Last Updated: May 11, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR INVEGA SUSTENNA


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for INVEGA SUSTENNA

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT01136772 ↗ A Comparison of Long-acting Injectable Medications for Schizophrenia Completed Duke University Phase 4 2011-03-01 The purpose of this research study is to compare the "real-world" effectiveness of two FDA-approved and widely used long-acting injectable antipsychotic medications (paliperidone palmitate and haloperidol decanoate) in patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder who are expected to benefit from the improved medication compliance associated with injectable medications. The goal is to evaluate the effects of the medications on outcomes of importance to patients (relapse, symptoms, adverse effects, functioning) as well as policy makers (all of the above plus costs).
NCT01136772 ↗ A Comparison of Long-acting Injectable Medications for Schizophrenia Completed National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) Phase 4 2011-03-01 The purpose of this research study is to compare the "real-world" effectiveness of two FDA-approved and widely used long-acting injectable antipsychotic medications (paliperidone palmitate and haloperidol decanoate) in patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder who are expected to benefit from the improved medication compliance associated with injectable medications. The goal is to evaluate the effects of the medications on outcomes of importance to patients (relapse, symptoms, adverse effects, functioning) as well as policy makers (all of the above plus costs).
NCT01136772 ↗ A Comparison of Long-acting Injectable Medications for Schizophrenia Completed University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill Phase 4 2011-03-01 The purpose of this research study is to compare the "real-world" effectiveness of two FDA-approved and widely used long-acting injectable antipsychotic medications (paliperidone palmitate and haloperidol decanoate) in patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder who are expected to benefit from the improved medication compliance associated with injectable medications. The goal is to evaluate the effects of the medications on outcomes of importance to patients (relapse, symptoms, adverse effects, functioning) as well as policy makers (all of the above plus costs).
NCT01136772 ↗ A Comparison of Long-acting Injectable Medications for Schizophrenia Completed New York State Psychiatric Institute Phase 4 2011-03-01 The purpose of this research study is to compare the "real-world" effectiveness of two FDA-approved and widely used long-acting injectable antipsychotic medications (paliperidone palmitate and haloperidol decanoate) in patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder who are expected to benefit from the improved medication compliance associated with injectable medications. The goal is to evaluate the effects of the medications on outcomes of importance to patients (relapse, symptoms, adverse effects, functioning) as well as policy makers (all of the above plus costs).
NCT01193153 ↗ A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy of Paliperidone Palmitate in the Prevention of Relapse of the Symptoms of Schizoaffective Disorder Completed Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC Phase 3 2010-09-01 This study will evaluate the efficacy of paliperidone palmitate compared with placebo in the delay of relapse of the symptoms of schizoaffective disorder. This study will also assess the safety and tolerability of paliperidone palmitate in patients with schizoaffective disorder.
NCT01211704 ↗ Paliperidone Palmitate Efficacy and Safety in Bipolar Disorder Complicated by Alcoholism Withdrawn Ortho-McNeil, Inc. Phase 4 2010-10-01 The primary specific aim is to examine the efficacy of Paliperidone extended release Paliperidone Palmitate Injection (INVEGA® SUSTENNA™) compared to placebo in decreasing manic symptoms in patients with comorbid DSM-IV bipolar disorder and alcohol dependence. The investigators hypothesize that the Paliperidone Palmitate Injection (INVEGA® SUSTENNA™) treated group will have a statistically significant advantage on improvement in manic symptoms. They will also have higher rate of treatment response and remission.
NCT01211704 ↗ Paliperidone Palmitate Efficacy and Safety in Bipolar Disorder Complicated by Alcoholism Withdrawn University of Miami Phase 4 2010-10-01 The primary specific aim is to examine the efficacy of Paliperidone extended release Paliperidone Palmitate Injection (INVEGA® SUSTENNA™) compared to placebo in decreasing manic symptoms in patients with comorbid DSM-IV bipolar disorder and alcohol dependence. The investigators hypothesize that the Paliperidone Palmitate Injection (INVEGA® SUSTENNA™) treated group will have a statistically significant advantage on improvement in manic symptoms. They will also have higher rate of treatment response and remission.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for INVEGA SUSTENNA

Condition Name

Condition Name for INVEGA SUSTENNA
Intervention Trials
Schizophrenia 6
Schizoaffective Disorder 3
Psychotic Disorders 1
Psychotropic Drugs 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for INVEGA SUSTENNA
Intervention Trials
Schizophrenia 8
Disease 4
Psychotic Disorders 4
Mood Disorders 2
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for INVEGA SUSTENNA

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for INVEGA SUSTENNA
Location Trials
United States 49
Korea, Republic of 2
India 1
Romania 1
Bulgaria 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for INVEGA SUSTENNA
Location Trials
California 6
New Jersey 4
Texas 4
Florida 4
Illinois 3
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for INVEGA SUSTENNA

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for INVEGA SUSTENNA
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 4 5
Phase 3 2
Phase 1 3
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for INVEGA SUSTENNA
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 7
Terminated 1
Active, not recruiting 1
[disabled in preview] 2
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for INVEGA SUSTENNA

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for INVEGA SUSTENNA
Sponsor Trials
Luye Pharma Group Ltd. 3
Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC 2
Janssen Korea, Ltd., Korea 2
[disabled in preview] 5
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for INVEGA SUSTENNA
Sponsor Trials
Industry 10
Other 8
NIH 2
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Invega Sustenna (paliperidone palmitate): clinical trials update, market analysis and projection

Last updated: April 26, 2026

What is Invega Sustenna and where is it in the clinical pipeline?

Invega Sustenna is an extended-release, intramuscular (IM) formulation of paliperidone palmitate used for schizophrenia and for schizoaffective disorder. Janssen markets the product globally (brand name Invega Sustenna; generic active is paliperidone palmitate).

Core regulatory status (key label anchors)

The US label anchors the product’s current clinical and safety expectations around established dosing and long-term use patterns:

  • Formulation: IM depot; monthly maintenance regimen after initial loading.
  • Indications: schizophrenia; schizoaffective disorder, depressive or bipolar type (per full prescribing information).
  • Important boxed/major safety themes on label: suicidality risk and metabolic and extrapyramidal symptom monitoring consistent with antipsychotics (see full label details). Source: US Prescribing Information (Invega Sustenna). [1]

Clinical trials update (what has changed versus prior cycles)

Publicly observable clinical activity for Invega Sustenna in recent years is dominated by:

  • Label-consistency studies (extrapolation across populations, real-world outcomes, and switching use cases)
  • Comparative or operational studies tied to long-acting injectable (LAI) care pathways (initiation/continuation, adherence, persistence)
  • Safety and tolerability work typical for mature LAI assets rather than late-stage novelty

At this stage of maturity, the most actionable “update” is not a wave of novel Phase 3 efficacy programs but the steady flow of evidence on persistence, adherence, and healthcare utilization. These outcomes track directly to formulary placement and payer decisions, which govern market performance.

What do the latest evidence themes imply for efficacy, safety, and access?

For a mature LAI, payers and providers typically treat “effectiveness” as a bundle:

  • Symptom control and relapse reduction consistent with prior efficacy findings
  • Lower rates of missed doses versus oral antipsychotics
  • Real-world safety consistency with class expectations

Practical endpoints that influence uptake

Across real-world and pragmatic evaluations, the endpoints that repeatedly translate into access decisions are:

  • Treatment persistence (time on therapy)
  • Relapse or hospitalization proxies (where studied)
  • Emergency department use and inpatient days (where studied)
  • Adverse event rates consistent with paliperidone LAI administration

These evidence categories support the product’s positioning as a high-adherence LAI option rather than a narrow “efficacy-only” claim.

Safety considerations that constrain adoption

The label’s core safety monitoring remains the adoption limiter set:

  • Extrapyramidal symptoms and related movement disorder risk
  • Prolactin-related effects consistent with paliperidone pharmacology
  • Metabolic changes typical for antipsychotics
  • Weight gain and glucose/lipid monitoring expectations Source: US Prescribing Information (Invega Sustenna). [1]

How does Invega Sustenna compete in the LAI schizophrenia and schizoaffective market?

The LAI antipsychotic space for schizophrenia has a mature competitive set. Invega Sustenna’s competitive posture rests on its monthly dosing cadence, established initiation regimen, and long track record.

Competitive set (LAI antipsychotics used for schizophrenia)

Key comparators in payer and clinic formularies include:

  • Janssen’s other LAI (Invega Trinza, Invega Hafyera) with longer dosing intervals
  • Other LAIs such as aripiprazole LAIs (monthly and longer interval options)
  • Other paliperidone and risperidone LAIs across regions

Within that set, Invega Sustenna typically wins when:

  • A monthly option is preferred
  • Clinicians seek a well-understood initiation-to-maintenance transition
  • Payers are already comfortable with paliperidone LAI utilization and cost structure

What does the market look like now (size, share dynamics, and demand drivers)?

Invega Sustenna sits inside the broader schizophrenia and schizoaffective treatment market and the LAI segment. Because Invega Sustenna is a mature asset, the market dynamics are less about “new patients starting” and more about:

  • Switching from oral to LAI
  • LAI-to-LAI migration by dosing interval preference
  • Formulary retention versus competitors based on contracting and budget impact
  • Losses from patent and exclusivity transitions (where applicable by geography), offset by ongoing contracting and lifecycle management

Demand drivers that raise utilization

  • Preference for adherence-support in chronic schizophrenia
  • Provider shift toward LAIs for relapse prevention and reduced missed dosing
  • Payer adoption of LAIs in high-risk adherence populations

Constraints that limit growth

  • Ongoing switching to longer-interval injectables as they become preferred on convenience and adherence
  • Budget pressure and step-therapy protocols for high-cost LAIs
  • Safety-monitoring burden consistent with antipsychotic class risk

What is the forecast direction (and what drives the magnitude)?

For a mature LAI like Invega Sustenna, the forecast typically shows:

  • Mid-to-low single digit annual growth in many mature markets, with volatility tied to contracting and mix shifts
  • Share pressure from longer-interval LAIs inside the paliperidone franchise and from other LAI classes
  • Downward pricing pressure where biosimilar/generic competition exists for the active or where payer leverage increases

Forecast framework

A practical projection model for Invega Sustenna market performance usually decomposes into:

  1. Volume: persistence and new starts
  2. Mix: monthly versus longer-interval shifts
  3. Net price: payer rebates, contracting changes, and procurement dynamics
  4. Geography: market maturity differences and reimbursement structure
  5. Competitive intensity: LAI class competition and switching patterns

Given the product’s monthly cadence, it is structurally more exposed than longer-interval LAIs to switching toward less frequent administration. Still, it remains a dominant LAI option where monthly is the default during initiation phases or where longer-interval is not accessible.

What is the realistic near-term projection for Invega Sustenna (base case behavior)?

Base case market behavior for an established monthly LAI:

  • Volume growth: modest, supported by continued LAI uptake and persistence.
  • Net price: flat to declining, constrained by contracting and competitive bidding.
  • Share: stable to slightly negative versus longer-interval LAIs, with resilience from entrenched clinical use and paliperidone LAI pathway integration.

Because Invega Sustenna is not the newest LAI, its upside is primarily from:

  • Expanded formulary access in schizophrenia and schizoaffective care pathways
  • Persistence improvements from programmatic adherence models
  • Stable conversion from oral agents where compliance is a priority

What business actions follow from the clinical and market setup?

For R&D and investment decisions, the actionable implications are:

1) Treat Invega Sustenna as a “platform asset” rather than a late-stage growth bet

The evidence stream supports lifecycle management. Any incremental clinical program should aim at:

  • Population expansion within label boundaries
  • Operational endpoints that matter to payers (hospitalization and persistence proxies)
  • Safety management frameworks that reduce discontinuations

2) Use competitive positioning around “monthly reliability”

In a market migrating to longer intervals, Invega Sustenna’s monthly cadence can still be an advantage where:

  • Long-interval products are delayed due to stabilization phases
  • Switching protocols start with a monthly foundation
  • Payers prefer a proven cost and outcomes profile

3) Prioritize payer-relevant outcomes in future trial designs

For this maturity stage, trial value is maximized by endpoints that correlate with reimbursement and formulary retention:

  • Persistence
  • Relapse or hospitalization proxies
  • Total healthcare utilization

Key Takeaways

  • Invega Sustenna is an established monthly LAI antipsychotic with current clinical positioning anchored by the US Prescribing Information dosing and safety framework. [1]
  • Recent publicly observable clinical activity in mature LAIs is dominated by real-world and operational evidence that supports persistence and reduces missed dosing, rather than new late-stage efficacy breakthroughs.
  • Market growth is constrained by LAI switching dynamics, especially migration toward longer-interval options, while demand is supported by adherence-driven prescribing patterns.
  • A realistic near-term outlook shows modest volume growth with flat-to-declining net price, and share pressure versus longer-interval LAIs inside the category.

FAQs

1) What conditions is Invega Sustenna approved to treat?

It is approved for schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder per the US prescribing information. [1]

2) Is Invega Sustenna dosed monthly?

Yes. The product is designed for monthly maintenance dosing after initiation consistent with label guidance. [1]

3) What safety categories matter most for prescribing decisions?

The US label emphasizes antipsychotic class monitoring themes including movement-related adverse effects, metabolic changes, and other established risks. [1]

4) What type of clinical evidence most affects payer acceptance for mature LAIs?

Real-world and pragmatic evidence that tracks persistence, relapse or hospitalization proxies, and overall healthcare utilization. (Clinical trial endpoint focus consistent with LAI adoption patterns and the labeled safety framework.) [1]

5) How does competition from longer-interval LAIs affect Invega Sustenna?

Competition increases switching pressure from monthly to less frequent injectables, which can temper share growth even when overall LAI use expands. This is consistent with LAI class dynamics and Invega Sustenna’s monthly cadence positioning. [1]


References

[1] Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc. INVEGA SUSTENNA (paliperidone palmitate) prescribing information. US Food and Drug Administration. https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.