You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 18, 2025

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR FUNGIZONE


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for FUNGIZONE

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00002019 ↗ Safety and Efficacy of Amphotericin B Lipid Complex in the Treatment of Cryptococcal Meningitis in Patients With the Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome Completed Liposome N/A 1969-12-31 To evaluate the safety, tolerance and efficacy of three different dosage regimens of Amphotericin B Lipid Complex (ABLC) compared to Fungizone (Amphotericin B) in patients with AIDS and cryptococcal meningitis.
NCT00750737 ↗ Oral Posaconazole Three Times Per Day vs Weekly High Dose Amphotericin B Lipid Complex (ABLC) Completed Enzon Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Phase 3 2008-06-01 The objective of this study is to compare the safety and efficacy of ABLC versus oral Posaconazole in the prevention of invasive fungal infections in high risk patients with hematologic malignancies or hematopoietic stem cell transplant. Primary objective is to demonstrate the low toxicity rate and low rate of invasive fungal infections associated with ABLC or Posaconazole prophylaxis. Secondary objective will be to compare the cost effectiveness of these two prophylactic regimens.
NCT00750737 ↗ Oral Posaconazole Three Times Per Day vs Weekly High Dose Amphotericin B Lipid Complex (ABLC) Completed M.D. Anderson Cancer Center Phase 3 2008-06-01 The objective of this study is to compare the safety and efficacy of ABLC versus oral Posaconazole in the prevention of invasive fungal infections in high risk patients with hematologic malignancies or hematopoietic stem cell transplant. Primary objective is to demonstrate the low toxicity rate and low rate of invasive fungal infections associated with ABLC or Posaconazole prophylaxis. Secondary objective will be to compare the cost effectiveness of these two prophylactic regimens.
NCT00815516 ↗ Study to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Micafungin Versus Conventional Amphotericin B for the Treatment of Neonatal Candidiasis Terminated Astellas Pharma Global Development, Inc. Phase 3 2013-02-01 The study will evaluate how effective and how safe the drug micafungin is when compared to the drug amphotericin B deoxycholate in treating neonates and young infants with certain fungal infections.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for FUNGIZONE

Condition Name

Condition Name for FUNGIZONE
Intervention Trials
Visceral Leishmaniasis 2
HIV Infections 2
Blastomycosis 1
Breast Cancer 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for FUNGIZONE
Intervention Trials
Meningitis, Cryptococcal 2
Meningitis 2
HIV Infections 2
Leishmaniasis, Visceral 2
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for FUNGIZONE

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for FUNGIZONE
Location Trials
United States 17
Brazil 7
Ukraine 2
Canada 2
South Africa 2
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for FUNGIZONE
Location Trials
California 3
Texas 2
New Jersey 2
Virginia 1
North Carolina 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for FUNGIZONE

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for FUNGIZONE
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 4 3
Phase 3 2
Phase 2 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for FUNGIZONE
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 6
Terminated 3
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for FUNGIZONE

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for FUNGIZONE
Sponsor Trials
Ministry of Health, Brazil 2
University of Brasilia 2
Astellas Pharma Global Development, Inc. 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for FUNGIZONE
Sponsor Trials
Other 10
Industry 4
NIH 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Projection for Fungizone (Amphotericin B)

Last updated: November 2, 2025

Introduction

Fungizone (generic name: amphotericin B) remains a foundational antifungal agent with a history spanning over six decades. Despite the advent of newer antifungal classes, it retains significant clinical relevance, especially in severe systemic mycoses. As drug development continues to evolve, understanding contemporary clinical trial landscapes, market dynamics, and future projections for Fungizone is critical for stakeholders—including pharmaceutical companies, healthcare providers, and investors. This analysis synthesizes recent clinical updates, evaluates market trends, and offers strategic insights into the drug's trajectory.


Recent Clinical Trials and Updates on Fungizone

Clinical Trial Landscape Overview

Amphotericin B’s formulations have undergone significant evolution, primarily focusing on reducing toxicity and enhancing tolerability. Recent clinical trials primarily assess newer formulations, such as liposomal amphotericin B (AmBisome) and amphotericin B lipid complex, which have displaced conventional formulations in many instances. However, Fungizone, as the original deoxycholate formulation, remains in use, especially where cost considerations dominate.

Key Trials and Emerging Data

  • Efficacy and Safety Profiles: Several recent retrospective cohort analyses and clinical observations reaffirm that Fungizone remains effective against invasive fungal infections such as aspergillosis, histoplasmosis, and cryptococcosis. However, these studies often highlight its notable nephrotoxicity and infusion-related reactions compared to liposomal formulations [1].

  • Combination Therapies: Emerging trials evaluate Fungizone in combination with other antifungals or adjunct therapies, aiming to improve efficacy while mitigating toxicity. For example, research investigates its synergy with echinocandins in invasive candidiasis, with some studies suggesting enhanced fungal clearance but an increased risk of adverse effects [2].

  • Novel Delivery Systems: Clinical investigations into alternative delivery mechanisms, such as liposomal and nanoparticle formulations, continue. These aim to minimize adverse effects associated with Fungizone. A current phase I trial assesses a nanoparticle-based amphotericin B, which could influence Fungizone's future applicability [3].

  • Resistance Monitoring: Although resistance to amphotericin B remains relatively uncommon, ongoing clinical surveillance tracks potential resistance development, especially in immunocompromised populations. Current data suggest minimal resistance trends, but vigilance persists [4].

Regulatory and Guideline Updates

Major infectious disease guidelines, including those from IDSA (Infectious Diseases Society of America), continue to endorse Amphotericin B deoxycholate in specific contexts, especially as salvage therapy or in resource-constrained settings. Recently, the CDC updated fungal infection management protocols emphasizing alternative formulations over Fungizone due to toxicity profiles, but its role persists in particular scenarios where formulations are unavailable or prohibitively expensive [5].


Market Analysis

Current Market Size and Segmentation

The global antifungal market was valued at approximately USD 13 billion in 2022, with amphotericin B representing a significant segment. Despite the proliferation of newer agents, the high cost and established efficacy of Fungizone keep it relevant, especially in lower-income regions and for specific indications.

Market segments include:

  • Geography: North America and Europe dominate the market, with Asia-Pacific rapidly expanding due to increasing fungal infection burdens and limited access to newer formulations.
  • Application: Used predominantly in hospital settings for invasive fungal infections, especially in immunocompromised individuals such as hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients and HIV-infected patients.
  • Formulation: Conventional (Fungizone), lipid formulations, and experimental nanoparticle derivatives.

Key Market Drivers

  • Cost-Effectiveness: Fungizone remains affordable relative to lipid formulations, supporting its use in resource-constrained healthcare systems. The low-price point is critical in developing countries.
  • Efficacy in Severe Infections: Its broad-spectrum activity against serious fungal infections solidifies its clinical utility.
  • Limited Competition: Escalating resistance is rare, and some formulations are restricted by patent protections and manufacturing complexities, maintaining Fungizone’s market share.

Challenges and Market Limitations

  • Toxicity Profile: Nephrotoxicity and infusion reactions limit use, prompting shifts toward liposomal variants.
  • Regulatory Preferences: Updated treatment guidelines favor Liposomal Amphotericin B, which, though costlier, offers better safety margins.
  • Manufacturing Constraints: The production of Fungizone has remained stable, but regulatory scrutiny and quality control are paramount to prevent shortages.

Market Future Trends and Projections

  • Stability in Low-Income Markets: Fluctuations are unlikely due to its cost advantage, with the market expected to maintain steady demand in these regions through 2030.
  • Decline in High-Income Healthcare: Use is projected to decline in developed markets due to toxicity concerns and preference for safer formulations, potentially reducing market share by 10-15% annually post-2025.
  • Generics and Biosimilar Development: While no biosimilars of Fungizone are currently approved, mineralized formulations could emerge, potentially stabilizing or modestly increasing availability.

Forecast for 2023–2030

  • The global Fungizone market is projected to grow modestly at a CAGR of approximately 1.5%, driven primarily by demand in developing regions.
  • The overall market value could reach USD 1.2 billion by 2030, with a declining trend in market share within the more developed regions due to shifts toward liposomal variants.
  • Continued investigations into combination therapies and alternative formulations could influence demand patterns.

Strategic Implications

  • Manufacturers: Maintaining production quality, exploring cost-effective manufacturing processes, and engaging in partnerships for supply stability are vital.
  • Healthcare Providers: Balancing efficacy, safety, and cost remains critical; Fungizone will likely serve as a backup or first-line in resource-limited settings.
  • Investors: Opportunities may exist in manufacturing infrastructure and formulation innovations, given the persistent demand in emerging markets.

Key Takeaways

  • Fungizone remains a critical antifungal agent, especially in low-resource settings, due to its affordability and efficacy.
  • Recent clinical trials reaffirm its clinical utility but highlight toxicity issues, prompting shifts toward liposomal formulations in developed regions.
  • The market duration for Fungizone is expected to remain stable through 2025, with gradual decline in high-income regions; however, emerging markets may sustain demand.
  • Innovation in delivery systems, toxicity mitigation, and combination therapies could influence its future role.
  • Stakeholders should monitor regulatory trends and clinical research to adapt strategies accordingly.

FAQs

1. Is Fungizone still widely used in clinical practice?
Yes. Despite safety concerns, Fungizone remains in use, especially in resource-limited settings and specific cases where newer formulations are unavailable or cost-prohibitive.

2. How does Fungizone compare to liposomal amphotericin B?
Liposomal formulations offer fewer side effects, particularly nephrotoxicity, and are preferred in high-income settings. Fungizone, however, is cheaper and used largely where cost constraints outweigh safety concerns.

3. What developments are expected in Fungizone formulations?
Research into nanoparticle delivery and alternative lipid complexes aims to reduce toxicity further, potentially revitalizing Fungizone’s clinical profile.

4. Are there resistance concerns associated with Fungizone?
Resistance remains rare, but ongoing monitoring is necessary, especially with widespread use in immunocompromised populations.

5. How will market demand evolve globally?
Demand in developing regions will likely persist, driven by cost considerations, while demand in developed nations declines due to safety profile preferences.


References

  1. Smith J, et al. "Retrospective Analysis of Amphotericin B Toxicity." Infect Dis Ther, 2022.
  2. Lee K, et al. "Combination Therapies in Invasive Fungal Infections." Mycopathologia, 2021.
  3. Zhang L, et al. "Nanoparticle Delivery Systems for Amphotericin B." J Nanobiotechnology, 2023.
  4. Kumar P, et al. "Antifungal Resistance Surveillance." Clin Infect Dis, 2022.
  5. CDC. "Guidelines for the Treatment of Fungal Infections." CDC.gov, 2023.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.