Last Updated: June 23, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR HAILEY 24 FE


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for HAILEY 24 FE

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT02782702 ↗ Evaluation of the Improvement of Quality of Life of Patients Suffering From Hailey Hailey or Darier Disease After Injections of Botulism Toxin Into Large Folds. Completed University Hospital, Toulouse Phase 1 2015-09-01 Hailey Hailey and Darier disease are rare genetic dermatoses. Mutations of 2 genes (ATP2C1 or ATP2A2 respectively) are responsible for the diseases. These genes have a key role in calcium pump; their defect create abnormal link between keratinocytes' desmosomes and induce skin lesions. Clinically, patients present with inflammatory lesions located in the folds. Quality of life is impaired because of pain, pruritus and tendency to infections. Lesions are permanent but acute exacerbations occur in hot seasons because of increased sweating. Usual therapies are often not effective (local treatment, laser, phototherapy). Because sweating is a well established inducing or aggravating factor, botulism toxin could be an effective treatment for these diseases. Botulism toxin is already used in clinical practice and acts via a decreased sweet secretion. Improvement of skin lesions in Hailey-Hailey or Darier diseases has been previously reported in a few cases but there is no study properly evaluating the benefit of such treatment. The aim of the project is to study the improvement of quality of life for patients suffering from Hailey-Hailey or Darier diseases after a injections of botulism toxin in large skin folds. The principal objective is to estimate the distribution of the variation of quality of life at M1 vs. baseline.
NCT06651489 ↗ Efficacy of Guselkumab in Treating Hailey Hailey Disease RECRUITING Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC PHASE2 2025-03-13 Hailey-Hailey disease (HHD) is a debilitating genetic skin disorder, affecting mainly body folds with erythema and painful erosions and blisters. Histopathological findings include epidermal hyperplasia, suprabasilar clefting, dyskeratosis and acantholysis of keratinocytes. A final diagnosis of HHD is usually confirmed based on clinical and histopathological findings in line with genetic testing. Several treatment options have been proposed for this chronic and disabling disorder, however, there is no reproducibly effective therapeutic for it. The primary objective is to evaluate the treatment response of guselkumab. Single-center, non-randomized, single-arm, open-label, phase II trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of guselkumab for the treatment of patients with HHD.
NCT06651489 ↗ Efficacy of Guselkumab in Treating Hailey Hailey Disease RECRUITING Yale University PHASE2 2025-03-13 Hailey-Hailey disease (HHD) is a debilitating genetic skin disorder, affecting mainly body folds with erythema and painful erosions and blisters. Histopathological findings include epidermal hyperplasia, suprabasilar clefting, dyskeratosis and acantholysis of keratinocytes. A final diagnosis of HHD is usually confirmed based on clinical and histopathological findings in line with genetic testing. Several treatment options have been proposed for this chronic and disabling disorder, however, there is no reproducibly effective therapeutic for it. The primary objective is to evaluate the treatment response of guselkumab. Single-center, non-randomized, single-arm, open-label, phase II trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of guselkumab for the treatment of patients with HHD.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for HAILEY 24 FE

Condition Name

Condition Name for HAILEY 24 FE
Intervention Trials
Darier Disease 1
Hailey Hailey Disease 1
Hailey-Hailey Disease 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for HAILEY 24 FE
Intervention Trials
Pemphigus, Benign Familial 2
Darier Disease 1
Botulism 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for HAILEY 24 FE

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for HAILEY 24 FE
Location Trials
United States 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for HAILEY 24 FE
Location Trials
Connecticut 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for HAILEY 24 FE

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for HAILEY 24 FE
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
PHASE2 1
Phase 1 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for HAILEY 24 FE
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 1
RECRUITING 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for HAILEY 24 FE

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for HAILEY 24 FE
Sponsor Trials
University Hospital, Toulouse 1
Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC 1
Yale University 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for HAILEY 24 FE
Sponsor Trials
Other 2
INDUSTRY 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial
Last updated: June 2, 2026

HAILEY 24 FE clinical trials update, market analysis, and projection (2024-2035)

Executive summary: HAILEY 24 FE (norethindrone acetate and ethinyl estradiol; ferrous fumarate tablets for placebo) is a branded combined oral contraceptive (COC) with long-cycle manufacturing and marketing dynamics rather than a late-stage pipeline driver. Public clinical-trials activity is limited and largely renews product lifecycle requirements (bioequivalence and labeling support) instead of advancing new clinical endpoints. Market growth is expected to track the US COC baseline with modest share gains for manufacturers that sustain payer contracting and inventory depth, offset by ongoing generic competition. Peak-year value exposure is driven by pharmacy channel pricing and formulary penetration, not by near-term therapeutic innovation.


What is HAILEY 24 FE and what are its key clinical trial endpoints?

HAILEY 24 FE is a combined oral contraceptive containing:

  • Active hormones: norethindrone acetate and ethinyl estradiol
  • Placebo/iron component: ferrous fumarate tablets (for scheduled “placebo” doses)

What clinical evidence typically supports HAILEY 24 FE labeling?

For established COCs like HAILEY 24 FE, FDA-supported evidence commonly relies on:

  • Bioequivalence (BE) to a reference listed drug (RLD) for pharmacokinetic comparability
  • Contraceptive effectiveness characterization via historical COC performance benchmarks rather than new large efficacy trials, unless a formulation change triggers additional study needs
  • Safety evaluation through integrated datasets for estrogen/progestin class risks (e.g., thromboembolism, blood pressure effects)

What endpoints are used in COC clinical studies?

For COC lifecycle studies, endpoints typically include:

  • Pharmacokinetic parameters (Cmax, AUC)
  • Ovulation suppression surrogates
  • Cycle control metrics (breakthrough bleeding/spotting rates)
  • Safety signals class-wide

Clinical-trials update: No new late-stage, phase-shifting efficacy trials are typically tied to HAILEY 24 FE in public datasets; activity is usually BE and post-approval lifecycle work that does not change the competitive risk profile.


What clinical trials are listed for HAILEY 24 FE on ClinicalTrials.gov?

ClinicalTrials.gov record coverage requirement not satisfied. A complete clinical-trials update requires verifiable entry identifiers, dates, study phases, endpoints, recruiting status, and results. Without a retrievable set of HAILEY 24 FE-specific trial records, a definitive trials update cannot be produced to the standard required for litigation, licensing, or investment use.


What patents protect HAILEY 24 FE and how strong is the patent estate?

Patent-estate mapping requires drug product patent references and Orange Book listings tied to HAILEY 24 FE. Without the specific FDA Orange Book record for HAILEY 24 FE (application holder, listed patents, and expiration dates), a complete and accurate patent-protection assessment cannot be provided.


What is the Orange Book status of HAILEY 24 FE (application holder, listed patents, expirations)?

Orange Book status requires direct Orange Book data for HAILEY 24 FE. Without the application number(s) and listed patent entries (composition, method-of-use, and formulation where applicable), exclusivity and expiration timelines cannot be stated with accuracy.


When does HAILEY 24 FE lose exclusivity and what generic entry risks exist?

Exclusivity and generic-entry risk depend on:

  • Listed patent expirations (and any terminal disclaimers)
  • Any unexpired exclusivities (e.g., 5-year new chemical entity where applicable, 3-year new clinical investigation, 7-year orphan where relevant)
  • Whether ANDA filers have active Paragraph IV certifications

Without Orange Book and certification status data for HAILEY 24 FE, a compliant, accurate exclusivity timeline cannot be produced.


What Paragraph IV challenges involve HAILEY 24 FE and what settlements matter?

Paragraph IV and settlement mapping requires court dockets and FDA ANDA certification records linked to HAILEY 24 FE’s specific Orange Book listing. Without those record identifiers, the required “which companies are challenging” and “what is the settlement structure” fields cannot be completed.


How many FDA ANDAs exist for HAILEY 24 FE and what is the competition intensity?

A quantitative ANDA landscape requires:

  • ANDA numbers tied to the HAILEY 24 FE Orange Book entry
  • Filing dates and approval statuses
  • Market entry status for each product

This cannot be completed without the Orange Book-linked ANDA table.


How does HAILEY 24 FE compare with other norethindrone/ethinyl estradiol COCs on pricing and uptake?

Without access to a current pricing and utilization dataset for HAILEY 24 FE versus direct competitors (same ethinyl estradiol dose and norethindrone acetate dose regimens), comparative performance cannot be quantified.


What are the market drivers for HAILEY 24 FE in the US (2024-2030)?

Given the therapeutic class (COC) and typical US market mechanics, HAILEY 24 FE’s market performance is usually driven by:

  • Formulary placement (commercial and Medicaid)
  • Contracting and rebates tied to pharmacy benefit manager formularies
  • Wholesale execution (availability and inventory depth)
  • Patient persistence and switching behavior, which is sensitive to cost-share and plan design
  • Generic substitution pressure, which tends to cap sustained premium pricing

Where does demand come from?

COC demand is dominated by:

  • Continuation use in commercially insured and Medicaid populations
  • Switchers from other COCs based on tolerability and cycle control
  • Market expansion tied to demographic and insurance coverage trends rather than innovation

What are the headwinds?

  • Multiyear generic competition reduces branded share
  • PBM formulary tightening and lower net prices
  • Ongoing risk-management scrutiny around estrogen-associated adverse events affects class-wide prescribing patterns

Market projection for HAILEY 24 FE: revenue and unit outlook (2024-2035)

Quantitative projection requires baseline sales and unit estimates. Without a source dataset for HAILEY 24 FE revenue (at minimum by year), any projection would be ungrounded and cannot meet the “high-stakes” standard.


Scenario analysis: what generic launch paths could erode HAILEY 24 FE share fastest?

Even without HAILEY 24 FE-specific Orange Book timelines, generic erosion in COCs typically occurs through:

  • Faster generic entry when multiple ANDA approvals align with patent expiry windows
  • Broad NDC coverage enabling pharmacy substitution at scale
  • Aggressive rebate structures that secure formulary positions for generics

Actionable barrier analysis depends on the specific patent and exclusivity map, which cannot be supplied without Orange Book.


Key regulatory timeline questions: does HAILEY 24 FE face new FDA requirements?

COC products can face:

  • Updated labeling language based on class risk updates
  • Risk evaluation updates related to thromboembolism warnings
  • Manufacturing compliance requirements (cGMP updates, inspections)

A regulatory “timeline update” for HAILEY 24 FE requires direct FDA labeling revision history and supplement identifiers tied to the product’s ANDA/BLA or NDA entry. That record set is not available in the prompt.


Key Takeaways

  • HAILEY 24 FE is a COC lifecycle product where competitive dynamics are driven more by formulary access, supply execution, and generic pressure than by new phase-shifting clinical trials.
  • A credible clinical-trials update and patent/exclusivity timeline require HAILEY 24 FE-specific trial records and Orange Book listing data. Those record-specific inputs are not present in the provided context.
  • Market outcomes for branded COCs typically track US COC baseline trends with share erosion governed by entry timing of approved ANDAs and contracting behavior.

FAQs

  1. What are the typical bioequivalence study requirements for combined oral contraceptives like HAILEY 24 FE?
  2. How do pharmacy formulary tiers affect branded COC net pricing versus generics?
  3. What class-wide risks are included in FDA labeling for ethinyl estradiol and norethindrone acetate products?
  4. What data do PBMs use to restrict non-preferred branded oral contraceptives?
  5. How do ANDA launch timelines correlate with Orange Book patent expirations for COCs?

References

No sources were cited because HAILEY 24 FE-specific clinical-trial, Orange Book, patent, ANDA, or sales/projection inputs were not provided in the prompt.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.