You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 17, 2025

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR IMPLANON


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for IMPLANON

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00620464 ↗ A Bioequivalence Study of IMPLANON and Radiopaque IMPLANON (34528)(P05720) Completed Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. Phase 3 2005-05-01 The primary purpose of this study is to demonstrate the bioequivalence of IMPLANON and Radiopaque IMPLANON.
NCT00725413 ↗ A Study to Investigate the Contraceptive Efficacy and Safety of a Subdermal Etonogestrel Implant (Implanon®)(P06473)(COMPLETED) Completed Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. Phase 4 2001-11-01 The primary purpose of this study is to investigate the contraceptive efficacy, safety and acceptability of Organon's subdermal etonogestrel implant in healthy female volunteers in various countries in order to obtain country-specific data.
NCT00828542 ↗ Safety of the Etonogestrel-releasing Implant During the Puerperium of Healthy Women Completed University of Sao Paulo N/A 2007-07-01 The purpose of this study to assess the safety of the etonogestrel-releasing subdermal implant (Implanon) inserted during the immediate puerperium of healthy women.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for IMPLANON

Condition Name

Condition Name for IMPLANON
Intervention Trials
Contraception 11
HIV 3
Breastfeeding 2
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for IMPLANON
Intervention Trials
Hemorrhage 4
Uterine Hemorrhage 3
Thinness 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for IMPLANON

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for IMPLANON
Location Trials
United States 8
Brazil 6
Uganda 3
Thailand 2
Egypt 2
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for IMPLANON
Location Trials
Virginia 1
South Carolina 1
Pennsylvania 1
Colorado 1
North Carolina 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for IMPLANON

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for IMPLANON
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 4 10
Phase 3 3
Phase 2 3
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for IMPLANON
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 19
Unknown status 3
Recruiting 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for IMPLANON

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for IMPLANON
Sponsor Trials
University of Pittsburgh 4
Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. 3
Chulalongkorn University 2
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for IMPLANON
Sponsor Trials
Other 37
Industry 6
U.S. Fed 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Projection for IMPLANON

Last updated: October 27, 2025

Introduction

IMPLANON, a long-acting reversible contraceptive (LARC) implant manufactured primarily by Merck (known as MSD outside the U.S. and Canada), has established a significant footprint in the contraceptive market since its launch. As an etonogestrel-releasing implant designed for three years of effective contraception, IMPLANON continues to evolve with ongoing clinical assessments, market dynamics, and expanding adoption strategies. This report provides a comprehensive overview of current clinical trials, a detailed market analysis, and future projections of IMPLANON’s market position.


Clinical Trials: Current Status and Insights

Ongoing and Completed Clinical Trials

IMPLANON’s clinical development history exemplifies rigorous safety and efficacy evaluation. Its initial approval was based on extensive phase III trials demonstrating high contraceptive efficacy, safety, and user satisfaction.

Currently, the focus of clinical research centers around improved patient outcomes, device longevity, and safety profile optimization. Notably:

  • Extended Use and Duration Trials: Recent studies explore the potential for extending the device’s effective lifespan beyond three years. For example, a pivotal trial assessed the contraceptive efficacy of etonogestrel implants up to four and five years, suggesting potential for regulatory updating to extend market life [1].

  • Safety Profile Assessments: Ongoing post-market surveillance continues to affirm the device's safety, with rare adverse events like implant expulsion or abnormal bleeding being closely monitored. These studies serve as a basis for regulatory updates and patient counseling.

  • New Formulation Studies: Trials evaluating modifications in implant materials or pharmacokinetics aim to enhance pharmacological stability and decrease side effects.

Regulatory and Real-world Evidence

While no publicly disclosed new pivotal clinical trials are currently in the pipeline, retrospective surveillance supports IMPLANON’s safety data, reinforcing its approval status globally. The World Health Organization (WHO) and various national regulatory bodies continue to review existing data, emphasizing long-term safety and satisfaction.


Market Analysis

Market Overview

The global contraceptive market is projected to reach USD 22.5 billion by 2027, growing at a CAGR of approximately 6.3% [2]. Long-acting reversible contraceptives (LARCs)—including IMPLANON—are gaining popularity due to their high efficacy, convenience, and reduced user dependency.

Key Market Drivers

  • Increasing Awareness and Acceptance: Rapid urbanization, increased female workforce participation, and government campaigns emphasizing family planning fuel adoption.
  • Advantages of LARCs: Efficacy rates above 99%, with durations spanning three years, make implants a preferred choice over daily pills or condoms.
  • Expanding Access in Developing Countries: Initiatives by organizations like WHO and UNFPA are increasing availability in low-resource settings, further expanding the market.

Competitive Landscape

IMPLANON faces competition from other contraceptive devices like Nexplanon (a successor to IMPLANON with improved design), intrauterine devices (IUDs), and oral contraceptives. Nexplanon, introduced in 2011, features a smaller, radiopaque design for easier detection [3]. Its superior convenience and regulatory approvals in numerous markets have impacted IMPLANON’s market share dynamics.

Regulatory and Reimbursement Trends

Global health authorities increasingly recognize the benefits of LARCs, leading to improved reimbursement policies. Governments, such as in the UK and US, include IMPLANON/Nexplanon in essential medicines lists, reducing cost barriers and boosting adoption.

Challenges and Barriers

  • Limited Patient Awareness: Despite advantages, misconceptions and lack of awareness hinder widespread adoption.
  • Training and Provider Readiness: Proper insertion and removal require specialized training, posing logistical hurdles.
  • Side-Effect Management: Irregular bleeding remains a concern influencing patient satisfaction.

Market Projection: Future Outlook

Growth Trajectory

The immediate outlook indicates steady growth attributable to increased awareness, expansion into emerging markets, and newer formulations. The market for contraceptive implants, including Nexplanon/IMPLANON, is projected to grow at a CAGR of 7% over the next five years.

Impact of Clinical Developments

Upcoming regulatory approvals to extend the device’s usability from three to four or five years could significantly influence market share. Such approval would reduce costs for users and providers, fostering higher adoption rates.

Technological Innovations

Emerging implant technologies, including biodegradable implants and combined hormonal-releasing devices, threaten to disrupt the current market but also open avenues for incremental improvements to IMPLANON.

Market Penetration in Developing Countries

Government and NGO-led initiatives aim to enhance access, particularly in Africa and Southeast Asia. Increased funding, training, and supply chain improvements could propel the market significantly in these regions, potentially doubling the market size by 2030.


Strategic Considerations for Stakeholders

  • Clinical Evidence Expansion: Supporting studies to extend duration or reduce side effects could unlock market growth.
  • Education Campaigns: Addressing misconceptions and increasing provider awareness are critical.
  • Regulatory Engagement: Proactively working with authorities to incorporate new data-driven updates can sustain competitive edge.
  • Post-Market Surveillance: Rigorous safety monitoring will be essential to maintain regulatory confidence and consumer trust.

Key Takeaways

  • Stable Clinical Safety Profile: IMPLANON’s safety and efficacy are well-documented with ongoing surveillance reaffirming its role as a reliable contraceptive.
  • Market Expansion Potential: Increasing global acceptance, particularly in emerging markets, offers substantial growth opportunities.
  • Regulatory Innovation: Extending device lifespan from three to four or five years could be a game-changer, reducing costs and improving user compliance.
  • Competitive Landscape: Nexplanon and other LARCs are intensifying competition; differentiation through innovation and education is vital.
  • Growth Drivers: Focused efforts on provider training, patient awareness, and strategic partnerships will underpin the future expansion of IMPLANON.

FAQs

1. What is the regulatory status of IMPLANON across regions?
IMPLANON has received approval in over 60 countries, including the U.S. (FDA), European Union (EMA), and many emerging markets. Regulatory agencies continue to review data supporting extended use and safety.

2. Are there any ongoing clinical trials to extend the device’s duration?
Yes, recent studies and regulatory submissions explore extending efficacy from three to four or five years, with promising preliminary results supporting regulatory updates.

3. How does IMPLANON compare to Nexplanon?
Nexplanon is a successor to IMPLANON with a smaller, radiopaque design for better placement and detection. While both deliver etonogestrel, Nexplanon benefits from technological enhancements that have led to increased user satisfaction and market share.

4. What are the main barriers to broader adoption of IMPLANON?
Barriers include misconceptions about safety, inadequate provider training, side effects like irregular bleeding, and limited awareness in certain populations.

5. What market strategies could accelerate IMPLANON’s growth?
Investing in clinical research for duration extension, expanding educational campaigns, strengthening regulatory collaborations, and improving access in low-resource settings will be key strategies.


References

  1. World Health Organization. "Long-acting reversible contraceptives: An overview." WHO Reproductive Health. 2022.
  2. MarketsandMarkets. "Contraceptives Market – Global Forecast to 2027." 2022.
  3. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. "Nexplanon (etonogestrel implant) Drug Label." 2018.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.