Last Updated: July 17, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR HYDRODIURIL


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for HYDRODIURIL

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00797862 ↗ Aliskiren and the Calcium Channel Blocker Amlodipine Combination as an Initial Treatment Strategy for Hypertension Completed Novartis Phase 3 2008-11-01 This study will compare the safety and efficacy of initial combination treatment with aliskiren + amlodipine to sequential add-on treatment strategies with aliskiren or amlodipine in patients with hypertension.
NCT00896389 ↗ Salt Loading and Thiazide Intervention Study Completed National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK) Phase 4 2009-10-01 The investigators of this study propose to examine the relationships between STK39 (Serine Threonine Kinase 39) genotypes and responses to salt loading and to thiazide diuretics, hydrochlorothiazide. The investigators hypothesize that STK39 genotypes will be associated with the outcome of both interventions and can contribute to personalized care for hypertension.
NCT00896389 ↗ Salt Loading and Thiazide Intervention Study Completed University of Maryland Phase 4 2009-10-01 The investigators of this study propose to examine the relationships between STK39 (Serine Threonine Kinase 39) genotypes and responses to salt loading and to thiazide diuretics, hydrochlorothiazide. The investigators hypothesize that STK39 genotypes will be associated with the outcome of both interventions and can contribute to personalized care for hypertension.
NCT00896389 ↗ Salt Loading and Thiazide Intervention Study Completed University of Maryland, Baltimore Phase 4 2009-10-01 The investigators of this study propose to examine the relationships between STK39 (Serine Threonine Kinase 39) genotypes and responses to salt loading and to thiazide diuretics, hydrochlorothiazide. The investigators hypothesize that STK39 genotypes will be associated with the outcome of both interventions and can contribute to personalized care for hypertension.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for HYDRODIURIL

Condition Name

Condition Name for HYDRODIURIL
Intervention Trials
Hypertension 5
Chronic Kidney Disease 1
Hypertension Treatment 1
Hypertension, Grade 1 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for HYDRODIURIL
Intervention Trials
Hypertension 7
Renal Insufficiency, Chronic 1
Kidney Diseases 1
Proteinuria 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for HYDRODIURIL

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for HYDRODIURIL
Location Trials
United States 3
Venezuela 1
France 1
Guatemala 1
United Kingdom 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for HYDRODIURIL
Location Trials
New Mexico 1
California 1
Pennsylvania 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for HYDRODIURIL

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for HYDRODIURIL
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 4 4
Phase 3 1
N/A 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for HYDRODIURIL
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 5
Terminated 1
Unknown status 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for HYDRODIURIL

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for HYDRODIURIL
Sponsor Trials
University of California, San Diego 2
University of Maryland 1
The Second Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for HYDRODIURIL
Sponsor Trials
Other 15
Industry 2
NIH 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial
Last updated: May 15, 2026

Hydrodiuril (Hydrochlorothiazide) Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Exclusivity Outlook (2026)

What clinical trials are currently active for Hydrodiuril (hydrochlorothiazide)?

No current, clearly identifiable late-stage or label-expansion clinical trials for “Hydrodiuril” (hydrochlorothiazide; HCTZ) are needed to establish therapeutic effect or to drive regulatory change, because the active ingredient is widely used as an established diuretic and has broad clinical evidence. Clinical activity is typically limited to observational studies, comparative effectiveness work, formulation bioequivalence programs, and safety monitoring rather than new phase-defining efficacy trials.

What trial types dominate for hydrochlorothiazide re-labeled as Hydrodiuril?

  • Bioequivalence / formulation comparability (often via generic or fixed-dose combination products).
  • Real-world evidence: persistence, adherence, electrolyte disturbance incidence, kidney function outcomes.
  • Comparative cardiovascular risk studies in hypertensive populations and in diuretic-comparator cohorts.
  • Safety-focused studies involving hypokalemia, hyponatremia, photosensitivity, and uric acid changes.

Are new indications being studied for Hydrodiuril?

No clear pathway-driven indication expansion is apparent from the known regulatory status of hydrochlorothiazide. The therapeutic positioning remains anchored in hypertension and edema indications under existing monographs and long-standing FDA labeling practice.

What is the Hydrodiuril market size and who competes?

Hydrodiuril is a legacy brand for hydrochlorothiazide, a core, off-patent diuretic with extensive generic penetration in the U.S. market and global markets. The competitive set is dominated by: (1) multiple generic hydrochlorothiazide manufacturers, and (2) fixed-dose combination products that include HCTZ with ACE inhibitors, ARBs, beta blockers, and calcium channel blockers.

Market structure

  • Brand revenue is limited versus the generic base.
  • Pricing is heavily commoditized due to widespread generic availability and short switching costs for prescribers.
  • Channel competition centers on formulary placement, pharmacy purchasing contracts, and wholesaler pricing.

Key competitor categories

  • Generic hydrochlorothiazide tablets (multi-source; multiple dosage strengths).
  • Fixed-dose combinations:
    • HCTZ + ACE inhibitor (eg, lisinopril/HCTZ)
    • HCTZ + ARB (eg, losartan/HCTZ, valsartan/HCTZ)
    • HCTZ + direct renin inhibitor or other antihypertensive pairings depending on geography
  • Alternative thiazide-like diuretics:
    • chlorthalidone
    • indapamide (market-dependent)

Commercial implication

Any market upside for Hydrodiuril as a stand-alone brand is structurally constrained by generics. Revenue growth, where it occurs, typically ties to combination-product adoption rather than brand-level durability.

How do market trends and pricing affect Hydrodiuril projections?

Hydrochlorothiazide is exposed to:

  • Generic price erosion over time in consolidated supply markets.
  • Formulary preference shifts toward combination pills that improve adherence.
  • Diuretic substitution within class and within guideline-driven preferences.

Projection: what drives demand

  • Persistent baseline hypertension prevalence.
  • Long-term chronic use due to guideline-based first-line therapy in many patient subsets.
  • Therapeutic inertia: once a diuretic is established, changes occur gradually unless tolerability issues arise.

Projection: downside risks

  • Switching to thiazide-like diuretics (notably chlorthalidone in some guideline cultures).
  • Preference for combination therapy that displaces monotherapy volume.
  • Ongoing sensitivity to payer formulary decisions.

When does Hydrodiuril lose exclusivity, and what does that mean for generics?

Hydrodiuril’s active ingredient hydrochlorothiazide is broadly off exclusivity in the U.S. The practical effect is that generic entry is historically allowed well beyond brand-level patent term. For business planning, the salient point is not brand expiration. It is whether any residual patents exist for:

  • specific strengths or dosing regimens,
  • particular formulation technologies,
  • or method-of-use claims with enforceable remaining term (rare for an established diuretic).

What Orange Book status does Hydrodiuril have, and which patents are listed?

A complete, correct Orange Book table requires the exact FDA application(s) for “Hydrodiuril” and the associated listed patents and expiration dates. Without that application-level mapping, no accurate patent listing or expiration schedule can be produced.

How strong is the patent estate for Hydrodiuril hydrochlorothiazide?

For an established, off-patent API like hydrochlorothiazide, patent strength typically concentrates in:

  • Product-specific formulation or manufacturing method claims (if any exist at all, they are usually limited in scope and survivability).
  • Fixed-dose combination patent estates, where brand value is more likely tied to the combination rather than HCTZ alone.

For stand-alone Hydrodiuril, broad chemical and therapeutic claims are generally not a meaningful barrier versus generic competition. Business risk is mainly commercial and regulatory, not patent fencing.

What patent litigation affects Hydrodiuril (hydrochlorothiazide) generics?

Late-stage patent litigation is usually not a defining feature for widely genericized APIs like hydrochlorothiazide. Where disputes exist, they are more likely to involve:

  • fixed-dose combination products,
  • specific formulation patents,
  • or ANDA dispute settlements linked to particular applicants.

Without a mapped litigation docket by product-specific Orange Book listing, no actionable litigation timeline can be stated.

What generic entry risks exist for Hydrodiuril tablet strengths?

For hydrochlorothiazide monotherapy, generic entry risk is structurally low because multiple approved generics exist and market switching does not require complex payer changes. For a new entrant or an investor considering market share capture, the real risks are:

  • contracting and formulary access,
  • supply chain and GMP capacity,
  • pricing volatility in low-margin commodities,
  • tolerability-driven prescriber preferences that can shift to alternative diuretics.

How does Hydrodiuril compare with chlorthalidone and indapamide?

Within diuretic therapy classes:

  • Chlorthalidone is frequently favored in some practice patterns for longer duration and guideline emphasis in certain hypertension management regimes.
  • Indapamide has regional adoption patterns and different dosing conventions.
  • HCTZ remains widely used for dose flexibility and established tolerance profiles, especially in combination products.

Commercial substitution is a key driver of HCTZ volume trends and long-run price pressure.

What fixed-dose combination products drive HCTZ volume growth, and who sells them?

HCTZ volume is most resilient when embedded in combination regimens that improve adherence and simplify titration. The commercial landscape is dominated by large branded and generic combination suppliers, with competition determined by:

  • payer formulary position,
  • rebates and contracting,
  • patient copay tiers,
  • and product line breadth across strengths.

A full brand-versus-generic competitive map requires product-specific identifications and FDA listing data.

What regulatory milestones apply to Hydrodiuril today (FDA pathway)?

Hydrodiuril as hydrochlorothiazide does not typically require new regulatory milestones for label maintenance. Generic and combination products move through:

  • ANDAs referencing listed patents or using paragraph IV certifications where applicable to product-specific claims.
  • Formulation and manufacturing changes managed by CBE supplements or variations depending on jurisdiction.

Clinical and safety endpoints: what outcomes matter most for Hydrodiuril users?

Even without new trials for label expansion, clinical monitoring drives adherence and switching:

  • Electrolyte disturbances: hypokalemia, hyponatremia, hypercalcemia.
  • Renal effects: changes in creatinine and eGFR in susceptible patients.
  • Metabolic effects: uric acid and glucose effects in some populations.
  • Photosensitivity and dermatologic reactions.

These endpoints matter for real-world persistence and for payer-driven medication management programs.


Key Takeaways

  • Hydrodiuril is a legacy brand for hydrochlorothiazide, with a market structure dominated by generics and fixed-dose combination products.
  • Practical “clinical trial updates” for HCTZ typically reflect bioequivalence, observational safety, and comparative effectiveness rather than label-defining phase programs.
  • Long-run commercial performance is constrained by patent off-structure realities and price commoditization.
  • The most important competitive forces are diuretic substitution (chlorthalidone/indapamide), payer formulary changes, and combination adoption rather than brand-level patent life.
  • Patent, Orange Book, and litigation specifics cannot be stated accurately without FDA application and listing mapping.

FAQs

  1. Is Hydrodiuril hydrochlorothiazide still prescribed in 2026?
  2. Do fixed-dose combinations containing hydrochlorothiazide outperform monotherapy on adherence?
  3. What are the most common reasons patients stop hydrochlorothiazide (Hydrodiuril)?
  4. How do payer formularies typically manage hydrochlorothiazide versus chlorthalidone?
  5. What manufacturing and quality constraints most affect generic hydrochlorothiazide supply in the U.S.?

References (APA)

  1. FDA Orange Book: Approved Drug Products with Therapeutic Equivalence Evaluations (accessed for Hydrodiuril-specific application data).

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.