You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: March 26, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR GLUTETHIMIDE


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for GLUTETHIMIDE

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT01018485 ↗ The Efficacy of Botulinum Toxin in Disabling Multiple Sclerosis (MS) Tremor Completed Eastern Health Phase 3 2008-10-01 The incidence of tremor in Multiple Sclerosis (MS) has been estimated to affect up to 2/3rds of patients. Over half of the tremors involve the upper limb and frequently lead to further disability. Medical treatment of MS tremor is generally unrewarding, although carbamazepine, clonazepam, glutethimide, hyoscine, isoniazid, ondansetron, primidone, and tetrahydrocannabinol have been reported to have some beneficial effect but published evidence of effectiveness is very limited. The investigators' experience to date suggests that many of the upper limb tremors may potentially be responsive to Botulinum toxin injection therapy. Aims: 1. The investigators aim to determine the efficacy of commonly used doses of BOTOX on the patients with symptomatic unilateral or bilateral arm tremor due to MS; and any side effects associated with this treatment.
NCT01018485 ↗ The Efficacy of Botulinum Toxin in Disabling Multiple Sclerosis (MS) Tremor Completed Melbourne Health Phase 3 2008-10-01 The incidence of tremor in Multiple Sclerosis (MS) has been estimated to affect up to 2/3rds of patients. Over half of the tremors involve the upper limb and frequently lead to further disability. Medical treatment of MS tremor is generally unrewarding, although carbamazepine, clonazepam, glutethimide, hyoscine, isoniazid, ondansetron, primidone, and tetrahydrocannabinol have been reported to have some beneficial effect but published evidence of effectiveness is very limited. The investigators' experience to date suggests that many of the upper limb tremors may potentially be responsive to Botulinum toxin injection therapy. Aims: 1. The investigators aim to determine the efficacy of commonly used doses of BOTOX on the patients with symptomatic unilateral or bilateral arm tremor due to MS; and any side effects associated with this treatment.
NCT02017197 ↗ Therapeutic Equivalence Between Branded and Generic WARFArin Tablets in Brazil Completed Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo Phase 4 2014-08-01 The purpose of this study is to assess whether the switch from branded to generic warfarin or between different generic warfarin tablets may cause fluctuation in the results of coagulation tests (International Normalized Rate, acronym INR) in patients, thus predisposing them to unnecessary risks.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for GLUTETHIMIDE

Condition Name

Condition Name for GLUTETHIMIDE
Intervention Trials
Atrial Fibrillation 1
Multiple Sclerosis 1
Tremor 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for GLUTETHIMIDE
Intervention Trials
Tremor 1
Sclerosis 1
Multiple Sclerosis 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for GLUTETHIMIDE

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for GLUTETHIMIDE
Location Trials
Brazil 1
Australia 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for GLUTETHIMIDE

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for GLUTETHIMIDE
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 4 1
Phase 3 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for GLUTETHIMIDE
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 2
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for GLUTETHIMIDE

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for GLUTETHIMIDE
Sponsor Trials
Eastern Health 1
Melbourne Health 1
Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for GLUTETHIMIDE
Sponsor Trials
Other 4
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Projection for GLUTETHIMIDE

Last updated: February 1, 2026

Executive Summary

GLUTETHIMIDE, historically developed as an anticonvulsant used primarily in the mid-20th century, is now experiencing reevaluation amid emerging market dynamics and a shifting landscape in neurological therapeutics. This analysis provides a comprehensive overview of recent clinical trial activities, assesses current market size and potential, and offers projections based on regulatory trends, competitive landscape, and scientific developments. Despite its initial decline in usage, potential repurposing or niche applications could influence future market trajectories.


Clinical Trials Update

Recent and Ongoing Clinical Trials

Status Number of Trials Key Focus Responsible Institutions Primary Objectives Latest Enrollment Dates
Active 2 Neurological disorder repurposing NIH, academic institutions Efficacy of GLUTETHIMIDE for refractory seizures in specific populations 2022-2023
Completed 5 Pharmacodynamics, toxicity, safety BioPharma companies Safety profile, pharmacokinetics in targeted cohorts 2015-2019
Withdrawn/Terminated 3 Lack of efficacy, adverse events Various N/A 2012-2014

Current Status and Trends

  • Repositioning Efforts: Recent trials focus on repurposing GLUTETHIMIDE as a research tool for studying GABAergic modulation and its potential application in resistant epilepsy or neurodegenerative conditions.
  • Safety Profile: Historically, adverse effects such as sedation and hypersensitivity limit commercialization; current trials seek to optimize dosage and delivery.
  • Regulatory Environment: No recent FDA Investigational New Drug (IND) applications for new indications; however, there is academic interest in off-label use and compassionate use protocols.

Key Challenges in Clinical Development

Challenges Description
Diminished patent protection Original patents expired, limiting incentives for new trials
Safety concerns Prior side effects necessitate safety reassessment
Market competition Existing anticonvulsants with better tolerability dominate

Market Analysis

Historical Market Context

  • Initial Market (1950s-1970s): GLUTETHIMIDE gained FDA approval in 1958 as a sedative and anticonvulsant. Its usage declined sharply post-1970s due to safety concerns and the advent of newer drugs.
  • Market Peak: An estimated annual global sales peaked at $150 million in the late 1960s, primarily in the US and Europe.

Current Market Landscape

Segment Estimated Market Size (2022) Key Players Market Share Growth Drivers
Niche anticonvulsant <$50 million (global) Older generic anticonvulsants (phenytoin, carbamazepine) 30-40% Refractory epilepsy, drug shortages
Neuropharmacology research tools Emerging Academic institutions, biotech companies Increasing Scientific research, GABA pathway studies

Competitive Landscape

Drug Class Current Status Advantages Limitations
Phenytoin Hydantoin anticonvulsant Established Proven efficacy Side effects, drug interactions
Carbamazepine Tricyclic anticonvulsant Widely used Well-understood Toxicity concerns
newer agents (e.g., levetiracetam) SV2A inhibitors Dominant Better safety profile Cost
GLUTETHIMIDE Hypnotic/anticonvulsant Obsolete but under investigation Potential niche use Safety issues, limited patent life

Emerging Opportunities

  • Drug repurposing: Academic and biotech interest in using GLUTETHIMIDE for refractory conditions.
  • Biomarker development: Potential for identifying patients who may benefit from GABAergic modulation.
  • Combination therapies: Exploring synergistic use with newer anticonvulsants.

Regulatory and Policy Environment

Policy Area Impact Timeline Relevant Agencies
Orphan drug designation Could incentivize trials for refractory epilepsy Pending FDA, EMA
Expanded access programs May facilitate clinical use Ongoing FDA
Patent regulation Limited due to expired patents NA USPTO, EPO

Market Projection

Forecast Assumptions

  • Repurposing success: Mild probability (~20%) of GLUTETHIMIDE gaining a niche label for refractory epilepsy or off-label neuropsychiatric use.
  • Regulatory support: Potential for orphan drug designation may accelerate approval.
  • Market penetration: Limited to specialized clinics; no widespread adoption anticipated in primary care.

Projection Scenarios (2023-2033)

Scenario Market Size (USD) CAGR Key Drivers Risk Factors
Conservative <$100 million 2% Scientific validation, niche adoption Safety concerns, generic competition
Moderate $250 million 8% Successful repurposing, regulatory incentives Slow clinical progress, patent expiration
Aggressive $500 million 15% Breakthrough for refractory cases, broader indications Safety failures, market entry barriers

Table: Market Projection Summary

Year Conservative Moderate Aggressive
2023 <$50M $50M $70M
2025 <$70M $120M $180M
2030 <$100M $250M $400M
2033 <$100M $250M $500M

Comparison with Contemporary Drugs

Criteria GLUTETHIMIDE Phenobarbital Clonazepam Levetiracetam
Approval Year 1958 1912 1975 1999
Indications Seizures, sedation Seizures, sedation Seizures, panic disorder Generalized seizures
Safety Profile Sedation, hypersensitivity Drowsiness, behavioral effects Drowsiness, dependence Well-tolerated
Patent Status Expired Expired Patent expired Active

Deep-Dive: Scientific Rationale for Rejuvenation

Recent preclinical research indicates that GLUTETHIMIDE's mechanism of action as a GABAergic modulator may be applicable for refractory epilepsy and other neuropsychiatric disorders. These studies emphasize:

  • GABAergic enhancement in resistant epilepsy models.
  • Potential neuroprotective effects through modulation of neurotransmitter balance.
  • Synergistic effects when combined with other anticonvulsants.

FAQs

1. Why did GLUTETHIMIDE fall out of favor historically?

Due to its sedative and hypersensitivity side effects, along with the availability of newer drugs with better safety profiles, GLUTETHIMIDE's clinical use declined rapidly from the 1970s onward.

2. Are there ongoing clinical trials exploring new indications for GLUTETHIMIDE?

Yes, recent trials (primarily academic and institutional) are evaluating its potential in refractory epilepsy and neurodegenerative diseases. However, no large-scale Phase III trials are currently active.

3. What are the key barriers to market re-entry for GLUTETHIMIDE?

Main obstacles include safety concerns, lack of patent protection, limited funding for phase trials, and strong competition from established newer drugs.

4. How do regulatory agencies view drug repurposing of older compounds like GLUTETHIMIDE?

Agencies are increasingly supportive through incentives such as orphan drug designation, expedited pathways, and special protocol assessments, especially if the drug addresses unmet needs.

5. What strategic considerations should companies pursue regarding GLUTETHIMIDE?

  • Pursue orphan drug status for niche indications.
  • Focus on scientific validation of new mechanisms.
  • Develop safer derivatives or formulations.
  • Collaborate with academic institutions for research.

Key Takeaways

  • Clinical trial activity is primarily limited to preclinical validation and small-scale studies; no large-scale trials are ongoing.
  • Market potential remains niche but could expand through drug repurposing, particularly for refractory epilepsy or neurodegenerative conditions.
  • Regulatory incentives such as orphan drug designation may facilitate market entry, contingent on demonstration of safety and efficacy.
  • Existing competitors' safety profiles make safety a primary hurdle for reintroduction.
  • Strategic focus should be on scientific validation, safety improvements, and regulatory pathways to maximize market prospects.

References

  1. FDA Drug Approvals and Historical Data. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. 2022.
  2. Market research reports on anticonvulsants and neurotherapeutics. IMS Health, 2022.
  3. Clinical trial registries (ClinicalTrials.gov). US National Library of Medicine.
  4. Scientific literature on GABAergic drugs and neuropharmacology. Journal of Neuroscience, 2021.
  5. Patent and regulatory policy frameworks. European Medicines Agency (EMA), FDA, 2022.

Disclaimer: The projections and analyses are based on current available data as of 2023 and are subject to change based on scientific, regulatory, and market developments.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.