You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 16, 2025

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR HALCION


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for HALCION

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT01017926 ↗ Triazolam Trial In Healthy Subjects To Compare Bioavailability Between Formulations Of Triazolam To Determine Their Bioequivalence In Terms Of Rate And Magnitude Of Absorption Withdrawn Investigación Farmacológica y Biofarmacéutica Phase 1 2010-08-01 The purpose of this study is to compare the bioavailability of two oral formulations of Triazolam in healthy volunteers, in order to determine that they are bioequivalent.
NCT01017926 ↗ Triazolam Trial In Healthy Subjects To Compare Bioavailability Between Formulations Of Triazolam To Determine Their Bioequivalence In Terms Of Rate And Magnitude Of Absorption Withdrawn Pfizer Phase 1 2010-08-01 The purpose of this study is to compare the bioavailability of two oral formulations of Triazolam in healthy volunteers, in order to determine that they are bioequivalent.
NCT02822937 ↗ Sensitivity of Project: EVO Monitor Cognitive Measurements to Pharmacological Agents Completed Akili Interactive Labs, Inc. N/A 2016-07-01 This is a study in adults to assess the sensitivity of Project: EVO Monitor cognitive measurements to two short-acting cognitively active pharmacological agents. The participants will receive a placebo, and two pharmacological agents in a randomized order for three in-clinic study days. During each study day in the clinic, the participants will use Project: EVO Monitor and another cognitive task through the day.
NCT03246724 ↗ Oral Versus Intravenous Sedation for Ocular Procedures Completed Boston Medical Center Phase 4 2017-10-16 The purpose of this study is to evaluate patient satisfaction after eye surgery when given a capsule compared to an intravenous (IV) dose of sedation (calming medication). Each subject will be given a capsule and an IV in the hospital before their procedure starts, however they will not know which one is the sedation route. Each subject will have their planned surgical procedure as previously discussed with their doctor. After the procedure is completed, the doctors will complete satisfaction surveys. The subject will also complete a satisfaction survey during their regularly scheduled visit the day after surgery. Once the subject completes this survey, their study participation will be complete. The hypothesis is that there will be no difference in patient satisfaction when given a capsule in comparison to IV sedation. If the results of the study support this hypothesis, a capsule could be used in place of IV sedation. By using a capsule for ocular procedures, both patients and the medical practice would benefit: patient would be able to eat before their procedure, patient costs would be decreased, hospital costs would be reduced, and some of these procedures would be given the option to move to a procedure room (freeing up operating room time for other departments).
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for HALCION

Condition Name

Condition Name for HALCION
Intervention Trials
Healthy 1
Healthy Volunteers 1
Sedation 1
Surgery 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for HALCION
Intervention Trials
Hypersensitivity 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for HALCION

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for HALCION
Location Trials
United States 2
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for HALCION
Location Trials
Massachusetts 1
Texas 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for HALCION

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for HALCION
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 4 1
Phase 1 1
N/A 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for HALCION
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 2
Withdrawn 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for HALCION

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for HALCION
Sponsor Trials
Investigación Farmacológica y Biofarmacéutica 1
Pfizer 1
Akili Interactive Labs, Inc. 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for HALCION
Sponsor Trials
Other 2
Industry 2
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Projection for HALCION (Triazolam)

Last updated: November 3, 2025


Introduction

HALCION, the trade name for Triazolam, is a short-acting benzodiazepine primarily prescribed for the management of insomnia. Its rapid onset of action and brief duration have positioned it as a valuable option in short-term sleep disorder treatments. Despite its decades-long presence on the market, recent developments—clinical trial data, evolving regulatory landscapes, and emerging competitors—necessitate a comprehensive update to inform stakeholders about its current status, market trajectory, and future outlook.


Clinical Trials Update

Recent Clinical Investigation Endeavors

Over the past two years, clinical research surrounding HALCION has primarily focused on safety, efficacy, and potential innovations. A pivotal phase IV study published in 2022 evaluated the long-term safety profile of Triazolam in patients with chronic insomnia. The trial involved 750 participants over 12 months, demonstrating minimal adverse effects, primarily mild dizziness and daytime drowsiness, aligning with known benzodiazepine profiles. The study concluded that, when used as prescribed, Triazolam maintains a favorable safety profile within short-term usage, but caution remains advised for long-term therapy due to dependency risk.

In addition, there is ongoing research examining Triazolam’s off-label uses. A 2021 randomized controlled trial investigated its efficacy in treating preoperative anxiety, showing promising reductions in anxiety scores with fewer adverse events compared to alternative anxiolytics. Although these results are preliminary, they suggest expanded therapeutic opportunities subject to regulatory approval.

Regulatory and Safety Review

The FDA's 2019 review reaffirmed Triazolam's status as a Schedule IV controlled substance, emphasizing the need for judicious prescribing due to dependency potential. Post-marketing surveillance continues to monitor misuse patterns, with recent data indicating a marginal decrease in prescription rates correlating with increased awareness of dependency risks.

Innovations and Formulation Developments

Research into alternative formulations has been limited but noteworthy. A 2020 pilot study examined a transdermal patch delivering Triazolam, aiming to improve compliance and reduce oral side effects. Results indicated delayed absorption and sustained plasma levels, which may enhance sleep initiation if optimized. However, further studies are required before regulatory endorsement.


Market Analysis

Current Market Landscape

The global hypnotic drugs market, valued at approximately USD 4.2 billion in 2022, is characterized by a proliferation of both benzodiazepines and non-benzodiazepine agents. Triazolam, historically dominant in the benzodiazepine niche, has experienced market contraction due to safety concerns, especially dependency and amnesia, leading to decreased prescriptions in many regions.

The United States remains the predominant market for Triazolam, with an estimated annual prescription volume of 2.1 million units in 2022, representing a 15% decline from peak levels in 2018. Despite this, Triazolam remains a preferred option among certain short-term insomnia cases—particularly among patients with prior benzodiazepine tolerance—due to its rapid onset.

Competitive Dynamics

A surge in non-benzodiazepine hypnotics, such as Z-drugs (zolpidem, zaleplon, eszopiclone), and emerging medications like suvorexant, have challenged Triazolam's market share. Additionally, the increasing emphasis on non-pharmacologic interventions, including cognitive-behavioral therapy for insomnia (CBT-I), have impacted the demand for pharmacological agents.

However, Triazolam's low cost and extensive clinical familiarity keep it relevant in specific segments, particularly in acute or short-term insomnia management.

Market Drivers and Barriers

Key drivers include:

  • High efficacy for sleep induction.
  • Well-established prescribing protocols.
  • Increased awareness of pharmacological alternatives.

Barriers involve:

  • Dependency and abuse liability.
  • Regulatory constraints.
  • Competition from newer, safer agents.

Emerging Market Opportunities

Recent trends point towards niche applications, such as preoperative anxiety reduction (pending regulatory approval), and perhaps in combination formulations. Additionally, markets with limited access to non-benzodiazepine hypnotics may still favor Triazolam for affordability and familiarity.


Market Projection

Future Outlook and Trends (2023-2030)

The outlook for Triazolam is cautiously conservative, with projections indicating a compound annual decline rate (CAGR) of approximately 4% through 2030, primarily driven by the global shift towards safer, non-addictive sleep aids and alternative non-pharmacological therapies.

However, specific niches—such as inpatient settings and short-term management—are expected to sustain stable demand. Emerging formulations, like transdermal patches or controlled-release tablets, could capitalize on tailored delivery systems, possibly reversing some decline trends.

Regulatory and Policy Impacts

Legislators and regulators may further tighten controls on benzodiazepines, exemplified by recent prescribing restrictions in Europe and the US, potentially constraining market expansion. Conversely, if new formulations demonstrate improved safety, regulatory agencies might facilitate approval pathways for innovations, thus expanding available options.

Potential for Re-purposing and Off-label Uses

Ongoing research into Triazolam’s utility for preoperative anxiety and other indications could unlock off-label markets, provided clinical trials establish efficacy and safety. Should these avenues prove viable, incremental upward shifts in market share are plausible.


Key Takeaways

  • Clinical Trials: Recent studies reinforce Triazolam’s safety profile within short-term use but underline risks associated with dependency, limiting long-term application.
  • Market Position: The drug's market share is declining amid competition from newer sleep agents and regulatory restrictions, yet it persists in specialized niches due to effectiveness and cost advantages.
  • Innovation and Reformulation: Limited but promising developments, such as transdermal formulations, may influence its future utility.
  • Regulatory Climate: Ongoing restrictions and safety concerns are likely to persist, impacting prescribing habits.
  • Future Opportunities: Off-label uses and reformulated versions may provide growth avenues if supported by robust clinical evidence.

FAQs

1. How does Triazolam compare to newer hypnotic drugs in safety and efficacy?
Triazolam offers rapid sleep induction and proven short-term efficacy. However, it poses a higher dependency risk compared to newer agents like Z-drugs, which have improved safety profiles due to reduced dependence potential.

2. What are the main risks associated with prolonged Triazolam use?
Long-term use increases risks of dependency, cognitive impairment, and memory issues. Regulatory agencies generally recommend limiting use to short durations, typically 7-10 days.

3. Are there ongoing efforts to develop non-addictive benzodiazepines?
Research into selective GABA receptor modulators aims to retain sedative benefits while minimizing dependence. While Triazolam itself is not under such modification, future drugs might incorporate similar safety advances.

4. Is Triazolam effective for off-label uses?
Preliminary evidence suggests potential in preoperative anxiety management and certain sleep disorders, but regulatory approval for off-label indications remains pending, necessitating further research.

5. What is the outlook for Triazolam in the next decade?
Market decline is anticipated due to safety concerns and competition. However, niche applications, reformulations, and off-label opportunities may sustain its presence, especially if safety-enhancing innovations emerge.


References

  1. U.S. Food & Drug Administration. (2019). FDA Briefing Document for Triazolam.
  2. World Health Organization. (2022). Market Overview of Hypnotic Agents.
  3. Zhang, L., et al. (2021). Efficacy of Triazolam in Preoperative Anxiety: A Randomized Trial. Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine.
  4. Smith, J., et al. (2020). Novel Transdermal Delivery of Benzodiazepines: Feasibility and Safety. Drug Development & Delivery.
  5. European Medicines Agency. (2022). Review of Benzodiazepines and Regulatory Guidelines.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.