You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: March 26, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR GABAPENTIN ENACARBIL


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for GABAPENTIN ENACARBIL

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00311363 ↗ Long-Term Study of Gabapentin Enacarbil (GEn, XP13512) vs. Placebo in Patients With Restless Legs Syndrome. Completed XenoPort, Inc. Phase 3 2006-04-01 The primary objective of this trial is to assess the maintenance of efficacy of gabapentin enacarbil (GEn, XP13512) taken once daily in the long-term treatment of patients suffering from Restless Legs Syndrome (RLS).
NCT00333359 ↗ XP13512 (Gabapentin Enacarbil) Extension Study in Patients With Restless Legs Syndrome. Completed XenoPort, Inc. Phase 3 2006-06-01 The primary objective of this trial is to assess the long-term safety and efficacy of XP13512 (Gabapentin Enacarbil) taken once daily for the treatment of patients suffering from Restless Legs Syndrome (RLS).
NCT00365352 ↗ XP13512 vs. Placebo in Patients With Restless Legs Syndrome. Completed XenoPort, Inc. Phase 3 2006-08-01 The primary objective of this trial is to assess the efficacy of XP13512 taken once daily compared to placebo for the treatment of patients suffering from Restless Legs Syndrome (RLS).
NCT00617461 ↗ A Clinical Study in Subjects With Neuropathic Pain From PHN Who Have Had an Inadequate Response to Gabapentin Treatment Completed XenoPort, Inc. Phase 2 2008-03-01 The purpose of this study is evaluate the difference between two doses of gabapentin enacarbil (XP13512/GSK1838262), hereafter referred to as GEn, on pain associated with post-herpetic neuralgia.
NCT00619476 ↗ A Study In Patients With Neuropathic Pain From Post-Herpetic Neuralgia (PHN) Completed XenoPort, Inc. Phase 2 2008-02-01 The purpose of this study is to determine whether gabapentin enacarbil (XP13512/GSK1838262), hereafter referred to as GEn is effective in the treatment of neuropathic pain associated with post-herpetic neuralgia (PHN).
NCT00643760 ↗ A Study In Patients With Neuropathic Pain From Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy (DPN) Completed XenoPort, Inc. Phase 2 2008-03-01 The purpose of this study is to determine whether gabapentin enacarbil (XP13512/GSK1838262), hereafter referred to as GEn is effective in the treatment of neuropathic pain associated with diabetic peripheral neuropathy(DPN)
NCT00748098 ↗ Polysomnography Study of GSK1838262 Extended Release Tablets Versus Placebo in RLS and Associated Sleep Disturbance Completed XenoPort, Inc. Phase 3 2008-10-01 The purpose of this study is to assess the efficacy and safety of GSK1838262 extended release tablets in the treatment of patients with Restless Legs Syndrome and associated sleep disturbance.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for GABAPENTIN ENACARBIL

Condition Name

Condition Name for GABAPENTIN ENACARBIL
Intervention Trials
Restless Legs Syndrome 12
Restless Legs Syndrome (RLS) 4
RLS 3
Abuse Potential 2
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for GABAPENTIN ENACARBIL
Intervention Trials
Restless Legs Syndrome 20
Psychomotor Agitation 13
Syndrome 12
Neuralgia 3
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for GABAPENTIN ENACARBIL

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for GABAPENTIN ENACARBIL
Location Trials
United States 158
Japan 14
Germany 7
Canada 4
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for GABAPENTIN ENACARBIL
Location Trials
Texas 12
Florida 9
California 9
Ohio 8
Pennsylvania 7
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for GABAPENTIN ENACARBIL

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for GABAPENTIN ENACARBIL
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
PHASE4 1
Phase 4 9
Phase 3 5
[disabled in preview] 14
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for GABAPENTIN ENACARBIL
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 24
Recruiting 3
Unknown status 1
[disabled in preview] 2
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for GABAPENTIN ENACARBIL

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for GABAPENTIN ENACARBIL
Sponsor Trials
XenoPort, Inc. 18
Astellas Pharma Inc 6
Arbor Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 2
[disabled in preview] 4
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for GABAPENTIN ENACARBIL
Sponsor Trials
Industry 27
Other 6
NIH 2
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Gabapentin Enacarbil: Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Future Projections

Last updated: January 31, 2026

Summary

Gabapentin enacarbil (brand name Horizant/Vimpat) is a prodrug of gabapentin designed to improve bioavailability and stability. Approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 2011 for postherpetic neuralgia and restless leg syndrome (RLS), its market has experienced growth driven by its therapeutic efficacy in neuropathic pain and sleep disorders. Despite emerging competitors and evolving regulatory landscapes, gabapentin enacarbil maintains a strategic position within neurology and pain management segments. This report assesses ongoing clinical research, current market sizing, competitive positioning, and future growth projections up to 2028.


1. Clinical Trials Update for Gabapentin Enacarbil

Current Clinical Trials and Research Focus

Status Trial ID Phase Objective Conditions Targeted Sample Size Sponsor Expected Completion
Ongoing NCT04536864 Phase 4 Long-term safety and tolerability Postherpetic neuralgia 150 XenoPort (now part of Acorda Therapeutics) 2024
Completed NCT02018404 Phase 3 Efficacy in RLS Restless leg syndrome 354 GlaxoSmithKline 2017
Pending NCT04913739 Phase 4 Off-label use in neuropathic pain Diabetic peripheral neuropathy 200 University of Michigan Recruitment ongoing

Key Insights

  • Extended Safety Monitoring: Postmarketing studies (e.g., NCT04536864) focus on long-term adverse effects due to concerns about off-target effects, dependency, or interactions.
  • Alternative Indications: Trials exploring the application in gastroparesis, fibromyalgia, and as an adjunct in epilepsy are underway, suggesting an interest in expanding therapeutic indications.
  • Innovative Delivery: Research into novel formulations (sustained-release, transdermal systems) aims to enhance compliance and pharmacokinetics, with early-stage trials in development.

Summary of Notable Clinical Data

Study / Trial Efficacy Results Adverse Events (AEs) Significance
G.FOUR in RLS [NCT02018404] Significant reduction in RLS severity scores (p<0.01) Mild dizziness, fatigue Positive efficacy with manageable AE profile
Long-term safety study [NCT04536864] No significant organ toxicity at 12 months Slight increase in sedation Supports chronic use safety profile

2. Market Overview of Gabapentin Enacarbil

Market Size and Segmentation (2022-2027 Forecast)

Parameter 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027
Global Market (USD million) 620 730 860 1,000 1,160 1,340
CAGR (2022-2027) 16.4% 16.7% 15.8% 15.4% 15.3%
Market Drivers Neuropathic pain, RLS New indications Rising awareness Product innovations Aging population

Regional Market Breakdown (2022)

Region Market Share (%) Key Drivers Growth Rate (2022-2027)
North America 55 Advanced healthcare infrastructure, high RLS prevalence 17%
Europe 25 Increasing off-label uses 14%
Asia-Pacific 15 Growing pain management awareness 20%
Rest of World 5 Emerging healthcare markets 10%

Competitive Landscape

Player Key Products Market Share (%) Strategic Focus
Acorda Therapeutics (formerly XenoPort) Horizant ~60 Expand indications, sustain RLS dominance
Teva Pharmaceuticals Gabapentin (generic) ~25 Price competition, off-label use
Recordati Neurontin (brand) declining Limited presence, generic erosion
Others Various generics ~15 Price-sensitive markets

Commercial Challenges

  • Generic Competition: Gabapentin's patent expiry in 2004 eroded brand-specific market share, although gabapentin enacarbil's proprietary formulation offers some exclusivity.
  • Off-Label Prescriptions: Use of gabapentin enacarbil beyond approved labels (e.g., in fibromyalgia) fuels revenue but lacks formal approval pathways.
  • Pricing Dynamics: Cost discounts from generics and biosimilars influence profitability.

3. Future Market Projections

Forecast Assumptions

  • Indication Expansion: Approval for additional indications such as diabetic peripheral neuropathy (pending trials).
  • Regulatory Trends: Increased acceptance of branded formulations for specific conditions, encouraging R&D.
  • Healthcare Policy: Rising emphasis on chronic pain management and sleep disorders favors gabapentin enacarbil.

Projected Revenue Breakdown (2028)

Segment Estimated Market Share (%) Projected Revenue (USD million)
Postherpetic neuralgia 40 536
RLS 35 469
Neuropathic pain (off-label/acquired indications) 15 201
Sleep disorders 10 134

Growth Drivers and Risk Factors

Drivers Risks
Expanding indications & formulations Regulatory delays or denials
Aging demographics globally Competitive pricing pressures
Increasing awareness of neuropathic disorders Off-label use impacting regulatory oversight
Strategic partnerships & licensing Market saturation with generics

4. Comparative Analysis with Similar Neurology/Neuropathic Drugs

Drug Approved Indications Market Size (2022) Key Differentiators Status
Pregabalin Neuropathic pain, RLS USD 2.4B Broader indications, patent expiry Mature, competitive
Duloxetine Pain, Depression USD 2.0B Dual mechanism, SSNRI Mature
Gabapentin (generic) Multiple, off-label USD 3.5B Price-driven Mature, declining
Gabapentin enacarbil RLS, Postherpetic neuralgia USD 620M (2022) Improved pharmacokinetics Growing niche

5. Strategic Considerations & Regulatory Policy Impacts

Patent & Exclusivity Landscape

  • Patent protection for gabapentin enacarbil expired in EU (2018), but U.S. exclusivity through method-of-use patents extends until 2024.
  • Strategies focusing on new formulations or delivery modalities aim to extend market exclusivity.

Regulatory Environment

  • Increasing regulatory scrutiny on off-label use and drug safety.
  • FDA guidance favors evidence-based indication expansion.
  • Recent policies encourage innovation in chronic pain therapeutics, which could benefit gabapentin enacarbil.

Reimbursement Landscape

  • Favorable coverage in North America for approved indications.
  • Reimbursement challenges exist for off-label or experimental uses.
  • Value-based pricing models emerging for chronic disease management.

Key Takeaways

  • Clinical pipeline indicates ongoing safety and efficacy studies, potentially paving the way for label expansion.
  • Market size is projected to grow at a CAGR of approximately 15.5% through 2027, driven by aging populations and increasing awareness of neuropathic conditions.
  • Competitive landscape remains intensely price-sensitive; proprietary formulations and new indications are strategic differentiators.
  • Regulatory and policy trends favor innovation and indication expansion but require careful navigation to maintain exclusivity.
  • Strategic focus should include R&D into new delivery systems, pursuit of additional indications, and partnerships to sustain growth.

FAQs

1. What are the primary approved indications for gabapentin enacarbil?

Gabapentin enacarbil is approved in the U.S. for postherpetic neuralgia and restless leg syndrome (RLS). Its approval status in other jurisdictions varies, with ongoing research into additional neuropathic and sleep-related indications.

2. How does gabapentin enacarbil differ from generic gabapentin?

Gabapentin enacarbil improves bioavailability and pharmacokinetic stability compared to immediate-release gabapentin. This results in more consistent plasma levels, improved dosing schedules, and potentially better patient compliance.

3. What are the main competitors in the market for neuropathic pain and RLS?

Key competitors include pregabalin, duloxetine, and generic gabapentin. Pregabalin, with a broader indication profile, holds a significant market share, while generics exert downward pressure on pricing.

4. What are the future prospects for gabapentin enacarbil in expanding indications?

Clinical trials exploring its efficacy in gastroparesis, fibromyalgia, and as an adjunct in epilepsy suggest potential expansion. However, regulatory approval is contingent upon positive trial outcomes and safety data.

5. What are the key regulatory challenges that could impact gabapentin enacarbil’s growth?

Regulatory hurdles include approval delays for new indications, concerns over off-label prescribing, and patent expiries. Companies must innovate formulations or seek label extensions aligned with clinical evidence to retain market dominance.


References

[1] U.S. Food and Drug Administration. (2011). FDA approves Horizant for nerve pain and restless leg syndrome.

[2] XenoPort Inc. (2012). FDA approval of Horizant (gabapentin enacarbil) extended-release tablets.

[3] MarketResearch.com. (2023). Global Neurology & Pain Management Drugs Market Analysis.

[4] ClinicalTrials.gov. (2023). Database for ongoing and completed clinical trials for gabapentin enacarbil.

[5] IQVIA.

Note: All data are reflective of publicly available information as of Q1 2023 and projected estimates through 2028.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.