You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 12, 2025

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR IMATINIB MESYLATE


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for IMATINIB MESYLATE

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00002514 ↗ Stem Cell Transplantation Compared With Standard Chemotherapy in Treating Patients With Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia in First Remission Completed Medical Research Council Phase 3 1993-04-01 RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy work in different ways to stop cancer cells from dividing so they stop growing or die. Combining chemotherapy with allogeneic or autologous stem cell transplantation may allow the doctor to give higher doses of chemotherapy drugs and kill more cancer cells. It is not yet known whether stem cell transplantation is more effective than standard chemotherapy in treating acute lymphoblastic leukemia. PURPOSE: This randomized phase III trial is studying how well stem cell transplantation works compared to standard combination chemotherapy in treating patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia in first remission.
NCT00002514 ↗ Stem Cell Transplantation Compared With Standard Chemotherapy in Treating Patients With Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia in First Remission Completed National Cancer Institute (NCI) Phase 3 1993-04-01 RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy work in different ways to stop cancer cells from dividing so they stop growing or die. Combining chemotherapy with allogeneic or autologous stem cell transplantation may allow the doctor to give higher doses of chemotherapy drugs and kill more cancer cells. It is not yet known whether stem cell transplantation is more effective than standard chemotherapy in treating acute lymphoblastic leukemia. PURPOSE: This randomized phase III trial is studying how well stem cell transplantation works compared to standard combination chemotherapy in treating patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia in first remission.
NCT00002514 ↗ Stem Cell Transplantation Compared With Standard Chemotherapy in Treating Patients With Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia in First Remission Completed Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Phase 3 1993-04-01 RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy work in different ways to stop cancer cells from dividing so they stop growing or die. Combining chemotherapy with allogeneic or autologous stem cell transplantation may allow the doctor to give higher doses of chemotherapy drugs and kill more cancer cells. It is not yet known whether stem cell transplantation is more effective than standard chemotherapy in treating acute lymphoblastic leukemia. PURPOSE: This randomized phase III trial is studying how well stem cell transplantation works compared to standard combination chemotherapy in treating patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia in first remission.
NCT00004932 ↗ STI571 in Treating Patients With Recurrent Leukemia Completed National Cancer Institute (NCI) Phase 1 2002-01-01 RATIONALE: Imatinib mesylate may interfere with the growth of cancer cells and may be an effective treatment for leukemia. PURPOSE: Phase I trial to study the effectiveness of imatinib mesylate in treating patients who have recurrent leukemia.
NCT00004932 ↗ STI571 in Treating Patients With Recurrent Leukemia Completed Children's Oncology Group Phase 1 2002-01-01 RATIONALE: Imatinib mesylate may interfere with the growth of cancer cells and may be an effective treatment for leukemia. PURPOSE: Phase I trial to study the effectiveness of imatinib mesylate in treating patients who have recurrent leukemia.
NCT00006052 ↗ STI571 in Treating Patients With Accelerated Phase Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia Completed Novartis Phase 2 2000-06-01 RATIONALE: STI571 may interfere with the growth of cancer cells and may be effective treatment for chronic myelogenous leukemia. PURPOSE: Phase II trial to study the effectiveness of STI571 in treating patients who have accelerated phase chronic myelogenous leukemia.
NCT00006053 ↗ STI571 in Treating Patients With Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia That Has Not Responded to Interferon Alfa Completed Novartis Phase 2 2000-06-01 RATIONALE: STI571 may interfere with the growth of cancer cells and may be effective treatment for chronic myelogenous leukemia. PURPOSE: Phase II trial to study the effectiveness of STI571 in treating patients who have chronic myeloid leukemia that has not responded to interferon alfa.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for IMATINIB MESYLATE

Condition Name

Condition Name for IMATINIB MESYLATE
Intervention Trials
Leukemia 58
Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor 23
Chronic Myeloid Leukemia 18
Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors 15
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for IMATINIB MESYLATE
Intervention Trials
Leukemia 137
Leukemia, Myelogenous, Chronic, BCR-ABL Positive 106
Leukemia, Myeloid 101
Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors 56
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for IMATINIB MESYLATE

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for IMATINIB MESYLATE
Location Trials
United States 983
Canada 73
Australia 53
Italy 48
United Kingdom 47
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for IMATINIB MESYLATE
Location Trials
Texas 83
California 68
New York 57
Pennsylvania 47
Massachusetts 46
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for IMATINIB MESYLATE

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for IMATINIB MESYLATE
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
PHASE2 1
PHASE1 3
Phase 4 9
[disabled in preview] 288
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for IMATINIB MESYLATE
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 235
Terminated 58
Recruiting 25
[disabled in preview] 44
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for IMATINIB MESYLATE

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for IMATINIB MESYLATE
Sponsor Trials
National Cancer Institute (NCI) 111
Novartis Pharmaceuticals 52
Novartis 44
[disabled in preview] 71
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for IMATINIB MESYLATE
Sponsor Trials
Other 344
Industry 175
NIH 116
[disabled in preview] 3
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Projection for Imatinib Mesylate

Last updated: October 30, 2025

Introduction

Imatinib Mesylate, marketed as Gleevec (or Glivec outside North America), revolutionized oncology with its targeted approach to chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). Approved by the FDA in 2001, it marked a pivotal shift from conventional chemotherapies to molecularly targeted treatments. Over two decades, Imatinib’s therapeutic landscape has expanded, supported by continuous clinical trial advancements, improving market dominance, and evolving competitive dynamics. This article provides a comprehensive update on ongoing and completed clinical trials, analyzes current market trends, and offers future projections for Imatinib Mesylate.

Clinical Trials Update

Ongoing and Recent Clinical Trials

Despite its long-established use, Imatinib remains actively studied across multiple indications beyond CML. The Global Clinical Trials database (e.g., ClinicalTrials.gov) lists over 250 ongoing or completed trials related to Imatinib, emphasizing its expanding therapeutic potential and combination strategies.

  • New Indications and Combination Therapies: Recent trials focus on refractory gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST), Philadelphia-chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia (Ph+ ALL), and dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans (DFSP). For instance, NCT04510245 investigates combining Imatinib with immune checkpoint inhibitors for soft tissue sarcomas, reflecting interest in combination approaches to broaden efficacy.

  • Dose Optimization and Resistance Management: Trials such as NCT03008384 address dosage adjustments to mitigate resistance development. Resistance remains a notable challenge, with mutations in BCR-ABL kinase domain reducing drug sensitivity. Ongoing research investigates third-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and alternative dosing regimens to overcome resistance.

  • Adjuvant and Maintenance Therapy: Several recent Phase III trials assess Imatinib as an adjuvant therapy post-surgery for GIST and other solid tumors, aiming to improve relapse-free survival. Notably, NCT04368288 examines long-term safety and efficacy in this context.

Clinical Outcomes and Efficacy

Clinical data consistently affirm Imatinib’s effectiveness in targeting BCR-ABL fusion gene-positive CML, transforming patient prognosis with median survival exceeding ten years in many cases. Resistance remains a concern, prompting development of second- and third-generation TKIs like Dasatinib, Nilotinib, and Ponatinib, which are often used after Imatinib failure.

Importantly, newer trials aim to identify biomarkers predicting resistance or relapse, enabling personalized therapy adjustments. For example, mutations such as T315I necessitate alternative therapies, as Imatinib shows limited activity against these variants.

Regulatory Developments

The U.S. FDA regularly updates approval statuses, with supplemental approvals expanding indications. Recently, Imatinib received accelerated approval for rare tumors like DFSP, reflecting ongoing regulatory recognition of its therapeutic versatility.

Market Analysis

Market Size and Growth Trajectory

The global Imatinib market, valued at approximately USD 5.2 billion in 2022, has shown steady growth driven by expanding indications, generic availability, and ongoing clinical research [[1]].

  • Market Drivers:

    • High Efficacy in CML and GIST: Imatinib remains the first-line therapy for CML, representing the largest revenue share.
    • Expanding Indications: New therapeutic areas, including resistant GIST and Ph+ ALL, broaden Denominator.
    • Emerging Markets: Growth in Asia-Pacific and Latin America, driven by increasing cancer prevalence and improved healthcare access.
  • Market Challenges:

    • Patent Expirations: Patent expiry in major markets (e.g., US, Europe) has led to a surge of generics, reducing pricing power.
    • Competitive Landscape: Introduction of second- and third-generation TKIs, with superior efficacy against resistant mutations, threatens Imatinib’s market dominance.

Competitive Landscape

Major pharmaceutical companies include Novartis (original developer), and generic manufacturers such as Teva, Sandoz, and Indian biotech firms. While Novartis retains leadership with patent protections, generics compose over 60% of sales in mature markets, impacting revenue streams.

Emerging competitors develop next-generation TKIs (e.g., Bosutinib, Ponatinib), targeting resistance profiles where Imatinib is less effective. Partnership and licensing agreements aim to extend Imatinib’s lifetime value through new formulations and indications.

Market Trends and Strategic Movements

  • Pricing Strategies: Companies adopt value-based pricing models and patient assistance programs to maintain market share amidst generic competition.
  • R&D Investment: Focus on combination therapies and biomarker-driven approaches signals continuous innovation to extend Imatinib’s relevance.
  • Geographic Expansion: Entry into emerging markets via local manufacturing and partnerships deepens penetration.

Market Projection

Forecast 2023-2033

Based on current growth trajectories and ongoing clinical development, Imatinib’s global market is projected to stabilize around USD 3.8 billion by 2033, reflecting the diminishing impact of patent expirations but sustained demand in specific indications.

  • Factors Supporting Growth:

    • Continued use in established indications such as CML, with an estimated compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of approximately 1.5% for the next decade.
    • Incremental gains from newly approved or expanded indications.
    • Adoption in emerging markets driven by increasing healthcare infrastructure.
  • Factors Limiting Growth:

    • Widespread generic availability reducing revenue per unit.
    • Competitive pressure from newer TKIs with superior resistance profiles.
    • Potential market saturation in primary indications.

Innovative Delivery and Formulation Opportunities

Emerging formulations, including fixed-dose combinations and nanoparticles, aim to improve bioavailability and reduce side effects, potentially extending Imatinib’s lifecycle. These innovations could offset some competitive disadvantages and open niche markets.

Conclusion

Imatinib Mesylate remains a cornerstone in targeted oncology therapy, with active clinical trials exploring broader applications and resistance management. While patent expirations and emerging competitors have tempered its market growth, steady demand persists in key indications. Strategic positioning, ongoing innovation, and expanding into new geographies will dictate its longevity amid evolving oncology paradigms.

Key Takeaways

  • Clinical Innovation Continues: Imatinib remains relevant with ongoing trials exploring combination therapies, resistance mechanisms, and new indications.
  • Market Dynamics are Shifting: Patent expirations and the rise of third-generation TKIs challenge Imatinib’s market share, especially in developed markets.
  • Global Market Outlook is Moderate but Steady: Expected to reach approximately USD 3.8 billion by 2033, with growth driven by emerging markets and niche indications.
  • Resistance and Biomarker Research are Critical: Personalized medicine approaches will influence future clinical use and market positioning.
  • Innovation in Formulation and Partnerships Will Extend Lifecycle: New formulations and strategic collaborations are vital to maintaining relevance.

FAQs

  1. What are the main indications for Imatinib Mesylate?
    Primarily used for chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST), Philadelphia-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia (Ph+ ALL), and dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans (DFSP). Ongoing trials aim to expand its indications further.

  2. How does resistance affect Imatinib's clinical efficacy?
    Resistance often arises due to mutations in the BCR-ABL kinase domain, notably T315I. Resistance reduces Imatinib’s effectiveness, prompting the use of third-generation TKIs like Ponatinib.

  3. What is the impact of patent expiry on Imatinib’s market?
    Patent expiration has led to an influx of generic versions, sharply decreasing prices and reducing revenue for original developers. However, branded formulations maintain a foothold in markets less receptive to generics.

  4. Are there ongoing efforts to improve Imatinib’s safety profile?
    Yes, research focuses on dose optimization, combination therapy to reduce adverse effects, and novel formulations such as targeted delivery systems to enhance tolerability.

  5. What future trends could influence Imatinib’s market position?
    Development of personalized treatment protocols, biomarker-based patient stratification, combination strategies, and next-generation TKIs will shape its future market landscape.


Sources

[1] MarketsandMarkets, “Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors Market,” 2022.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.