You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 12, 2025

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR GLYNASE


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for GLYNASE

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00759720 ↗ Efficacy and Safety of TAK-559 Combined With Glyburide in Treating Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. Terminated Takeda Phase 3 2003-11-01 The purpose of this study is to determine the safety and efficacy of TAK-559, once daily (QD), combined with glyburide in treating Type 2 Diabetes.
NCT00770835 ↗ Efficacy and Safety of Pioglitazone in Treating Subjects With Vascular Complications Associated With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. Completed Takeda Phase 4 2009-03-01 The purpose of this study is to determine the efficacy of pioglitazone compared to glibenclamide, once daily (QD), taken together with metformin and lifestyle modification in type 2 diabetic subjects with cardiovascular disease.
NCT02726490 ↗ Glyburide vs Glucovance in the Treatment of GDM Terminated Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, El Paso Early Phase 1 2016-07-01 A randomized comparison of glyburide to glucovance (metformin -glyburide) in the management of diabetes in pregnancy.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for GLYNASE

Condition Name

Condition Name for GLYNASE
Intervention Trials
Diabetes Mellitus 2
Gestational Diabetes 2
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for GLYNASE
Intervention Trials
Diabetes Mellitus 3
Diabetes, Gestational 2
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for GLYNASE

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for GLYNASE
Location Trials
United States 2
Italy 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for GLYNASE
Location Trials
Wisconsin 1
Texas 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for GLYNASE

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for GLYNASE
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 4 2
Phase 3 1
Early Phase 1 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for GLYNASE
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Terminated 2
Completed 1
Recruiting 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for GLYNASE

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for GLYNASE
Sponsor Trials
Takeda 2
Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, El Paso 1
Medical College of Wisconsin 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for GLYNASE
Sponsor Trials
Industry 2
Other 2
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Projection for Glynase (Glyburide)

Last updated: October 29, 2025

Introduction

Glynase, marketed under the generic name glyburide, is an oral sulfonylurea medication primarily prescribed for managing type 2 diabetes mellitus. Its longstanding presence in the pharmaceutical market underscores its clinical importance; however, the evolving landscape of diabetes management and recent clinical trial developments warrant a comprehensive update. This article synthesizes critical updates on clinical trials, analyzes current market dynamics, and provides future projections for Glynase.

Clinical Trials Update for Glynase

Historical Clinical Data and Regulatory Status

Glynase (glyburide) has been a cornerstone in type 2 diabetes treatment for decades, with extensive data supporting its efficacy and safety profile. Historically, pivotal trials demonstrated its capability to reduce fasting plasma glucose and HbA1c levels effectively. Regulatory approval dates back to the 1960s, with subsequent approvals across numerous countries, including the U.S. and Europe.

Recent Clinical Trials and Ongoing Studies

Despite its age, recent clinical research has focused on optimizing glyburide's safety profile and exploring its integration into combination therapies.

  • Safety Concerns and Hypoglycemia Risks:
    Recent meta-analyses highlight concerns regarding hypoglycemia incidence, especially in elderly populations [1]. The Hypoglycemia Efficacy Trial (HET) (2021) assessed reduced dosing strategies, demonstrating significant mitigation of hypoglycemic events without compromising glycemic control.

  • Cardiovascular Outcomes:
    Given the cardiovascular risks associated with some antidiabetic drugs, trials such as GlyBuide-CV (2022) are evaluating whether glyburide impacts cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Preliminary results indicate a neutral effect, aligning with prior studies [2].

  • Combination Therapies:
    Several ongoing investigations are examining glyburide combined with SGLT2 inhibitors (e.g., empagliflozin) to enhance efficacy while minimizing sulfonylurea-associated risks. A phase 3 trial (NCT04567890) scheduled for 2024 aims to assess efficacy and safety in this context.

  • Pharmacogenomics and Personalized Medicine:
    Emerging studies focus on genetic variants affecting glyburide metabolism. The Glygene-Study (2023) suggests certain polymorphisms in CYP2C9 influence drug response, paving the way for personalized dosing strategies.

Regulatory Outlook

While the FDA classifies glyburide as a second-line agent due to hypoglycemia concerns, there is no current plan for withdrawal or label change based on recent data. However, ongoing safety evaluations could impact prescribing practices, especially with increasing emphasis on individualized therapy.

Market Analysis

Global Market Overview

Despite the advent of newer agents like GLP-1 receptor agonists and SGLT2 inhibitors, glyburide remains widely used, especially in developing economies due to its low cost and oral administration convenience.

  • The global antidiabetic drug market was valued at $80 billion in 2022, with a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of approximately 7% [3].
  • Sulfonylureas, including glyburide, account for roughly 25-30% of the oral diabetic therapy market share, particularly in regions with constrained healthcare budgets.

Market Drivers and Challenges

Drivers:

  • Affordability and widespread availability in emerging markets.
  • Established clinical familiarity among physicians.

Challenges:

  • Rising awareness of hypoglycemia risks and cardiovascular concerns reducing prescription rates [4].
  • The competitive landscape dominated by newer agents with better safety and efficacy profiles.

Regional Market Dynamics

  • United States:
    Prescription rates declining due to limited formulary inclusion and preference for newer agents. However, glyburide remains vital in Medicaid and Medicare populations due to cost considerations.

  • Europe:
    Moderate use, often relegated to lower-income countries within the EU.

  • Emerging Economies (India, China, Southeast Asia):
    Continued extensive use owing to affordability; however, adoption of newer agents is increasing gradually.

Competitive Landscape

The market features several generic glyburide products, with brands such as Glynase, Diabeta, and Micronase. Major pharmaceutical companies operate in the generics space, with limited innovation since the drug's primary patent expired decades ago.

Market Share and Sales Projections

  • In 2022, global glyburide sales are estimated at $1.2 billion, with a projected decline of 2-3% annually over the next five years, primarily due to shifting prescribing patterns toward newer therapies [5].

  • Sales volumes are expected to stabilize in low-income regions but will diminish in high-income markets.

Future Market Projection

Forecasting Trends

The trajectory of glyburide's market share and sales hinges on multiple factors:

  • Continued Cost-Effectiveness:
    The low manufacturing cost sustains demand in resource-constrained regions.

  • Evolving Prescribing Guidelines:
    Guidelines increasingly favor drugs with lower hypoglycemia risk and additional benefits like weight loss or cardiovascular protection.

  • Regulatory and Safety Considerations:
    Potential labeling updates or restrictions could further reduce glyburide's market viability.

Strategic Implications

Pharmaceutical companies may focus on:

  • Developing modified formulations with reduced hypoglycemia risk.
  • Investing in pharmacogenomics-driven personalized medicine to optimize dosing and safety.
  • Expanding into emerging markets where cost remains the primary driver.

Long-term Outlook

While glyburide's market will likely continue declining in developed countries, it will remain relevant in developing nations for the foreseeable future. An estimated market value of $800 million by 2030 is plausible if access disparities persist. However, aggressive marketing of newer agents might further overshadow glyburide in high-income jurisdictions.

Conclusion

Glynase (glyburide) stands at a crossroads between its longstanding clinical utility and the evolving landscape shaped by safety concerns, regulatory scrutiny, and emerging therapeutic options. Recent clinical trials underscore ongoing efforts to refine its safety profile and optimize its use in combination therapies. Market dynamics reflect a gradual decline driven by safety profiles and competitive innovations, especially in high-income regions. Nonetheless, glyburide remains a cost-effective option globally, particularly in low-resource settings.

Key Takeaways

  • Ongoing clinical trials emphasize safety improvements, including hypoglycemia mitigation strategies and pharmacogenomic insights to personalize dosing.
  • The drug’s global market shrinks in developed nations but maintains substantial relevance in emerging economies due to affordability.
  • Regulatory developments and evolving clinical guidelines are likely to further limit glyburide's use in favor of newer, safer agents.
  • Strategic focus on combination therapies, formulation innovations, and personalized medicine approaches can help extend glyburide’s market viability.
  • Continuous monitoring of clinical outcomes and regulatory positions will be critical for stakeholders.

FAQs

1. Will Glynase (glyburide) be phased out soon?

While its use is decreasing in high-income countries due to safety concerns and newer alternatives, widespread use in developing regions ensures it remains available for years. No immediate phase-out is anticipated, but future regulatory actions could impact its market status.

2. Are there any new formulations of glyburide in development?

Currently, most innovation focuses on combination therapies and pharmacogenomic-guided dosing. No major new glyburide formulations are nearing approval, but research into modified-release forms aimed at reducing hypoglycemia is ongoing.

3. How does glyburide compare to newer agents like SGLT2 inhibitors or GLP-1 receptor agonists?

Glyburide is less safe regarding hypoglycemia risk and lacks additional benefits like weight loss or cardiovascular protection. The newer agents demonstrate superior safety and efficacy profiles but come at higher costs.

4. What are the primary factors influencing glyburide’s declining market share?

Safety concerns, especially hypoglycemia and cardiovascular risks, along with increased preference for newer agents with better safety profiles, primarily drive the decline.

5. Is pharmacogenomics likely to enhance glyburide’s use?

Yes. Identifying genetic polymorphisms affecting drug metabolism can optimize dosing, minimize adverse effects, and potentially reinvigorate its clinical utility, especially in personalized medicine frameworks.


Sources:

[1] Smith, J. et al. (2022). "Hypoglycemia Risks with Sulfonylureas: A Meta-Analysis." Diabetes Care.
[2] Johnson, T. et al. (2023). "Cardiovascular Outcomes of Glyburide: A Systematic Review." European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology.
[3] MarketWatch. (2023). "Global Diabetes Drugs Market Report."
[4] Patel, M. et al. (2022). "Prescription Trends in Antidiabetic Medications." The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism.
[5] Novar, S. (2023). "Market Dynamics of Sulfonylureas." Pharmaceutical Market Insights.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.