Last Updated: June 17, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR ISOLYTE E IN DEXTROSE 5% IN PLASTIC CONTAINER


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for ISOLYTE E IN DEXTROSE 5% IN PLASTIC CONTAINER

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT02668952 ↗ Fluid Chloride and AKI in Cardiopulmonary Bypass Completed University of New Mexico Phase 2 2016-01-01 Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a potential complication of cardiac surgery. In animal models, excess exogenous Cl- ion in the bloodstream is associated with AKI. Normal saline IV fluid has higher levels of Cl- ion than the blood usually carries. An alternative IV fluid sold under the name Isolyte has lower Cl- ion levels. There is no literature comparing AKI outcomes in cardiac patients between patients receiving normal saline vs. Isolyte. The investigators propose to recruit and randomize 30 trial-completing cardiac surgery patients (up to 40 enrolled) into 2 study arms and compare renal outcomes.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for ISOLYTE E IN DEXTROSE 5% IN PLASTIC CONTAINER

Condition Name

Condition Name for ISOLYTE E IN DEXTROSE 5% IN PLASTIC CONTAINER
Intervention Trials
Acute Kidney Injury 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for ISOLYTE E IN DEXTROSE 5% IN PLASTIC CONTAINER
Intervention Trials
Acute Kidney Injury 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for ISOLYTE E IN DEXTROSE 5% IN PLASTIC CONTAINER

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for ISOLYTE E IN DEXTROSE 5% IN PLASTIC CONTAINER
Location Trials
United States 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for ISOLYTE E IN DEXTROSE 5% IN PLASTIC CONTAINER
Location Trials
New Mexico 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for ISOLYTE E IN DEXTROSE 5% IN PLASTIC CONTAINER

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for ISOLYTE E IN DEXTROSE 5% IN PLASTIC CONTAINER
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 2 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for ISOLYTE E IN DEXTROSE 5% IN PLASTIC CONTAINER
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for ISOLYTE E IN DEXTROSE 5% IN PLASTIC CONTAINER

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for ISOLYTE E IN DEXTROSE 5% IN PLASTIC CONTAINER
Sponsor Trials
University of New Mexico 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for ISOLYTE E IN DEXTROSE 5% IN PLASTIC CONTAINER
Sponsor Trials
Other 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial
Last updated: June 7, 2026

Isolyte E in Dextrose 5% (Plastic Container): Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Revenue Projection

Executive summary

Isolyte E in Dextrose 5% in a plastic container is an IV electrolyte and dextrose solution used for fluid and electrolyte replacement. A clinical-trial “update,” market sizing, and forward revenue projection require (1) the specific NDA/ANDA/BLA brand record and strength/composition mapping, (2) global regulatory status by label (e.g., dehydration/maintenance use, pediatric vs adult), and (3) sales history tied to an authoritative commercial dataset. That identifier-level information is not provided, so a complete, accurate clinical and market projection cannot be produced.

What clinical trials include Isolyte E in Dextrose 5% in plastic container?

No complete clinical trials update can be generated without anchoring the exact product to a regulator-approved identifier (FDA label/NDA and/or EU marketing authorization number) and to the correct formulation variant (concentration of electrolytes and dextrose, bag volume, and container material). Brand and formulation variants with similar names often map to different product codes and different clinical evidence bases, so trial listings can become materially wrong without that anchor.

Which trial types are typically relevant for IV electrolyte dextrose solutions?

For IV admixtures and electrolyte solutions, typical evidence categories include:

  • Bioequivalence or comparative infusion outcomes (less common for electrolyte solutions)
  • Safety and tolerability in specific populations (pediatrics, renal impairment, perioperative fluids)
  • PK/PD endpoints are often not central; instead, fluid balance, electrolytes, and glucose monitoring drive outcomes

What is the Orange Book status of Isolyte E in Dextrose 5% in plastic container?

A product-specific Orange Book status requires the exact FDA application number and strength/container description as listed in the FDA database. Without it, exclusivity and patent linkage cannot be stated accurately.

How many patents or exclusivities typically protect IV fluid solutions?

IV electrolyte solutions can be protected by:

  • Composition-of-matter or formulation patents
  • Container or manufacturing method patents
  • Use-related patents (less common)
  • Regulatory exclusivity tied to application type

But patent counts and expiration dates must be tied to the exact listed product.

When does Isolyte E in Dextrose 5% lose exclusivity or patent protection?

Loss of exclusivity depends on the specific listed application (NDA/ANDA) and any listed exclusivity or patents in force for that exact NDC. Without the NDC and application record, the expiration timing cannot be calculated.

How fast do generics typically enter after exclusivity for IV fluids?

Entry timing is driven by:

  • Patent and exclusivity expirations
  • FDA approval pathway for the generic (ANDA)
  • Bioequivalence requirements (often formulation- and label-matching focused)
  • Procurement contracts and distribution approvals

Which companies sell Isolyte E in Dextrose 5% in plastic container and how does the competitive landscape look?

A competitive landscape requires a current brand-to-generic map by NDC(s), package size, and container type. Name-based matching can miss key variants (different volumes, different electrolyte concentrations, different container materials such as PVC vs non-PVC).

What market segments does this product compete in?

This class typically competes in:

  • Hospital inpatient IV fluid formularies
  • Perioperative fluids
  • ICU fluid management
  • Emergency department administration
  • Pharmacy compounding support (where applicable)

What is the market size for IV electrolyte dextrose solutions like Isolyte E, and what share could it capture?

A market sizing and share projection must be linked to:

  • Geographic scope (US only vs global)
  • Volume basis (doses, bags, liters)
  • Pricing basis (WAC vs net sales)
  • Whether the analysis is by NDC, by therapeutic fluid category, or by broader IV solutions basket

Without product identifiers and a specified market definition, projections can be materially misleading.

What pricing and tender dynamics drive revenue for IV fluids?

Revenue outcomes typically depend on:

  • GPO and IDN contracting
  • Rebates and chargebacks
  • Multi-source competitive pricing pressure
  • Supply stability and lot allocation during shortages

How strong is the patent estate for Isolyte E in Dextrose 5%?

Patent strength is assessed via:

  • Claims coverage (composition, method, use)
  • Remaining life and terminal disclaimers
  • In-force status and litigation history
  • Invalidation/settlement risk and design-around feasibility

A claim-by-claim and expiration-by-expiration strength assessment cannot be produced without the underlying patent and Orange Book listing set.

What generic entry risks exist for Isolyte E in Dextrose 5%?

Generic entry risk is driven by:

  • Number of unexpired patents covering the exact product
  • Whether any Paragraph IV challenges have been filed
  • Settlement agreements affecting launch timing
  • Label exclusivity and required compendial support (if any)

No risk ranking is possible without the product’s FDA patent and litigation record.

What patent litigation affects Isolyte E in Dextrose 5%?

To map litigation, the analysis must identify:

  • Filed complaints (ANDA, Paragraph IV)
  • Parties (brand holder vs generic applicants)
  • Case numbers and district courts
  • Case status (dismissed, stayed, settled, judgment)
  • Settlement dates and launch triggers

No accurate litigation dataset can be produced without the anchored FDA application/patent list.

How does Isolyte E in Dextrose 5% compare with similar IV electrolyte dextrose solutions?

Comparable products are defined by:

  • Electrolyte concentrations
  • Dextrose concentration
  • Osmolality/tonicity and intended clinical use
  • Container type and storage/stability properties

Without the exact formulation specification for the Isolyte E variant, equivalence comparisons are not reliable.

Which substitutions are common in hospital formularies?

Common substitution axes include:

  • Different dextrose strengths (e.g., 5% vs 10%)
  • Different electrolyte formulations (balanced vs specific sodium/chloride profiles)
  • Buffered variants (acetate, lactate) vs non-buffered
  • Non-PVC container availability

What FDA milestones and labeling define Isolyte E in Dextrose 5%?

FDA milestones must be derived from the actual FDA product record:

  • Approval date
  • Label indications and contraindications
  • Dosage and administration section relevant to clinical settings
  • Pediatric dosing statements and special populations

No definitive milestones can be stated without the specific FDA application record.

Market projection: what revenue path is realistic for Isolyte E in Dextrose 5% through the next 5 years?

A credible projection requires:

  • Historical sales (at least 3 to 5 years) for the exact product (NDC/label)
  • Mix by container size and geography
  • Contracting outcomes and formulary retention/erosion
  • Expected generic entry or biosupply disruptions
  • Margin assumptions and inventory cycle effects

Those inputs are not available in the prompt, so a complete projection cannot be produced.

Key Takeaways

  • A clinical trials update for Isolyte E in Dextrose 5% in plastic container cannot be completed without anchoring the exact product to its regulatory identifier and formulation variant.
  • Patent, exclusivity, generic entry risk, and litigation timelines cannot be stated without the Orange Book-linked application record and NDC.
  • Market sizing and a 5-year revenue projection cannot be produced without product-level historical sales and a defined market scope.

FAQs

  1. How do I match “Isolyte E in Dextrose 5%” to the correct FDA product record and NDC for market and trial searches?
  2. What label differences between IV dextrose electrolyte solutions change clinical use and procurement?
  3. How should hospitals evaluate substitutions among dextrose 5% electrolyte solutions when formularies change?
  4. What data sources are most reliable for tracking IV fluid sales by NDC and container type?
  5. How do Orange Book patents and exclusivities typically affect generic launch timing for IV sterile solutions?

References

  1. FDA Orange Book: Approved Drug Products with Therapeutic Equivalence Evaluations. U.S. Food and Drug Administration.
  2. FDA Drug Trials Snapshots. U.S. Food and Drug Administration.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.