Last Updated: August 9, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR HEPARIN SODIUM 5,000 UNITS IN DEXTROSE 5% IN PLASTIC CONTAINER


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for HEPARIN SODIUM 5,000 UNITS IN DEXTROSE 5% IN PLASTIC CONTAINER

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00000468 ↗ Myocardial Infarction Triage and Intervention Project (MITI) Completed National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) Phase 3 1988-04-01 To determine the practicality, benefit, and safety of paramedic administration of thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction. The feasibility of paramedics correctly identifying candidates for thrombolytic therapy following myocardial infarction was assessed in Phase I. In Phase II, pre-hospital thrombolytic therapy was compared with in-hospital thrombolytic therapy.
NCT00000468 ↗ Myocardial Infarction Triage and Intervention Project (MITI) Completed University of Washington Phase 3 1988-04-01 To determine the practicality, benefit, and safety of paramedic administration of thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction. The feasibility of paramedics correctly identifying candidates for thrombolytic therapy following myocardial infarction was assessed in Phase I. In Phase II, pre-hospital thrombolytic therapy was compared with in-hospital thrombolytic therapy.
NCT00182143 ↗ PROphylaxis for ThromboEmbolism in Critical Care Trial (PROTECT) Completed Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Society Clinical Trials Group Phase 3 2006-05-01 The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effect of Low Molecular Weight Heparin (LMWH) (Fragmin, dalteparin) versus Unfractionated Heparin (UFH) on the primary outcome of proximal leg Deep Vein Thrombosis (DVT) diagnosed by compression ultrasound, and the secondary outcomes of Pulmonary Embolism (PE), bleeding, Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia (HIT), and objectively confirmed venous thrombosis at any site.
NCT00182143 ↗ PROphylaxis for ThromboEmbolism in Critical Care Trial (PROTECT) Completed Canadian Critical Care Trials Group Phase 3 2006-05-01 The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effect of Low Molecular Weight Heparin (LMWH) (Fragmin, dalteparin) versus Unfractionated Heparin (UFH) on the primary outcome of proximal leg Deep Vein Thrombosis (DVT) diagnosed by compression ultrasound, and the secondary outcomes of Pulmonary Embolism (PE), bleeding, Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia (HIT), and objectively confirmed venous thrombosis at any site.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for HEPARIN SODIUM 5,000 UNITS IN DEXTROSE 5% IN PLASTIC CONTAINER

Condition Name

Condition Name for HEPARIN SODIUM 5,000 UNITS IN DEXTROSE 5% IN PLASTIC CONTAINER
Intervention Trials
Covid19 4
Thrombosis 4
Healthy 4
Myocardial Infarction 4
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for HEPARIN SODIUM 5,000 UNITS IN DEXTROSE 5% IN PLASTIC CONTAINER
Intervention Trials
Thrombosis 13
Acute Kidney Injury 7
Venous Thrombosis 7
COVID-19 6
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for HEPARIN SODIUM 5,000 UNITS IN DEXTROSE 5% IN PLASTIC CONTAINER

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for HEPARIN SODIUM 5,000 UNITS IN DEXTROSE 5% IN PLASTIC CONTAINER
Location Trials
United States 44
China 17
Canada 14
Brazil 12
Spain 11
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for HEPARIN SODIUM 5,000 UNITS IN DEXTROSE 5% IN PLASTIC CONTAINER
Location Trials
California 7
New York 5
Texas 4
Ohio 3
Maryland 2
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for HEPARIN SODIUM 5,000 UNITS IN DEXTROSE 5% IN PLASTIC CONTAINER

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for HEPARIN SODIUM 5,000 UNITS IN DEXTROSE 5% IN PLASTIC CONTAINER
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
PHASE4 4
PHASE3 1
PHASE2 1
[disabled in preview] 27
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for HEPARIN SODIUM 5,000 UNITS IN DEXTROSE 5% IN PLASTIC CONTAINER
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 48
Unknown status 13
Withdrawn 10
[disabled in preview] 9
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for HEPARIN SODIUM 5,000 UNITS IN DEXTROSE 5% IN PLASTIC CONTAINER

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for HEPARIN SODIUM 5,000 UNITS IN DEXTROSE 5% IN PLASTIC CONTAINER
Sponsor Trials
Ain Shams University 5
GlaxoSmithKline 5
Azidus Brasil 4
[disabled in preview] 3
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for HEPARIN SODIUM 5,000 UNITS IN DEXTROSE 5% IN PLASTIC CONTAINER
Sponsor Trials
Other 152
Industry 36
NIH 5
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Heparin Sodium 5,000 Units in Dextrose 5%: Clinical Trials, Market Analysis, Patent Position and 2025-2030 Projection

Last updated: July 31, 2026

Heparin Sodium 5,000 Units in Dextrose 5% in a plastic container is a hospital-use premixed formulation of unfractionated heparin, typically supplied as an intravenous infusion in a flexible container. Its commercial outlook is driven by inpatient anticoagulation demand, hospital purchasing contracts, supply reliability, and competition from generic vials, prefilled syringes, low-molecular-weight heparins and direct oral anticoagulants. The product has no meaningful standalone clinical-development program because its active ingredient and intravenous use are established. The principal commercial risks are manufacturing cost, heparin-source control, shortages, contract pricing and substitution by alternative anticoagulants.

What is Heparin Sodium 5,000 Units in Dextrose 5%?

The product contains unfractionated heparin sodium diluted in 5% dextrose injection. A common presentation contains 5,000 USP units in 100 mL, equivalent to 50 units/mL, although container size and concentration can differ by manufacturer.

Attribute Product profile
Active ingredient Heparin sodium
Drug class Unfractionated anticoagulant
Route Intravenous infusion
Diluent 5% dextrose injection
Typical strength 5,000 units per 100 mL
Container Flexible plastic intravenous container
Primary users Hospitals, intensive-care units, operating rooms, dialysis centers
FDA pathway Established prescription injectable product
Main clinical use Prevention and treatment of thrombosis and systemic anticoagulation
Primary substitutes Heparin vials, prefilled syringes, enoxaparin, fondaparinux, direct oral anticoagulants

The product is used when rapid anticoagulant effect, continuous titration and short pharmacologic duration are required. Its effect is monitored primarily through activated partial thromboplastin time or anti-factor Xa testing, depending on institutional protocol.

What FDA-approved indications apply to the heparin dextrose premix?

FDA labeling for unfractionated heparin includes prophylaxis and treatment of venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism, prevention of postoperative thrombosis, anticoagulation during arterial and cardiac procedures, treatment of selected thromboembolic disorders, and use in extracorporeal circulation and dialysis settings.[1]

The dextrose premix is most relevant to settings requiring continuous intravenous administration. It is not interchangeable with every heparin product because concentration, diluent, container, preservative status and intended route must match the prescribing order.

How is the product used clinically?

Typical hospital applications include:

  • Continuous intravenous anticoagulation for acute venous thromboembolism.
  • Anticoagulation in atrial fibrillation when rapid titration is required.
  • Periprocedural anticoagulation.
  • Acute coronary syndrome management in selected protocols.
  • Cardiovascular and vascular surgery.
  • Hemodialysis and extracorporeal circuits.
  • Bridging during interruption or initiation of longer-term anticoagulation.
  • Treatment of patients in whom renal impairment limits use of low-molecular-weight heparin or direct oral anticoagulants.

The major safety risks are bleeding, heparin-induced thrombocytopenia, hyperkalemia and medication errors involving concentration or route. FDA labeling carries a boxed warning for serious or fatal hemorrhage and requires platelet monitoring for heparin-induced thrombocytopenia.[1]

What clinical trials have evaluated Heparin Sodium 5,000 Units in Dextrose 5%?

No conventional phase 1, phase 2 or phase 3 development program is required for this established formulation. ClinicalTrials.gov contains studies evaluating unfractionated heparin in procedures and disease settings, but these studies generally assess heparin as a treatment component rather than the specific commercial presentation of 5,000 units in 5% dextrose in a plastic container.[2]

What is the current clinical-trial status?

Trial category Relevance to the product Development implication
Product-specific registration trials Limited or absent No new efficacy package is normally required
Acute coronary syndrome studies Indirect Supports protocol use of unfractionated heparin
Venous thromboembolism studies Indirect Supports treatment algorithms
Cardiac and vascular surgery studies Indirect Supports procedural use
Dialysis and extracorporeal studies Indirect Supports specialized hospital demand
Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia studies Safety and management Reinforces monitoring and substitution risk
Biosimilar studies Not applicable Heparin is a chemically characterized biologic, not a conventional biosimilar market

The relevant evidence base is clinical practice and comparative anticoagulation research, not a new-drug trial program. Trials comparing unfractionated heparin with enoxaparin or direct oral anticoagulants can affect utilization, but they do not create exclusivity for the premixed product.

What is the FDA regulatory status of the product?

Heparin sodium is an FDA-regulated prescription anticoagulant with longstanding approval and extensive labeling history. The FDA has treated heparin as a biological product under the Public Health Service Act, but it is not managed commercially like a modern monoclonal-antibody biosimilar.[3]

The product’s regulatory value comes from:

  1. Compliance with injectable-drug manufacturing requirements.
  2. Validated sterility and container-closure systems.
  3. Control of potency and impurities.
  4. Control of heparin-related contaminants.
  5. Reliable sourcing and characterization of porcine-derived raw material.
  6. Labeling that prevents concentration and route errors.

A manufacturer marketing a premixed presentation must maintain an approved application or authorized abbreviated pathway and comply with current good manufacturing practice requirements. The commercial product is generally sold to hospitals through wholesalers, group purchasing organizations and direct institutional contracts.

What patents protect Heparin Sodium 5,000 Units in Dextrose 5%?

The formulation has little practical patent protection. The active ingredient is an established anticoagulant, and the core use of unfractionated heparin is long off-patent. Any historic composition, use or formulation patents associated with standard heparin products have expired.

IP category Current competitive relevance
Heparin active ingredient No meaningful composition-of-matter exclusivity
Standard intravenous anticoagulation No meaningful use exclusivity
5% dextrose dilution Generally unprotected legacy formulation
Flexible plastic container May involve platform or manufacturing IP, but not usually product-level exclusivity
Container-closure technology Potentially protected at the supplier level
Manufacturing process Trade-secret and quality-system advantage more important than patent rights
Hospital packaging and labeling Limited patent value
Device or administration system May have separate IP if sold with a proprietary device

The primary barriers are manufacturing validation, supply-chain control and regulatory execution rather than patent claims. A patent search may identify container, bag, tubing or production patents, but those rights generally do not prevent a qualified competitor from marketing the same heparin concentration in a compliant plastic container.

What is the Orange Book status of Heparin Sodium 5,000 Units in Dextrose 5%?

The Orange Book is not the main source of competitive protection for this product. The relevant listing depends on the specific manufacturer, application, presentation and FDA approval pathway. Legacy injectable heparin presentations may appear in FDA product databases, while some products marketed under abbreviated or biologic-related pathways may require review of FDA approval records and labeling rather than reliance on a single Orange Book entry.[4]

There is no expected patent-based Orange Book barrier comparable to those affecting branded small-molecule products. Generic entry risk is therefore high when a competitor can obtain approval, validate the container system and secure heparin raw material.

When does Heparin Sodium 5,000 Units in Dextrose 5% lose exclusivity?

The product has already lost practical market exclusivity. It is an established generic hospital injectable with competition from multiple heparin formats and alternative anticoagulants.

Exclusivity type Status
New chemical entity exclusivity Expired
Composition patent Expired or not applicable
Standard method-of-use exclusivity Expired or not applicable
Formulation exclusivity Not material for the legacy premix
Orphan exclusivity Not applicable
Pediatric exclusivity Not material to the commercial presentation
Biosimilar interchangeability exclusivity Not applicable
Current competitive position Open, contract-driven hospital market

A new entrant would compete on approval status, availability, price, packaging, concentration options and supply continuity. It would not need to overcome a blocking patent estate in the ordinary case.

What formulation patents protect the heparin plastic-container product?

The formulation is technically simple but operationally sensitive. Relevant protection, if any, is more likely to relate to container systems, oxygen permeability, sterilization, bag materials, ports, overwraps or manufacturing processes than to heparin in dextrose itself.

What manufacturing barriers affect generic entry?

The main barriers include:

  • Consistent potency across batches.
  • Control of molecular-weight distribution and sulfation characteristics.
  • Detection and control of oversulfated chondroitin sulfate and other contaminants.
  • Qualification of porcine mucosal heparin suppliers.
  • Sterility assurance for the final container.
  • Stability of the drug in the plastic bag over the labeled shelf life.
  • Compatibility with ports, tubing and administration sets.
  • Prevention of mix-ups with concentrated heparin products.
  • Validated shipping and storage conditions.
  • Reliable access to dextrose, containers and sterile filling capacity.

These requirements can delay entry even where patent barriers are absent. Heparin supply disruptions have historically produced hospital shortages and elevated the value of dependable manufacturing capacity.[5]

How many companies compete in the heparin premix market?

Competition varies by country and hospital contract. The market includes branded legacy suppliers, generic injectable manufacturers, contract manufacturers and distributors that sell private-label presentations.

Relevant competitor groups include:

Competitor group Product overlap
Hospital injectable manufacturers Premixed heparin bags and vials
Generic parenteral companies Heparin sodium injections in multiple concentrations
Large diversified pharmaceutical suppliers Institutional anticoagulant portfolios
Contract manufacturers Private-label or supply-agreement production
Low-molecular-weight heparin manufacturers Clinical substitution, especially enoxaparin
Direct oral anticoagulant manufacturers Outpatient and step-down substitution

The product does not compete only against identical 5,000-unit bags. Hospitals often compare total anticoagulation cost, nursing workload, dosing flexibility, medication-error risk and availability.

How does the product compare with competing anticoagulants?

Product Main advantage Main limitation Commercial effect
UFH premix Rapid onset, short half-life, titratable, reversible with protamine Monitoring and bleeding risk Strong inpatient and procedural demand
UFH vial Flexible concentration and dosing Requires pharmacy preparation Substitutes for premixed bags
Enoxaparin Predictable subcutaneous dosing Renal and bleeding limitations Reduces UFH use in selected patients
Fondaparinux Once-daily dosing and low HIT risk Limited reversibility and renal restrictions Niche substitution
Apixaban and rivaroxaban Oral administration Not suitable for all acute or procedural settings Strong outpatient substitution
Warfarin Low acquisition cost and long experience Monitoring and delayed onset Chronic-use alternative
Bivalirudin and argatroban Alternatives in HIT or procedural settings High cost Specialty and rescue use

Unfractionated heparin remains valuable where anticoagulation must be stopped quickly, adjusted continuously or reversed before an invasive procedure.

What is the market size and revenue outlook?

Public sources generally do not separate revenue for the exact presentation from total unfractionated heparin or hospital injectable anticoagulants. A precise product-level revenue figure therefore cannot be derived from FDA labeling or clinical-trial records.

The market can be modeled through three variables:

  1. Number of inpatient and procedural administrations.
  2. Average contracted price per container.
  3. Share captured by the premixed presentation rather than vials or competing anticoagulants.

What is the projected market direction from 2025 to 2030?

The expected direction is stable to modestly declining volume with continued price pressure. A scenario framework is more useful than a single global estimate.

Scenario Volume trend, 2025-2030 Price trend Revenue outcome
Base case Flat to low-single-digit decline Low-single-digit decline Flat to moderate decline
Upside case Stable volume from procedural and ICU demand Stable pricing during shortages Stable to modest growth
Downside case Mid-single-digit decline Continued contract erosion Meaningful revenue decline

Growth drivers include hospital admissions, cardiac and vascular procedures, dialysis activity, ICU utilization and periodic shortages of competing injectable anticoagulants. Decline drivers include direct oral anticoagulant adoption, increased use of low-molecular-weight heparins, dose standardization, vial substitution and hospital cost-containment programs.

The strongest commercial opportunity is not premium pricing. It is supply reliability, broad contract access, low medication-error risk and the ability to provide multiple concentrations and container sizes.

What generic entry risks exist?

Generic entry risk is high because the formulation is established and the patent estate is weak. The practical entry hurdles are operational:

  • FDA approval and inspection readiness.
  • Availability of qualified heparin API.
  • Sufficient sterile filling capacity.
  • Evidence of container compatibility and stability.
  • Hospital formulary acceptance.
  • Group purchasing organization contracts.
  • Adequate shortage-response capacity.
  • Product liability and pharmacovigilance systems.

A competitor can launch rapidly after approval if it already has sterile injectable infrastructure and a qualified heparin supply chain. The largest commercial risk to an incumbent is share loss through contract rebidding rather than a patent lawsuit.

Which companies are challenging the product’s market position?

The principal challengers are not patent litigants. They are suppliers of lower-cost heparin vials, premixed bags, prefilled syringes and alternative anticoagulants.

Competitive pressure is highest from:

  • Generic heparin manufacturers with lower contract prices.
  • Manufacturers offering ready-to-administer bags.
  • Suppliers with more reliable inventory during shortages.
  • Enoxaparin suppliers in medical and surgical prophylaxis.
  • Direct oral anticoagulant manufacturers in discharge and outpatient pathways.

What patent litigation and settlement agreements affect the product?

No major patent-litigation framework is expected to govern the standard heparin sodium 5,000-unit-in-5% dextrose premix. The product is an off-patent hospital injectable, and competition is usually resolved through regulatory approval, procurement contracts and supply agreements.

Settlement agreements are more relevant to newer anticoagulants, delivery devices or proprietary formulations than to this legacy heparin presentation. A litigation event involving a container supplier or manufacturing technology would not necessarily block the active drug or the standard premix.

What is the geographic coverage of the market?

The product is used globally, but regulatory and commercial conditions differ.

United States

The U.S. market is heavily influenced by hospital group purchasing organizations, FDA injectable-drug requirements and shortage history. Premixed bags have value because they reduce pharmacy compounding and preparation steps.

Europe

European demand is shaped by national procurement, hospital tenders and country-specific marketing authorizations. Low-molecular-weight heparins and direct oral anticoagulants have significant roles outside acute inpatient care.

Asia-Pacific

Demand is supported by hospital expansion, cardiovascular procedures and dialysis growth. Price sensitivity is high, while local production and supply-chain qualification can determine market access.

Latin America and other emerging markets

Procurement often favors lower-cost vials, but premixed presentations can gain share in tertiary hospitals where pharmacy automation and medication-safety programs are expanding.

Key Takeaways

  • Heparin Sodium 5,000 Units in Dextrose 5% is an established unfractionated heparin premix for hospital intravenous use.
  • Its clinical evidence base is mature; product-specific phase 1-3 development is generally not required.
  • The product has no meaningful remaining composition or method-of-use exclusivity.
  • Patent risk is low. Manufacturing, API sourcing, sterility, container compatibility and procurement access are the principal barriers.
  • The Orange Book is not expected to provide a material patent-based barrier for the standard presentation.
  • Market volume should remain resilient in intensive care, surgery, cardiology, dialysis and other procedural settings.
  • Revenue is likely to face low-single-digit annual price pressure, with volume ranging from stable to modestly declining through 2030.
  • Generic entry risk is high, but dependable supply can protect hospital contracts.
  • The main substitutes are heparin vials, enoxaparin, fondaparinux and direct oral anticoagulants.
  • The strongest commercial strategy is a reliable multi-presentation injectable portfolio rather than reliance on a single premixed bag.

FAQs

Is Heparin Sodium 5,000 Units in Dextrose 5% a biologic?

Heparin is derived from biological tissue and is regulated as a biological product in the United States, but the commercial market does not operate like the monoclonal-antibody biosimilar market.

Does the product require a new clinical trial before generic approval?

A new efficacy trial is generally not required for an established heparin injectable if the applicant satisfies the applicable FDA approval requirements for the formulation, route, strength, quality and labeling.

Can the heparin dextrose premix be substituted for a heparin vial?

Substitution depends on concentration, route, formulation, institutional policy and the prescribing order. Premixed bags and vials should not be treated as interchangeable solely because both contain heparin sodium.

Is heparin sodium protected by a patent?

The active ingredient and standard anticoagulation uses are not protected by meaningful current exclusivity. Supplier-level patents may cover containers, ports or manufacturing processes without blocking the standard formulation.

Will direct oral anticoagulants eliminate demand for intravenous heparin?

No. Oral anticoagulants have reduced heparin use in many outpatient and step-down settings, but intravenous unfractionated heparin remains important in acute care, surgery, dialysis, severe renal impairment and situations requiring rapid reversal.

References

  1. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. (n.d.). Heparin sodium injection prescribing information. FDA labeling database.

  2. National Library of Medicine. (n.d.). ClinicalTrials.gov: Heparin studies. https://clinicaltrials.gov/

  3. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. (2020). Implementation of the biologics price competition and innovation act of 2009: Transfer of products regulated under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act to the Public Health Service Act. FDA.

  4. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. (n.d.). Approved drug products with therapeutic equivalence evaluations, Orange Book. https://www.fda.gov/drugsatfda

  5. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. (n.d.). Drug shortages: Heparin sodium injection. FDA Drug Shortages Database.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.