Last Updated: May 31, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR HEPARIN SODIUM 10,000 UNITS IN DEXTROSE 5%


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for Heparin Sodium 10,000 Units In Dextrose 5%

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00000468 ↗ Myocardial Infarction Triage and Intervention Project (MITI) Completed National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) Phase 3 1988-04-01 To determine the practicality, benefit, and safety of paramedic administration of thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction. The feasibility of paramedics correctly identifying candidates for thrombolytic therapy following myocardial infarction was assessed in Phase I. In Phase II, pre-hospital thrombolytic therapy was compared with in-hospital thrombolytic therapy.
NCT00000468 ↗ Myocardial Infarction Triage and Intervention Project (MITI) Completed University of Washington Phase 3 1988-04-01 To determine the practicality, benefit, and safety of paramedic administration of thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction. The feasibility of paramedics correctly identifying candidates for thrombolytic therapy following myocardial infarction was assessed in Phase I. In Phase II, pre-hospital thrombolytic therapy was compared with in-hospital thrombolytic therapy.
NCT00182143 ↗ PROphylaxis for ThromboEmbolism in Critical Care Trial (PROTECT) Completed Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Society Clinical Trials Group Phase 3 2006-05-01 The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effect of Low Molecular Weight Heparin (LMWH) (Fragmin, dalteparin) versus Unfractionated Heparin (UFH) on the primary outcome of proximal leg Deep Vein Thrombosis (DVT) diagnosed by compression ultrasound, and the secondary outcomes of Pulmonary Embolism (PE), bleeding, Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia (HIT), and objectively confirmed venous thrombosis at any site.
NCT00182143 ↗ PROphylaxis for ThromboEmbolism in Critical Care Trial (PROTECT) Completed Canadian Critical Care Trials Group Phase 3 2006-05-01 The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effect of Low Molecular Weight Heparin (LMWH) (Fragmin, dalteparin) versus Unfractionated Heparin (UFH) on the primary outcome of proximal leg Deep Vein Thrombosis (DVT) diagnosed by compression ultrasound, and the secondary outcomes of Pulmonary Embolism (PE), bleeding, Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia (HIT), and objectively confirmed venous thrombosis at any site.
NCT00182143 ↗ PROphylaxis for ThromboEmbolism in Critical Care Trial (PROTECT) Completed Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) Phase 3 2006-05-01 The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effect of Low Molecular Weight Heparin (LMWH) (Fragmin, dalteparin) versus Unfractionated Heparin (UFH) on the primary outcome of proximal leg Deep Vein Thrombosis (DVT) diagnosed by compression ultrasound, and the secondary outcomes of Pulmonary Embolism (PE), bleeding, Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia (HIT), and objectively confirmed venous thrombosis at any site.
NCT00182143 ↗ PROphylaxis for ThromboEmbolism in Critical Care Trial (PROTECT) Completed McMaster University Phase 3 2006-05-01 The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effect of Low Molecular Weight Heparin (LMWH) (Fragmin, dalteparin) versus Unfractionated Heparin (UFH) on the primary outcome of proximal leg Deep Vein Thrombosis (DVT) diagnosed by compression ultrasound, and the secondary outcomes of Pulmonary Embolism (PE), bleeding, Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia (HIT), and objectively confirmed venous thrombosis at any site.
NCT00203580 ↗ Trial of the Effect of Low-Molecular-Weight Heparin (LMWH) Versus Warfarin on Mortality in the Long-Term Treatment of Proximal Deep Vein Thrombosis (DVT) (Main LITE Study) Completed Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) Phase 4 1994-12-01 The purpose of this study is to assess the long-term treatment of patients with proximal venous thrombosis through the administration of subcutaneous low-molecular-weight heparin (tinzaparin sodium) versus the standard care use of intravenous heparin followed by oral warfarin sodium.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for Heparin Sodium 10,000 Units In Dextrose 5%

Condition Name

Condition Name for Heparin Sodium 10,000 Units In Dextrose 5%
Intervention Trials
Myocardial Infarction 4
Healthy 4
Covid19 4
Thrombosis 4
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for Heparin Sodium 10,000 Units In Dextrose 5%
Intervention Trials
Thrombosis 13
Venous Thrombosis 7
Acute Kidney Injury 7
COVID-19 6
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for Heparin Sodium 10,000 Units In Dextrose 5%

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for Heparin Sodium 10,000 Units In Dextrose 5%
Location Trials
United States 44
China 17
Canada 14
Brazil 12
Spain 11
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for Heparin Sodium 10,000 Units In Dextrose 5%
Location Trials
California 7
New York 5
Texas 4
Ohio 3
Maryland 2
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for Heparin Sodium 10,000 Units In Dextrose 5%

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for Heparin Sodium 10,000 Units In Dextrose 5%
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
PHASE4 4
PHASE3 1
PHASE2 1
[disabled in preview] 61
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for Heparin Sodium 10,000 Units In Dextrose 5%
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 48
Unknown status 13
Withdrawn 10
[disabled in preview] 28
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for Heparin Sodium 10,000 Units In Dextrose 5%

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for Heparin Sodium 10,000 Units In Dextrose 5%
Sponsor Trials
Ain Shams University 5
GlaxoSmithKline 5
Azidus Brasil 4
[disabled in preview] 10
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for Heparin Sodium 10,000 Units In Dextrose 5%
Sponsor Trials
Other 152
Industry 36
NIH 5
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial
Last updated: May 21, 2026

Heparin Sodium 10,000 Units in Dextrose 5%: Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Forecast (US and Global)

Executive summary: Heparin sodium in dextrose 5% (commonly “10,000 units in D5W” IV) is a mature, widely stocked anticoagulant formulation used primarily in inpatient settings. Demand tracks hospital admissions, ICU and cardiology volumes, and peri-procedural anticoagulation. Pricing pressure is steady due to generic supply, while shortages intermittently impact substitution and purchasing behavior. A durable, near-term “clinical trials update” is not driven by new drug-development programs, but by incremental safety, dosing, and workflow studies for anticoagulation management, plus ongoing monitoring of heparin contamination and manufacturing reliability. Forecast risk is centered on supply continuity and regulatory/manufacturing events, not on breakthrough efficacy.


What is heparin sodium 10,000 units in D5% used for in clinical practice?

Featured snippet answer: The product is used for IV anticoagulation in hospital settings, including peri-procedural anticoagulation, cardiology/vascular indications, and anticoagulation protocols where an IV heparin regimen is required.

Core use settings

  • Hospitals (acute care and ICU): Continuous or intermittent IV anticoagulation protocols
  • Cardiology/vascular workflows: Peri-procedural anticoagulation for cardiology and vascular interventions
  • Peri-procedural bridging: Transition management where IV anticoagulant control is required

Why the D5% carrier matters

  • IV stability and compatibility are governed by the specific heparin concentration and diluent.
  • Workflow fit: A D5% formulation can align with institutional IV fluid practices and infusion compatibility requirements.

Which clinical trials are running for heparin sodium in D5% formulations?

Featured snippet answer: No large, label-changing, late-stage trials are typically associated with this specific “heparin sodium in D5W, 10,000 units” presentation as an independent drug-development target. Clinical evidence is largely drawn from the established heparin therapeutic class, while studies focus on anticoagulation management, protocol optimization, safety monitoring, and biosafety/manufacturing reliability in practice.

What “clinical trials update” typically means for mature heparin presentations

In practice, ongoing or recently reported studies for IV unfractionated heparin tend to cluster in:

  • Protocol comparisons: dosing nomograms, monitoring strategies (aPTT/anti-Xa), and adjustment algorithms
  • Safety signals: bleeding risk stratification and heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) risk workflows
  • Operational research: turnaround time for lab monitoring, standard order set effectiveness, adherence to infusion protocols
  • Substitution/continuity studies: impact of product availability on protocol compliance

Trial identifiers you should look for in registries

When mapping trial activity to this exact presentation, the relevant registry search logic is:

  • Drug substance: “heparin” or “unfractionated heparin”
  • Route: “intravenous”
  • Formulation terms: “dextrose 5%” or “D5W” (often absent from protocol titles)
  • Concentration: “10,000 units” (frequently omitted from public trial titles)

Implication for business analysis: A “clinical trials update” for this specific SKU is usually limited unless trials cite this exact carrier in the protocol arms. Most new trials are heparin-management rather than formulation innovation.


How many heparin sodium products compete with “10,000 units in D5%” in the market?

Featured snippet answer: Competition is broad across unfractionated heparin IV products, including different vial/strength presentations and alternative diluents, but the clinical substitution is often high because the active ingredient is the same heparin sodium.

Competitive substitution map

  • Same active, different presentation: UFH vials/solutions with alternative concentrations and diluents
  • Same intent, different anticoagulant class: direct thrombin inhibitor strategies in some pathways, but usually secondary in routine inpatient UFH protocols
  • Institutional formulary behavior: hospitals often switch based on availability, procurement pricing, and compatibility constraints rather than new efficacy.

What drives selection in hospitals

  • Supply continuity and procurement terms
  • Formulary contracts
  • Nursing/IV workflow compatibility
  • Packaging fit: concentration, volume, and ready-to-use status

What patents protect heparin sodium 10,000 units in D5%?

Featured snippet answer: For heparin sodium itself, the active substance is long out of patent protection. Product-level patent coverage for this specific formulation is typically limited, often concentrated in legacy process claims or specific formulation/packaging enhancements rather than the base drug.

Patent estate characterization for mature heparin sodium

  • Active ingredient: generally expired
  • Formulation and manufacturing: may have narrow, older process or stability claims
  • Compounding/distribution: usually does not create enforceable exclusion beyond specific manufacturing methods

Business impact: The market behaves like a generic commodity with procurement-driven competition rather than patent-led exclusivity.


When does heparin sodium in D5% lose exclusivity?

Featured snippet answer: Exclusivity for the heparin active ingredient is effectively exhausted. Any remaining exclusivity would be tied to narrow, product-specific approvals or manufacturing improvements, not a broad “D5% carrier” exclusivity.

Practical exclusivity drivers

  • NDA/BLA exclusivity: if any product-specific exclusivity exists, it has historically been exhausted for older heparin presentations
  • Orange Book listing behavior: heparin products often have sparse, non-blocking IP for the exact SKU due to maturity

What is the Orange Book status of heparin sodium 10,000 units in D5%?

Featured snippet answer: This presentation is typically represented as an approved generic (or reference-listed entry) where the primary regulatory status is driven by the approved NDA/ANDA pathway and listed patents are usually limited in scope.

How to read the Orange Book for this product class

  • Look for: “heparin sodium” and the specific dosage form labeling (solution) plus strength
  • Confirm carrier specificity: Orange Book entries can describe the drug as solution but not always the diluent language in a consistent way

Has the FDA issued any heparin safety or manufacturing actions affecting availability?

Featured snippet answer: Heparin has periodically faced FDA actions tied to manufacturing reliability and contamination risks historically. For a business outlook, the primary “regulatory risk” is supply disruption rather than label-change clinical outcome events.

What to monitor for near-term impact

  • Drug shortage notifications
  • FDA enforcement and facility actions impacting heparin manufacturing
  • Batch/lot recalls and inspection outcomes
  • US supply continuity statements from key manufacturers

How does the market price heparin sodium in D5W, and what drives margin?

Featured snippet answer: Pricing is shaped by generic commodity dynamics, purchasing contracts, and supply constraints. Margin is less about differentiation and more about manufacturing scale, fulfillment reliability, and procurement terms.

Key margin levers

  • Manufacturing yield and batch release reliability
  • Distribution access: GPO and wholesaler placement
  • Shortage premiums: when product is constrained, net prices can rise temporarily
  • Contracting cycles: quarterly or annual hospital contracting can stabilize pricing despite underlying volatility

Market size and demand drivers for IV unfractionated heparin formulations

Featured snippet answer: Demand is correlated with US and global inpatient utilization of anticoagulation protocols. Heparin in D5% is one of multiple UFH IV solutions used across inpatient settings.

Demand drivers (high signal)

  • Hospital admissions and ICU census
  • Cardiovascular procedure volumes
  • Peri-procedural anticoagulation protocols
  • COVID-era normalization and ongoing elective vs emergency mix
  • Protocol adherence: whether hospitals use UFH vs alternatives

Supply-side constraints (high signal)

  • A few large manufacturing sites
  • Sterility and quality system performance
  • Quality deviations leading to lot holds
  • Recurring shortage notifications in heparin history

Clinical outcomes: does heparin in D5% have differentiated efficacy or safety versus other UFH solutions?

Featured snippet answer: Efficacy and safety for anticoagulation are primarily determined by heparin exposure and monitoring strategy. Carrier differences are typically not the dominant clinical determinant, as long as the solution is administered according to labeled instructions and compatibility standards.

Where differences can matter operationally

  • Compatibility with concurrent IV therapies
  • Nursing protocol preferences
  • Pump setup and volume considerations
  • Institutional stock management

What generic entry risks exist for this heparin sodium in D5% presentation?

Featured snippet answer: Entry risk is mainly procedural and supply-related (ANDA readiness, quality system capacity, and manufacturing validation), not patent-blocking. With mature active ingredient status, the primary gating factors are manufacturing and regulatory chemistry controls rather than IP litigation barriers.

Entry pathway dynamics

  • ANDA submissions for equivalent strengths and IV solution presentations
  • Bioequivalence considerations are usually straightforward for IV solutions
  • Primary constraints: facility capacity and sterility assurance

What patent litigation affects heparin sodium formulations?

Featured snippet answer: Patent litigation for heparin sodium is not commonly the dominant driver of market change for mature heparin presentations. When litigation occurs, it is typically driven by narrow manufacturing/process claims or legacy product-specific patents.

Litigation relevance for planning

  • IP-driven launch delays: usually less likely for heparin commodity solutions
  • Business impact usually arises from manufacturing QA issues and supply holds rather than court injunctions

Which companies supply heparin sodium IV products in the US?

Featured snippet answer: The market is supplied by multiple global and domestic manufacturers, with concentration in a smaller number of large-scale sterile injectables producers.

Procurement and stocking behavior

  • GPO and distributor allocation determine bedside availability
  • Multiple SKUs are often stocked so the hospital can substitute across UFH solutions during shortages

(Company-level mapping requires the specific product’s approved label and NDA/ANDA identifier. Without that, the supplier list would not be exact for this specific SKU.)


Forecast: revenue and volume projection scenarios for heparin sodium 10,000 units in D5%

Featured snippet answer: The base-case outlook is stable to modest growth in units, with revenue growth lagging if competitive pricing compresses. Upside occurs during shortage-driven price premiums or expanding inpatient volumes; downside comes from supply disruptions at major manufacturers, quality holds, or substitution away from this specific carrier/presentation.

Scenario framework (structure, not speculative point estimates)

  • Base case (stable supply):
    • Unit demand tracks inpatient activity
    • Revenue growth is driven by inflation and contract renegotiation
    • Competitive generic pressure limits sustained price increases
  • Upside (shortage premium or procurement tightening):
    • Temporary net price lift during constrained availability
    • Hospitals maintain UFH use but may switch carriers and strengths based on supply
  • Downside (manufacturing/quality disruption):
    • Allocation limits volumes
    • Substitution across UFH solutions reduces this SKU’s share
    • Revenue falls due to inability to ship, not due to clinical disuse

What would signal trend changes early

  • FDA shortage notifications for UFH solutions
  • Wholesaler backorder rates
  • Distributor lead times
  • GPO contract changes tied to UFH products

How does heparin in D5% compare with other UFH presentations (vials, other strengths, and carriers)?

Featured snippet answer: The decision among UFH presentations in hospitals is generally a supply and workflow optimization problem. Clinical differences are minimal when dosing and monitoring are equivalent.

Comparative factors used in formulary committees

  • Total volume and concentration practicality
  • Compatibility with hospital IV mix policies
  • Availability and lead times
  • Contract pricing

Key Takeaways

  • Heparin sodium 10,000 units in dextrose 5% is a mature, procurement-driven inpatient anticoagulant presentation; differentiation is operational, not clinical.
  • Clinical trial activity relevant to this exact SKU is typically limited; the evidence base is class-level, while current research focuses on anticoagulation management and safety workflows.
  • Patent and exclusivity constraints are generally not the dominant market limiter; competition is primarily generic and supply-capacity driven.
  • Market outlook depends more on manufacturing reliability and FDA-driven supply continuity than on label expansion.
  • Forecasting should be scenario-based around shortage and allocation behavior rather than assuming structural growth from new clinical adoption.

FAQs

  1. What is the difference between heparin sodium in D5W versus normal saline carrier for IV anticoagulation protocols?
  2. How do hospitals adjust UFH monitoring when switching between different heparin solutions or concentrations?
  3. What are the most common causes of UFH shortages, and how do they affect formulary substitution?
  4. How does heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) monitoring influence UFH protocol selection in the ICU?
  5. What compliance and quality documentation are typically required to launch a generic UFH IV solution under ANDA?

References

  1. U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Drug Shortages database and safety communications. https://www.fda.gov/drugs/drug-shortages
  2. FDA. Orange Book: Approved Drug Products with Therapeutic Equivalence Evaluations. https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cder/daf/
  3. ClinicalTrials.gov. Unfractionated heparin study results and ongoing trials. https://clinicaltrials.gov/

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.