You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: March 27, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR IOPAMIDOL-200


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for IOPAMIDOL-200

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00209417 ↗ Renal Effects of Two Iodinated Contrast Media in Patients at Risk Undergoing Computed Tomography Terminated ABX CRO Phase 4 2005-06-01 It is well known that X-ray contrast media can affect kidney function in some patients, especially when administered intra-arterially, and patients who already suffer from reduced kidney function and diabetes mellitus may be at increased risk. It is widely accepted to use low-osmolar or iso-osmolar contrast media, especially in patients at risk for contrast media-induced nephropathy. However, little is known about the intravenous use of X-ray contrast media in risk patients, such as contrast-enhanced CT examinations. The main purpose of this study is to evaluate and compare the effects on kidney function of two contrast media, the iso-osmolar iodixanol and the low-osmolar iopamidol in patients at risk of kidney damage associated with the injection of contrast media. Due to the iso-osmolar feature, it is expected less influence on renal function following administration of iodixanol. A standard hydration procedure, based on available guidelines will be given to all patients to prevent negative effects on the kidneys. Serum creatinine (SCr ) concentrations will be measured before and up to 7 days after contrast media administration to evaluate the effects on renal function.
NCT00209417 ↗ Renal Effects of Two Iodinated Contrast Media in Patients at Risk Undergoing Computed Tomography Terminated ABX-CRO Phase 4 2005-06-01 It is well known that X-ray contrast media can affect kidney function in some patients, especially when administered intra-arterially, and patients who already suffer from reduced kidney function and diabetes mellitus may be at increased risk. It is widely accepted to use low-osmolar or iso-osmolar contrast media, especially in patients at risk for contrast media-induced nephropathy. However, little is known about the intravenous use of X-ray contrast media in risk patients, such as contrast-enhanced CT examinations. The main purpose of this study is to evaluate and compare the effects on kidney function of two contrast media, the iso-osmolar iodixanol and the low-osmolar iopamidol in patients at risk of kidney damage associated with the injection of contrast media. Due to the iso-osmolar feature, it is expected less influence on renal function following administration of iodixanol. A standard hydration procedure, based on available guidelines will be given to all patients to prevent negative effects on the kidneys. Serum creatinine (SCr ) concentrations will be measured before and up to 7 days after contrast media administration to evaluate the effects on renal function.
NCT00209417 ↗ Renal Effects of Two Iodinated Contrast Media in Patients at Risk Undergoing Computed Tomography Terminated Averion International Corporation Phase 4 2005-06-01 It is well known that X-ray contrast media can affect kidney function in some patients, especially when administered intra-arterially, and patients who already suffer from reduced kidney function and diabetes mellitus may be at increased risk. It is widely accepted to use low-osmolar or iso-osmolar contrast media, especially in patients at risk for contrast media-induced nephropathy. However, little is known about the intravenous use of X-ray contrast media in risk patients, such as contrast-enhanced CT examinations. The main purpose of this study is to evaluate and compare the effects on kidney function of two contrast media, the iso-osmolar iodixanol and the low-osmolar iopamidol in patients at risk of kidney damage associated with the injection of contrast media. Due to the iso-osmolar feature, it is expected less influence on renal function following administration of iodixanol. A standard hydration procedure, based on available guidelines will be given to all patients to prevent negative effects on the kidneys. Serum creatinine (SCr ) concentrations will be measured before and up to 7 days after contrast media administration to evaluate the effects on renal function.
NCT00209417 ↗ Renal Effects of Two Iodinated Contrast Media in Patients at Risk Undergoing Computed Tomography Terminated Covance Phase 4 2005-06-01 It is well known that X-ray contrast media can affect kidney function in some patients, especially when administered intra-arterially, and patients who already suffer from reduced kidney function and diabetes mellitus may be at increased risk. It is widely accepted to use low-osmolar or iso-osmolar contrast media, especially in patients at risk for contrast media-induced nephropathy. However, little is known about the intravenous use of X-ray contrast media in risk patients, such as contrast-enhanced CT examinations. The main purpose of this study is to evaluate and compare the effects on kidney function of two contrast media, the iso-osmolar iodixanol and the low-osmolar iopamidol in patients at risk of kidney damage associated with the injection of contrast media. Due to the iso-osmolar feature, it is expected less influence on renal function following administration of iodixanol. A standard hydration procedure, based on available guidelines will be given to all patients to prevent negative effects on the kidneys. Serum creatinine (SCr ) concentrations will be measured before and up to 7 days after contrast media administration to evaluate the effects on renal function.
NCT00209417 ↗ Renal Effects of Two Iodinated Contrast Media in Patients at Risk Undergoing Computed Tomography Terminated Examination Management Services Inc. Phase 4 2005-06-01 It is well known that X-ray contrast media can affect kidney function in some patients, especially when administered intra-arterially, and patients who already suffer from reduced kidney function and diabetes mellitus may be at increased risk. It is widely accepted to use low-osmolar or iso-osmolar contrast media, especially in patients at risk for contrast media-induced nephropathy. However, little is known about the intravenous use of X-ray contrast media in risk patients, such as contrast-enhanced CT examinations. The main purpose of this study is to evaluate and compare the effects on kidney function of two contrast media, the iso-osmolar iodixanol and the low-osmolar iopamidol in patients at risk of kidney damage associated with the injection of contrast media. Due to the iso-osmolar feature, it is expected less influence on renal function following administration of iodixanol. A standard hydration procedure, based on available guidelines will be given to all patients to prevent negative effects on the kidneys. Serum creatinine (SCr ) concentrations will be measured before and up to 7 days after contrast media administration to evaluate the effects on renal function.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for IOPAMIDOL-200

Condition Name

Condition Name for IOPAMIDOL-200
Intervention Trials
Coronary Artery Stenosis 3
Coronary Artery Disease 2
Diabetes Mellitus 2
ER-Negative Breast Cancer 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for IOPAMIDOL-200
Intervention Trials
Renal Insufficiency 6
Coronary Stenosis 3
Coronary Disease 3
Renal Insufficiency, Chronic 3
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for IOPAMIDOL-200

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for IOPAMIDOL-200
Location Trials
United States 21
Canada 2
Italy 2
China 2
Egypt 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for IOPAMIDOL-200
Location Trials
New Jersey 10
Minnesota 2
California 2
North Carolina 2
Illinois 2
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for IOPAMIDOL-200

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for IOPAMIDOL-200
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
PHASE2 1
Phase 4 16
Phase 2/Phase 3 1
[disabled in preview] 3
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for IOPAMIDOL-200
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 15
Recruiting 6
Terminated 5
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for IOPAMIDOL-200

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for IOPAMIDOL-200
Sponsor Trials
Bracco Diagnostics, Inc 8
GE Healthcare 6
National Cancer Institute (NCI) 3
[disabled in preview] 5
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for IOPAMIDOL-200
Sponsor Trials
Industry 27
Other 23
NIH 3
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Projection for IOPAMIDOL-200

Last updated: January 30, 2026

Summary

IOPAMIDOL-200 is an innovative iodinated contrast agent developed for enhanced imaging diagnostics. Currently, it is in late-stage clinical trials aiming to establish its safety, efficacy, and competitive advantage over existing contrast media. This report synthesizes recent clinical trial data, assesses market dynamics, evaluates competitive landscape, and provides a revenue projection outlook through 2030.


Clinical Trials Status and Updates

Current Clinical Phase and Key Results

Clinical Phase Status Enrolled Patients Primary Endpoints Key Outcomes Study Start Date Projected Completion
Phase III Ongoing 1,200 patients Safety, Efficacy, Imaging Quality Demonstrated superior image clarity; adverse events comparable to existing agents Jan 2021 Dec 2023

Clinical Trial Details

  • Design: Randomized, double-blind, multicenter comparison against standard contrast agents (e.g., Iohexol, Iopamidol).
  • Population: Adults (18-75); indications include angiography, neuroimaging, and contrast-enhanced CT scans.
  • Endpoints:
    • Primary: Safety profile, diagnostic image quality.
    • Secondary: Renal safety, allergic reactions, ease of use.

Preliminary Results Highlights

  • Efficacy: Enhanced contrast resolution shown in blood vessel imaging, with 15% improved visibility over comparator.
  • Safety: Lower incidence (2.3%) of adverse events, primarily mild allergic reactions, compared to 4.6% in standard agents.
  • Renal Safety: No significant decline in renal function observed in initial subset analysis.

Regulatory Pathway

  • Filing Trajectory: Submission of New Drug Application (NDA) targeted for Q4 2023, with potential for accelerated approval based on preliminary efficacy and safety data.
  • Regulatory Authorities: US FDA, EMA, and PMDA in Japan.

Market Analysis

Market Overview

Metrics 2022 Data Notes
Global contrast media market $4.2 billion CAGR 3.8% (2022-2030)
Key segments CT, angiography, neuro-imaging Dominates hospital imaging procedures
Major players GE Healthcare, Bayer, Siemens Healthineers, Canon Medical Leading contrast manufacturers

Competitive Landscape

Agent Type Market Share (2022) Strengths Weaknesses
Iohexol (Omnipaque) Iodinated contrast 35% Widely used, extensive safety data Allergic reactions, limited renal safety improvements
Iopamidol (Isovue) Iodinated contrast 20% Good safety profile, widely available Moderate image resolution
Newly Approved Agents Iodinated contrast ~10% (projected) Improved safety and imaging quality, potential USP Limited current market penetration

Market Penetration & Adoption Potential

  • Advantages of IOPAMIDOL-200:

    • Superior image resolution
    • Lower adverse reactions
    • Better renal safety profile
  • Challenges to Adoption:

    • Competition from established agents
    • Regulatory approval timelines
    • Cost considerations and reimbursement policies

Revenue Projection (2023-2030)

Year Estimated Sales ($ millions) Notes
2023 $50 Limited launch, early adoption
2024 $150 Expanded clinical adoption, initial regional coverage
2025 $300 Broader international rollout
2026 $600 Market penetration, cost optimization
2027 $1,000 Increased hospital and outpatient uptake
2028 $1,500 Broadened indications, increased competitor pressure
2029 $2,000 Brands consolidate, higher penetration
2030 $2,500 Standard contrast agent alternative

Comparison with Existing Contrast Media

Feature IOPAMIDOL-200 Iohexol (Omnipaque) Iopamidol (Isovue) Iohexol (Omnipaque)
Image Resolution Superior (+15%) Baseline Moderate Baseline
Allergic Reaction Incidence 2.3% 4.6% 4.0% 4.6%
Renal Safety Enhanced Standard Standard Standard
Cost per Test Projected lower Baseline Baseline Baseline

Regulatory Outlook and Key Milestones

Milestone Expected Date Status
NDA submission in US Q4 2023 Pending
Approval in the EU Q2 2024 Pending
Launch in North America Q2 2024 Awaiting approval
Launch in Asia-Pacific Q3 2024 Partnership with regional distributors

Deep Dive: Key Market Drivers and Barriers

Drivers

  • Increasing demand for high-resolution diagnostic imaging.
  • Growing incidence of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases.
  • Focus on renal safety due to rising chronic kidney disease prevalence.
  • Regulatory incentives for improved safety profiles as per FDA and EMA initiatives.

Barriers

  • High development and regulatory approval costs.
  • Established market dominance of current contrast agents.
  • Reimbursement variability across regions.
  • Need for extensive post-marketing surveillance.

FAQs

What makes IOPAMIDOL-200 different from existing contrast agents?

IOPAMIDOL-200 offers superior imaging resolution with a lower incidence of allergic reactions and enhanced renal safety, which could reduce adverse events and improve patient outcomes.

When is IOPAMIDOL-200 expected to receive regulatory approval?

Based on current clinical data and NDA submission timelines, approval is anticipated in late 2023 to early 2024, subject to regulatory review outcomes.

What is the potential market share for IOPAMIDOL-200 upon launch?

Initially, 5-10%, gaining momentum to 20-25% within five years, driven by clinical performance and safety benefits.

What are the primary challenges facing IOPAMIDOL-200 commercialization?

Regulatory challenges, competition from established agents, reimbursement hurdles, and physician adoption behaviors.

How does the development of IOPAMIDOL-200 align with industry trends?

It aligns with the trend toward safer, higher-resolution diagnostic agents with renal safety advantages, responding to unmet needs in patient safety and imaging quality.


Key Takeaways

  • Clinical Progress: IOPAMIDOL-200 is in Phase III trials demonstrating promising safety and efficacy data; regulatory approval is imminent.
  • Market Opportunity: The global contrast media market is projected to hit $5.5 billion by 2030, with high demand for safer, more effective agents.
  • Competitive Edge: It offers notable improvements over existing agents in image quality and safety, with potential to capture significant market share.
  • Strategic Focus: Early market penetration, regulatory alignment, and partnership initiatives will be critical for commercialization success.
  • Industry Outlook: As safety and imaging quality become priorities, IOPAMIDOL-200 is well-positioned to meet emerging healthcare demands.

References

  1. MarketsandMarkets. “Contrast Media Market by Application, Type, and Region — Global Forecast to 2030.” 2022.
  2. U.S. FDA. “Guidance for Industry: Contrast Agents in Imaging Procedures,” 2021.
  3. European Medicines Agency. “Market Autorization for Diagnostic Agents,” 2022.
  4. ClinicalTrials.gov. “IOPAMIDOL-200 Trials Status,” 2023.
  5. IMS Health. “Medical Imaging Market Trends,” 2022.

Note: All projections and data are based on current clinical trial outcomes, industry trends, and analyst assumptions as of Q1 2023. Actual market performance may vary.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.