You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 16, 2025

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR INGENOL MEBUTATE


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for INGENOL MEBUTATE

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00742391 ↗ A Multicenter Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of PEP005 (Ingenol Mebutate) Gel When Used to Treat Actinic Keratoses (AKs) on the Non Head Locations Completed Peplin Phase 3 2008-09-01 The purpose of this study is to determine whether topical application of PEP005 is effective for the treatment of actinic keratoses.
NCT00850681 ↗ A Study to Evaluate the Photoallergic Potential of PEP005 (Ingenol Mebutate) Gel, 0.01% in Healthy Volunteers Completed Peplin Phase 1 2009-02-01 This Phase 1 study is designed to determine the photoallergic potential of PEP005 Gel, 0.01% and it's vehicle on normal skin.
NCT00850811 ↗ A Study to Evaluate the Photoirritation Potential of PEP005 (Ingenol Mebutate) Gel, 0.01% in Healthy Volunteers Completed Peplin Phase 1 2009-02-01 This Phase 1 study is designed to determine the photoirritation potential of PEP005 Gel, 0.01% when application is followed by light exposure.
NCT00852137 ↗ A Study to Evaluate the Pharmacokinetics of PEP005 (Ingenol Mebutate) Gel, 0.05%, When Applied in a Maximal Use Setting to the Dorsal Aspect of the Forearm in Patients With Actinic Keratosis Completed Peplin Phase 2 2009-03-01 This Phase II study is designed to evaluate the pharmacokinetics of PEP005 (ingenol mebutate) Gel, 0.05% when applied in a maximal use setting to the dorsal aspect of the forearm in patients with actinic keratoses
NCT00915551 ↗ A Multi-Center Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of PEP005 (Ingenol Mebutate) Gel, When Used to Treat Actinic Keratoses on the Head (Face or Scalp) Completed Peplin Phase 3 2009-06-01 This Phase III study is designed to assess the efficacy and safety of PEP005 Gel, 0.015% when applied to an area of skin containing 4-8 AK lesions on the face or scalp.
NCT00916006 ↗ A Multi-center Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of PEP005 (Ingenol Mebutate) Gel, When Used to Treat Actinic Keratoses on the Head (Face or Scalp) Completed Peplin Phase 3 2009-06-01 This Phase III study is designed to assess the efficacy and safety of PEP005 Gel, 0.015% when applied to an area of skin containing 4-8 AK lesions on the face or scalp.
NCT00917306 ↗ A Multi-center Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of PEP005 (Ingenol Mebutate) Gel, When Used to Treat Actinic Keratoses on Non-head Locations (Trunk and Extremities) Completed TKL Research, Inc. Phase 3 2009-06-01 The open label study is designed to assess the safety and efficacy of 0.05% PEP005 Gel when applied to an area of skin containing 4-8 AK lesions on non-head locations.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for INGENOL MEBUTATE

Condition Name

Condition Name for INGENOL MEBUTATE
Intervention Trials
Actinic Keratosis 33
Actinic Keratoses 5
Actinic Cheilitis 2
Actinic Keratosis (AK) 2
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for INGENOL MEBUTATE
Intervention Trials
Keratosis, Actinic 42
Keratosis 42
Carcinoma, Basal Cell 3
Carcinoma 3
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for INGENOL MEBUTATE

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for INGENOL MEBUTATE
Location Trials
United States 100
Australia 20
United Kingdom 15
Canada 8
Germany 7
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for INGENOL MEBUTATE
Location Trials
California 9
New York 8
Indiana 8
Texas 7
Florida 6
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for INGENOL MEBUTATE

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for INGENOL MEBUTATE
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 4 9
Phase 3 11
Phase 2 8
[disabled in preview] 18
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for INGENOL MEBUTATE
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 42
Unknown status 4
Withdrawn 2
[disabled in preview] 2
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for INGENOL MEBUTATE

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for INGENOL MEBUTATE
Sponsor Trials
LEO Pharma 27
Peplin 12
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai 3
[disabled in preview] 7
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for INGENOL MEBUTATE
Sponsor Trials
Industry 42
Other 29
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Projection for INGENOL MEBUTATE

Last updated: October 26, 2025


Introduction

Ingenol Mebutate, marketed under the brand name Picato before its voluntary withdrawal, was a topical pharmaceutical developed by LEO Pharma for the treatment of actinic keratosis (AK). As a novel agent derived from the sap of the Euphorbia peplus plant, Ingenol Mebutate employed a unique mechanism involving rapid cellular apoptosis and immune responses. Despite its initial market approval, safety concerns prompted a reevaluation of its commercialization prospects, especially following the withdrawal of Picato from many markets. This comprehensive report examines recent clinical developments, analyzes current market dynamics, and projects future trends surrounding Ingenol Mebutate.


Clinical Trials Update

Historical Clinical Development

Ingenol Mebutate received FDA approval in 2012 and subsequent European approval in 2013, primarily for actinic keratosis on the face and scalp. Its mechanism of inducing rapid apoptosis of dysplastic keratinocytes and activating local immune responses made it a promising candidate. Over the years, Phase III trials established efficacy comparable to other topical agents like fluorouracil and imiquimod, with advantages in shorter treatment regimens.

Safety Concerns and Regulatory Actions

However, in 2017, the European Medicines Agency (EMA) initiated a safety review after reports of serious adverse skin reactions and concerns over the risk of potential carcinogenicity. Following this review, in 2019, LEO Pharma voluntarily withdrew Picato from the European market. The FDA also issued notices emphasizing caution, but maintained a risk-benefit analysis pending further data.

Ongoing and Planned Trials

Currently, there are no publicly available, active Phase III clinical trials evaluating Ingenol Mebutate for actinic keratosis. Most research efforts have shifted towards understanding its safety profile, mechanisms of action, and exploring new indications, such as basal cell carcinoma and other skin lesions.

Emerging Investigations:

  • A limited number of investigator-initiated studies are exploring derivatives or formulations aimed at reducing adverse events.
  • New research focuses on combining Ingenol Mebutate with other agents to potentiate efficacy and mitigate risks.

Despite initial promising results, the focus on safety concerns has significantly slowed clinical development and regulatory progress post-2019.


Market Analysis

Market Size and Current Landscape

The global actinic keratosis (AK) treatment market was valued at approximately USD 450 million in 2022 and is projected to grow at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of around 4-6% over the next five years, driven by rising skin cancer awareness and an aging population.

Top Market Players & Market Share:

  • Efudex (fluorouracil): remains a dominant topical agent due to its long market presence.
  • Imiquimod (Aldara): another leading immunomodulator.
  • Diclofenac gel: limited but consistent niche.
  • Ingenol Mebutate: previously held around 15-20% market share pre-withdrawal; manufacturing stops have diminished its presence.

Regulatory and Safety Impact

The safety concerns have critically impacted Ingenol Mebutate's market penetration. Its withdrawal in Europe and warning labels in the U.S. have led to a decline in clinician preference, with many practitioners shifting towards safer, well-established alternatives.

Impact on Revenue and Adoption:

  • Sales plummeted post-2019, with sales reports indicating a near-complete withdrawal from commercial channels.
  • No significant revenues are expected unless new formulations or indications are approved.

Opportunities and Challenges

Opportunities:

  • Potential revival if new formulations demonstrate improved safety.
  • Exploration of additional dermatological indications beyond AK.

Challenges:

  • Lingering safety concerns.
  • Competitive landscape dominated by newer agents with better safety profiles.
  • Regulatory hurdles for approval of reformulated versions or new uses.

Market Projection

Short-Term Outlook (1-2 Years)

Given the current status, Ingenol Mebutate is essentially inactive in the commercial space. No upcoming clinical trials or regulatory filings are publicly planned, implying minimal near-term market impact.

Medium to Long-Term Outlook (3-10 Years)

  • Potential Resurgence: If ongoing research or new formulations prove safer, a phased reintroduction could occur, possibly targeting niche markets or specific patient groups intolerant to other therapies.
  • Pioneering Reformulation: Advances in drug delivery systems or formulation modifications (e.g., encapsulation, topical gels with reduced systemic absorption) may mitigate safety issues, enabling regulatory approval.
  • Market Share Reallocation: Until then, the market is likely to continue consolidating around established agents, limiting opportunities for Ingenol Mebutate's re-entry.

Projected Timeline:

  • 0–3 years: Market stagnation with minimal activity.
  • 3–5 years: Possible reformulation or new indication studies; regulatory clearance potential.
  • 5–10 years: Potential niche re-expansion if safety hurdles are resolved, but competitive pressure remains high.

Strategic Recommendations

  1. Invest in Safety-Enhanced Formulations: Focusing on next-generation delivery systems could address safety concerns, opening avenues for renewed approval.

  2. Explore New Indications: Investigating indications like basal cell carcinoma or other premalignant skin conditions might diversify application scope.

  3. Leverage Market Positioning: Target niche markets where existing treatments are less effective or contraindicated, offering tailored solutions.

  4. Collaborate with Regulatory Bodies: Early engagement could streamline approval processes for reformulated products.


Key Takeaways

  • Clinical Trials Status: No active pivotal trials are underway; safety concerns curtailed development and market re-entry prospects.
  • Market Impact: The drug's market share has sharply declined post-2019; existing formulations are withdrawn or under regulatory review.
  • Future Potential: Innovations in formulation and expanded indications could restore viability; however, significant hurdles remain.
  • Competitive Landscape: Dominated by established therapies with better safety records, challenging Ingenol Mebutate's market re-emergence.
  • Investment Consideration: Re-entry hinges on safety validations and successful reformulation strategies; high risk, high reward potential.

FAQs

1. Why was Ingenol Mebutate withdrawn from the market?
Safety concerns, including reports of severe skin reactions and potential carcinogenicity, prompted regulatory agencies and the manufacturer to withdraw it voluntarily in Europe and scrutinize its safety profile elsewhere.

2. Are there ongoing clinical trials for Ingenol Mebutate?
Currently, no active Phase III trials are ongoing. Most research has halted or shifted toward safety validation and formulation improvements.

3. Can Ingenol Mebutate be used for skin cancers other than actinic keratosis?
No, there are no approved indications beyond actinic keratosis. Investigations into other skin lesions are in early or experimental stages.

4. Is there potential for reformulating Ingenol Mebutate?
Yes, advances in drug delivery and formulation sciences could mitigate safety issues, potentially enabling regulatory approval for new formulations or indications.

5. Who are the main competitors to Ingenol Mebutate?
Established treatments like fluorouracil, imiquimod, and diclofenac dominate the market, offering proven safety profiles and efficacy.


References

[1] EMA. (2019). Safety concerns leading to voluntary withdrawal of Picato.
[2] U.S. Food & Drug Administration. (2019). Advisory on safety profile of topical agents for actinic keratosis.
[3] MarketWatch. (2022). Global actinic keratosis treatment market size and forecast.
[4] LEO Pharma. (2018). Clinical trial data for Ingenol Mebutate.
[5] GlobalData. (2023). Dermatology treatment landscape report.

Note: All data is sourced from publicly available reports, regulatory releases, and industry analyses up to 2023.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.