Last Updated: September 29, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR HEPARIN SODIUM 10,000 UNITS IN DEXTROSE 5% IN PLASTIC CONTAINER


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for HEPARIN SODIUM 10,000 UNITS IN DEXTROSE 5% IN PLASTIC CONTAINER

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00000468 ↗ Myocardial Infarction Triage and Intervention Project (MITI) Completed National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) Phase 3 1988-04-01 To determine the practicality, benefit, and safety of paramedic administration of thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction. The feasibility of paramedics correctly identifying candidates for thrombolytic therapy following myocardial infarction was assessed in Phase I. In Phase II, pre-hospital thrombolytic therapy was compared with in-hospital thrombolytic therapy.
NCT00000468 ↗ Myocardial Infarction Triage and Intervention Project (MITI) Completed University of Washington Phase 3 1988-04-01 To determine the practicality, benefit, and safety of paramedic administration of thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction. The feasibility of paramedics correctly identifying candidates for thrombolytic therapy following myocardial infarction was assessed in Phase I. In Phase II, pre-hospital thrombolytic therapy was compared with in-hospital thrombolytic therapy.
NCT00182143 ↗ PROphylaxis for ThromboEmbolism in Critical Care Trial (PROTECT) Completed Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Society Clinical Trials Group Phase 3 2006-05-01 The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effect of Low Molecular Weight Heparin (LMWH) (Fragmin, dalteparin) versus Unfractionated Heparin (UFH) on the primary outcome of proximal leg Deep Vein Thrombosis (DVT) diagnosed by compression ultrasound, and the secondary outcomes of Pulmonary Embolism (PE), bleeding, Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia (HIT), and objectively confirmed venous thrombosis at any site.
NCT00182143 ↗ PROphylaxis for ThromboEmbolism in Critical Care Trial (PROTECT) Completed Canadian Critical Care Trials Group Phase 3 2006-05-01 The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effect of Low Molecular Weight Heparin (LMWH) (Fragmin, dalteparin) versus Unfractionated Heparin (UFH) on the primary outcome of proximal leg Deep Vein Thrombosis (DVT) diagnosed by compression ultrasound, and the secondary outcomes of Pulmonary Embolism (PE), bleeding, Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia (HIT), and objectively confirmed venous thrombosis at any site.
NCT00182143 ↗ PROphylaxis for ThromboEmbolism in Critical Care Trial (PROTECT) Completed Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) Phase 3 2006-05-01 The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effect of Low Molecular Weight Heparin (LMWH) (Fragmin, dalteparin) versus Unfractionated Heparin (UFH) on the primary outcome of proximal leg Deep Vein Thrombosis (DVT) diagnosed by compression ultrasound, and the secondary outcomes of Pulmonary Embolism (PE), bleeding, Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia (HIT), and objectively confirmed venous thrombosis at any site.
NCT00182143 ↗ PROphylaxis for ThromboEmbolism in Critical Care Trial (PROTECT) Completed McMaster University Phase 3 2006-05-01 The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effect of Low Molecular Weight Heparin (LMWH) (Fragmin, dalteparin) versus Unfractionated Heparin (UFH) on the primary outcome of proximal leg Deep Vein Thrombosis (DVT) diagnosed by compression ultrasound, and the secondary outcomes of Pulmonary Embolism (PE), bleeding, Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia (HIT), and objectively confirmed venous thrombosis at any site.
NCT00203580 ↗ Trial of the Effect of Low-Molecular-Weight Heparin (LMWH) Versus Warfarin on Mortality in the Long-Term Treatment of Proximal Deep Vein Thrombosis (DVT) (Main LITE Study) Completed Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) Phase 4 1994-12-01 The purpose of this study is to assess the long-term treatment of patients with proximal venous thrombosis through the administration of subcutaneous low-molecular-weight heparin (tinzaparin sodium) versus the standard care use of intravenous heparin followed by oral warfarin sodium.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for HEPARIN SODIUM 10,000 UNITS IN DEXTROSE 5% IN PLASTIC CONTAINER

Condition Name

Condition Name for HEPARIN SODIUM 10,000 UNITS IN DEXTROSE 5% IN PLASTIC CONTAINER
Intervention Trials
Covid19 4
Thrombosis 4
Healthy 4
Myocardial Infarction 4
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for HEPARIN SODIUM 10,000 UNITS IN DEXTROSE 5% IN PLASTIC CONTAINER
Intervention Trials
Thrombosis 13
Acute Kidney Injury 7
Venous Thrombosis 7
COVID-19 6
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for HEPARIN SODIUM 10,000 UNITS IN DEXTROSE 5% IN PLASTIC CONTAINER

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for HEPARIN SODIUM 10,000 UNITS IN DEXTROSE 5% IN PLASTIC CONTAINER
Location Trials
United States 44
China 17
Canada 14
Brazil 12
Spain 11
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for HEPARIN SODIUM 10,000 UNITS IN DEXTROSE 5% IN PLASTIC CONTAINER
Location Trials
California 7
New York 5
Texas 4
Ohio 3
Maryland 2
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for HEPARIN SODIUM 10,000 UNITS IN DEXTROSE 5% IN PLASTIC CONTAINER

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for HEPARIN SODIUM 10,000 UNITS IN DEXTROSE 5% IN PLASTIC CONTAINER
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
PHASE4 4
PHASE3 1
PHASE2 1
[disabled in preview] 61
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for HEPARIN SODIUM 10,000 UNITS IN DEXTROSE 5% IN PLASTIC CONTAINER
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 48
Unknown status 13
Withdrawn 10
[disabled in preview] 28
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for HEPARIN SODIUM 10,000 UNITS IN DEXTROSE 5% IN PLASTIC CONTAINER

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for HEPARIN SODIUM 10,000 UNITS IN DEXTROSE 5% IN PLASTIC CONTAINER
Sponsor Trials
Ain Shams University 5
GlaxoSmithKline 5
Azidus Brasil 4
[disabled in preview] 10
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for HEPARIN SODIUM 10,000 UNITS IN DEXTROSE 5% IN PLASTIC CONTAINER
Sponsor Trials
Other 152
Industry 36
NIH 5
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial
Last updated: July 30, 2026

Heparin Sodium 10,000 Units in Dextrose 5% in Plastic Container: Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Price/Volume Projections

Heparin sodium in D5W plastic container is a short-horizon, operational product tied to hospital formularies and anticoagulation protocols rather than a blockbuster, indication-driven franchise. Market dynamics are dominated by (1) inventory turnover and substitution policies, (2) hospital switching under purchasing contracts, and (3) regulatory and compendial manufacturing controls for sterile parenterals. No clinical-trial “pipeline” is typically maintained for this specific repackaged or packaged strength unless a manufacturer runs trials for a new formulation, container system, or labeling change.

What is the clinical trial status for heparin sodium 10,000 units in dextrose 5% in plastic container?

Bottom line: Public clinical-trial activity for the exact packaged strength and container format is usually limited or not separately tracked from heparin sodium’s broader clinical history. Current public attention is typically on:

  • New anticoagulation pathways (e.g., dosing/monitoring strategies)
  • Biosafety and quality systems for sterile parenterals
  • Labeling updates tied to monitoring, dosing, and contraindications
  • Generic and 505(b)(2) or ANDA changes for formulation or container packaging

Are there active trials for this exact product configuration?

For this product class, active interventional trials are not commonly listed at the “packaged strength in D5W plastic container” granularity. Most clinical evidence is shared across heparin sodium products, while trials at the product level tend to focus on:

  • PK/PD comparisons after reformulation or container change
  • Stability and compatibility studies for admixtures and infusion settings
  • Labeling-supporting studies (rare for legacy strengths)

Where do trials usually show up for heparin in current practice?

Clinical trial portfolios that materially affect heparin demand generally include:

  • Unfractionated heparin dosing and monitoring strategies (aPTT targets, heparin resistance)
  • Anticoagulation in acute coronary syndrome and venous thromboembolism settings
  • Bridging protocols around procedures
  • Use in dialysis and extracorporeal circuits These programs can shift hospital utilization mix across heparin brands and generics, even when the exact product formulation is unchanged.

Which approvals and regulatory pathway govern heparin sodium infusions in D5W plastic containers?

Bottom line: This product is a sterile parenteral heparin sodium presentation. For the US, demand and market access follow the ANDA ecosystem for generics and, for branded products, legacy ANDA/NDAs plus labeling and manufacturing changes. Entry timing and switching are driven by Orange Book status and exclusivity, not by new clinical endpoints.

Orange Book and exclusivity drivers

Key market-access variables for this drug presentation:

  • Patent/market exclusivity listed in FDA’s Orange Book for the specific NDA or ANDA product
  • Whether the listed product is considered the reference for substitution in contracts
  • Suitability for hospital “therapeutic interchange” policies under state pharmacy regulations

Container system and stability

Packaging with D5W in a plastic container can matter for:

  • Leachables and extractables controls
  • Stability under refrigerated vs room conditions
  • Compatibility with common infusion tubing and additives

These controls affect batch release timing and can create supply constraints, which translate directly into market share during outages.

How big is the market for heparin sodium 10,000 units in D5W plastic container?

Bottom line: The addressable market is a subset of the broader unfractionated heparin (UFH) and anticoagulation infusion market. Exact unit-level market sizing for the specific strength and solvent container is typically not published publicly; however, hospital procurement data and contract awards show that this category behaves like:

  • A high-utilization, low-to-mid spend SKU relative to newer anticoagulants
  • A “system drug” ordered in volume during inpatient throughput cycles
  • A product category where substitution is frequent once multiple suppliers are qualified

Demand sources that drive utilization

Primary pull-through comes from:

  • Inpatient anticoagulation pathways (ED to ICU)
  • ACS and VTE protocols using UFH
  • Peri-procedural bridging programs
  • Dialysis and extracorporeal therapies

Share drivers

Demand share depends on:

  • Supply reliability and fill-rate history
  • Contract pricing and preferred formulary status
  • Availability of equivalent dosing presentations (bolus and infusion options)
  • Pharmacy preferences for ready-to-use admixture vs pharmacy compounding

Who are the key suppliers and how does competition work for heparin sodium UFH in infusion presentations?

Bottom line: Competition is typically generic-multiplexed once multiple ANDA products are approved, with branded share contracting to:

  • Bundled hospital contracts
  • Preferred distribution channels
  • Periodic supply constraints where branded inventory is used to cover shortages

What matters to hospital purchasing

Hospital P&T and pharmacy procurement teams weight:

  • Total cost of therapy under their ordering system
  • Packaging format requirements (ready-to-use vs pharmacy compounding)
  • Stability and storage assumptions
  • Contract rebates and distributor fees

How competition reshapes pricing

When multiple ANDA products exist, price typically:

  • Compresses after entry
  • Experiences episodic spikes when shortages occur
  • Stabilizes as contract renewals lock preferred suppliers

What are the current market and supply risks for heparin sodium infusion products?

Bottom line: The risk profile is driven by sterile manufacturing constraints and raw material sourcing, not by clinical attrition.

Common supply risk factors

  • Batch failures in sterile filtration and aseptic fill-finish
  • Raw heparin sourcing variability
  • Container-related quality holds or distribution constraints
  • Broad anticoagulant demand surges during seasonal hospitalization peaks

Impact on revenue and allocation

When supply tightens:

  • Hospitals reallocate between SKUs with similar dosing
  • Substitutions occur even across different container types if stability allows
  • Wholesalers allocate to accounts with established contract history

When does heparin sodium in D5W lose exclusivity or face generic entry risks?

Bottom line: For the specific strength and container presentation, “exclusivity” and “launch risk” are generally already resolved for most markets. The ongoing question is supply availability and whether any remaining listed patents affect particular bottle sizes, labeling, or container closure systems.

How to think about generic entry timing

Generic entry risk typically accelerates when:

  • Orange Book-listed patents expire or are found non-infringed
  • Exclusivity windows for the reference product end
  • Litigation is settled or dismissed For this drug category, the competitive field is often already populated, so “entry risk” translates into:
  • Ability to maintain supply at contracted volumes
  • Ability to pass compatibility and stability qualification in hospital workflows

What patents protect heparin sodium products, and how strong is the patent estate?

Bottom line: Heparin sodium as an API is mature and largely off-patent as a chemical entity. Current patent estate, where it exists, tends to cluster around:

  • Specific formulations or concentration combinations
  • Methods of use tied to labeling claims
  • Container system or manufacturing process improvements

What typically remains patent-relevant

  • Packaging/container system claims
  • Specific dilution media or admixture instructions
  • Stability claims for defined storage conditions

Practical strength for commercialization

For market planning, the practical effect of patent estate is often:

  • Reduced competition if a particular presentation is locked to a single supplier
  • Otherwise, standard generic competition that compresses pricing

How does this heparin product compare with alternative anticoagulants and other UFH presentations?

Bottom line: UFH competes mainly with:

  • Low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWH)
  • Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
  • Warfarin (in selected pathways)
  • Institutional protocols choosing DOACs over UFH when appropriate Within UFH, the competitive set is other heparin strengths and ready-to-use admixtures versus pharmacy compounding.

Clinical and operational comparison

  • DOACs reduce monitoring requirements, which can reduce UFH share in elective pathways.
  • UFH persists in high-acuity settings where rapid reversibility and titratability are required.
  • Ready-to-use infusion presentations can win share for workflow simplicity.

What is the FDA and compendial status of heparin sodium 10,000 units in D5W plastic container?

Bottom line: The product is positioned as a sterile parenteral for infusion settings where D5W is an accepted diluent within labeling and compendial standards. Regulatory status determines manufacturability and substitution eligibility.

Key status checkpoints

  • NDA/ANDA marketing status
  • Current labeling and administration instructions
  • Listing in FDA’s Orange Book for the specific product configuration

What generic launch scenarios could drive future share shifts?

Bottom line: The next share-shifting events are less about “new clinical evidence” and more about:

  • New ANDA approvals for equivalent presentations
  • Patent settlements that unlock supply
  • Temporary shortages that reallocate hospital demand

Scenarios

  1. Broad availability increases: Multiple suppliers maintain steady supply; pricing softens.
  2. Localized shortage persists: Allocation moves demand to the closest substitutable SKU.
  3. A container system change: Requires stability qualification and may temporarily delay substitution.

Market projections: pricing, volume, and revenue outlook (next 3 to 5 years)

Bottom line: The category’s outlook is stable-to-mildly declining in unit price with periodic supply-driven volatility, and stable-to-mildly growing in unit volume only if inpatient throughput and guideline-driven UFH use increase. Without a product-level clinical expansion, growth is primarily utilization-driven.

Projection framework

  • Volume: Tied to hospital admissions, ICU utilization, and anticoagulation protocol mix
  • Price: Tied to generic competition and contract rebasing
  • Revenue: Product of volume and net price after rebates/contract concessions

Base case (most likely)

  • Moderate unit price compression as generic competition remains active
  • Volume roughly flat with hospital anticoagulation protocols
  • Revenue growth unlikely unless contracts yield net price stability or supply constraints boost allocation share

Upside case

  • Inpatient demand outpaces expectations
  • Supply constraints limit the number of qualified suppliers, increasing allocation to available products
  • Contract wins in large IDNs

Downside case

  • Protocol drift toward DOAC/LMWH in eligible pathways
  • Supply quality events reduce fill rate and lead to lost contract position
  • Continued cost pressure from pharmacy benefit and tendering systems

How strong is the commercial position of this SKU in hospital formularies?

Bottom line: This SKU’s commercial position depends on whether hospitals:

  • Stock it as a ready-to-use infusion option
  • Can substitute across UFH concentration presentations
  • Choose a preferred supplier under contract terms

Formulary stickiness

Stickiness is high when:

  • Nurses and pharmacists have established dilution and administration workflows
  • Stability and storage assumptions are locked in
  • Contract pricing makes switching uneconomic

What clinical-trial updates matter most for business planning?

Bottom line: For this product category, “clinical-trial updates” that matter are those that change:

  • The proportion of patients treated with UFH rather than alternatives
  • Monitoring intensity and dosing protocols that shift UFH utilization
  • Adverse event profiles that drive guideline changes

Business-relevant readouts

  • Guideline updates that increase UFH use in specific cohorts
  • Trials showing workflow or monitoring benefits that increase adoption in high-acuity settings
  • Evidence affecting reversal strategy preferences and dosing titration

Key Takeaways

  • Heparin sodium 10,000 units in D5W plastic container is a hospital-workflow product whose growth is driven by anticoagulation protocol utilization and supply reliability, not by a distinct late-stage clinical pipeline.
  • Market share and price are dominated by generic competition, contract tendering, and sterile manufacturing supply constraints.
  • Future share shifts will come from ANDA approvals (if any remain), patent settlement outcomes for specific presentations (where applicable), and episodic shortage-driven allocation.
  • The 3-to-5-year outlook is stable volume with continued net price pressure in a typical competitive environment, with upside tied to supply availability and IDN contract wins.

FAQs

  1. Does heparin sodium in D5W plastic container qualify for hospital therapeutic interchange with other UFH presentations?
  2. How do shortages of unfractionated heparin affect allocation and switching between different solvent or container formats?
  3. What endpoints in UFH trials most influence guideline adoption between heparin and LMWH or DOACs?
  4. How do Orange Book listings for heparin presentations typically constrain generic substitution in the US?
  5. What stability and compatibility factors with D5W influence pharmacy ordering decisions for ready-to-use heparin infusions?

References

  1. FDA Orange Book. “Approved Drug Products with Therapeutic Equivalence Evaluations.” (accessed 2026).
  2. FDA. “Drug Shortages.” (accessed 2026).
  3. US FDA. Labeling resources for heparin sodium products and parenteral sterile drug guidance materials. (accessed 2026).

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.