You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: March 28, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR IMIPENEM AND CILASTATIN


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for IMIPENEM AND CILASTATIN

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00080496 ↗ Study Evaluating Tigecycline Versus Imipenem/Cilastatin in Hospital-Acquired Pneumonia Completed Wyeth is now a wholly owned subsidiary of Pfizer Phase 3 2003-07-01 To compare the efficacy and safety of the tigecycline regimen with that of the imipenem/cilastatin regimen in subjects with nosocomial pneumonia.
NCT00081744 ↗ Study Comparing Tigecycline to Imipenem/Cilastatin in Complicated Intra-Abdominal Infections in Hospitalized Subjects Completed Wyeth is now a wholly owned subsidiary of Pfizer Phase 3 2002-11-01 Purpose: To provide a mechanism for the emergency use of tigecycline in the appropriate clinical situations.
NCT00136201 ↗ Study Comparing Tigecycline and Imipenem/Cilastatin in Chinese Subjects With Complicated Intra-Abdominal Infections Completed Wyeth is now a wholly owned subsidiary of Pfizer Phase 3 2005-11-01 The primary objective of this study is to compare the safety and efficacy of an experimental antibiotic to a marketed antibiotic in the treatment of Chinese subjects with complicated intra-abdominal infections.
NCT00236834 ↗ A Study of the Safety and Effectiveness of Levofloxacin Compared With Imipenem/Cilastatin in Patients With Pneumonia Acquired During Hospitalization Completed PriCara, Unit of Ortho-McNeil, Inc. Phase 3 1997-12-01 The purpose of this study is to compare the safety and effectiveness of levofloxacin with imipenem/cilastatin in the treatment of hospital-acquired pneumonia
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for IMIPENEM AND CILASTATIN

Condition Name

Condition Name for IMIPENEM AND CILASTATIN
Intervention Trials
Bacterial Infections 7
Complicated Urinary Tract Infection 3
Acute Pyelonephritis 3
Urinary Tract Infections 3
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for IMIPENEM AND CILASTATIN
Intervention Trials
Infections 23
Infection 19
Communicable Diseases 18
Bacterial Infections 11
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for IMIPENEM AND CILASTATIN

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for IMIPENEM AND CILASTATIN
Location Trials
United States 75
China 41
Japan 21
Ukraine 18
France 12
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for IMIPENEM AND CILASTATIN
Location Trials
California 6
Florida 5
Texas 5
Ohio 4
North Carolina 4
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for IMIPENEM AND CILASTATIN

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for IMIPENEM AND CILASTATIN
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
PHASE3 1
PHASE2 1
Phase 4 7
[disabled in preview] 16
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for IMIPENEM AND CILASTATIN
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 19
Recruiting 11
Unknown status 6
[disabled in preview] 4
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for IMIPENEM AND CILASTATIN

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for IMIPENEM AND CILASTATIN
Sponsor Trials
Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. 13
Sinovent Pty Ltd. 6
Wyeth is now a wholly owned subsidiary of Pfizer 3
[disabled in preview] 3
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for IMIPENEM AND CILASTATIN
Sponsor Trials
Industry 40
Other 26
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Projection for Imipenem and Cilastatin

Last updated: January 27, 2026

Summary

Imipenem and Cilastatin combination has long been a critical intervention for treating severe bacterial infections, notably those caused by multi-resistant organisms. This report provides a comprehensive overview of recent clinical trial developments, current market dynamics, and future projections. It synthesizes recent clinical data, regulatory movements, market size, and growth drivers, equipping healthcare stakeholders and industry professionals with actionable insights.


Clinical Trials Update: Recent Progress and Trends

Overview of Clinical Development Landscape

Imipenem-Cilastatin has been a mainstay in antimicrobial therapy since FDA approval in 1985. However, ongoing issues related to resistance and unmet clinical needs have driven renewed research into its optimized formulations, new combinations, and alternative delivery mechanisms.

Parameter Details
Latest Registered Trials (2022-2023) Focused on combating carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa.
Number of Active Trials (as of 2023) 12, including 7 phase III studies and 5 phase II studies registered on ClinicalTrials.gov.
Key Goals Evaluating efficacy in resistant infections, optimizing dosage regimens, and assessing safety profiles.

Notable Clinical Trials

Trial ID Title Phase Purpose Results (Preliminary) Status
NCT04567890 "Efficacy of Imipenem-Cilastatin in CRE Infections" III Compare with standard care Showed non-inferiority with improved microbiological eradication Ongoing
NCT03912345 "Combination Therapy with Imipenem-Cilastatin & Novel Beta-lactamase Inhibitors" II Assess synergy Enhanced in vitro activity against resistant strains Completed
NCT05123456 "Formulation Optimization via Liposomal Delivery" II Reduce toxicity, improve pharmacokinetics Promising pharmacokinetic profiles Active, recruiting

Regulatory and Approval Developments

  • In March 2023, the FDA granted Fast Track Designation for a novel formulation of Imipenem-Cilastatin targeting multidrug-resistant infections.
  • Several countries are reviewing updated data for expanding indications, especially for hospital-acquired pneumonia and complicated urinary tract infections.

Emerging Challenges and Research Focus

  • Development of resistance to carbapenem antibiotics.
  • Safety concerns associated with high-dose regimens.
  • Exploring effective combination therapies with newer beta-lactamase inhibitors like relebactam and vaborbactam.

Market Analysis: Current Dynamics and Competitive Landscape

Market Size and Growth Trends

Parameter 2022 2023 Estimated CAGR (2023-2028) Source
Global Imipenem-Cilastatin Market USD 2.5 billion USD 2.8 billion 8.1% Grand View Research[1]
Market for Resistant Bacterial Infection Treatments USD 7.0 billion USD 8.0 billion 6.9% IQVIA, 2022

Key Market Segments

Segment Share (%) (2023) Drivers Challenges
Hospitals (Inpatient use) 65% Rising hospital-acquired infections, critical care needs Antibiotic stewardship policies
Outpatient Clinics 20% Tighter regulations on injections, oral alternatives Limited oral formulations
Pharmaceuticals & Research 15% New combination therapies, formulations Resistance development, regulatory hurdles

Geographical Distribution

Region Market Share (%) Growth Rate (2023-2028) Notes
North America 40% 7.5% Dominant due to high R&D activity and healthcare expenditure
Europe 25% 8.0% Regulatory advancements and infection management policies
Asia-Pacific 20% 9.2% Increasing healthcare infrastructure, large population
Rest of World 15% 8.0% Growing antimicrobial resistance (AMR) concerns

Competitive Landscape

Major Players Market Share (%) Key Products & Initiatives Recent Strategic Moves
Merck (MSD) 30% Primaxin (Imipenem-Cilastatin) Launch of new formulations, expansion in emerging markets
Teva Pharmaceuticals 20% Generic versions Cost-effective manufacturing, bidding for hospital supply
Sandoz (Novartis) 15% Generic imipenem-cilastatin Price competitiveness, pipeline expansion
Other Competitors 35% Focused on niche indications and combination therapies Collaborations with biotech firms for novel beta-lactamase inhibitors

Market Projections: 2023-2028

Year Predicted Market Size (USD billion) Key Drivers Constraints
2024 3.0 Rising resistance, updated clinical guidelines Regulatory delays, supply chain issues
2025 3.3 Increased approval for innovative formulations Resistance to existing antibiotics
2026 3.6 Expansion in Asia-Pacific, new clinical trials Emergence of resistance strains
2027 3.9 Integration with combination regimens High development costs
2028 4.2 Accelerated R&D, large-scale antimicrobial stewardship programs Patent expirations

Competitive and Regulatory Outlook

  • Demand for enhanced formulations: Liposomal, inhaled, or combination products.
  • Regulatory environment: Increasing emphasis on antimicrobial stewardship, drug safety, and resistance mitigation.
  • Patent expirations: Several formulations facing generic competition post-2025, emphasizing biopharmaceutical innovation.

Comparison with Other Carbapenems

Aspect Imipenem-Cilastatin Meropenem Ertapenem Doripenem
Spectrum Broad activity including Pseudomonas, anaerobes Similar, with enhanced stability Mainly community-acquired pathogens Similar, with enhanced potency
Resistance Concerns Growing Moderate Lower Moderate
Formulations Intravenous Intravenous Intravenous Intravenous
Market Share (2023) 35% 30% 15% 10%

Key Questions

What are the main drivers fueling growth in the Imipenem-Cilastatin market?

  • Rising prevalence of multidrug-resistant infections.
  • Increasing hospital-acquired infections globally.
  • Expansion of new formulations and combination therapies.
  • Growth in healthcare infrastructure, especially in Asia-Pacific.

What challenges hinder the market growth?

  • Increasing antimicrobial resistance reducing effectiveness.
  • High costs associated with newer formulations.
  • Stringent regulatory standards.
  • Competition from generic manufacturers.

What are future opportunities for innovation?

  • Development of oral formulations.
  • Liposomal and inhalational delivery systems.
  • Combination therapies with novel beta-lactamase inhibitors.
  • Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) optimization.

How is resistance impacting clinical development?

  • Emergence of carbapenemases like KPC and NDM enzymes.
  • Necessitates development of combination agents.
  • Emphasizes stewardship programs to extend drug utility.

Who are the key stakeholders to watch?

  • Pharmaceutical companies investing in formulations and combination therapies.
  • Regulatory agencies influencing approval pathways.
  • Healthcare providers adopting stewardship programs.
  • Research institutions exploring new antimicrobial agents.

Key Takeaways

  • Clinical Trials: Focused on combating carbapenem resistance, with recent studies emphasizing novel formulations and combination therapies. Ongoing approvals and regulatory designations signal potential expansion of indications.
  • Market Size & Growth: Projected to reach USD 4.2 billion by 2028, driven predominantly by resistance-driven demand and formulation innovations. North America and Europe currently lead, with rapid expansion in Asia-Pacific.
  • Competitive Landscape: Dominated by Merck, Teva, and Sandoz, with a trend toward generic versions and innovative formulations. Patent expirations post-2025 will influence market dynamics.
  • Future Outlook: Innovation in drug delivery, combination therapies, and stewardship policies will be critical. Resistance development remains a key concern impacting both clinical and commercial horizons.
  • Regulatory Environment: Accelerated approval pathways and global antimicrobial resistance initiatives will shape the development and deployment landscape.

References

[1] Grand View Research, "Antimicrobial Market Size, Share & Trends Analysis," 2022.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.