Last Updated: September 24, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR IMIPENEM AND CILASTATIN


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for IMIPENEM AND CILASTATIN

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00080496 ↗ Study Evaluating Tigecycline Versus Imipenem/Cilastatin in Hospital-Acquired Pneumonia Completed Wyeth is now a wholly owned subsidiary of Pfizer Phase 3 2003-07-01 To compare the efficacy and safety of the tigecycline regimen with that of the imipenem/cilastatin regimen in subjects with nosocomial pneumonia.
NCT00081744 ↗ Study Comparing Tigecycline to Imipenem/Cilastatin in Complicated Intra-Abdominal Infections in Hospitalized Subjects Completed Wyeth is now a wholly owned subsidiary of Pfizer Phase 3 2002-11-01 Purpose: To provide a mechanism for the emergency use of tigecycline in the appropriate clinical situations.
NCT00136201 ↗ Study Comparing Tigecycline and Imipenem/Cilastatin in Chinese Subjects With Complicated Intra-Abdominal Infections Completed Wyeth is now a wholly owned subsidiary of Pfizer Phase 3 2005-11-01 The primary objective of this study is to compare the safety and efficacy of an experimental antibiotic to a marketed antibiotic in the treatment of Chinese subjects with complicated intra-abdominal infections.
NCT00236834 ↗ A Study of the Safety and Effectiveness of Levofloxacin Compared With Imipenem/Cilastatin in Patients With Pneumonia Acquired During Hospitalization Completed PriCara, Unit of Ortho-McNeil, Inc. Phase 3 1997-12-01 The purpose of this study is to compare the safety and effectiveness of levofloxacin with imipenem/cilastatin in the treatment of hospital-acquired pneumonia
NCT00236834 ↗ A Study of the Safety and Effectiveness of Levofloxacin Compared With Imipenem/Cilastatin in Patients With Pneumonia Acquired During Hospitalization Completed Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceutical Research & Development, L.L.C. Phase 3 1997-12-01 The purpose of this study is to compare the safety and effectiveness of levofloxacin with imipenem/cilastatin in the treatment of hospital-acquired pneumonia
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for IMIPENEM AND CILASTATIN

Condition Name

Condition Name for IMIPENEM AND CILASTATIN
Intervention Trials
Bacterial Infections 7
Pneumonia, Bacterial 3
Complicated Urinary Tract Infection 3
Acute Pyelonephritis 3
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for IMIPENEM AND CILASTATIN
Intervention Trials
Infections 23
Infection 19
Communicable Diseases 18
Bacterial Infections 11
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for IMIPENEM AND CILASTATIN

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for IMIPENEM AND CILASTATIN
Location Trials
United States 75
China 41
Japan 21
Ukraine 18
Russian Federation 12
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for IMIPENEM AND CILASTATIN
Location Trials
California 6
Texas 5
Florida 5
Ohio 4
North Carolina 4
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for IMIPENEM AND CILASTATIN

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for IMIPENEM AND CILASTATIN
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
PHASE3 1
PHASE2 1
Phase 4 7
[disabled in preview] 17
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for IMIPENEM AND CILASTATIN
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 19
Recruiting 11
Unknown status 6
[disabled in preview] 8
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for IMIPENEM AND CILASTATIN

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for IMIPENEM AND CILASTATIN
Sponsor Trials
Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. 13
Sinovent Pty Ltd. 6
Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceutical Research & Development, L.L.C. 3
[disabled in preview] 6
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for IMIPENEM AND CILASTATIN
Sponsor Trials
Industry 40
Other 26
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial
Last updated: July 27, 2026

IMIPENEM AND CILASTATIN Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Price-Adjusted Revenue Projections (2026–2035)

Imipenem and cilastatin is a mature, off-patent injectable antibiotic used for serious bacterial infections. The clinical-trials landscape is active mainly in comparative studies, pharmacokinetics, dose-optimization, and protocol-driven evaluations in specific infection categories, rather than first-in-class drug development. Commercial growth is constrained by (1) low pricing power, (2) stewardship and hospital formulary pressure, (3) loss of exclusivity dynamics already largely completed in most markets, and (4) substitution risk from newer beta-lactam/beta-lactamase inhibitor combinations and last-resort agents.

Bottom line projection: global revenue is expected to grow at low single-digit rates through 2035 under a base case that assumes steady volume retention in hospital-acquired infections and continued use in resistant gram-negative and mixed infections, offset by price erosion and competitive share shifts.


What clinical trials are ongoing for imipenem and cilastatin and what endpoints matter?

Most imipenem/cilastatin trials are designed to confirm dosing, exposure, and safety in defined patient groups (renal impairment, critical illness, pediatrics, ICU pharmacokinetic variability), plus pragmatic efficacy endpoints aligned to guideline definitions.

Trial types and endpoints to track

  1. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics

    • Primary endpoints: free-drug exposure indices, % time above MIC (fT>MIC), clearance, half-life, AUC.
    • High decision impact: dosing strategies in augmented renal clearance and renal dysfunction.
  2. Safety and tolerability in special populations

    • Primary endpoints: adverse event rates, CNS adverse event monitoring (seizure risk signal), lab changes.
    • High decision impact: regimen selection for ICU and pediatrics.
  3. Comparative trials vs standard-of-care (SOC)

    • Primary endpoints: clinical cure and microbiological eradication.
    • High decision impact: formulary positioning vs newer gram-negative agents.
  4. Real-world evidence (RWE) and observational cohorts

    • Primary endpoints: length of stay, treatment persistence, culture outcomes.
    • High decision impact: payer and hospital pathway adoption.

Clinical-trials intelligence that affects commercial outcomes

  • Renal dosing algorithms directly affect dosing uptake and reduces underdosing risk, which can improve outcomes and drive repeat use.
  • ICU PK variability evidence supports clinician confidence and increases protocol adherence.
  • Comparative efficacy in resistant pathogens impacts whether imipenem/cilastatin stays on “reserve” lists or becomes a default option in specific pathways.

(Note: a specific “ongoing trials list” with trial identifiers, start dates, and results cannot be produced from the information provided in the request.)


How big is the global market for imipenem and cilastatin, and what drives unit demand?

Demand drivers

  • Hospital inpatient use for severe infections where broad gram-negative coverage is needed.
  • Carbapenem-sparing stewardship can limit usage, but imipenem/cilastatin remains an option in settings where narrower regimens are not adequate.
  • Culture-guided therapy increases use when MIC profiles support carbapenem selection.
  • Renal-dose protocols influence physician confidence and continuity of treatment.

Commercial constraints

  • Generic competition has already eroded branded pricing in most jurisdictions.
  • Antibiotic reimbursement is often constrained by diagnosis-related group (DRG) bundling and hospital procurement tender dynamics.
  • Clinical pathway bias toward newer beta-lactam/beta-lactamase inhibitor combinations and cephalosporin-based carbapenem alternatives reduces incremental demand.

When does imipenem and cilastatin lose exclusivity and what does that imply for generic entry?

Exclusivity for imipenem/cilastatin is effectively over for most markets given its long commercial history and generic availability.

Implications for market structure

  • Market is typically generic-dominant with limited differentiation beyond:
    • supply reliability,
    • package configuration,
    • stability and compatibility for infusion workflows,
    • pricing through hospital tenders.

Practical generic entry risk

  • Entry risk is usually lower than for novel drugs but manufacturing reliability and drug product quality consistency are decisive for procurement awards.
  • Brand-like market positioning is hard once generics are consolidated.

What patent estate protects imipenem and cilastatin and how strong is it?

Imipenem and cilastatin is generally treated as off-patent in major markets for the core API and standard formulations. Patent protection, where it exists, tends to be limited to:

  • specific formulation improvements (if any),
  • manufacturing process claims,
  • or method-of-use claims tied to particular regimens in defined settings.

A complete, jurisdiction-specific patent estate mapping (with expiration dates and legal status) cannot be compiled from the information provided in the prompt.


What is the Orange Book status of imipenem and cilastatin and what does it mean for FDA exclusivity?

The Orange Book status will be dominated by ANDA-relevant listings for generic imipenem/cilastatin products, with low residual exclusivity likelihood. A product-by-product Orange Book table with application numbers, active ingredients, dosage forms, and listed patents cannot be produced from the prompt input.


How does imipenem and cilastatin compare with piperacillin-tazobactam, meropenem, and newer gram-negative agents?

Relative positioning

  • Imipenem/cilastatin vs piperacillin-tazobactam

    • Carbapenem is typically reserved for higher-risk scenarios, resistant organisms, or failures of narrower coverage.
    • Stewardship programs can prefer narrower options unless culture or clinical severity indicates carbapenem need.
  • Imipenem/cilastatin vs meropenem

    • Both are carbapenems used for severe gram-negative infections.
    • Selection often depends on local formulary, dosing convenience, and clinician experience.
  • Imipenem/cilastatin vs newer beta-lactam/beta-lactamase inhibitors

    • Newer agents can reduce carbapenem consumption where resistance mechanisms permit.
    • Carbapenem use persists when resistance profiles make alternative agents less reliable.

Competitive substitution risk

  • High substitution risk in:
    • empiric regimens where guidelines support alternatives,
    • hospitals with standardized pathways favoring specific newer agents,
    • settings with proven stewardship targets.

What formulation and administration details change market uptake for imipenem and cilastatin?

Market uptake in hospitals depends on practical handling:

  • Reconstitution and infusion compatibility for ICU workflows.
  • Stability and storage constraints that affect nursing and pharmacy handling.
  • Dose flexibility for renal impairment adjustments.
  • Package size that matches typical treatment durations to reduce wastage.

Differentiation is rarely clinical at this stage, so supply chain and usability can matter as much as pharmacology.


What manufacturing and supply issues affect imipenem and cilastatin availability and pricing?

  • Carbapenems are subject to:
    • tight procurement,
    • batch release variability risks,
    • capacity constraints during high demand.
  • Short supply can drive temporary price increases or substitution to other carbapenems or alternatives.
  • Long-term pricing trends generally follow generic competitive equilibrium unless supply shocks occur.

A data-driven manufacturing risk map requires market-specific sourcing and FDA drug shortage data.


Revenue projection model for imipenem and cilastatin (base case, 2026–2035)

Projection logic used

  • Volume growth: constrained by stewardship and competition.
  • Price trend: modest declines with tender cycles and generic competition.
  • Net revenue: low single-digit CAGR in most regions absent major supply shocks or new clinical re-expansion.

Base case forecast (global)

  • CAGR (2026–2030): low single digit.
  • CAGR (2031–2035): tapering toward flat-to-low growth.

Upside / downside cases

  • Upside drivers

    • increased empiric carbapenem use in resistant gram-negative waves,
    • formulation or supply stabilization improving continuity of use,
    • guideline alignment for severe mixed infections where imipenem stays favored.
  • Downside drivers

    • broader adoption of carbapenem-sparing combinations,
    • stricter stewardship reducing broad empiric carbapenem use,
    • accelerated procurement consolidation toward fewer suppliers.

A numerical forecast in USD requires baseline sales, regional splits, and payer-level pricing inputs that are not included in the prompt.


Key commercial questions hospital buyers ask in 2026–2030

What generic entry risks exist for imipenem and cilastatin?

Low product IP differentiation; risks center on:

  • regulatory compliance,
  • supply reliability,
  • ability to win tenders.

Which geographies keep the best residual demand?

Typically hospital-heavy markets with high severe infection burden, but exact country-ranking requires sales data.

How does clinician practice affect uptake?

Protocol adherence to renal dosing and ICU PK guidance improves outcomes and supports continued use.


Key Takeaways

  • Imipenem and cilastatin remains a core inpatient antibiotic for severe infections, but growth is limited by generic competition and carbapenem-sparing prescribing.
  • Clinical trials activity is most likely focused on PK/dosing, special populations, and comparative effectiveness rather than new product discovery.
  • Exclusivity and patent-driven market protection are minimal for the core drug class in most markets, shifting competition to price, supply, and usability.
  • Base-case revenue outlook is low single-digit to near-flat growth through 2035, with meaningful upside only from resistance-driven demand spikes or supply stability events.

FAQs

  1. What renal dosing adjustments are most important for imipenem and cilastatin in ICU patients?
  2. How do hospital stewardship policies typically restrict empiric carbapenem use and how does that affect imipenem/cilastatin volumes?
  3. Which organism resistance profiles most often maintain carbapenem selection over beta-lactam/beta-lactamase inhibitor alternatives?
  4. What practical formulation or infusion handling factors influence pharmacy procurement decisions for imipenem/cilastatin generics?
  5. How do FDA drug shortage events for carbapenems affect real-world imipenem/cilastatin pricing and substitution?

References

  1. (No citable source material was provided in the prompt content.)

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.