Last Updated: September 24, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR FORTAZ


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for FORTAZ

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT01784445 ↗ Post ERCP Pancreatitis Prevention in Average Risk Patients Completed University Hospital Rijeka Phase 4 2013-06-01 Diclophenac potassium and ceftazidime are commercially available drugs that are used in various clinical situations. They are safe and known for years. Diclophenac potassium and Ceftazidime have been used in some studies for the prophylaxis and treatment of pancreatitis and Post-ERCP Pancreatitis (PEP). Diclophenac potassium, together with indometacin is currently standard treatment for prevention of (PEP) while ceftazidime is possible alternative treatment for patients with contraindications for nonsteroidal medicines. The aim of the study is to evaluate the efficacy of Ceftazidime for the prophylaxis of PEP.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for FORTAZ

Condition Name

Condition Name for FORTAZ
Intervention Trials
Pancreatitis 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for FORTAZ
Intervention Trials
Pancreatitis 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for FORTAZ

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for FORTAZ
Location Trials
Croatia 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for FORTAZ

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for FORTAZ
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 4 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for FORTAZ
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for FORTAZ

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for FORTAZ
Sponsor Trials
University Hospital Rijeka 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for FORTAZ
Sponsor Trials
Other 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial
Last updated: June 29, 2026

FORTAZ (ceftazidime) clinical trials update, market analysis, and revenue projection

Executive summary: FORTAZ is a brand of ceftazidime (a parenteral third-generation cephalosporin). Ceftazidime products are long off patent in most jurisdictions, and the current competitive market is dominated by generic ceftazidime manufacturers and by bundled hospital purchasing dynamics rather than ongoing proprietary clinical development. A detailed, drug-specific “clinical trials update” and quantified revenue projection require drug-product specificity (strength, dosage form, NDA/BLA, label route, and country) and market-history data (net sales, wholesaler channel, and geographic mix) that are not provided.

What is FORTAZ and what ceftazidime formulations are on the market?

Answer: FORTAZ is a branded ceftazidime injection used for serious bacterial infections. In competitive practice, “FORTAZ” market behavior is determined by generic ceftazidime availability, hospital formulary position, and tender pricing rather than by brand exclusivity.

Which dosage forms and strengths drive purchasing decisions

Hospital procurement typically differentiates by:

  • vial configuration (e.g., single-dose vial)
  • strength per vial (varies by market)
  • reconstitution workflow (pharmacy labor and medication error risk)
  • supply continuity and lead-time reliability

How market competition typically impacts branded ceftazidime

  • Multiple generic ceftazidime ANDAs (or local equivalents) exist in most markets.
  • Price compression is the dominant economic variable.
  • Switching costs are low because ceftazidime is substitutable by formulation and equivalence standards.

What clinical trials are active for ceftazidime (FORTAZ) right now?

Answer: Ceftazidime is generally studied as:

  • backbone antibiotic in combination regimens
  • comparator arms in antimicrobial resistance and sepsis trials
  • treatment approaches against Gram-negative pathogens

A precise “clinical trials update for FORTAZ” depends on identifying the exact sponsor program and registries tied to the branded product, not just the active ingredient.

Where ceftazidime trials typically show up

Long-tail patterns include:

  • hospital-acquired pneumonia and ventilator-associated pneumonia regimens
  • complicated urinary tract infection and pyelonephritis pathways
  • bloodstream infection and sepsis observational cohorts
  • carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) treatment comparisons

When do ceftazidime product exclusivities end, and when do generics typically launch?

Answer: Ceftazidime’s original branded exclusivities ended years ago in major markets, so generic entry is largely a function of local patent/market history rather than ongoing FORTAZ-specific exclusivity.

How to interpret “exclusivity timelines” for FORTAZ

For ceftazidime brands, exclusivity is typically not a current barrier; procurement tends to treat them as interchangeable commodity antibiotics.

What patents protect FORTAZ (ceftazidime) and how strong is the patent estate?

Answer: For ceftazidime injection, patent protection is typically not actionable at the brand level today in most jurisdictions. Current freedom-to-operate is usually driven by:

  • legacy composition-of-matter and formulation patents (largely expired)
  • any later-life cycle patents that may have existed in specific countries (if any)

Which patent categories matter in current brand economics

  • formulation tweaks (if any still active in a given jurisdiction)
  • manufacturing process patents (rarely influential for market access today for commodity injectables)
  • method-of-use claims (limited impact if active ingredient is off patent)

What is the Orange Book status of FORTAZ in the US?

Answer: The Orange Book status must be mapped to the specific ceftazidime product’s application number and dosage form. Without the exact product identifier (strength, NDA holder, and ANDA equivalents), a definitive Orange Book-style status summary cannot be produced.

What Paragraph IV challenges exist for FORTAZ or ceftazidime generics?

Answer: For ceftazidime, the dominant legal reality is historical genericization and subsequent market consolidation. A Paragraph IV challenge database requires linkage to the specific FORTAZ NDA and listed patents.

What generic entry risks exist for FORTAZ?

Answer: Generic entry risk is structurally high for older ceftazidime brands because:

  • active ingredient is widely generic
  • buyers can source from multiple manufacturers
  • price is governed by tender supply and unit cost

What actually drives near-term “switching”

  • supply availability and allocation
  • benchmark price drops
  • contract renewals and formulary committees
  • shortages in certain dosage strengths that can temporarily support supply-adjusted pricing

How does FORTAZ compare with other cephalosporins and competitor antibiotics in hospital contracting?

Answer: In practice, FORTAZ competes within:

  • other third-generation cephalosporins (e.g., ceftriaxone, cefotaxime depending on spectrum and guideline fit)
  • broader-spectrum beta-lactams where stewardship policies allow alternatives
  • carbapenems for resistant organisms, where stewardship and resistance patterns decide usage

Key clinical decision drivers that translate into market share

  • local antibiogram and resistance rates
  • guideline alignment for targeted infection sites
  • dosing frequency and administration logistics
  • renal impairment dosing protocols
  • antibiotic stewardship restrictions

Market analysis: who buys ceftazidime and how is pricing set?

Answer: The primary buyers are:

  • hospitals and integrated delivery networks
  • government and public procurement in many countries
  • centralized purchasing organizations (CPOs) and group purchasing organizations (GPOs) where applicable

Pricing mechanics

For older antibiotics:

  • benchmark-driven pricing
  • tender-based awarding
  • contract-level rebates and volume commitments
  • multi-supplier qualification lists that allow fast substitution

Revenue projection: what is the growth outlook for FORTAZ?

Answer: A quantified revenue projection cannot be generated without:

  • current baseline net sales (by geography)
  • unit volumes and price assumptions
  • tender frequency and expected discounting
  • competitor price trajectories and supply risks
  • regulatory status by country

What can be stated structurally for commodity ceftazidime brands:

  • long-run brand revenue trends are typically flat to declining under generic pressure
  • short-run deviations occur from supply constraints, shortage-driven substitutions, or stewardship-driven usage changes

What commercial risks and catalysts affect FORTAZ in the next 12 to 24 months?

Answer: Key levers for ceftazidime brands are operational and procurement-driven.

Primary risks

  • continued price compression from incremental generic competition
  • manufacturing disruptions at large generic suppliers
  • stewardship tightening that reduces ceftazidime utilization for certain indications
  • negative hospital budget pressure that accelerates switch to the lowest-cost equivalent

Potential catalysts

  • supply interruption at key competitors that temporarily supports market share and pricing
  • changes in local resistance patterns favoring ceftazidime
  • procurement contract re-rankings that restore listing status or volume share

Key takeaways

  • FORTAZ is a ceftazidime injection brand, and the market behaves like a mature generic antibiotic segment rather than an exclusivity-driven proprietary pipeline.
  • A drug-product specific clinical trials update and quantified revenue projection require identifiers and baseline commercial data not provided here.
  • Near-term dynamics are governed by tender pricing, supply continuity, and antibiotic stewardship rather than patent life-cycle events.
  • For business planning, the operational watchlist should focus on supplier continuity, contract award patterns, and regional resistance-driven formulary shifts.

FAQs

1) What are the most common infections treated with ceftazidime (FORTAZ)?
Hospital-acquired infections, complicated urinary tract infections, bloodstream infections, and serious Gram-negative infections where ceftazidime is guideline-aligned.

2) How do hospitals decide between FORTAZ and alternative beta-lactams?
They compare spectrum fit to local antibiograms, dosing and administration practicality, and stewardship restrictions, then apply tender pricing.

3) Does FORTAZ face biosimilar risk or biologic substitution?
No. Ceftazidime is a small-molecule antibiotic; biosimilar concepts do not apply.

4) Are there new clinical trials that can expand ceftazidime use?
Ceftazidime commonly appears in combination or comparator arms, but “brand FORTAZ-specific” expansion is uncommon for mature antibiotics.

5) What market events most influence ceftazidime unit price?
Supply shortages, procurement tender timing, and competitor unit-cost reductions from manufacturing scale.

References

No sources were cited because the necessary drug-product identifiers, trial registry matches, and market financial baselines were not provided.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.