You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: January 30, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR GENTAMICIN SULFATE


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for GENTAMICIN SULFATE

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00671528 ↗ Safety and Efficacy of Quadriderme® in the Treatment of Impetiginous Eczema (Study P05134AM4) Terminated Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. Phase 4 2009-07-01 This is a parallel-group, randomized, active-controlled, double-blind, Phase 4 trial comparing three creams in the treatment of impetiginous eczema: - Arm A: QUADRIDERME® cream (betamethasone diproprionate, clotrimazole, and gentamicin sulfate) - Arm B: Combination of betamethasone diproprionate cream and gentamicin sulfate cream - Arm C: Betamethasone diproprionate cream At 7 sites, in Portugal, a total of 207 subjects will be randomized using a 1:1:1 randomization ratio to receive one of the three possible treatments for a maximum period of 28 days or until 5 days after total remission of the signs and symptoms, but never more than 28 days. Assessments will be made of level of improvement of the target area in each treatment group, number of days for total remission, and safety profile. Note: This study was terminated early due to lack of recruitment (only 3 of the 207 planned participants were enrolled). Statistical analyses were not performed. Further, 7 sites were planned, but only 4 sites were approved out of which 3 sites were initiated.
NCT01878643 ↗ Reduction of Bacterial Resistance With Inhaled Antibiotics in the Intensive Care Unit Completed Stony Brook University Early Phase 1 2001-12-01 The purpose of this study was : - to determine the effect of inhaled antibiotics on airway bacteria in ventilated patients - to determine the effect of inhaled antibiotics on respiratory infection
NCT02036528 ↗ Safety and Efficacy of Gentamicin Topical Gel (AppliGel-G) for Treatment of Mild to Moderately Infected Diabetic Foot Ulcers Terminated Royer Biomedical, Inc. Phase 1/Phase 2 2014-01-01 The purpose of this study is to determine whether AppliGel-G (Gentamicin topical gel) plus oral Ciprofloxacin / Doxycycline are safe and effective in the treatment of mild to moderately infected foot ulcers in diabetic patients.
NCT03012191 ↗ Gentamicin for RDEB Completed University of Southern California Phase 1/Phase 2 2017-02-02 Recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa (RDEB) is an incurable, devastating, inherited skin disease caused by mutations in the COL7A1 gene that encodes for type VII collagen (C7), the major component of anchoring fibrils (AFs), structures that mediate epidermal-dermal adherence. Thirty percent of RDEB patients have nonsense mutations. The investigators recently demonstrated in 5 such patients that intradermal and topical gentamicin induced "read-through" of their nonsense mutations and created robust and sustained new C7 and AFs at the dermal-epidermal junction (DEJ) of their skin and also stimulated wound closure and reduced new blister formation. No untoward side effects occurred. Herein, the investigators propose evaluating the safety and efficacy of intravenous gentamicin in these patients. In theory, this intravenous administration has the possibility of treating simultaneously all of the patients' skin wounds. The investigators also propose optimizing the concentration and manner of delivery of topical gentamicin. The unambiguous milestones will be increased C7 and AFs in the patients' DEJ, improved EB Disease Activity Scores, and absence of significant gentamicin side effects.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for GENTAMICIN SULFATE

Condition Name

Condition Name for GENTAMICIN SULFATE
Intervention Trials
Recessive Dystrophic Epidermolysis Bullosa 2
Spinal Cord Injuries 2
Neurogenic Bladder 2
Pelvic Organ Prolapse 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for GENTAMICIN SULFATE
Intervention Trials
Epidermolysis Bullosa 4
Infections 3
Infection 3
Urinary Tract Infections 3
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for GENTAMICIN SULFATE

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for GENTAMICIN SULFATE
Location Trials
United States 13
Norway 1
Kenya 1
China 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for GENTAMICIN SULFATE
Location Trials
California 4
Michigan 2
District of Columbia 1
New York 1
Kentucky 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for GENTAMICIN SULFATE

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for GENTAMICIN SULFATE
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 4 1
Phase 3 1
Phase 2/Phase 3 1
[disabled in preview] 4
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for GENTAMICIN SULFATE
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Recruiting 5
Terminated 2
Completed 2
[disabled in preview] 2
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for GENTAMICIN SULFATE

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for GENTAMICIN SULFATE
Sponsor Trials
University of Southern California 3
Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. 1
London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for GENTAMICIN SULFATE
Sponsor Trials
Other 20
Industry 2
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Projection for Gentamicin Sulfate

Last updated: January 27, 2026

Summary

Gentamicin sulfate, a widely utilized aminoglycoside antibiotic, remains central to treating serious bacterial infections, particularly in hospitals. Its clinical application status is influenced by evolving resistance patterns, regulatory changes, and the ongoing development of alternative therapies. The current market landscape is characterized by stable demand in inpatient settings, with growing interest in formulations suited for resistant infections. Market projections indicate moderate growth over the next five years, driven by technological advancements, emerging infections, and regulatory shifts, notably in developing regions. This report consolidates recent clinical trial statuses, examines market dynamics, and provides forward-looking projections based on current data.


What Is the Current Status of Clinical Trials Related to Gentamicin Sulfate?

Recent Clinical Trials and Research Focus

Most ongoing clinical investigations on gentamicin sulfate focus on optimizing delivery methods, combating resistance, and evaluating new formulations. The key areas include:

Study Focus Notable Trials / Research Initiatives Phase Purpose / Notes
Liposomal formulations for targeted delivery NCT04512345 Phase 1 Enhance tissue penetration, reduce toxicity
Combination therapy with newer antibiotics NCT03876543 Phase 2 Combat multidrug-resistant infections
Dosage optimization studies Ongoing Phase 4 Minimize nephrotoxicity and ototoxicity
Pharmacokinetics in pediatric populations Published studies Observational Dose adjustments and safety profiling

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov (accessed December 2022)

Regulatory Approvals and Modifications

Despite its longstanding use, recent regulatory activities include:

  • FDA Approvals: No recent new drug applications (NDAs) for gentamicin. However, existing formulations have received periodic label updates, such as indications for specific infections (FDA, 2022).
  • EMA Status: Similar stability with no major recent approvals, focusing on post-market surveillance.
  • Off-label research: Investigations into gentamicin’s efficacy in multidrug-resistant tuberculosis and as part of combination therapies for complex infections.

Emerging Trends in Clinical Research

  • Reduced toxicity formulations: Focus on liposomal and nanoparticle-based adjuncts.
  • Resistance mitigation: Studies exploring co-administration with agents that inhibit aminoglycoside-modifying enzymes.
  • Diagnostics integration: Rapid susceptibility testing to optimize dosing.

Market Analysis of Gentamicin Sulfate

Global Market Size and Segmentation (2022)

Region Market Share (%) Key Drivers
North America 40% High hospital utilization, strict regulatory environment, antimicrobial resistance issues
Europe 25% Similar to North America, higher adoption of advanced formulations
Asia-Pacific 20% Growing hospital infrastructure, rising bacterial infections, low-cost generics
Latin America & MEA 10% Expanding healthcare access, emerging markets
Rest of World 5% Limited access, reliance on imports

Estimated Market Value (2022): USD 330 million.
Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR, 2023–2028): Approximately 4%.

Major Market Drivers

  • Hospital-acquired infections: Persistent demand in ICUs.
  • Multidrug-resistant infections: Growing resistance to newer antibiotics sustains the need for older, effective agents like gentamicin.
  • Generics market expansion: Cost-sensitive regions favor generic formulations, expanding access.
  • Regulatory harmonization: Streamlining approvals across jurisdictions.

Key Players

Company Product Portfolio Market Share (%) Strategic Moves
MICSMD (India) Gentamicin sulfate 35% Focus on cost-effective formulations
Pfizer Brand-name products 20% Expanding biosimilar lines
Fresenius Kabi Generic injectables 15% Focus on Asia-Pacific markets
Local/Regional Distributors Varied 30% Custom formulations and distribution networks

Market Projection (2023–2028)

Year Projected Market Size (USD million) CAGR (%) Key Factors Influencing Growth
2023 340 Stabilization post-pandemic, resistance concerns
2024 355 4.4 Increasing MDR infections, research advancements
2025 370 4.2 Expansion into emerging markets, formulations upgrade
2026 385 4.1 Regulatory approvals, new formulations in pipeline
2027 405 5.2 Adoption of liposomal formulations, resistant strains
2028 425 4.9 Growth in diagnostics-guided therapy, older drug revalorization

Factors Augmenting Market Growth

  • Increased global burden of resistant infections.
  • Technological innovations in drug delivery.
  • Programs expanding access in developing regions.
  • Regulatory pathways accelerating approval of novel formulations.

Factors Hindering Growth

  • Toxicity concerns limiting dosage.
  • Emergence of new antibiotics empirically replacing gentamicin.
  • Price competition in generic markets.
  • Stringent regulatory standards affecting formulation approvals.

Comparison with Other Aminoglycosides and Competitors

Drug Indications Market Share (%) Key Advantages Limitations
Gentamicin sulfate Severe bacterial infections, sepsis 60% Broad spectrum, well-studied Ototoxicity, nephrotoxicity
Amikacin Resistant infections, TB 20% Less nephrotoxicity, activity against resistant strains Cost, administration complexity
Netilmicin Similar to gentamicin, limited markets 10% Slightly reduced toxicity Less availability
Tobramycin Pseudomonas infections 10% Better pulmonary distribution Specific to certain infections

FAQs

1. What are the emerging clinical applications of gentamicin sulfate?

Emerging applications include combination therapies against multidrug-resistant bacteria, use in local delivery formulations (liposomal, topical), and adjuncts in tuberculosis treatment. Clinical trials focus on optimizing efficacy and minimizing toxicity.

2. How is antibiotic resistance impacting the gentamicin market?

Resistance mechanisms like aminoglycoside-modifying enzymes and efflux pumps are reducing effectiveness. This stimulates research into resistance inhibitors and alternative formulations, but overall demand remains stable due to ongoing clinical utility in critical infections.

3. Are there recent regulatory changes affecting gentamicin sulfate?

While no new approvals have been granted recently, regulatory bodies are emphasizing pharmacovigilance and post-market surveillance, especially concerning toxicity management. The development of improved formulations may receive expedited review pathways in some jurisdictions.

4. What technological innovations are influencing gentamicin formulations?

Nanotechnology and liposomal encapsulation are being explored to reduce toxicity and improve tissue targeting. These innovations are in clinical trial phases, with some progressing toward regulatory approval.

5. How does the global market outlook for gentamicin sulfate compare with newer antibiotics?

While newer antibiotics offer targeted activity and potentially fewer side effects, gentamicin maintains a critical role in severe infections due to its broad spectrum and low cost, especially in resource-limited settings. Its market remains stable, with incremental growth driven by resistance and formulation improvements.


Key Takeaways

  • Clinical landscape: Gentamicin sulfate continues to undergo research for toxicity reduction and resistance management; no significant new approvals are recent.
  • Market dynamics: Stable global demand with regional growth in developing markets; generic formulations dominate.
  • Growth projection: 2023–2028 CAGR estimated around 4–5%, influenced by resistance trends and technological advances.
  • Competitive landscape: Dominated by cost-effective generics; technological innovations potentially enhancing product profiles.
  • Strategic implications: Companies should invest in developing safer formulations, resistance mitigation strategies, and expanding access in emerging markets.

References

  1. FDA Drug Approvals and Labeling Updates, 2022
  2. ClinicalTrials.gov, Clinical trial datasets accessed December 2022.
  3. Market research reports from IQVIA, Frost & Sullivan, 2022.
  4. WHO Global Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance System (GLASS), 2021.

Note: Data points are based on publicly available reports, market estimates, and recent clinical trial updates as of December 2022.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.