Last Updated: June 9, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR HEPARIN SODIUM 25,000 UNITS IN DEXTROSE 5%


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for HEPARIN SODIUM 25,000 UNITS IN DEXTROSE 5%

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00000468 ↗ Myocardial Infarction Triage and Intervention Project (MITI) Completed National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) Phase 3 1988-04-01 To determine the practicality, benefit, and safety of paramedic administration of thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction. The feasibility of paramedics correctly identifying candidates for thrombolytic therapy following myocardial infarction was assessed in Phase I. In Phase II, pre-hospital thrombolytic therapy was compared with in-hospital thrombolytic therapy.
NCT00000468 ↗ Myocardial Infarction Triage and Intervention Project (MITI) Completed University of Washington Phase 3 1988-04-01 To determine the practicality, benefit, and safety of paramedic administration of thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction. The feasibility of paramedics correctly identifying candidates for thrombolytic therapy following myocardial infarction was assessed in Phase I. In Phase II, pre-hospital thrombolytic therapy was compared with in-hospital thrombolytic therapy.
NCT00182143 ↗ PROphylaxis for ThromboEmbolism in Critical Care Trial (PROTECT) Completed Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Society Clinical Trials Group Phase 3 2006-05-01 The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effect of Low Molecular Weight Heparin (LMWH) (Fragmin, dalteparin) versus Unfractionated Heparin (UFH) on the primary outcome of proximal leg Deep Vein Thrombosis (DVT) diagnosed by compression ultrasound, and the secondary outcomes of Pulmonary Embolism (PE), bleeding, Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia (HIT), and objectively confirmed venous thrombosis at any site.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for HEPARIN SODIUM 25,000 UNITS IN DEXTROSE 5%

Condition Name

Condition Name for HEPARIN SODIUM 25,000 UNITS IN DEXTROSE 5%
Intervention Trials
Thrombosis 4
Myocardial Infarction 4
Healthy 4
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for HEPARIN SODIUM 25,000 UNITS IN DEXTROSE 5%
Intervention Trials
Thrombosis 13
Acute Kidney Injury 7
Venous Thrombosis 7
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for HEPARIN SODIUM 25,000 UNITS IN DEXTROSE 5%

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for HEPARIN SODIUM 25,000 UNITS IN DEXTROSE 5%
Location Trials
United States 44
China 17
Canada 14
Brazil 12
Spain 11
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for HEPARIN SODIUM 25,000 UNITS IN DEXTROSE 5%
Location Trials
California 7
New York 5
Texas 4
Ohio 3
Pennsylvania 2
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for HEPARIN SODIUM 25,000 UNITS IN DEXTROSE 5%

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for HEPARIN SODIUM 25,000 UNITS IN DEXTROSE 5%
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
PHASE4 4
PHASE3 1
PHASE2 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for HEPARIN SODIUM 25,000 UNITS IN DEXTROSE 5%
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 48
Unknown status 13
Withdrawn 10
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for HEPARIN SODIUM 25,000 UNITS IN DEXTROSE 5%

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for HEPARIN SODIUM 25,000 UNITS IN DEXTROSE 5%
Sponsor Trials
Ain Shams University 5
GlaxoSmithKline 5
Azidus Brasil 4
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for HEPARIN SODIUM 25,000 UNITS IN DEXTROSE 5%
Sponsor Trials
Other 152
Industry 36
NIH 5
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Heparin Sodium 25,000 Units in Dextrose 5%: Clinical Trials, Market Status, and Projection

Last updated: April 28, 2026

What is “Heparin Sodium 25,000 Units In Dextrose 5%” in product terms?

“Heparin Sodium 25,000 Units in Dextrose 5%” is a ready-to-use heparin formulation where heparin sodium is dissolved in a dextrose 5% (D5W) infusion. The clinical use pattern is typically for intravenous anticoagulation where an infusion-compatible concentration and carrier are required.

Because “25,000 Units in Dextrose 5%” is a concentration and container descriptor, filings and clinical records often categorize it under heparin injection or heparin sodium in D5W rather than as a unique proprietary drug name. As a result, trial and market reporting tends to be captured at the level of heparin sodium injection products and, in some cases, heparin regimens (e.g., heparin during surgery, dialysis anticoagulation, or acute coronary syndromes).

Which clinical trials currently matter for this specific formulation?

A formulation-level clinical trial map for “heparin sodium 25,000 units in D5%” is not typically published as a standalone evidence base. Instead, clinical evidence for unfractionated heparin sodium covers infusion protocols where the carrier is clinically consistent with D5W use in infusion workflows.

Given the absence of trial identifiers specific to this exact unit count plus D5W carrier in publicly indexed trial registries, the actionable way to evaluate the development landscape is to anchor to:

  1. Unfractionated heparin clinical use areas (peri-procedural anticoagulation, ACS, VTE treatment alternatives, ECMO, dialysis circuits).
  2. Heparin formulation and administration protocols in guidelines and label-based practice.
  3. Regulatory submissions for heparin sodium injection products (device and container changes, stability, and infusion compatibility).

In practice, this means there is no “modern” phase 3 evidence pipeline for this exact concentration-carrier combination that behaves like a new molecular entity. The category behaves more like a stable generic manufacturing product where the competitive differentiators are supply reliability, packaging, and regulatory compliance rather than new clinical endpoints.

Is there active late-stage development for this exact product?

Market behavior for heparin sodium injections indicates:

  • The active ingredient (unfractionated heparin) has long-established clinical positioning.
  • Development focus in recent years for many markets is tied to manufacturing scale, sterility assurance, and formulation consistency rather than new clinical efficacy trials at the product-concentration level.

As a result, the “clinical trials update” for this exact descriptor is best treated as a status check for heparin sodium in clinical protocols rather than a pipeline watch for a single discrete development program.

How does guideline and label positioning translate into clinical demand for D5W heparin?

Clinical workflows that drive steady demand include:

  • Continuous IV anticoagulation protocols where heparin is titrated to target aPTT or anti-Xa depending on local protocol.
  • Perioperative anticoagulation and bridging regimens.
  • Extracorporeal circuits such as dialysis or ECMO where heparin infusion compatibility matters.
  • Acute cardiovascular indications where unfractionated heparin remains a standard comparator or component.

The key commercial point: demand is not tied to a single indication but to “protocol frequency” in settings that continuously use anticoagulants. The D5W carrier shows up where infusion stability and compatibility are operationally aligned with institutional practice.

What is the market landscape for heparin sodium injections?

Competitive structure

Heparin sodium injections operate in a mature category:

  • Multiple manufacturers across major geographies.
  • Generic and authorized generic availability is common.
  • Pricing is influenced by manufacturing capacity, demand volatility in acute care, and procurement cycles.

Demand drivers

The major drivers for sales of heparin sodium injection products include:

  • High patient volumes in ER, ICU, cath lab, perioperative services.
  • Continued use of unfractionated heparin in settings where rapid onset/offset and reversibility with protamine is clinically preferred.
  • Routine anticoagulation in dialysis and ECMO workflows.

Supply constraints and pricing behavior

Unfractionated heparin supply is exposed to:

  • Upstream raw material constraints.
  • Manufacturing and sterility testing capacity.
  • Batch-to-batch consistency requirements (potency and anticoagulant activity).

This produces periodic procurement pressure and short-term pricing moves, but the overall category tends to remain volumetrically stable.

How large is the market for this specific concentration and carrier?

A precise market-size number for “25,000 Units in Dextrose 5%” alone is rarely published because:

  • Procurement data often aggregates heparin sodium injection SKUs.
  • Product descriptors and packaging differ by region and distributor.
  • Hospitals report usage by active ingredient and concentration range rather than unit-count packaging.

So, market projection for investment-grade decision-making is conducted at the active ingredient and infusion-product level, then scaled by the share of use attributable to D5W carrier and the 25,000-unit packaging convention.

What is the projection for market growth and revenue?

A practical projection framework for this mature category uses:

  • Units demand: proportional to hospital admissions, procedure volume, and ICU utilization.
  • Pricing: driven by procurement contracting, competitive intensity, and supply-demand tightness.
  • Mix: shifts across heparin concentrations and carriers; some institutions standardize on specific infusion-ready formats.

Base-case market projection (category-level to SKU-level scaling)

Base case assumptions for 2025 to 2030:

  • Moderate volumetric growth aligned to hospital utilization growth.
  • Flat-to-slightly down net price driven by generic competition.
  • Occasional supply shocks that temporarily raise pricing before normalization.

Resulting projection for the “heparin sodium injection in D5W” segment:

  • Revenue growth tracks slightly above or in line with inflation, with periodic deviations during supply tightness cycles.
  • SKU-specific revenue is stable, with movement tied more to contracting and inventory than to clinical adoption of a new regimen.

Scenario table

Scenario Volume trend Net price trend Revenue outcome (directional) Timing
Downside (supply adequate, stronger competition) Low growth Price pressure Flat to slightly negative 2025-2026
Base (steady demand, contract mix stable) Moderate growth Mild decline/flat Low single-digit growth 2025-2030
Upside (supply constraints, limited competitors) Moderate growth Price increases Mid single-digit growth peaks then normalize 2026-2028

What matters most for commercialization and R&D decisions?

1) Regulatory posture and product lifecycle

For mature heparin sodium injection products, competitive advantage tends to come from:

  • Regulatory execution (manufacturing consistency, stability data, sterility assurance).
  • Supply reliability (fill-finish capacity, batch release reliability).
  • Distribution contracting (hospital group purchasing, distributor relationships).

2) Procurement and contracting mechanics

Hospital procurement tends to:

  • Lock in preferred suppliers through formularies and group contracts.
  • Re-contract annually or biannually depending on region and budget cycles.
  • Reward suppliers with low backorder risk.

3) Substitution pressure

Even when a specific packaging is preferred, substitutability remains high because:

  • Clinicians can dose-adjust infusion protocols.
  • Carriers may differ but dosing continuity is possible with compatible preparation approaches.
  • Generic switching is common in stable formulations.

Risk map for market projection

Risk How it hits revenue Mitigation typical in the category
Supply disruption upstream Temporary shortages; loss of share if not covered Dual-sourcing strategy and capacity planning
Sterility/batch release delays Missed deliveries; inventory loss Tight quality systems and validated release timelines
Price erosion from generic entry Net price declines Contracting strategy and SKU mix optimization
Formulary exclusion Volume drop Hospital account retention and service-level guarantees

Investment lens: what to underwrite

For “Heparin Sodium 25,000 Units in Dextrose 5%,” underwriting should focus on:

  • Manufacturing continuity and fill-finish throughput.
  • Evidence of consistent potency and stability across batches.
  • Contract coverage with large hospital networks.
  • Distribution resilience (ability to meet scheduled demand).

The clinical evidence base is not a differentiator in the same way it is for new molecular entities. The economic differentiator is supply and procurement access.


Key Takeaways

  • “Heparin Sodium 25,000 Units in Dextrose 5%” is a concentration-carrier presentation of a mature anticoagulant; evidence and trial activity are mostly protocol-level rather than formulation-specific.
  • Clinical demand is driven by high-frequency anticoagulation workflows in acute care, peri-procedural settings, and extracorporeal therapies.
  • Market growth is expected to be low single-digit on a base case, with revenue swings driven more by supply constraints and contracting than by new clinical adoption.
  • Commercial advantage in this category comes from manufacturing reliability, regulatory execution, and hospital purchasing access rather than new R&D efficacy endpoints.

FAQs

  1. Is there a dedicated phase 3 pipeline for “heparin sodium 25,000 units in D5W”?
    No stand-alone formulation-specific late-stage pipeline is typically how this category develops; clinical positioning is covered by unfractionated heparin protocols.

  2. What drives usage of heparin sodium products in D5W?
    Continuous IV anticoagulation workflows and infusion compatibility preferences in institutional protocols.

  3. How does generic competition affect pricing?
    It pushes net pricing toward flat-to-declining levels over contract cycles, with temporary price lifts during supply tightness.

  4. What are the biggest risks to revenue for this product type?
    Supply disruptions, batch release delays, and formulary or contracting changes.

  5. What is the most important underwriting metric for investors?
    Supply reliability and contract coverage, supported by consistent manufacturing and release performance.


References

[1] U.S. National Library of Medicine. ClinicalTrials.gov. (Database). https://clinicaltrials.gov/
[2] U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Drug Approval Reports and Drug Labels (heparin sodium injection-related labeling via FDA access systems). https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/
[3] World Health Organization. ATC/DDD Index: Anticoagulants including heparin preparations. https://www.whocc.no/

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.