Last Updated: June 25, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR IRBESARTAN AND HYDROCHLOROTHIAZIDE


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for IRBESARTAN AND HYDROCHLOROTHIAZIDE

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00095394 ↗ Irbesartan/Hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) Combination Therapy as First Line Treatment for Severe Hypertension Completed Sanofi Phase 3 2004-09-01 The purpose of this clinical research is to learn if severe hypertension can be better controlled by initially treating with a combination of drugs (Irbesartan/HCTZ), in patients who are unlikely to achieve blood pressure (B/P) control with only one drug. In addition, the study will also evaluate the safety and tolerability of the drugs.
NCT00095394 ↗ Irbesartan/Hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) Combination Therapy as First Line Treatment for Severe Hypertension Completed Bristol-Myers Squibb Phase 3 2004-09-01 The purpose of this clinical research is to learn if severe hypertension can be better controlled by initially treating with a combination of drugs (Irbesartan/HCTZ), in patients who are unlikely to achieve blood pressure (B/P) control with only one drug. In addition, the study will also evaluate the safety and tolerability of the drugs.
NCT00095550 ↗ Irbesartan/Hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) Combination Therapy for Patients With Moderate Hypertension Completed Sanofi Phase 3 2004-10-01 The purpose of this clinical research is to learn if moderate hypertension can be better controlled by initially treating with a combination of drugs (Irbesartan/HCTZ), in patients who are unlikely to achieve blood pressure (B/P) control with only one drug. In addition, the study will also evaluate the safety and tolerability of the drugs.
NCT00095550 ↗ Irbesartan/Hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) Combination Therapy for Patients With Moderate Hypertension Completed Bristol-Myers Squibb Phase 3 2004-10-01 The purpose of this clinical research is to learn if moderate hypertension can be better controlled by initially treating with a combination of drugs (Irbesartan/HCTZ), in patients who are unlikely to achieve blood pressure (B/P) control with only one drug. In addition, the study will also evaluate the safety and tolerability of the drugs.
NCT00110422 ↗ Irbesartan in the Treatment of Hypertensive Patients With Metabolic Syndrome Completed Sanofi Phase 4 2005-11-01 The purpose of this clinical research study is to learn if irbesartan is superior to hydrochlorothiazide relative to effects on insulin sensitivity and glucose metabolism in hypertensive patients with metabolic syndrome.
NCT00110422 ↗ Irbesartan in the Treatment of Hypertensive Patients With Metabolic Syndrome Completed Bristol-Myers Squibb Phase 4 2005-11-01 The purpose of this clinical research study is to learn if irbesartan is superior to hydrochlorothiazide relative to effects on insulin sensitivity and glucose metabolism in hypertensive patients with metabolic syndrome.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for IRBESARTAN AND HYDROCHLOROTHIAZIDE

Condition Name

Condition Name for IRBESARTAN AND HYDROCHLOROTHIAZIDE
Intervention Trials
Hypertension 14
Type 2 Diabetes 1
Healthy 1
Metabolic Syndrome 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for IRBESARTAN AND HYDROCHLOROTHIAZIDE
Intervention Trials
Hypertension 13
Syndrome 1
Metabolic Syndrome X 1
Metabolic Syndrome 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for IRBESARTAN AND HYDROCHLOROTHIAZIDE

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for IRBESARTAN AND HYDROCHLOROTHIAZIDE
Location Trials
United States 71
Canada 18
Germany 6
Taiwan 4
France 4
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for IRBESARTAN AND HYDROCHLOROTHIAZIDE
Location Trials
Texas 4
Montana 2
Mississippi 2
Michigan 2
Massachusetts 2
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for IRBESARTAN AND HYDROCHLOROTHIAZIDE

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for IRBESARTAN AND HYDROCHLOROTHIAZIDE
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 4 9
Phase 3 3
NA 1
[disabled in preview] 3
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for IRBESARTAN AND HYDROCHLOROTHIAZIDE
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 15
NOT_YET_RECRUITING 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for IRBESARTAN AND HYDROCHLOROTHIAZIDE

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for IRBESARTAN AND HYDROCHLOROTHIAZIDE
Sponsor Trials
Sanofi 10
Bristol-Myers Squibb 4
Roxane Laboratories 2
[disabled in preview] 3
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for IRBESARTAN AND HYDROCHLOROTHIAZIDE
Sponsor Trials
Industry 16
Other 6
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Irbesartan And Hydrochlorothiazide: Clinical Trials Update and Market Projection

Last updated: April 27, 2026

What is the drug and how is it marketed?

Irbesartan and hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) is a fixed-dose combination (FDC) product combining an angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB) with a thiazide diuretic. It is used for hypertension management in patients who require combination therapy.

What is the clinical development status?

What do current trial records indicate?

Across major registries, the combination is largely in the category of established therapy rather than active late-stage global development. Clinical activity tends to center on:

  • Bioequivalence (BE) and formulation work
  • Local or post-authorization studies, including patient follow-up in routine care settings
  • Switching, adherence, and tolerability studies rather than novel mechanism research

Implication for R&D timing: The active pipeline signal for a new, differentiated asset is weak at the combination level; most visible work is compliance and lifecycle management rather than new clinical positioning.

How do studies typically measure outcomes?

For trials of irbesartan/HCTZ FDC, endpoints commonly include:

  • Change in seated systolic and diastolic blood pressure from baseline
  • Proportion reaching guideline targets (varies by study design)
  • Safety and tolerability (electrolytes, renal function, adverse events)
  • Pharmacokinetics (PK) and BE parameters for formulation studies

What is the market reality today?

What does demand typically depend on?

Market demand is driven by:

  • Hypertension prevalence and treated patient share
  • Generic penetration and payer formularies
  • Fixed-dose convenience versus monotherapy
  • Guideline alignment for ARB + diuretic regimens in uncontrolled hypertension

How exposed is the combination to generics?

Irbesartan and HCTZ are long-established molecules. The FDC market is therefore structurally exposed to:

  • Generic FDC entry in multiple geographies
  • Lower price points versus branded monotherapy combinations
  • Competitive substitution by equivalent ARB/HCTZ FDCs and separate co-pays for generic components

Market impact: Growth is typically volume-led and slower on value due to price erosion. The combination still holds share because fixed-dose therapy is cost-effective and simplifies adherence.

What is the competitive landscape?

Who competes in the same clinical space?

In ARB/HCTZ FDCs, competitive pressure is primarily from:

  • Other ARB/HCTZ FDCs (class peers)
  • ARB + thiazide as separate generics
  • Other FDCs within hypertension (for example ARB/CCB or ACEi/diuretic)

How does differentiation work when MoA is shared?

Differentiation is usually limited to:

  • Tablet strength ladder and titration usability
  • Formulation and tolerability
  • Regional availability and formulary placement
  • Pharmacokinetic differences from formulation variants (where applicable)

Clinical trial update: what is likely actionable for development strategy?

What trial types remain most relevant?

Given the combination’s established use, development activity that can still create value typically comes from:

  1. Formulation improvements that reduce variability (BE-driven)
  2. Patient-centric studies that support label-compatible adherence and persistence claims
  3. Geographic expansion for generic FDCs with updated manufacturing sites and regulatory dossiers

What will regulators focus on for this kind of product?

For FDC lifecycle or reformulation work, regulatory scrutiny typically includes:

  • Demonstrating bioequivalence to the reference product
  • Ensuring consistent dissolution and stability for both actives
  • Safety monitoring for electrolytes and renal function signals consistent with class effects

Market projection: how to forecast the next cycle

What is the base case assumption?

For an established ARB/HCTZ FDC facing generic competition, projections usually follow:

  • Stable or modest unit growth driven by hypertension treatment coverage
  • Value decline due to price competition
  • Share shifts by payer contracting and brand-specific availability of strengths

What directional projection does the evidence support?

In the absence of a new proprietary clinical differentiation signal at the combination level, projections are most consistent with:

  • Units: low-to-mid single digit growth over multi-year horizons (driven by prevalence, persistence, and guideline-driven combination escalation)
  • Value: flat to low growth, or decline in pricing terms, depending on country and generic intensity

A practical projection framework for investment or R&D planning

How to model revenues

A workable model for this asset class is:

  • Patient pool growth (hypertension treated prevalence)
  • Combination penetration (share of patients requiring ARB + diuretic)
  • Dose strength mix (affects ASP and reimbursement tiers)
  • Net price trends (generic erosion, tendering dynamics)
  • Exclusivity status (end of brand protection timelines are the dominant swing factor)

What variables most change outcomes?

For irbesartan/HCTZ specifically, the top swing variables are:

  • Local generic entry timing and tender outcomes
  • Payer preference policies for ARB + diuretic regimens
  • Regulatory approvals for new FDC strengths and formulations in key markets
  • Competition from other ARB/HCTZ FDC manufacturers at the same strength ladder

Key product and data anchors used in market and trial review

Registry and guidance anchors

  • Clinical trial records for irbesartan and related FDC therapy are primarily BE and lifecycle oriented in recent years, consistent with established use patterns.
  • Clinical endpoints across hypertension trials follow standard BP reduction and safety frameworks used in antihypertensive development.

Sources used for registry and labeling review: the clinical trial registry and FDA label-type information for the class and combination are the operational references. (See cited sources.)

Key Takeaways

  • Irbesartan/HCTZ is an established ARB + thiazide fixed-dose combination with limited visible late-stage innovation at the combination level; most current clinical activity is lifecycle oriented (BE, post-authorization, tolerability, adherence).
  • Market growth is most likely volume-led and value-limited due to generic competition and payer-driven pricing.
  • For planning, the highest-impact levers are geographic tender dynamics, combination penetration rates, dose strength mix, and any formulation that changes tolerability or reduces variability.
  • Near-term R&D value creation is more likely to come from lifecycle/regulatory execution (BE and dossier refresh) and targeted real-world evidence support than from new mechanism or claim expansion.

FAQs

1) Are there meaningful late-stage clinical trials for irbesartan/HCTZ right now?

Most publicly visible trial activity for this combination is consistent with established therapy lifecycle work (bioequivalence and post-authorization studies) rather than new late-stage efficacy programs.

2) What are the most common endpoints used in trials of this FDC?

Trials typically measure change in seated systolic and diastolic blood pressure and assess safety with emphasis on renal function and electrolyte parameters.

3) What drives payer coverage for an ARB/HCTZ fixed dose?

Coverage is usually driven by hypertension guideline alignment, formulary tiering, and net pricing from tendering and contracting rather than novel clinical differentiation.

4) How does generic competition typically affect this market?

Generic competition compresses price and shifts growth toward unit volume. Value typically grows slower than units or declines in pricing terms.

5) Where can new value still be created for established ARB/HCTZ combinations?

Value can come from formulation and manufacturing lifecycle execution (BE), strength ladder optimization for local formularies, and real-world or adherence-focused evidence that supports utilization.


References

[1] ClinicalTrials.gov. (n.d.). Search results for irbesartan hydrochlorothiazide. https://clinicaltrials.gov/
[2] U.S. Food and Drug Administration. (n.d.). Drug labels and information for antihypertensive fixed-dose combinations (irbesartan and hydrochlorothiazide class-related references). https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.