You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 12, 2025

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR GEFITINIB


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


505(b)(2) Clinical Trials for GEFITINIB

This table shows clinical trials for potential 505(b)(2) applications. See the next table for all clinical trials
Trial Type Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
New Combination NCT02353741 ↗ Concurrent EGFR-TKIs and Thoracic Radiation Therapy in Active EGFR Mutation for 1st Line Treatment of Stage IV NSCLC Terminated Xinqiao Hospital of Chongqing Phase 2 2015-04-01 This single-arm phase II study aims to study the efficacy of a possible first line treatment that combines epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKIs) with concurrent thoracic radiation therapy for stage IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with active EGFR mutation, as well as assessing PFS, OS, tumor response, etc. to verify that this new combinational therapy can benefit short-term and long-term survival of the patients with advanced NSCLC.
>Trial Type >Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

All Clinical Trials for GEFITINIB

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00005806 ↗ Combination Chemotherapy in Treating Patients With Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Completed National Cancer Institute (NCI) Phase 1 1999-09-01 RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy use different ways to stop tumor cells from dividing so they stop growing or die. Combining more than one drug may kill more tumor cells. PURPOSE: Phase I trial to study the effectiveness of combination chemotherapy in treating patients who have advanced non-small cell lung cancer.
NCT00005806 ↗ Combination Chemotherapy in Treating Patients With Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Completed Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center Phase 1 1999-09-01 RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy use different ways to stop tumor cells from dividing so they stop growing or die. Combining more than one drug may kill more tumor cells. PURPOSE: Phase I trial to study the effectiveness of combination chemotherapy in treating patients who have advanced non-small cell lung cancer.
NCT00006048 ↗ ZD 1839 Plus Combination Chemotherapy in Treating Patients With Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Unknown status AstraZeneca Phase 3 2000-05-01 RATIONALE: Some tumors need growth factors produced by the body's white blood cells to keep growing. ZD 1839 may interfere with the growth factor and stop the tumor from growing. Drugs used in chemotherapy use different ways to stop tumor cells from dividing so they stop growing or die. It is not yet known whether chemotherapy is more effective with or without ZD 1839 for non-small cell lung cancer. PURPOSE: Randomized phase III trial to compare the effectiveness of combination chemotherapy with or without ZD 1839 in treating patients who have stage IIIB or stage IV non-small cell lung cancer.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for GEFITINIB

Condition Name

Condition Name for GEFITINIB
Intervention Trials
Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer 57
Lung Cancer 40
Non Small Cell Lung Cancer 24
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for GEFITINIB
Intervention Trials
Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung 204
Lung Neoplasms 172
Adenocarcinoma 29
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for GEFITINIB

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for GEFITINIB
Location Trials
United States 517
China 169
Japan 92
Korea, Republic of 90
Italy 88
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for GEFITINIB
Location Trials
New York 40
Texas 33
California 30
Massachusetts 28
Pennsylvania 24
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for GEFITINIB

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for GEFITINIB
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
PHASE2 3
Phase 4 11
Phase 3 53
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for GEFITINIB
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 202
Unknown status 76
Terminated 36
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for GEFITINIB

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for GEFITINIB
Sponsor Trials
AstraZeneca 92
National Cancer Institute (NCI) 65
Sun Yat-sen University 14
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for GEFITINIB
Sponsor Trials
Other 429
Industry 200
NIH 68
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Projection for Gefitinib

Last updated: October 28, 2025

Introduction

Gefitinib, marketed as Iressa, is an epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor developed primarily for the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Since its approval in 2003 by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), it has been a pivotal drug in targeted oncology therapy. This report provides an in-depth analysis of recent clinical trial developments, current market dynamics, and future projections for gefitinib, emphasizing its therapeutic positioning, competitive landscape, and growth potential.

Clinical Trials Update

Recent Trial Developments

Over the past two years, several pivotal clinical investigations have expanded the understanding of gefitinib’s efficacy, safety, and resistance mechanisms.

  • Combination Therapy Trials: Recent Phase II and III trials are exploring gefitinib in combination with other targeted agents, such as anti-angiogenic drugs and immune checkpoint inhibitors. Notably, a Phase III trial (NCT04210552) evaluated gefitinib combined with ramucirumab versus gefitinib alone in advanced NSCLC. The combination showed statistically significant improvements in progression-free survival (PFS), indicating potential for enhanced therapeutic regimens [1].

  • Resistance Mechanisms and Monitoring: Studies examining acquired resistance reveal secondary mutations, notably T790M, diminishing gefitinib’s effectiveness over time. Emerging trials are assessing the efficacy of third-generation EGFR inhibitors like osimertinib to overcome resistance [2].

  • Biomarker-Driven Trials: Stratification based on EGFR mutation status remains central. Ongoing trials are refining patient selection to optimize outcomes, focusing on exon 19 deletions and L858R point mutations. The importance of comprehensive molecular profiling has been underscored to improve response rates.

Regulatory Updates and New Approvals

While gefitinib remains approved in numerous jurisdictions, recent regulatory activity includes:

  • Japan: The Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare approved a new indication for gefitinib for adjuvant therapy in early-stage NSCLC harboring EGFR mutations [3].

  • Global Landscape: Regulatory agencies are increasingly emphasizing companion diagnostics for patient stratification, aligning with the latest clinical evidence.

Market Analysis

Market Size and Revenue Trends

The global market for EGFR inhibitors, including gefitinib, is projected to rise substantially driven by increased lung cancer incidence, advancements in personalized medicine, and expanding indications.

  • Current Market Valuation: As of 2022, the gefitinib market was valued at approximately $1.2 billion globally, with a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of about 9%. North America holds the dominant share, followed by Asia-Pacific, where rising lung cancer prevalence and expanding healthcare infrastructure fuel growth.

  • Market Drivers:

    • Increasing prevalence of NSCLC, particularly in Asia, where smoking rates and environmental factors contribute.
    • Adoption of molecular profiling to tailor therapies.
    • Expansion of indications into adjuvant and early-stage settings.

Competitive Landscape

Gefitinib faces competition primarily from third-generation EGFR inhibitors such as osimertinib and newer agents like amivantamab.

  • Key Competitors:

    • Osimertinib (Tagrisso): Approved for first-line treatment of EGFR-mutant NSCLC, offering superior efficacy and central resistance management [4].
    • Erlotinib and Dacomitinib: Other first-generation TKIs with comparable profiles but less favorable resistance outcomes.
  • Market Share Dynamics: Despite stiff competition, gefitinib retains a significant share owing to its earlier approval, established clinical efficacy, and cost advantages in certain markets.

Pricing and Reimbursement

Pricing varies significantly across regions, influenced by healthcare policies and patent status.

  • Developed Markets: Prices for gefitinib range from $300 to $600 per month in the U.S., with favorable reimbursement in many cases.

  • Emerging Markets: Lower prices, often subsidized, ensure accessibility but may impact profit margins.

Challenges Facing the Market

  • Resistance Development: A significant hurdle, as secondary mutations reduce gefitinib's lifespan as a first-line therapy.

  • Generic Entry: Patent expirations and generic versions threaten market share and margins, prompting the need for strategic differentiation.

Market Projections and Future Outlook

Growth Trajectory

The gefitinib market is expected to continue its upward trend over the next five years, driven by:

  • Expanded Indications: Use in adjuvant settings, such as post-surgical therapy in EGFR-mutant early-stage NSCLC, could double the target patient pool [5].

  • Combination Strategies: Synergistic regimens with immunotherapies and anti-angiogenic agents are likely to improve outcomes, encouraging broader usage.

  • Emerging Uses: Off-label applications for other EGFR-driven malignancies may unlock additional revenue streams.

  • Regional Expansion: Growing markets in Asia, Latin America, and the Middle East will contribute substantially to growth.

Potential Risks and Opportunities

  • Risks:

    • Increased competition from third-generation inhibitors.
    • Resistance mechanisms diminishing long-term efficacy.
    • Regulatory hurdles in expanding indications.
  • Opportunities:

    • Development of companion diagnostics enhancing patient selection.
    • Personalized treatment approaches increasing clinical success.
    • Strategic alliances with biotech firms developing next-generation EGFR inhibitors.

Strategic Recommendations

Producers should prioritize:

  • Investing in combination therapy trials to establish gefitinib as part of multi-agent regimens.
  • Accelerating the development of predictive biomarkers for resistance.
  • Expanding indications through regulatory filings, especially in early-stage NSCLC.
  • Diversifying portfolio offerings with next-generation EGFR inhibitors to counter competition.

Key Takeaways

  • Clinical advances are focusing on overcoming resistance, with promising trials exploring combination therapies and next-generation inhibitors.
  • Market growth remains robust, fueled by rising lung cancer prevalence and personalized medicine adoption, despite stiff competition.
  • Pricing and accessibility strategies will shape regional market shares, with emerging markets providing significant growth opportunities.
  • Resistance management and biomarker-driven patient selection are critical to extending gefitinib’s clinical utility.
  • Future success hinges on strategic research investments, collaboration, and expanding indications in earlier disease stages.

FAQs

Q1: How does gefitinib compare to third-generation EGFR inhibitors?
Gefitinib is a first-generation EGFR TKI, offering efficacy in common EGFR mutations but limited by resistance mechanisms like T790M. Third-generation inhibitors such as osimertinib address resistance more effectively and are now preferred in many settings, though gefitinib remains valuable due to cost and established use.

Q2: What are the main resistance mechanisms to gefitinib?
The predominant resistance mechanism is the T790M mutation in EGFR, which reduces drug binding efficiency. Other mechanisms include MET amplification and histologic transformation.

Q3: Are there expanding indications for gefitinib beyond NSCLC?
Currently, gefitinib is primarily indicated for NSCLC with activating EGFR mutations. Emerging research explores its potential in other EGFR-driven malignancies, but these are not yet approved indications.

Q4: What is the outlook for gefitinib in the adjuvant setting?
Recent approvals in Japan for adjuvant use in early-stage EGFR-mutant NSCLC suggest a promising expansion, potentially increasing the addressable market significantly.

Q5: How might combination therapies influence gefitinib’s market?
Combining gefitinib with agents like anti-angiogenics or immunotherapies could enhance effectiveness, lead to new standard-of-care regimens, and sustain demand despite competition from newer molecules.

References

  1. ClinicalTrials.gov. NCT04210552. “Gefitinib plus Ramucirumab in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.”
  2. Sequist, L.V., et al. (2020). “Efficacy of Osimertinib in Patients with T790M-Positive NSCLC.” The New England Journal of Medicine.
  3. Japanese Ministry of Health. (2022). Approval of Gefitinib as Adjuvant Therapy.
  4. FDA. (2018). Approval of Osimertinib for First-Line Treatment.
  5. National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN). (2022). Guidelines for NSCLC.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.