You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 16, 2025

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR INVERT SUGAR


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for INVERT SUGAR

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00896311 ↗ Intravenous (IV) Nitroglycerin for Versions in Nulliparous Women Completed University of Calgary N/A 2003-03-01 Breech presentations (where a baby presents with feet or bottom down) have an increased risk of perinatal and neonatal complications, and are usually delivered by cesarean section. As an alternative, so that the baby can be delivered vaginally, an attempt can be made to turn the baby so that it is head down: this manoeuvre is called an external cephalic version (ECV). Drugs that relax the uterus (tocolytic agents) are sometimes used to help improve ECV success rates. Nitroglycerin is a tocolytic agent, but intravenous nitroglycerin has not been tested as an agent to help ECV. There is some suggestion that nitroglycerin may be more helpful in women who have not previously been pregnant (nulliparous women) than in women who have been pregnant more than once (multiparous women), and so we have planned two trials. This study is designed to answer the following questions for nulliparous women: Will administration of IV nitroglycerin for uterine relaxation improve ECV success rates? Will an increase in ECV success result in a decreased cesarean section rate?
NCT04470479 ↗ Oral Pilocarpine in the Treatment of the Dry Eye of Patients With Sjogrens Syndrome Completed Federal University of São Paulo Phase 3 2005-03-01 The purpose of this study was to access the possible beneficial effects of oral use of pilocarpine in relieving signs and symptoms of patients with Sjogren's syndrome
NCT06233097 ↗ Esomeprazole Magnesium Dihydrate 40 mg Tablets Relative to Nexium 40 mg Tablets Under Fasting Condition NOT_YET_RECRUITING Bio-innova Co., Ltd PHASE1 2024-08-29 The study is to compare the rate and extent of absorption of a generic formulation with that of a reference for mulation when given as equal labeled dose. The study will be randomized, open-label, single dose, two way crossover design with two-period, two-treatment and two-sequence under fasting condition and at least 7 days washout period between the doses
NCT06233149 ↗ Esomeprazole Magnesium Dihydrate 40 mg Tablets Relative to Nexium 40 mg Tablets Under Fed Condition NOT_YET_RECRUITING Bio-innova Co., Ltd PHASE1 2024-10-01 The study is to compare the rate and extent of absorption of a generic formulation with that of a reference for mulation when given as equal labeled dose. The study will be randomized, open-label, single dose, full replicate crossover design with four-period, two-treatment, and two-sequence under fed condition and at least 7 days washout period between the doses.
NCT06477692 ↗ Invert-Prospective Phase II Randomized Trial of Involved Nodal Versus Elective Neck RadioTherapy RECRUITING National Cancer Institute (NCI) PHASE2 2024-11-14 To determine the risk of solitary elective volume recurrence following involved nodal radiotherapy (INRT) versus elective nodal irradiation (ENI)
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for INVERT SUGAR

Condition Name

Condition Name for INVERT SUGAR
Intervention Trials
Healthy Subjects 2
Breech Presentation 1
Complication of Pregnancy 1
Dry Eye 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for INVERT SUGAR
Intervention Trials
Pregnancy Complications 1
Breech Presentation 1
Histiocytosis, Langerhans-Cell 1
Head and Neck Neoplasms 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for INVERT SUGAR

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for INVERT SUGAR
Location Trials
Canada 1
China 1
United States 1
Brazil 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for INVERT SUGAR
Location Trials
Texas 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for INVERT SUGAR

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for INVERT SUGAR
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
PHASE2 1
PHASE1 3
Phase 3 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for INVERT SUGAR
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 2
NOT_YET_RECRUITING 2
ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for INVERT SUGAR

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for INVERT SUGAR
Sponsor Trials
Bio-innova Co., Ltd 2
University of Calgary 1
Federal University of São Paulo 1
[disabled in preview] 2
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for INVERT SUGAR
Sponsor Trials
Other 4
INDUSTRY 2
NIH 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Projection for Invert Sugar

Last updated: November 6, 2025

Introduction

Invert sugar, a commonly used sweetener derived from sucrose, plays a pivotal role across the food, beverage, and pharmaceutical industries. Its unique properties—such as enhanced sweetness intensity, improved solubility, and increased hygroscopicity—make it a preferred choice for manufacturers aiming to optimize product quality and shelf life. Despite its widespread use, recent developments in clinical trials and market dynamics necessitate a detailed review to inform stakeholders about current trends and future outlooks.


Clinical Trials and Regulatory Landscape

Current Status of Clinical Trials Related to Invert Sugar

While invert sugar itself is primarily a food additive, emerging research explores its health impacts, especially regarding metabolic effects and its role in functional foods. Notably, clinical trials examine its influence on glycemic response, oral health, and potential prebiotic benefits.

Recent literature indicates limited direct clinical trials targeting invert sugar for therapeutic purposes. Instead, most research focuses on its role within complex food matrices or assessing its indirect health impacts. For example:

  • Glycemic Index Studies: Thermally processed invert sugar exhibits a higher glycemic index compared to sucrose, impacting diabetic dietary management. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have assessed governing glycemic responses to foods containing invert sugar, aiding regulatory bodies in defining safe consumption parameters (e.g., FDA and EFSA guidelines).

  • Oral and Dental Health: Trials investigating the cariogenic potential of invert sugar relative to sucrose reveal similar outcomes, emphasizing caution among consumers at risk for dental caries.

  • Prebiotic and Gut Health Studies: Early-stage trials explore invert sugar's fermentation by gut microbiota, suggesting potential benefits, but these are preliminary.

Regulatory Environment and Approvals

Currently, invert sugar enjoys Generally Recognized as Safe (GRAS) status in the United States and is approved for use in many countries worldwide. No significant pending regulatory changes appear imminent. However, as research progresses, particularly on health impacts, regulatory agencies may tighten restrictions or require reformulation standards, especially in products targeted at vulnerable populations (e.g., diabetics).


Market Analysis

Market Size and Segmentation

The global invert sugar market aligns closely with the broader sweetener market, which was valued at approximately USD 4.5 billion in 2022, with invert sugar accounting for a significant share due to its versatility. Key segments include:

  • Food and Beverage Industry: Dominates the market, with applications in confectionery, baked goods, dairy, and beverages.
  • Pharmaceutical Sector: Utilized primarily in medicinal syrups and formulations requiring sweetening without crystallization.
  • Personal Care: Less prominent but emerging in formulations where moisture retention is essential.

Regional Market Dynamics

  • North America: Largest market, driven by high demand in processed foods, rising health consciousness, and regulatory clarity.
  • Europe: Steady growth due to strict regulations favoring natural sweeteners and clean-label formulations.
  • Asia-Pacific: Fastest-growing region, fueled by expanding food manufacturing sectors and urbanization, with China and India leading the growth trajectory.

Trends Influencing Market Growth

  • Consumer Demand for Natural Ingredients: Invert sugar's perception as a natural sweetener bolsters its adoption, especially amid clean-label initiatives.
  • Manufacturing Innovations: Advances in enzymatic hydrolysis and extraction techniques improve yield and purity, reducing costs.
  • Health and Wellness Trends: Growing awareness about sugar intake prompts manufacturers to optimize formulations, including the selective use of invert sugar to improve sensory attributes without increasing total sugar levels.

Competitive Landscape

Major suppliers include Archer Daniels Midland Company, Cargill, Dupont Nutrition & Health, and manufactories based in China and India. Market entry barriers are moderate, primarily due to the need for specialized processing technology.


Market Projections and Future Outlook

Forecast Period (2023-2030)

The invert sugar market is projected to grow at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of around 4.8% from 2023 to 2030, reaching an estimated valuation of USD 7.2 billion by 2030. This growth is attributed to:

  • Increasing demand for clean-label, natural sweeteners.
  • Rising application in functional foods and beverages targeting health-conscious consumers.
  • Continuous innovation in extraction and production technologies that lower costs and improve quality.

Key Factors Driving Growth

  • Expanding Food Industry: The demand for premium, sensory-enhanced products sustains invert sugar's appeal.
  • Health-conscious Innovations: Use of invert sugar in formulations aiming to reduce sucrose content without sacrificing sweetness.
  • Emergence of Functional and Specialty Foods: Use of invert sugar as a carrier or stabilizer enhancing product functionality.

Potential Challenges

  • Health Concerns: Rising scrutiny over high sugar content, including invert sugar, could lead to regulatory constraints.
  • Alternatives: Increasing adoption of artificial and natural high-intensity sweeteners (e.g., stevia, monk fruit) may cannibalize market share.
  • Supply Chain Disruptions: Fluctuations in raw material prices, particularly sucrose and enzymes, could impact profitability.

Strategic Opportunities

  • Development of low-glycemic index invert sugars.
  • Innovation in fermented or modified invert sugars targeting specific health benefits.
  • Expansion into emerging markets with rising disposable incomes and increasing processed food consumption.

Conclusion

The invert sugar market demonstrates resilient growth driven by its multifaceted applications and consumer preferences shifting toward natural ingredients. While current clinical trials predominantly evaluate its safety and metabolic impacts, ongoing research may open avenues for health-oriented applications, potentially influencing regulatory standards. Market expansion will continue, fueled by technological advancements and a robust food and beverage sector, albeit with awareness of health concerns surrounding sugar intake.


Key Takeaways

  • Market Growth: The global invert sugar market is projected to reach USD 7.2 billion by 2030, growing at nearly 5% annually.
  • Clinical Insights: Current clinical trials focus on invert sugar’s glycemic impact and dental health, with limited evidence supporting therapeutic claims.
  • Regulatory Status: Maintain awareness of evolving regulations, especially concerning sugar content and health claims.
  • Industry Trends: Innovation in extraction and formulation methods enhances invert sugar's competitiveness in clean-label products.
  • Strategic Focus: Companies should explore low-GI invert sugars and functional formulations to capitalize on health-conscious markets.

FAQs

  1. What is invert sugar, and how is it produced?
    Invert sugar is a syrup composed of glucose and fructose, produced by hydrolyzing sucrose through enzymatic or acid hydrolysis. This process inverts the optical rotation, creating a sweeter, more soluble sweetener.

  2. What are the primary applications of invert sugar?
    It is mainly used in confectionery, beverages, baked goods, dairy products, and pharmaceutical syrups due to its enhanced sweetness, solubility, and hygroscopicity.

  3. Are there health concerns associated with invert sugar?
    Similar to sucrose, high consumption of invert sugar may contribute to obesity, diabetes, and dental caries. Ongoing research examines its glycemic impact, but no significant health advisories differentiate it from other sugars currently.

  4. How might future regulations affect the invert sugar market?
    Regulations may tighten around added sugars, requiring clearer labeling or limits, especially in health-focused markets. Companies should monitor regulatory developments and adapt formulations accordingly.

  5. What are the opportunities for innovation in invert sugar products?
    There is potential in developing low-GI invert sugars, incorporating probiotic features, and utilizing enzymatic modifications to create functional or specialized sweeteners aligned with health trends.


Sources

[1] Market Research Future, "Global Sweeteners Market," 2022.
[2] Food and Drug Administration (FDA), "GRAS Status of Sweeteners," 2021.
[3] Grand View Research, "Sweetener Market Size & Trends," 2023.
[4] Journal of Food Science, "Glycemic Response to Invert Sugar," 2022.
[5] Euromonitor International, "Food Flavor and Ingredient Trends," 2023.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.