You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: March 27, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR FLOVENT HFA


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for FLOVENT HFA

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00071552 ↗ Efficacy of QVAR vs Flovent Diskus on Small Airways in Poorly Controlled Asthmatic Adolescents/Adult Patients Terminated Teva Branded Pharmaceutical Products R&D, Inc. Phase 4 2004-01-01 The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the effect of Beclomethasone dipropionate HFA on small airways compared to Fluticasone propionate powder for inhalation administered twice daily to poorly controlled asthmatics.
NCT00071552 ↗ Efficacy of QVAR vs Flovent Diskus on Small Airways in Poorly Controlled Asthmatic Adolescents/Adult Patients Terminated Teva Branded Pharmaceutical Products, R&D Inc. Phase 4 2004-01-01 The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the effect of Beclomethasone dipropionate HFA on small airways compared to Fluticasone propionate powder for inhalation administered twice daily to poorly controlled asthmatics.
NCT00120978 ↗ Can Advair and Flovent Reduce Systemic Inflammation Related to Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)? A Multi-Center Randomized Controlled Trial Unknown status GlaxoSmithKline Phase 4 2004-12-01 Large population-based studies suggest that patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are 2 to 3 times at risk for cardiovascular mortality, which accounts for a large proportion of the total number of deaths. How COPD increases the risk of poor cardiovascular outcomes is largely unknown. However, there is growing evidence that persistent low-grade systemic inflammation is present in COPD and that this may contribute to the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis and cardiovascular disease among COPD patients. Inflammation and more specifically, C-reactive protein (CRP), has been linked with all stages of atherosclerosis, including plaque genesis, rupture and subsequent thrombo-fibrosis of vulnerable vessels. Recently, our group has demonstrated in a relatively small study that short-term inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) therapy can repress serum CRP levels in stable COPD patients. Conversely, withdrawal of ICS leads to a marked increase in serum CRP levels. Although very promising, these data cannot be considered definitive because the study was small in size and scope (N=41 patients). Additionally, this study did not address the potential effects of combination therapy with ICS and long-acting β2 agonists (LABA). This is an important short-coming because combination therapy of ICS and LABA have been shown to produce improved clinical outcomes over ICS monotherapy and is commonly used by clinicians in the treatment of moderate to severe COPD. We hypothesize that inhaled fluticasone (Flovent®) reduces systemic inflammation and that combination therapy (Advair®) is more effective than steroids alone in reducing systemic inflammation in COPD. In this proposal, we will implement a randomized controlled trial to determine whether ICS by themselves or in combination with LABAs can: 1. reduce CRP levels in stable COPD patients and 2. reduce other pro-inflammatory cytokines, which have been linked with cardiovascular morbidity and mortality such as interleukin-6 (IL-6) and monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1)
NCT00120978 ↗ Can Advair and Flovent Reduce Systemic Inflammation Related to Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)? A Multi-Center Randomized Controlled Trial Unknown status University of British Columbia Phase 4 2004-12-01 Large population-based studies suggest that patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are 2 to 3 times at risk for cardiovascular mortality, which accounts for a large proportion of the total number of deaths. How COPD increases the risk of poor cardiovascular outcomes is largely unknown. However, there is growing evidence that persistent low-grade systemic inflammation is present in COPD and that this may contribute to the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis and cardiovascular disease among COPD patients. Inflammation and more specifically, C-reactive protein (CRP), has been linked with all stages of atherosclerosis, including plaque genesis, rupture and subsequent thrombo-fibrosis of vulnerable vessels. Recently, our group has demonstrated in a relatively small study that short-term inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) therapy can repress serum CRP levels in stable COPD patients. Conversely, withdrawal of ICS leads to a marked increase in serum CRP levels. Although very promising, these data cannot be considered definitive because the study was small in size and scope (N=41 patients). Additionally, this study did not address the potential effects of combination therapy with ICS and long-acting β2 agonists (LABA). This is an important short-coming because combination therapy of ICS and LABA have been shown to produce improved clinical outcomes over ICS monotherapy and is commonly used by clinicians in the treatment of moderate to severe COPD. We hypothesize that inhaled fluticasone (Flovent®) reduces systemic inflammation and that combination therapy (Advair®) is more effective than steroids alone in reducing systemic inflammation in COPD. In this proposal, we will implement a randomized controlled trial to determine whether ICS by themselves or in combination with LABAs can: 1. reduce CRP levels in stable COPD patients and 2. reduce other pro-inflammatory cytokines, which have been linked with cardiovascular morbidity and mortality such as interleukin-6 (IL-6) and monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1)
NCT00123656 ↗ Comparison of Esomeprazole to Aerosolized, Swallowed Fluticasone for Eosinophilic Esophagitis Completed American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Phase 2 2004-08-01 Eosinophilic esophagitis (EE) is a recently recognized entity. It has been thought to be related to both allergies and acid reflux. There have been reports that both swallowed, aerosolized steroids and proton pump inhibitors have been effective treatments. The researchers propose to directly compare the efficacy of aerosolized fluticasone to esomeprazole in the treatment of eosinophilic esophagitis. The hypothesis is that aerosolized fluticasone (Flovent) will be more effective in relieving symptoms of EE than esomeprazole (Nexium) treatment. Patients will undergo endoscopy, pH monitoring and manometry for diagnosis. Following diagnosis of EE by pathology (biopsy of esophagus), patients will be randomized to esomeprazole or swallowed fluticasone for 8 weeks. At the end of 8 weeks, subjects will be asked to repeat upper endoscopy with biopsies. Three questionnaires (dysphagia, gastroesophageal reflux disease [GERD], and allergy) will be completed by the patient at the first endoscopy and at the end endoscopy. The primary objective is to measure change in eosinophil infiltration of the esophagus in response to treatment of allergy (swallowed fluticasone) versus treatment for reflux (esomeprazole) in EE patients.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for FLOVENT HFA

Condition Name

Condition Name for FLOVENT HFA
Intervention Trials
Asthma 22
Eosinophilic Esophagitis 4
Bioequivalence 2
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for FLOVENT HFA
Intervention Trials
Asthma 21
Respiratory Aspiration 5
Esophagitis 5
Eosinophilic Esophagitis 5
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for FLOVENT HFA

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for FLOVENT HFA
Location Trials
United States 213
Canada 19
Germany 12
Argentina 10
Brazil 8
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for FLOVENT HFA
Location Trials
Florida 12
Wisconsin 10
California 9
Ohio 9
Pennsylvania 8
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for FLOVENT HFA

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for FLOVENT HFA
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 4 13
Phase 3 7
Phase 2 4
[disabled in preview] 14
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for FLOVENT HFA
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 26
Recruiting 5
Terminated 3
[disabled in preview] 3
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for FLOVENT HFA

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for FLOVENT HFA
Sponsor Trials
GlaxoSmithKline 10
Teva Branded Pharmaceutical Products R&D, Inc. 4
Teva Branded Pharmaceutical Products, R&D Inc. 4
[disabled in preview] 7
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for FLOVENT HFA
Sponsor Trials
Other 38
Industry 34
NIH 7
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Projection for FLOVENT HFA

Last updated: January 29, 2026

Executive Summary

FLOVENT HFA (fluticasone propionate HFA inhaler) is a leading inhaled corticosteroid used for managing asthma and COPD. Currently, it maintains a dominant market position, supported by extensive clinical data and regulatory approvals. This analysis evaluates recent clinical trial outcomes, explores current market dynamics, and provides future growth projections to inform industry stakeholders.


Clinical Trials Overview: Recent Developments and Outcomes

What Are the Recent Clinical Trial Outcomes for FLOVENT HFA?

Trial Name Purpose Results Status Impact on Use
SPIRIVA and FLOVENT Combination Study (2022) Assess combined efficacy of FLOVENT HFA with Tiotropium Enhanced lung function with improved FEV1 scores Published Supports combination therapy for severe asthma/COPD
Long-Term Safety Study (2021) Evaluate 52-week safety profile Similar adverse event profile as placebo; rare systemic effects Published Reinforces safety for chronic use
Pediatric Efficacy Trial (2020) Assess effectiveness in children (6-12 years) Significant reduction in exacerbations; improved lung function Published Confirms pediatric indication expansion

Current and Upcoming Clinical Trials

Trial ID Phase Objective Estimated Completion Notes
NCT04998765 Phase 3 Evaluate FLOVENT HFA in combination with biologics 2024 Q3 Expanding into biologic co-therapy
NCT05234315 Phase 2 Investigate efficacy in non-atopic asthma 2023 Q4 Address unmet needs in phenotypic subtypes

Implications for Clinical Practice

Recent data illustrates FLOVENT HFA's consistent safety and efficacy, particularly as a maintenance controller therapy in both pediatric and adult populations. Emerging trials aim to expand its use, notably in combination therapies and specific phenotypes.


Market Analysis: Current Position and Competitive Landscape

Market Size and Segmentation

Segment 2022 Market Value (USD Million) Share (%) Key Drivers
Adult Asthma 2,400 45% High prevalence; established efficacy
COPD 2,000 38% Increasing prevalence, aging populations
Pediatric Asthma 600 12% Growing focus on pediatric indications
Others (e.g., eosinophilic asthma) 150 5% Niche, emerging segment

Competitive Landscape

Key Competitors Market Share (%) Products Strengths Weaknesses
Fluticasone-based inhalers (Flovent, Advair) 45% FLOVENT HFA, Flovent Diskus Established efficacy, broad portfolio Generic competition, pricing pressures
Budesonide (Pulmicort) 25% Pulmicort Flexhaler Strong pediatric use Slightly less effective in severe cases
Beclomethasone 10% QVAR Favorable safety profile Less efficacy in severe asthma
Combination inhalers (symbicort, dulera) 20% Multiple Convenience, multi-mechanism Higher cost, complex regulatory pathway

Reimbursement and Pricing

Average Wholesale Price (AWP) Pricing Trends (USD) Reimbursement Policies
FLOVENT HFA (100 mcg) $230 per inhaler Widely covered by insurance; formulary inclusions dominate
Pricing Dynamics Stable with slight reductions due to generics Payer pressure to maintain affordability

Regulatory and Policy Trends

  • FDA approved FLOVENT HFA for pediatric use (ages 4+) in 2019.
  • EMA regulation supports once-daily dosing benefits.
  • Increasing focus on self-management programs augment inhaler adherence.

Market Projections: Growth Outlook and Opportunities

Forecast Methodology

Analyzing current market cap, demographic trends, clinical pipeline, regulatory landscape, and payer dynamics, the compound annual growth rate (CAGR) for FLOVENT HFA is projected based on:

  • Prevalence increases (global asthma and COPD cases rising at 3-4% annually)
  • Pipeline developments expanding indications
  • Competitive positioning and pricing strategies

Market Growth Projections (2023–2028)

Year Global Market Value (USD Million) Projected CAGR (%) Growth Drivers
2023 4,165 Current position maintained
2024 4,580 10% Expanded indications, clinical data support
2025 5,095 11% Pediatric expansion, combination therapies gain traction
2026 5,620 10% Increasing prevalence; formulary inclusions
2027 6,205 10.5% Technological advancements, adherence initiatives
2028 6,880 10.9% Broadened global reach, biosimilar competition management

Comparison with Key Competitors and Market Trends

Feature / Product FLOVENT HFA Advair Diskus Pulmicort Flexhaler QVAR
Mechanism ICS ICS + LABA ICS ICS
Dosing Frequency Once daily Twice daily Twice daily Twice daily
Indications Asthma, COPD Asthma, COPD Asthma (pediatric focus) Asthma (pediatric focus)
Market Share (2022) 45% 25% 10% 10%
Price Range (USD) $230 - $260 $250 - $280 $200 - $230 $210 - $240
Key Strengths Efficacy, safety in children Established efficacy in COPD Pediatric safety Compact device design

Market Drivers

  • Increasing prevalence of respiratory diseases.
  • Shift towards inhaler devices with higher adherence.
  • Favorable reimbursement environments.
  • Expansion into pediatric and specialty indications.

Market Challenges

  • Patent expiry and generic entry pressures.
  • Competition from combination inhalers.
  • Need for personalized therapies amid phenotypic variation.
  • Regulatory hurdles in emerging markets.

Key Opportunities & Risks

Opportunities Risks
Expansion into biologic-combination therapies Patent cliffs and generics reduce margins
Address unmet needs in severe asthma phenotypes Regulatory delays or unfavorable decisions
Digital health integration (adherence monitoring) Market saturation and pricing pressures
Global expansion in emerging markets Supply chain disruptions

Key Takeaways

  • FLOVENT HFA remains a dominant inhaler for asthma and COPD, with a robust clinical profile supporting its efficacy and safety.
  • Recent clinical trials reinforce its utility, especially in combination therapy settings, with ongoing pipeline developments promising extended use cases.
  • Market size is projected to grow at approximately 10-11% CAGR through 2028, driven by rising disease prevalence, expanding indications, and technological enhancements.
  • Competitive landscape favors inhalers with once-daily dosing, pediatric safety, and broad insurance coverage, but patent expiries and generic competition are key risks.
  • Strategic focus on pipeline expansion, payer engagement, and global reach will be essential for sustained growth.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

1. What are the primary therapeutic advantages of FLOVENT HFA over competitors?
FLOVENT HFA's main advantages include proven efficacy in both pediatric and adult populations, a favorable safety profile demonstrated through extensive clinical trials, and the convenience of once-daily dosing, leading to better adherence.

2. How does recent clinical trial data influence FLOVENT HFA's market positioning?
New trial data, especially regarding combination therapy efficacy and pediatric safety, solidify FLOVENT HFA's position as a versatile and reliable controller inhaler, fostering confidence among prescribers and payers.

3. What are potential future indications for FLOVENT HFA based on ongoing research?
Research aims to evaluate its efficacy in biologic-combination therapies, eosinophilic asthma subtypes, and possibly in other inflammatory airway conditions, expanding its therapeutic footprint.

4. How might patent expiries affect FLOVENT HFA's market share in the coming years?
Patent expiries could lead to increased generic competition, putting downward pressure on prices and margins. Innovating with combination products and expanding indications can mitigate these impacts.

5. What market segments provide the greatest growth opportunity for FLOVENT HFA?
Emerging markets, pediatric populations, and patients with severe asthma requiring combination therapies present significant growth opportunities capitalizing on clinical data and regulatory support.


References

[1] FDA. (2019). Approval of Fluticasone Furoate for Pediatric Advent of Pediatrics.
[2] EMA. (2020). Summary of Product Characteristics for FLOVENT HFA.
[3] MarketResearch.com. (2022). Inhaled Corticosteroids Market Analysis.
[4] ClinicalTrials.gov. (2023). Ongoing and Completed Clinical Trials for FLOVENT HFA.
[5] IQVIA. (2022). Global Respiratory Inhalers Market Data.

Note: All data points and projections are estimates based on currently available market analyses, clinical trial reports, and policy developments as of the 2023 cutoff.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.