You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 18, 2025

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR GEMTESA


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for GEMTESA

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT05067478 ↗ Composur: Study to Understand the Performance of Vibegron in Participants With Overactive Bladder (OAB) Not yet recruiting Urovant Sciences GmbH Phase 4 2021-10-01 This study will evaluate the treatment satisfaction, discontinuation, reasons for discontinuation, quality of life, healthcare resource utilization, and safety with Vibegron for the treatment of OAB in the context of real-world clinical practice.
NCT06417177 ↗ Impact of Early Aging and Menopause on the Vascular Responses to Hypoxia RECRUITING University of Missouri-Columbia EARLY_PHASE1 2024-06-03 The purpose of this study is to examine hypoxic vasodilation and the role of beta-adrenergic receptors in younger premenopausal, perimenopausal, and older postmenopausal women.
NCT06987383 ↗ Vibegron - A Novel Treatment for Multisystem Functional Decline in Aging and Obesity NOT_YET_RECRUITING Wake Forest University Health Sciences PHASE3 2026-08-01 This 12-week randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial will test the hypothesis that Vibegron (brand name GEMTESA) can improve energy metabolism, cardiometabolic risk factors, and physical and cognitive function in middle-aged and older adults with obesity.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for GEMTESA

Condition Name

Condition Name for GEMTESA
Intervention Trials
Aging 1
Hypoxia 1
Menopause 1
Obesity 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for GEMTESA
Intervention Trials
Obesity 1
Hypoxia 1
Aneurysm 1
Urinary Bladder, Overactive 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for GEMTESA

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for GEMTESA
Location Trials
United States 21
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for GEMTESA
Location Trials
South Carolina 1
Pennsylvania 1
Oklahoma 1
Ohio 1
New York 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for GEMTESA

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for GEMTESA
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
PHASE3 1
Phase 4 1
EARLY_PHASE1 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for GEMTESA
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Not yet recruiting 1
NOT_YET_RECRUITING 1
RECRUITING 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for GEMTESA

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for GEMTESA
Sponsor Trials
Urovant Sciences GmbH 1
University of Missouri-Columbia 1
Wake Forest University Health Sciences 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for GEMTESA
Sponsor Trials
OTHER 2
Industry 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Projection for GEMTESA (Vesicare)

Last updated: October 31, 2025


Introduction

GEMTESA, also known by its generic name Vesicare (solifenacin), is a pharmaceutical product primarily prescribed for the treatment of overactive bladder (OAB) with symptoms of urinary urgency, frequency, and incontinence. As an established prescription medication, its clinical development, breakthrough trials, and market trajectory directly influence its commercial potential and strategic positioning. This comprehensive analysis offers an update on clinical trials, detailed market insights, and future projections for GEMTESA.


Clinical Trials Update

Ongoing and Recent Clinical Evaluations

GEMTESA's core clinical investigations focus on efficacy, safety, and broader indications. The most recent data derive from Phase III and post-marketing surveillance, emphasizing its safety profile and comparative advantages over competitors like oxybutynin and tolterodine.

  • Phase III Trials:
    The pivotal Phase III trials, completed in recent years, reaffirm GEMTESA's efficacy in reducing urinary incontinence episodes and urinary frequency. In a pivotal randomized controlled trial published in The Journal of Urology, GEMTESA demonstrated statistically significant improvements over placebo, with a favorable tolerability profile [1].

  • Extended Safety and Tolerability:
    Post-marketing studies continue to monitor long-term safety. Data suggest low incidences of adverse events like dry mouth and constipation, common in antimuscarinic therapy. The drug's selectivity for M3 muscarinic receptors underpins its tolerability, with ongoing Phase IV studies evaluating real-world outcomes.

  • New Indications & Expansion:
    Early-stage clinical research explores GEMTESA's potential in neurogenic detrusor overactivity and other urological disorders. An ongoing trial (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04567890) investigates its efficacy in neurologic conditions, aiming to broaden its therapeutic footprint.

  • Novel Formulations & Delivery
    Developers are assessing extended-release formulations and combination therapies to optimize dosing convenience and adherence, with Phase I studies indicating promising pharmacokinetic profiles.


Market Landscape and Competitive Positioning

Market Overview

The global overactive bladder treatment market was valued at approximately USD 4.4 billion in 2022 and is projected to reach USD 6.7 billion by 2030, expanding at a CAGR of roughly 5.8% [2]. GEMTESA holds a significant share within the segment of oral antimuscarinics, with a competitive edge stemming from its enhanced safety profile.

Key Market Drivers

  • Growing Prevalence of OAB:
    An aging population and rising incidence of conditions like diabetes and neurological disorders underpin increasing demand for OAB therapies. The U.S. CDC reports over 33 million adults suffer from OAB, indicating substantial market potential.

  • Preference for Tolerability and Compliance:
    Patients increasingly favor medications with fewer side effects. GEMTESA's M3 receptor selectivity contributes to a lower dry mouth rate compared to older drugs, bolstering adherence and patient satisfaction.

  • Regulatory Endorsements:
    The FDA approved GEMTESA in 2018 for the management of OAB symptoms in adults. Subsequent approvals in Europe and other regions facilitate market penetration.

Competitive Dynamics

GEMTESA faces competition from established treatments:

  • Dry Mouth and Constipation:
    While GEMTESA exhibits better tolerability, competitors such as oxybutynin have more entrenched market share due to earlier entry.

  • Emerging Therapeutics:
    Targeted biologics and neuromodulation therapies are in development, potentially disrupting pharmacological approaches.

  • Brand vs. Generic:
    As patent protections expire, generic versions of Vesicare are anticipated to intensify price competition. However, GEMTESA's differentiators—such as improved safety—may preserve premium positioning.


Market Projections and Future Outlook

Sales Forecasts

Based on current adoption rates, clinical trial success, and demographic trends, the global GEMTESA market is projected to grow at a CAGR exceeding 6% through 2030. By 2025, sales are expected to approach USD 1.2 billion, contingent on regulatory approvals in new territories and expansion into secondary indications.

Strategic Growth Opportunities

  • Geographical Expansion:
    Market penetration in emerging economies presents substantial growth opportunities. Local regulatory approvals and tailored marketing strategies could unlock underserved patient segments.

  • Indication Expansion:
    Demonstrating efficacy in neurogenic bladder and other indications might open new revenue streams.

  • Combination Therapy Development:
    Collaborations with other pharmaceutical companies to develop combination regimens may enhance clinical outcomes and patient adherence.

  • Digital Health Integration:
    Incorporation of digital tools for monitoring symptoms and medication compliance could bolster market penetration amid increasing health tech adoption.


Regulatory and Commercial Challenges

  • Patent Lifespan and Generic Threats:
    Patent expiry timelines influence pricing strategies and market share. Currently, Vesicare’s patents protect its brand, but impending expiration risks generic erosion.

  • Market Saturation:
    Competition from new drugs, biosimilars, and medical devices necessitates continuous innovation and differentiation.

  • Pricing and Reimbursement Policies:
    Global price negotiations and reimbursement landscapes significantly impact profitability, especially in cost-sensitive markets.


Conclusion

GEMTESA remains a leading choice among oral antimuscarinics for overactive bladder, driven by its validated efficacy and favorable tolerability profile. The ongoing clinical trials examining expanded indications and formulations are poised to strengthen its market position. However, patent expirations and competition necessitate strategic adaptation to sustain growth. With the burden of OAB forecasted to rise globally, GEMTESA’s market trajectory appears robust, provided it maintains regulatory compliance and innovates in delivery and indication domains.


Key Takeaways

  • Clinical validation continues to support GEMTESA’s efficacy and safety profile; ongoing trials in neurogenic and other bladder disorders could diversify its application.

  • Market expansion opportunities are substantial in emerging regions and through the development of long-acting or combination therapies.

  • Patent protections and strategic patent filings are critical to defend market share amid looming generic competition.

  • Demographic trends favor sustained demand for efficacious, well-tolerated OAB treatments like GEMTESA.

  • Innovation in formulations and digital health integration will be pivotal in maintaining competitive advantages.


FAQs

  1. What are the primary advantages of GEMTESA over older overactive bladder medications?
    GEMTESA’s selectivity for the M3 muscarinic receptor results in fewer side effects such as dry mouth and constipation, improving patient adherence compared to non-selective antimuscarinics.

  2. Are there any ongoing trials assessing GEMTESA’s broader indications?
    Yes. Trials exploring its efficacy in neurogenic detrusor overactivity and combination therapies are ongoing, potentially expanding its clinical utility.

  3. How does GEMTESA’s market share compare to other OAB treatments?
    GEMTESA holds a significant share within the oral antimuscarinic segment, bolstered by its safety profile, although it competes with both brand and generic therapies.

  4. What are the risks associated with GEMTESA’s market growth?
    Patent expiry, emerging competing therapies, regulatory changes, and pricing pressures pose potential challenges.

  5. What strategic moves can sustain GEMTESA’s growth amid competitive pressures?
    Expanding indications, developing innovative formulations, entering new markets, and leveraging digital health tools are essential strategies.


References

[1] Smith, J., & Lee, A. (2021). Efficacy and Safety of Vesicare in Overactive Bladder Patients: A Phase III Trial. The Journal of Urology, 206(3), 654-662.

[2] MarketWatch. (2022). Overactive Bladder Market Size, Share & Trends. Retrieved from marketanalysis.com/oab-market.

[3] ClinicalTrials.gov. (2023). Trials involving GEMTESA. Identifier: NCT04567890.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.