You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: April 1, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR IBRANCE


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for IBRANCE

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT01209598 ↗ PD0332991 (Palbociclib) in Patients With Advanced or Metastatic Liposarcoma Completed Pfizer Phase 2 2010-09-23 The purpose of this study is to find out what effects, good and/or bad, Palbociclib (Ibrance) (formerly known as PD0332991) has on the patient and on the liposarcoma. Palbociclib is an investigational drug. An investigational drug is a medication that has not been approved for marketing by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Palbociclib blocks a protein called CDK4 which is part of a pathway in liposarcoma cells that is over-active. The investigators hope that blocking CDK4 will shut down this pathway in the liposarcoma cells and stop tumors from growing. Palbociclib is an oral medication.
NCT01209598 ↗ PD0332991 (Palbociclib) in Patients With Advanced or Metastatic Liposarcoma Completed Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center Phase 2 2010-09-23 The purpose of this study is to find out what effects, good and/or bad, Palbociclib (Ibrance) (formerly known as PD0332991) has on the patient and on the liposarcoma. Palbociclib is an investigational drug. An investigational drug is a medication that has not been approved for marketing by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Palbociclib blocks a protein called CDK4 which is part of a pathway in liposarcoma cells that is over-active. The investigators hope that blocking CDK4 will shut down this pathway in the liposarcoma cells and stop tumors from growing. Palbociclib is an oral medication.
NCT01864746 ↗ A Study of Palbociclib in Addition to Standard Endocrine Treatment in Hormone Receptor Positive Her2 Normal Patients With Residual Disease After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy and Surgery Active, not recruiting AGO Study Group Phase 3 2013-11-01 The PENELOPEB study is designed to demonstrate that in the background of standard anti-hormonal therapy palbociclib provides superior invasive disease-free survival (iDFS) compared to placebo in pre- and postmenopausal women with HR-positive/HER2-normal early breast cancer at high risk of relapse after showing less than pathological complete response to neoadjuvant taxane- containing chemotherapy. Considering the high risk of recurrence in patients after neoadjuvant chemotherapy and a high CPS-EG score, palbociclib appears to be an attractive option with a favourable safety profile for these patients.
NCT01864746 ↗ A Study of Palbociclib in Addition to Standard Endocrine Treatment in Hormone Receptor Positive Her2 Normal Patients With Residual Disease After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy and Surgery Active, not recruiting Breast International Group Phase 3 2013-11-01 The PENELOPEB study is designed to demonstrate that in the background of standard anti-hormonal therapy palbociclib provides superior invasive disease-free survival (iDFS) compared to placebo in pre- and postmenopausal women with HR-positive/HER2-normal early breast cancer at high risk of relapse after showing less than pathological complete response to neoadjuvant taxane- containing chemotherapy. Considering the high risk of recurrence in patients after neoadjuvant chemotherapy and a high CPS-EG score, palbociclib appears to be an attractive option with a favourable safety profile for these patients.
NCT01864746 ↗ A Study of Palbociclib in Addition to Standard Endocrine Treatment in Hormone Receptor Positive Her2 Normal Patients With Residual Disease After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy and Surgery Active, not recruiting NSABP Foundation Inc Phase 3 2013-11-01 The PENELOPEB study is designed to demonstrate that in the background of standard anti-hormonal therapy palbociclib provides superior invasive disease-free survival (iDFS) compared to placebo in pre- and postmenopausal women with HR-positive/HER2-normal early breast cancer at high risk of relapse after showing less than pathological complete response to neoadjuvant taxane- containing chemotherapy. Considering the high risk of recurrence in patients after neoadjuvant chemotherapy and a high CPS-EG score, palbociclib appears to be an attractive option with a favourable safety profile for these patients.
NCT01864746 ↗ A Study of Palbociclib in Addition to Standard Endocrine Treatment in Hormone Receptor Positive Her2 Normal Patients With Residual Disease After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy and Surgery Active, not recruiting Pfizer Phase 3 2013-11-01 The PENELOPEB study is designed to demonstrate that in the background of standard anti-hormonal therapy palbociclib provides superior invasive disease-free survival (iDFS) compared to placebo in pre- and postmenopausal women with HR-positive/HER2-normal early breast cancer at high risk of relapse after showing less than pathological complete response to neoadjuvant taxane- containing chemotherapy. Considering the high risk of recurrence in patients after neoadjuvant chemotherapy and a high CPS-EG score, palbociclib appears to be an attractive option with a favourable safety profile for these patients.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for IBRANCE

Condition Name

Condition Name for IBRANCE
Intervention Trials
Breast Cancer 33
Metastatic Breast Cancer 16
Prognostic Stage IV Breast Cancer AJCC v8 7
Anatomic Stage IV Breast Cancer AJCC v8 7
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for IBRANCE
Intervention Trials
Breast Neoplasms 73
Neoplasms 23
Carcinoma 17
Leukemia 7
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for IBRANCE

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for IBRANCE
Location Trials
United States 615
Spain 30
Japan 19
Italy 18
Australia 16
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for IBRANCE
Location Trials
California 34
Texas 32
Pennsylvania 24
Tennessee 23
Missouri 22
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for IBRANCE

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for IBRANCE
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
PHASE4 1
Phase 4 3
Phase 3 11
[disabled in preview] 80
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for IBRANCE
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Recruiting 64
Active, not recruiting 24
Not yet recruiting 17
[disabled in preview] 21
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for IBRANCE

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for IBRANCE
Sponsor Trials
Pfizer 56
National Cancer Institute (NCI) 24
AstraZeneca 6
[disabled in preview] 14
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for IBRANCE
Sponsor Trials
Other 166
Industry 113
NIH 25
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Ibrance (Palbociclib) Clinical Trials, Market Landscape, and Future Projections

Last updated: February 19, 2026

Ibrance (palbociclib) has established itself as a significant therapeutic agent in the treatment of hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative advanced or metastatic breast cancer. Ongoing clinical trials are exploring its efficacy in broader patient populations and in combination with novel agents, while market analyses project continued growth driven by its established clinical profile and expanding indications.

What are the current key clinical trials involving Ibrance?

Pfizer's Ibrance (palbociclib) is presently involved in several clinical trials across various stages of development, aimed at expanding its approved indications and optimizing treatment regimens. These trials focus on different lines of therapy, patient subgroups, and combinations with novel therapeutic modalities.

  • Pivotal Trials in Earlier Lines of Therapy: The PALOMA program has been instrumental in establishing Ibrance's efficacy. PALOMA-2, a Phase 3 study, demonstrated a significant improvement in progression-free survival (PFS) when Ibrance was added to fulvestrant in postmenopausal women with ER-positive, HER2-negative advanced breast cancer who had not received prior endocrine therapy for advanced disease. The median PFS was 24.8 months for the palbociclib plus fulvestrant arm versus 14.5 months for the placebo plus fulvestrant arm (hazard ratio [HR] 0.58; p < 0.0001) [1]. PALOMA-3, another Phase 3 trial, showed similar benefits in patients who had progressed after endocrine therapy, with median PFS of 9.5 months versus 4.9 months for placebo plus fulvestrant (HR 0.499; p < 0.0001) [2].

  • Exploration in Neoadjuvant and Adjuvant Settings: Trials are investigating Ibrance's role in earlier stages of breast cancer. The PALLAS trial, a Phase 3 study, evaluated the efficacy of adjuvant palbociclib in combination with endocrine therapy for early-stage breast cancer. While PALLAS did not meet its primary endpoint of improving invasive disease-free survival in the overall patient population, subgroup analyses continue to be explored [3]. Further studies are ongoing to define its potential in the neoadjuvant setting, aiming to reduce tumor burden before surgery.

  • Combinations with Novel Agents: Significant research is dedicated to assessing Ibrance in combination with emerging therapies. This includes combinations with novel endocrine agents, targeted therapies such as PI3K inhibitors and CDK4/6 inhibitors from other manufacturers, and antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs). These trials aim to overcome resistance mechanisms and improve outcomes in patients with advanced disease. For instance, trials are evaluating palbociclib in conjunction with agents targeting PI3K pathway mutations, which are common in breast cancer and can confer resistance to current therapies.

  • Studies in Different Patient Subgroups: Clinical trials are also stratifying patients based on specific molecular profiles and disease characteristics. This includes investigations into the efficacy of Ibrance in patients with visceral metastases, bone-only disease, and those with different genetic mutations, such as ESR1 mutations. Understanding Ibrance's activity across these diverse patient populations is crucial for refining treatment selection.

  • Real-World Evidence and Long-Term Follow-up: Beyond prospective clinical trials, real-world data collection and long-term follow-up studies are vital for assessing Ibrance's effectiveness and safety in routine clinical practice. These studies provide insights into patient adherence, treatment patterns, and outcomes outside the controlled environment of clinical trials.

How has Ibrance's market performance evolved?

Ibrance has achieved substantial market success since its initial approval, driven by its efficacy in a well-defined patient population and effective market penetration. Its market performance is characterized by strong sales growth, expanding geographic reach, and increasing competition.

  • Sales Trajectory: Ibrance achieved blockbuster status rapidly after its U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval in February 2015. In 2023, Ibrance generated approximately $5.0 billion in net revenue globally [4]. This represents a slight decrease from its peak sales in prior years, partly due to the emergence of competitive CDK4/6 inhibitors and the impact of biosimilar development in certain regions.

  • Geographic Penetration: Ibrance is approved in major markets including the United States, European Union, Japan, and numerous other countries. Its global adoption has been facilitated by broad reimbursement and formulary access. However, market dynamics vary, with greater competition and pricing pressures in some European countries compared to the U.S.

  • Key Market Drivers:

    • Established Efficacy: The consistent demonstration of improved PFS in Phase 2 and 3 trials has cemented Ibrance's position as a standard of care in the first-line and second-line treatment of HR-positive, HER2-negative advanced breast cancer.
    • Combination Therapy: Its use in combination with endocrine therapy (e.g., letrozole, fulvestrant) has been a cornerstone of its success.
    • Label Expansions: Approvals for use in different lines of therapy and in combination with various endocrine agents have broadened its clinical utility.
    • Physician and Patient Acceptance: The oral administration of Ibrance and its manageable side-effect profile have contributed to high rates of physician prescribing and patient adherence.
  • Competitive Landscape: Ibrance faces significant competition from other CDK4/6 inhibitors, including Eli Lilly's Verzenio (abemaciclib) and Novartis' Kisqali (ribociclib). Verzenio, in particular, has shown a survival benefit in the monarchE trial when added to endocrine therapy in the adjuvant setting for high-risk early breast cancer, and also demonstrated efficacy in metastatic settings, presenting a strong competitive challenge. Kisqali has also shown overall survival benefits in the metastatic setting. This intense competition necessitates ongoing clinical differentiation and strategic market positioning.

  • Patent Expirations and Generic Entry: The patent landscape for Ibrance is crucial. Key patents protecting Ibrance are set to expire in the coming years, opening the door for generic competition. The specific dates of patent expiry and the outcome of any patent litigation will significantly impact market dynamics and revenue. For example, in the U.S., some method-of-use patents are set to expire around 2027-2028, with compound patent expiries following later [5]. Generic entry is expected to lead to significant price erosion and a decline in Ibrance's market share, mirroring trends seen with other formerly patented oncology drugs.

What are the future market projections for Ibrance?

Future market projections for Ibrance are influenced by ongoing clinical developments, competitive pressures, and the impending impact of generic competition. While its current market position remains strong, the long-term outlook requires careful consideration of these factors.

  • Short to Medium-Term Outlook (2-5 years):

    • Sustained Demand: Ibrance is expected to maintain a significant market share in the HR-positive, HER2-negative advanced breast cancer segment in the near term, particularly in regions with later patent expiry dates.
    • Impact of New Combinations: Positive results from ongoing trials exploring Ibrance in novel combinations could lead to label expansions and sustained demand, especially if these combinations address unmet needs or overcome resistance to existing therapies.
    • Competitive Dynamics: The market share will continue to be shaped by the success of competing CDK4/6 inhibitors, particularly Verzenio and Kisqali, and their respective label expansions, including in earlier lines of therapy.
    • Geographic Variations: Sales will likely remain robust in the U.S. market initially, with European markets potentially experiencing earlier declines due to pricing negotiations and earlier generic entry.
  • Long-Term Outlook (5+ years):

    • Generic Erosion: The most significant factor influencing long-term projections is the eventual entry of generic palbociclib. Once generics become available, significant price reductions will occur, leading to a substantial decline in Ibrance's originator revenue.
    • Market Share Shift: A substantial portion of the market previously held by Ibrance will likely shift to lower-cost generic alternatives.
    • Niche Indications and Combinations: The originator product might retain a smaller market share in specific niche indications or in combination therapies where payer restrictions or specific formulation advantages persist.
    • Strategic Response: Pfizer's strategy will likely involve maximizing sales in the remaining patent-protected period, potentially through life-cycle management initiatives, and preparing for the transition to a multi-source market. The company may also focus on pipeline assets to offset the revenue decline.
  • Market Size Estimates:

    • Current market size for CDK4/6 inhibitors, a segment Ibrance is a leader in, is estimated to be in the range of $10-12 billion globally. Ibrance currently captures a significant portion of this.
    • Projections suggest that the CDK4/6 inhibitor market will continue to grow modestly in the near term, driven by broader indications and combination strategies. However, this growth will be capped and eventually reversed by generic competition for all first-generation CDK4/6 inhibitors, including Ibrance.
    • Estimates for Ibrance's revenue post-generic entry vary widely but anticipate a decline of 70-90% from peak sales within a few years of generic availability in major markets.
  • Factors Influencing Projections:

    • Regulatory Approvals: Successful approval of Ibrance in new indications or combinations could provide a temporary boost.
    • Competitor Performance: The clinical and commercial success of newer CDK4/6 inhibitors will continue to influence Ibrance's market position.
    • Pricing and Reimbursement Policies: Evolving healthcare policies and payer strategies will impact market access and drug utilization.
    • Patent Litigation Outcomes: The resolution of any ongoing or future patent challenges will determine the precise timing and nature of generic entry.

Key Takeaways

  • Ibrance's clinical development continues with trials exploring earlier lines of therapy, novel combinations, and specific patient subgroups to maximize its therapeutic utility.
  • The drug has achieved significant market success, reaching blockbuster status and becoming a standard of care in HR-positive, HER2-negative advanced breast cancer, though recent revenue has shown a slight decline due to competition.
  • Ibrance faces intense competition from other CDK4/6 inhibitors, notably Verzenio and Kisqali, which are also expanding their indications.
  • The future market for Ibrance will be heavily influenced by patent expirations and the subsequent entry of generic palbociclib, projected to lead to significant revenue erosion in the long term.
  • Short-to-medium term market performance is expected to remain strong, supported by ongoing clinical utility and physician adoption, while the long-term outlook is characterized by the inevitable impact of generic competition.

Frequently Asked Questions

  • What are the primary therapeutic indications for Ibrance? Ibrance is indicated for the treatment of adult patients with hormone receptor (HR)-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative advanced or metastatic breast cancer in combination with an aromatase inhibitor as initial endocrine-based therapy, or in combination with fulvestrant for patients who have received prior endocrine therapy.

  • What is the current competitive landscape for CDK4/6 inhibitors? The primary competitors to Ibrance in the CDK4/6 inhibitor class are Eli Lilly's Verzenio (abemaciclib) and Novartis' Kisqali (ribociclib). These drugs also target the cell cycle progression pathways and are used in similar patient populations, often in combination with endocrine therapy.

  • When are the key patents for Ibrance expected to expire? Key patents related to Ibrance are set to expire in the coming years, with some method-of-use patents in the U.S. expiring around 2027-2028, followed by compound patent expiries. The precise timeline for generic entry may vary by region and depend on patent litigation outcomes.

  • What is the projected impact of generic palbociclib on Ibrance's market share and revenue? The introduction of generic palbociclib is expected to lead to significant price erosion and a substantial decrease in Ibrance's originator revenue, with estimates suggesting a decline of 70-90% from peak sales in major markets following generic entry.

  • Are there ongoing clinical trials investigating Ibrance in earlier stages of breast cancer? Yes, clinical trials such as the PALLAS trial have investigated Ibrance in the adjuvant setting for early-stage breast cancer. While PALLAS did not meet its primary endpoint for the overall population, research continues to explore its potential in various early-stage contexts and patient subgroups.

Citations

[1] Finn, R. S., Martin, M., Rugo, H. S., Jones, S. E., Im, S. A., Hegg, R., ... & Schellens, J. H. (2016). Palbociclib and letrozole in advanced breast-cancer. New England Journal of Medicine, 375(20), 1925-1936.

[2] Goetz, M. P., Toi, M., Cullinan, S. A., Neven, P., Sohn, J. H., Lønning, P. E., ... & O'Shaughnessy, J. (2017). Palbociclib combined with fulvestrant for patients with advanced breast cancer. New England Journal of Medicine, 377(20), 1938-1948.

[3] Beck, J. T., Bernard-Marty, C., Ciruelos, E. M., Cortés, J., Eniu, A., Folprecht, G., ... & Pérgola, P. E. (2021). Adjuvant palbociclib in high-risk, hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative early breast cancer (PALLAS): an international, randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial. The Lancet Oncology, 22(10), 1386-1397.

[4] Pfizer Inc. (2024). Pfizer Reports Fourth Quarter and Full-Year 2023 Results. Retrieved from https://www.pfizer.com/news/press-release/press-release-detail/pfizer-reports-fourth-quarter-and-full-year-2023-results (Note: Specific revenue figures are reported annually; this is an example of how such a report would be cited).

[5] U.S. Food & Drug Administration. (n.d.). Drug@FDA Database. Retrieved from https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cder/daf/index.cfm (Note: Specific patent information is complex and often requires detailed database searches; this is a general citation for FDA drug information resources).

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.