segment. Demand is linked to the number of myelography and related CNS imaging procedures, not to chronic patient treatment.

Demand drivers

  • Aging populations with spinal stenosis and degenerative spine disease
  • Continued use of myelography when MRI is contraindicated, unavailable or clinically insufficient
  • Growth in image-guided procedures
  • Hospital replacement of older contrast inventory
  • Supply disruptions affecting competing products

Demand constraints

  • MRI substitution in many CNS diagnostic pathways
  • Declining use of conventional myelography in some institutions
  • Generic pricing pressure
  • Hospital purchasing consolidation
  • Limited physician switching incentives
  • Low product differentiation

A precise global revenue forecast for ISOVUE-M 200 is not publicly disclosed. Bracco reports at the company level rather than providing a separate revenue line for this individual strength and presentation. A defensible projection therefore requires a bottom-up model based on procedure volume, market share, net price and supply performance rather than a reported product forecast.

2025-2030 scenario projection

Scenario Procedure demand Branded share Net price trend Revenue outlook
Downside Declines 4%-6% annually Falls rapidly Declines 5%-8% annually High-single- to low-double-digit annual decline
Base case Flat to down 1%-2% annually Gradual erosion Declines 2%-4% annually Mid-single-digit annual decline
Upside Grows 1%-2% annually Stable in contracted accounts Flat to down 2% annually Flat to modest annual growth

The base case is the most supportable commercial view. ISOVUE-M 200 should be modeled as a stable but declining hospital product, with periodic volume gains during competitor shortages. The product is unlikely to generate material growth from new indications or clinical innovation.

What generic launch risks exist for ISOVUE-M 200?

Generic launch risk is high in principle but may be moderate in realized commercial impact because the relevant market is specialized and procurement-driven.

Regulatory barriers

Generic entrants must demonstrate:

  • Sterility and injectable product quality
  • Consistent iopamidol concentration
  • Adequate stability and container closure integrity
  • Intrathecal suitability
  • Manufacturing compliance
  • Labeling aligned with the approved route and indications

Commercial barriers

The main barriers are:

  • Limited market size
  • Hospital contracting requirements
  • Group purchasing organization access
  • Need for reliable sterile manufacturing
  • Distributor qualification
  • Physician and radiology-department familiarity
  • Inventory and shortage-management requirements

A generic entrant could obtain regulatory approval yet fail to capture substantial share if it cannot support national distribution or hospital contract pricing.

Does ISOVUE-M 200 face biosimilar risk?

No. Biosimilars apply to biological products. Iopamidol is a chemically synthesized small molecule. ISOVUE-M 200 faces generic-drug competition, not biosimilar competition.

What licensing deals affect ISOVUE-M 200?

No major recent licensing transaction is publicly linked specifically to ISOVUE-M 200. Bracco’s commercial position is primarily based on ownership, manufacturing and distribution of its contrast-media portfolio rather than a newly licensed technology protecting this individual product.

A licensing or supply arrangement involving iopamidol, a contract manufacturer or a distributor could affect availability without changing the patent status. Such agreements are generally not disclosed at the individual product-strength level.

How strong is the ISOVUE-M 200 patent estate?

The patent estate is weak as a current exclusivity tool and moderate as a historical regulatory and manufacturing platform.

Patent-estate factor Assessment
Core molecule protection Expired
Core intrathecal use protection Expired or immaterial
New formulation protection No material current protection identified
Orange Book leverage Low
Litigation leverage Low
Manufacturing know-how Moderate operational value
Brand and hospital relationships Moderate commercial value
Supply-chain advantage Potentially material during shortages

Key Takeaways

  • ISOVUE-M 200 is an established intrathecal iopamidol product from Bracco Diagnostics.
  • Its primary uses are myelography and selected CNS CT procedures.
  • No active product-specific clinical development program is publicly associated with the marketed formulation.
  • The core molecule and original product protections are expired.
  • No material current Orange Book patent or Paragraph IV litigation issue drives the product outlook.
  • Generic iopamidol and iohexol are the main competitive threats.
  • The product is exposed to gradual price and share erosion, but hospital contracts and supply reliability can preserve volume.
  • A base-case 2025-2030 model supports mid-single-digit annual revenue decline rather than a sharp patent-cliff collapse.
  • The main commercial risks are generic substitution, MRI displacement, procurement pressure and sterile-product supply competition.
  • ISOVUE-M 200 has generic risk, not biosimilar risk.

FAQs About ISOVUE-M 200

Is ISOVUE-M 200 still available?

It is an established marketed product, but availability can vary by country, presentation, distributor inventory and hospital contract. Product-specific supply status should be verified through current FDA and manufacturer channels.

Is ISOVUE-M 200 the same as intravenous ISOVUE?

No. ISOVUE-M 200 is labeled for intrathecal use. Intravenous ISOVUE products use different concentrations and approved administration routes.

Can generic iopamidol replace ISOVUE-M 200?

A generic product may be substitutable when it has the appropriate FDA approval, labeling, concentration, route and institutional formulary status. Substitution is controlled by hospital policy and clinical judgment.

Is ISOVUE-M 200 used for MRI?

No. ISOVUE-M 200 is an iodinated X-ray and CT contrast agent. MRI contrast agents generally use gadolinium-based compounds or other MRI-specific technologies.

Why would physicians use ISOVUE-M 200 instead of MRI?

Myelography may be used when MRI is contraindicated, unavailable, technically inadequate or insufficient for the clinical question. It can provide dynamic or high-resolution information about the spinal canal and nerve-root structures.

References

  1. Bracco Diagnostics Inc. (2023). ISOVUE-M (iopamidol injection) prescribing information. U.S. Food and Drug Administration/DailyMed.
  2. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. (2024). Approved drug products with therapeutic equivalence evaluations, Orange Book.
  3. U.S. National Library of Medicine. (2024). ClinicalTrials.gov: Search results for iopamidol, intrathecal contrast and myelography.
  4. Bracco Diagnostics Inc. (2024). Contrast media product information and clinical resources.
  5. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. (2024). Drug shortages and supply-chain information for sterile injectable products.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.