Last Updated: May 31, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR INDOMETHACIN


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for INDOMETHACIN

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00000494 ↗ Management of Patent Ductus in Premature Infants Completed National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) Phase 3 1978-09-01 To evaluate the effects (up to one year of age) of indomethacin on the clinical course of patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) in premature infants (24 hours old or less) and to assess the relative merits of indomethacin and surgery in infants with persistent respiratory distress who were not treated early with indomethacin. Two concurrent trials were performed.
NCT00002535 ↗ Indomethacin Plus Biological Therapy in Treating Patients With Advanced Melanoma Completed St. Luke's Medical Center Phase 2 1993-07-01 RATIONALE: Biological therapies use different ways to stimulate the immune system and stop tumor cells from growing. Combining biological therapies with indomethacin and cyclophosphamide may kill more tumor cells. PURPOSE: Phase II trial to compare the effectiveness of indomethacin and biological therapy with or without cyclophosphamide in treating patients who have advanced melanoma that has not responded to previous therapy.
NCT00002796 ↗ Phase I-II Study of Fluorouracil in Combination With Phenylbutyrate in Advanced Colorectal Cancer Terminated National Cancer Institute (NCI) Phase 1/Phase 2 1997-05-01 Drugs used in chemotherapy use different ways to stop tumor cells from dividing so they stop growing or die. Interferon-gamma may interfere with the growth of tumor cells and slow the growth of the tumor. Combining more than one drug with interferon-gamma may kill more tumor cells. This phase I/II trial is studying the side effects and best dose of giving fluorouracil together with phenylbutyrate, indomethacin, and interferon-gamma and to see how well it works in treating patients with stage IV colorectal cancer
NCT00004778 ↗ Phase III Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study of Antenatal Thyrotropin-Releasing Hormone in Pregnant Women With Threatened Premature Delivery Completed Children's Hospital of Philadelphia Phase 3 1993-08-01 OBJECTIVES: I. Evaluate the effect of thyrotropin-releasing hormone (TRH) on the severity of initial lung disease and occurrence of chronic lung disease when given antenatally to women with threatened premature delivery. II. Evaluate possible mechanisms for the effects of TRH on the severity and incidence of chronic lung disease. III. Investigate whether a deficiency in endogenous cortisol and/or thyroid hormones after birth influences the severity of lung disease and the development of chronic lung disease.
NCT00004778 ↗ Phase III Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study of Antenatal Thyrotropin-Releasing Hormone in Pregnant Women With Threatened Premature Delivery Completed Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD) Phase 3 1993-08-01 OBJECTIVES: I. Evaluate the effect of thyrotropin-releasing hormone (TRH) on the severity of initial lung disease and occurrence of chronic lung disease when given antenatally to women with threatened premature delivery. II. Evaluate possible mechanisms for the effects of TRH on the severity and incidence of chronic lung disease. III. Investigate whether a deficiency in endogenous cortisol and/or thyroid hormones after birth influences the severity of lung disease and the development of chronic lung disease.
NCT00004778 ↗ Phase III Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study of Antenatal Thyrotropin-Releasing Hormone in Pregnant Women With Threatened Premature Delivery Completed National Center for Research Resources (NCRR) Phase 3 1993-08-01 OBJECTIVES: I. Evaluate the effect of thyrotropin-releasing hormone (TRH) on the severity of initial lung disease and occurrence of chronic lung disease when given antenatally to women with threatened premature delivery. II. Evaluate possible mechanisms for the effects of TRH on the severity and incidence of chronic lung disease. III. Investigate whether a deficiency in endogenous cortisol and/or thyroid hormones after birth influences the severity of lung disease and the development of chronic lung disease.
NCT00009646 ↗ Trial of Indomethacin Prophylaxis in Preterm Infants (TIPP) Completed Medical Research Council of Canada Phase 3 1993-11-01 This trial was to determine whether giving low-dose indomethacin to infants weight 500 to 999 grams (approximately 1 to 2 pounds) at birth improves their survival without cerebral palsy or developmental problems at 18 to 22 months of age.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for INDOMETHACIN

Condition Name

Condition Name for INDOMETHACIN
Intervention Trials
Patent Ductus Arteriosus 16
Post-ERCP Acute Pancreatitis 12
Pancreatitis 8
Healthy 7
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for INDOMETHACIN
Intervention Trials
Pancreatitis 38
Ductus Arteriosus, Patent 27
Premature Birth 17
Obstetric Labor, Premature 12
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for INDOMETHACIN

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for INDOMETHACIN
Location Trials
United States 283
China 52
Canada 39
India 19
Taiwan 10
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for INDOMETHACIN
Location Trials
California 18
Texas 17
Ohio 14
Michigan 14
Pennsylvania 12
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for INDOMETHACIN

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for INDOMETHACIN
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
PHASE4 6
PHASE2 5
PHASE1 2
[disabled in preview] 111
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for INDOMETHACIN
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 99
Unknown status 25
Recruiting 21
[disabled in preview] 43
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for INDOMETHACIN

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for INDOMETHACIN
Sponsor Trials
Air Force Military Medical University, China 7
National Institutes of Health (NIH) 4
China Medical University Hospital 4
[disabled in preview] 16
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for INDOMETHACIN
Sponsor Trials
Other 247
Industry 48
NIH 18
[disabled in preview] 4
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Indomethacin Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Exclusivity Outlook (2026)

Last updated: May 20, 2026

Indomethacin is an NSAID with long commercial history and a diversified set of uses spanning inflammatory pain and acute gout, with generics dominating most major markets. Patent exclusivity and regulatory protection are generally limited to legacy branded products and formulation-specific IP; the active ingredient itself is widely off-patent in practice.

What is the latest clinical trials update for indomethacin?

Answer: Indomethacin’s clinical trial footprint remains active mainly through small studies, comparative pharmacology, and formulation/administration work rather than phase-3 registrational programs tied to a new mechanism.

H3 How to read “activity” for indomethacin trials

  • Recruiting/active studies are often observational, dose/PK, or comparative symptom-relief work.
  • Completion updates frequently reflect older protocols closing without a new FDA label expansion.
  • Many studies test indomethacin in specialized delivery contexts (gastroprotection strategies, local delivery, or modified-release formulations) rather than brand-new indications.

H3 Trial categories commonly seen for indomethacin

  • Acute pain and inflammatory flare comparisons (NSAID benchmarking).
  • Gout and related crystal arthropathy use-case updates.
  • Drug-drug interaction and safety monitoring in specific populations.
  • Pediatric or special-cohort pharmacology (short-term NSAID exposure studies).

What are the most common indomethacin indications being studied?

Answer: Trials cluster around established label territories: inflammatory pain and fever; acute gout flares; and off-label clinical contexts explored through investigator-led protocols.

H3 Acute gout flare studies

  • Indomethacin is frequently used as a comparator against other NSAIDs and anti-inflammatory regimens for rapid symptom reduction.

H3 Inflammatory pain and osteoarticular conditions

  • Comparative trials often benchmark speed of onset, tolerability, and functional outcomes versus ibuprofen, naproxen, diclofenac, or COX-2 selective comparators.

Where do indomethacin clinical trials run: US, EU, or global?

Answer: Trial activity is global but fragmented, with a heavier share of small-sample studies in regions where NSAID generics are widely used and investigator-led research is common.

H3 Common enrollment geographies by trial type

  • PK and formulation work tends to concentrate in higher-capability research sites.
  • Observational or comparative symptom studies appear across multi-country settings where standard-of-care indomethacin is available.

What market is indomethacin in, and how does demand behave?

Answer: Indomethacin demand is driven by low-cost generic availability, with volume exposed to substitution across the NSAID class and periodic clinical practice guideline shifts.

H3 Demand drivers

  • Broad prescriber familiarity and long-standing role in acute inflammatory pain.
  • Acute gout flare utility in real-world practice when other options are constrained (cost, access, contraindications).
  • Persistent use for specific off-label clinical workflows in some settings, but these do not typically map to large registrational growth.

H3 Demand headwinds

  • Class-wide safety scrutiny for NSAIDs, especially gastrointestinal and renal risk.
  • Substitute NSAID penetration and patient-level switching.
  • Patent and exclusivity are not the key gating factor; clinical preference and payer formularies dominate.

What is the current market structure for indomethacin: branded vs generic?

Answer: The market is overwhelmingly generic by volume. Branded share is mostly historical and concentrated in certain geographies or specific branded presentations where line extensions persist.

H3 Typical product portfolio seen in market listings

  • Oral immediate-release capsules/tablets.
  • Extended-release or gastro-resistant variants in select markets (where legacy formulations still compete).
  • Suppositories and specialized dosage forms in some territories.

How does indomethacin pricing typically evolve in major markets?

Answer: Pricing follows classic generic NSAID dynamics: low absolute price, episodic downward pressure, and limited differentiation except where formulation or distribution is constrained.

H3 Price-setting factors

  • Competitive set breadth (multiple generic manufacturers).
  • Formulary placement (tiering).
  • Supply stability for API and finished dosage form.
  • Regulatory or manufacturing disruptions that temporarily lift prices in local markets.

What is the revenue outlook and volume projection for indomethacin to 2030?

Answer: The realistic projection is slow, modest growth at best, with growth tied to population baseline and seasonal inflammatory disease activity, offset by continued substitution within NSAID class and generic price erosion.

H3 3-scenario projection framework (volume vs value)

  • Base case (most likely): stable or slightly rising patient volumes; declining or flat real prices; value growth near zero or low single digits.
  • Downside: faster substitution and formulary tightening leads to volume contraction or steeper price pressure.
  • Upside: niche formulation uptake (better tolerability or specific institutional use) sustains volume; price stabilizes longer in targeted geographies.

What do payer formularies imply for indomethacin growth?

Answer: Formularies generally treat indomethacin as a low-cost NSAID option without premium placement, so uptake depends on patient-level contraindications, clinician habit, and short-term acute needs.

H3 Practical growth constraints

  • Most payers already cover multiple equivalent NSAIDs.
  • Indomethacin rarely wins on efficacy alone; it wins on fit for specific clinical constraints.

What patents protect indomethacin today?

Answer: For the active ingredient indomethacin, basic composition of matter protections are long expired. Current IP protection, where it exists, is usually tied to:

  • Specific formulations and dosage forms (including controlled-release or gastro-resistant compositions).
  • Specific manufacturing methods or process improvements.
  • Method-of-use claims in narrower settings.

H3 How to evaluate indomethacin patent estates in practice

  • Focus on Orange Book listings tied to each listed NDA/ANDA product presentation in the US.
  • Check for formulation patents that follow branded line extensions.
  • Review whether any method-of-use claims remain asserted in litigation or licensed through settlements.

When does indomethacin lose exclusivity in the US: ANDA and Orange Book status?

Answer: Indomethacin is broadly generic in the US; exclusivity risk for new generic entry is driven by presentation-specific Orange Book patents tied to individual ANDAs and legacy branded applications, not by active-ingredient exclusivity.

H3 Typical Orange Book pattern for older NSAIDs

  • The “hard” exclusivity is mostly finished.
  • Remaining barriers are presentation patents that can still block certain generic versions (different salt/formulation/dosage release profile).

What generic entry risks exist for indomethacin?

Answer: Generic entry risks are usually low at the active-ingredient level, but can persist for specific dosage forms if formulation patents remain listed and not expired.

H3 Where Paragraph IV risk shows up (if it does)

  • Some generic applicants may trigger litigation by certifying against still-listed formulation or method patents for a particular product code or strength.

What indomethacin patent litigation has mattered historically?

Answer: NSAID patent litigation involving indomethacin, when it occurs, typically involves generic challenges to listed formulation or method-of-use patents for specific product presentations rather than core API claims.

How do biosimilar risks apply to indomethacin?

Answer: Indomethacin is a small-molecule drug. Biosimilar frameworks do not apply.

Which companies are key competitors for indomethacin?

Answer: Competition is led by established generic manufacturers and large diversified pharma generics arms, with multiple ANDA filers and distributors. Brand presence is limited to legacy and regional arrangements.

H3 Competitive dynamics that matter commercially

  • Competitive intensity is high because indomethacin is commoditized.
  • Differentiation is mostly distribution, supply reliability, and dosage-form presentation.

How does indomethacin compare with other NSAIDs (ibuprofen, naproxen, diclofenac)?

Answer: Indomethacin competes on acute anti-inflammatory utility, but loses market share to widely used NSAIDs with broader OTC presence and payer-preferred generics.

H3 Clinical differentiation points in the market

  • Speed of symptom relief can be a minor differentiator in some acute contexts.
  • Safety profile and contraindication handling influence prescriber switching.
  • Formulary coverage across the class keeps substitution friction low.

What formulation types drive IP and differentiation for indomethacin?

Answer: Where IP persists, it is more likely around formulation engineering rather than therapeutic claims for the old molecule.

H3 Common formulation IP themes for legacy NSAIDs

  • Controlled-release kinetics for reduced dosing frequency.
  • Gastro-resistant or enteric coatings.
  • Pellet/tablet geometry and release-profile constraints.

What is the FDA regulatory status of indomethacin?

Answer: Indomethacin is an approved drug with widespread generic availability. Current regulatory activity is generally in the form of ANDA maintenance, labeling updates, and periodic bioequivalence-driven entries.

H3 Typical FDA status drivers

  • Labeling changes tied to NSAID class warnings.
  • Safety communications impacting boxed warnings and contraindications.
  • Bioequivalence compliance for additional generic manufacturers.

Market projection by region: US, EU5, and emerging markets

Answer: US and EU markets are mature with dense generic supply; emerging markets show steadier volume growth potential but face pricing pressure and regulatory variability.

H3 US

  • Mature generic market with high competition and low value growth.
  • Key growth limited to institution-level procurement dynamics and dosage-form availability.

H3 EU

  • Similar maturity; country-level pricing and reimbursement drive local share outcomes.

H3 Emerging markets

  • Volume growth potential higher due to baseline expansion and access, but margins compress with generic competition.

Key decision implications for R&D and licensing

Answer: For indomethacin specifically, the business case is usually not “new drug development” but:

  • Differentiated formulation lifecycle management.
  • Contesting or licensing formulation-specific patents for specific presentations where IP still exists.
  • Targeted clinical work to improve tolerability or adherence in a narrow delivery context, rather than new mechanism proof.

Key Takeaways

  • Indomethacin clinical activity is ongoing but largely incremental: comparative pharmacology, formulation, and small investigator-led studies rather than new registrational expansion.
  • The market is mature and generic-dominated; value growth is constrained by price erosion and intra-class substitution.
  • Exclusivity is not a meaningful barrier for the API; remaining IP risk, where relevant, is presentation-specific formulation or method-of-use claims tied to specific products.
  • Commercial projections to 2030 are most consistent with stable-to-slightly rising volume and low-to-flat value growth, with regional variation driven by reimbursement and procurement.

FAQs

  1. What formulation patents could still block generic indomethacin entry for specific product strengths?
  2. Do clinical trials of indomethacin still support new FDA label expansions?
  3. How does indomethacin’s safety profile influence payer coverage versus ibuprofen or naproxen?
  4. What dosing-form differences (IR vs gastro-resistant/controlled-release) change substitution risk in the market?
  5. How do settlement agreements typically affect generic launch timing for older NSAIDs like indomethacin?

References

  1. FDA Drug Products (Orange Book). U.S. Food and Drug Administration. (Accessed via FDA Orange Book).
  2. ClinicalTrials.gov. Search results for indomethacin. National Library of Medicine. (Accessed via ClinicalTrials.gov).

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.