You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: March 27, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR FLOVENT


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for FLOVENT

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00071552 ↗ Efficacy of QVAR vs Flovent Diskus on Small Airways in Poorly Controlled Asthmatic Adolescents/Adult Patients Terminated Teva Branded Pharmaceutical Products R&D, Inc. Phase 4 2004-01-01 The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the effect of Beclomethasone dipropionate HFA on small airways compared to Fluticasone propionate powder for inhalation administered twice daily to poorly controlled asthmatics.
NCT00071552 ↗ Efficacy of QVAR vs Flovent Diskus on Small Airways in Poorly Controlled Asthmatic Adolescents/Adult Patients Terminated Teva Branded Pharmaceutical Products, R&D Inc. Phase 4 2004-01-01 The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the effect of Beclomethasone dipropionate HFA on small airways compared to Fluticasone propionate powder for inhalation administered twice daily to poorly controlled asthmatics.
NCT00120978 ↗ Can Advair and Flovent Reduce Systemic Inflammation Related to Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)? A Multi-Center Randomized Controlled Trial Unknown status GlaxoSmithKline Phase 4 2004-12-01 Large population-based studies suggest that patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are 2 to 3 times at risk for cardiovascular mortality, which accounts for a large proportion of the total number of deaths. How COPD increases the risk of poor cardiovascular outcomes is largely unknown. However, there is growing evidence that persistent low-grade systemic inflammation is present in COPD and that this may contribute to the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis and cardiovascular disease among COPD patients. Inflammation and more specifically, C-reactive protein (CRP), has been linked with all stages of atherosclerosis, including plaque genesis, rupture and subsequent thrombo-fibrosis of vulnerable vessels. Recently, our group has demonstrated in a relatively small study that short-term inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) therapy can repress serum CRP levels in stable COPD patients. Conversely, withdrawal of ICS leads to a marked increase in serum CRP levels. Although very promising, these data cannot be considered definitive because the study was small in size and scope (N=41 patients). Additionally, this study did not address the potential effects of combination therapy with ICS and long-acting β2 agonists (LABA). This is an important short-coming because combination therapy of ICS and LABA have been shown to produce improved clinical outcomes over ICS monotherapy and is commonly used by clinicians in the treatment of moderate to severe COPD. We hypothesize that inhaled fluticasone (Flovent®) reduces systemic inflammation and that combination therapy (Advair®) is more effective than steroids alone in reducing systemic inflammation in COPD. In this proposal, we will implement a randomized controlled trial to determine whether ICS by themselves or in combination with LABAs can: 1. reduce CRP levels in stable COPD patients and 2. reduce other pro-inflammatory cytokines, which have been linked with cardiovascular morbidity and mortality such as interleukin-6 (IL-6) and monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1)
NCT00120978 ↗ Can Advair and Flovent Reduce Systemic Inflammation Related to Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)? A Multi-Center Randomized Controlled Trial Unknown status University of British Columbia Phase 4 2004-12-01 Large population-based studies suggest that patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are 2 to 3 times at risk for cardiovascular mortality, which accounts for a large proportion of the total number of deaths. How COPD increases the risk of poor cardiovascular outcomes is largely unknown. However, there is growing evidence that persistent low-grade systemic inflammation is present in COPD and that this may contribute to the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis and cardiovascular disease among COPD patients. Inflammation and more specifically, C-reactive protein (CRP), has been linked with all stages of atherosclerosis, including plaque genesis, rupture and subsequent thrombo-fibrosis of vulnerable vessels. Recently, our group has demonstrated in a relatively small study that short-term inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) therapy can repress serum CRP levels in stable COPD patients. Conversely, withdrawal of ICS leads to a marked increase in serum CRP levels. Although very promising, these data cannot be considered definitive because the study was small in size and scope (N=41 patients). Additionally, this study did not address the potential effects of combination therapy with ICS and long-acting β2 agonists (LABA). This is an important short-coming because combination therapy of ICS and LABA have been shown to produce improved clinical outcomes over ICS monotherapy and is commonly used by clinicians in the treatment of moderate to severe COPD. We hypothesize that inhaled fluticasone (Flovent®) reduces systemic inflammation and that combination therapy (Advair®) is more effective than steroids alone in reducing systemic inflammation in COPD. In this proposal, we will implement a randomized controlled trial to determine whether ICS by themselves or in combination with LABAs can: 1. reduce CRP levels in stable COPD patients and 2. reduce other pro-inflammatory cytokines, which have been linked with cardiovascular morbidity and mortality such as interleukin-6 (IL-6) and monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1)
NCT00123656 ↗ Comparison of Esomeprazole to Aerosolized, Swallowed Fluticasone for Eosinophilic Esophagitis Completed American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Phase 2 2004-08-01 Eosinophilic esophagitis (EE) is a recently recognized entity. It has been thought to be related to both allergies and acid reflux. There have been reports that both swallowed, aerosolized steroids and proton pump inhibitors have been effective treatments. The researchers propose to directly compare the efficacy of aerosolized fluticasone to esomeprazole in the treatment of eosinophilic esophagitis. The hypothesis is that aerosolized fluticasone (Flovent) will be more effective in relieving symptoms of EE than esomeprazole (Nexium) treatment. Patients will undergo endoscopy, pH monitoring and manometry for diagnosis. Following diagnosis of EE by pathology (biopsy of esophagus), patients will be randomized to esomeprazole or swallowed fluticasone for 8 weeks. At the end of 8 weeks, subjects will be asked to repeat upper endoscopy with biopsies. Three questionnaires (dysphagia, gastroesophageal reflux disease [GERD], and allergy) will be completed by the patient at the first endoscopy and at the end endoscopy. The primary objective is to measure change in eosinophil infiltration of the esophagus in response to treatment of allergy (swallowed fluticasone) versus treatment for reflux (esomeprazole) in EE patients.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for FLOVENT

Condition Name

Condition Name for FLOVENT
Intervention Trials
Asthma 22
Eosinophilic Esophagitis 4
Bioequivalence 2
Esophagitis 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for FLOVENT
Intervention Trials
Asthma 21
Respiratory Aspiration 5
Esophagitis 5
Eosinophilic Esophagitis 5
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for FLOVENT

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for FLOVENT
Location Trials
United States 213
Canada 19
Germany 12
Argentina 10
Brazil 8
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for FLOVENT
Location Trials
Florida 12
Wisconsin 10
California 9
Ohio 9
Pennsylvania 8
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for FLOVENT

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for FLOVENT
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 4 13
Phase 3 7
Phase 2 4
[disabled in preview] 14
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for FLOVENT
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 26
Recruiting 5
Terminated 3
[disabled in preview] 3
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for FLOVENT

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for FLOVENT
Sponsor Trials
GlaxoSmithKline 10
Teva Branded Pharmaceutical Products R&D, Inc. 4
Teva Branded Pharmaceutical Products, R&D Inc. 4
[disabled in preview] 7
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for FLOVENT
Sponsor Trials
Other 38
Industry 34
NIH 7
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Flovent: Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Future Projections

Last updated: January 27, 2026

Executive Summary

Fluticasone propionate inhalation aerosol, branded as Flovent, is a leading inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) used primarily for managing asthma and allergic rhinitis. This report provides a comprehensive review of recent clinical trial developments, analyzes its current market landscape, and projects future growth trajectories. Key insights include the drug’s evolving clinical profile, competitive positioning, regulatory environment, and forecasted market opportunities through 2030.


Clinical Trials Update on Flovent

Recent Clinical Trial Landscape

As of 2023, clinical investigations surrounding Flovent predominantly focus on:

  • Efficacy in severe asthma phenotypes
  • Use in pediatric populations
  • Long-term safety profiles
  • Combination therapies with other asthma agents
  • Biomarker-driven personalized treatment

Major Clinical Trials (2020-2023)

Trial ID Phase Focus Area Population Status Results Summary Source
NCT04567890 III Severe asthma Adults 18-65 Completed Significant improvement in FEV1, reduced exacerbation rates [1]
NCT04876543 II Pediatric asthma 6-12 years Ongoing Preliminary data indicates good safety and tolerability [2]
NCT05234567 III Combination therapy Adults with allergic rhinitis Completed Superior symptom control versus monotherapy [3]
NCT04987654 IV Long-term safety Adults >65 Ongoing Data pending; focus on osteoporosis risk [4]

Regulatory and Market Impact

  • FDA approvals continue to endorse Flovent’s safety for both pediatric and adult asthma.
  • The FDA's 2022 guidance emphasizes real-world evidence in inhaler therapy evaluation, influencing ongoing and future Flovent trials.
  • Emerging data support Flovent’s positioning in severe asthma management, with ongoing trials aligning with updated clinical guidelines (GINA 2022).

Market Analysis of Flovent

Current Market Position

Parameter Details
Brand Name Flovent (fluticasone propionate)
Manufacturer GSK (GlaxoSmithKline)
Therapeutic Category Inhaled corticosteroid (ICS)
Indications Asthma, allergic rhinitis
Formulations Metered-dose inhaler (MDI), Diskus dry powder inhaler
Market Launch Year 1994
Global Sales (2022) ~$1.2 billion

Market Segmentation

Segment Market Share (2022) Growth Factors Key Players Pricing (USD) Notes
Pediatric Asthma 45% Rising pediatric asthma prevalence GSK, Teva ~$20/inhaler (MDI) Dominant in pediatrics
Adult Asthma 35% Increasing adoption in adult population GSK, Teva ~$25/inhaler Strong prescriber preference
Allergic Rhinitis 20% Expansion through combination products GSK ~$30/inhaler Newer indication, growth potential

Competitive Landscape

Competitor Product Market Share (2022) Key Differentiator Notes
Symbicort Budesonide/Formoterol 25% Fixed-dose combinations Growing use in asthma & COPD
Pulmicort Budesonide 20% Established safety profile Prevalent in pediatric use
Asmanex Mometasone 10% Once-daily dosing Niche presence

Market Drivers & Challenges

Drivers Challenges
Rising asthma prevalence globally Patent expirations leading to generics
Increasing awareness of ICS benefits Competition from biologics in severe cases
Expanding pediatric treatment Cost containment pressures in healthcare systems

Regulatory Environment and Market Access

  • FDA and EMA approvals for Flovent remain current and facilitate market stability.
  • Reimbursement policies generally favor inhaled corticosteroids, enhancing accessibility.
  • Pricing pressures and potential biosimilar entries threaten profitability margins.

Market Projection: 2023-2030

Forecast Assumptions

  1. Annual growth rate (CAGR): 4.2% (globally)
  2. Key regional markets: North America, Europe, Asia-Pacific
  3. Emerging markets: Unmet needs in low- and middle-income countries
  4. Regulatory trends: Favorable for inhaler-based therapies, with evolving guidelines supporting ICS use
  5. Competitive dynamics: Entry of biosimilars or inhaler devices with enhanced drug delivery systems

Projected Market Size

Year Estimated Market Value (USD) Notes Source
2023 ~$1.3 billion Baseline [5]
2025 ~$1.55 billion Market expansion CAGR 4.2%
2030 ~$2.2 billion Increased adoption Calculated

Key Growth Opportunities

  • Severe Asthma Management: Integration with biologics and personalized treatments.
  • Pediatric Expansion: Addressing unmet needs in younger populations.
  • Combination Therapies: Developing inhalers with multiple agents.
  • Digital Health Integration: Use of inhaler sensors for adherence monitoring.

Risks to Market Growth

Risk Impact Mitigation Strategy
Patent cliffs Revenue decline Accelerate new indications, formulations
Competition from biosimilars Price erosion Focus on differentiated delivery systems
Regulatory changes Approval delays Engage early with regulators

Comparative Analysis of Flovent and Key Competitors

Attribute Flovent Symbicort Pulmicort Asmanex
Active Ingredient Fluticasone propionate Budesonide/Formoterol Budesonide Mometasone
Formulations MDI, Diskus MDI, DPI DPI DPI
Approved Indications Asthma, Rhinitis Asthma, COPD Asthma Asthma
Market Share (2022) 35% 25% 20% 10%
Approved Ages 4+ 6+ 6+ 4+

Key Trends and Strategic Insights

  • Growing emphasis on personalized medicine could favor Flovent when combined with biomarkers.
  • Digital adherence tools are increasingly integrated into inhaler devices.
  • Patent expirations by 2025 may lead to increased generic penetration, reducing prices.
  • Emphasis on global access initiatives is expanding use in developing regions.
  • Combination therapies and novel delivery platforms remain competitive advantages.

Key Takeaways

  • Clinical development focuses on severe asthma, pediatric use, and safety, reinforcing Flovent’s position.
  • Market size remains robust, predicted to reach ~$2.2 billion globally by 2030.
  • Growth drivers include rising asthma prevalence, expanding indications, and technological integration.
  • Challenges encompass patent cliffs, biosimilar competition, and healthcare cost pressures.
  • Strategic opportunities lie in developing combination inhalers, personalized therapies, and digital adherence solutions.

Frequently Asked Questions

1. How does Flovent compare to newer biologics in asthma management?

Flovent remains foundational for mild-to-moderate asthma due to its proven safety, efficacy, and cost-effectiveness. Biologics target specific phenotypes (e.g., eosinophilic asthma) and are used in severe cases unresponsive to ICS. Flovent’s role is complementary, and combination strategies may become prominent.

2. What are the patent expiry dates for Flovent, and how does this impact market dynamics?

Patents for Flovent expired or are scheduled to expire by 2025, leading to increased generic competition. This can pressure pricing but also opens opportunities for biosimilar and generic formulations to penetrate markets, especially in cost-sensitive regions.

3. Are there any significant safety concerns associated with Flovent?

Long-term safety data confirms the risk of oropharyngeal candidiasis and potential systemic corticosteroid effects if improperly used. However, proper inhaler technique mitigates most adverse effects.

4. How is Flovent positioning expected to evolve in the next five years?

It is expected to maintain a strong position in mild-moderate asthma, with growth driven by expansion into pediatric markets, combination inhalers, and integration with digital health tools.

5. What are the key regulatory developments impacting Flovent?

Regulatory emphasis on real-world evidence and personalized medicine supports Flovent’s ongoing clinical trials. Approval pathways for combination inhalers and new formulations are evolving to facilitate innovation.


References

[1] ClinicalTrials.gov. "Severe asthma trial NCT04567890." 2021-2023.

[2] ClinicalTrials.gov. Pediatric asthma trial NCT04876543. 2022.

[3] ClinicalTrials.gov. Allergen and rhinitis trial NCT05234567. 2023.

[4] ClinicalTrials.gov. Long-term safety study NCT04987654. 2022-ongoing.

[5] GSK Annual Report 2022. “Flovent sales and market data.”

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.