Last Updated: May 11, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR FLONASE ALLERGY RELIEF


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for FLONASE ALLERGY RELIEF

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00119015 ↗ The Addition of Montelukast to Fluticasone in the Treatment of Perennial Allergic Rhinitis Terminated Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. Phase 4 2005-07-01 Some people with nasal allergy symptoms continue to have symptoms even after treatment with a nasal steroid spray. The purpose of this study is to see if these patients are helped by adding another medication (montelukast) to their treatment compared to placebo (a substance that looks like the active medication but does not contain the drug).
NCT00119015 ↗ The Addition of Montelukast to Fluticasone in the Treatment of Perennial Allergic Rhinitis Terminated University of Chicago Phase 4 2005-07-01 Some people with nasal allergy symptoms continue to have symptoms even after treatment with a nasal steroid spray. The purpose of this study is to see if these patients are helped by adding another medication (montelukast) to their treatment compared to placebo (a substance that looks like the active medication but does not contain the drug).
NCT00275561 ↗ Topical Steroid Treatment for Eosinophilic Esophagitis Completed Mayo Clinic Phase 2 2005-11-01 This was a randomized controlled trial of swallowed fluticasone vs. placebo for eosinophilic esophagitis. Eosinophilic esophagitis is an inflammatory condition in which the wall of the esophagus becomes filled with large numbers of eosinophils, a type of white blood cell. Patients who have this condition have difficulty in swallowing (dysphagia) solid food. Prior to treatment the patients had biopsies of their esophagus and took questionnaires regarding their symptoms. Treatment was given for 6 weeks, after which biopsies were taken from the esophagus to measure any changes in the tissue from before treatment. The primary endpoint was improvement in dysphagia as measured by the validated Mayo Dysphagia Questionaire. Secondary outcomes included partial symptom response, and histologic (tissue) response to treatment.
NCT00385463 ↗ Adolescent and Adult Subjects With Asthma and Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis Receiving Advair Diskus or Placebo Withdrawn GlaxoSmithKline N/A 2006-04-01 The four respiratory drugs being researched in this study have been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and are currently available by prescription at your drug store. One of the drugs is for the treatment of asthma alone, one is for treatment of SAR alone, and one is for treatment of both SAR and asthma. In addition, you will also receive one asthma rescue drug (albuterol) that is to be used for any breakthrough asthma symptoms that you may experience throughout the study. The purpose of this study is to see how well your asthma and SAR are controlled when taking one of the medicine combinations
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for FLONASE ALLERGY RELIEF

Condition Name

Condition Name for FLONASE ALLERGY RELIEF
Intervention Trials
Allergic Rhinitis 5
Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis 4
Rhinitis 2
Conjunctivitis 2
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for FLONASE ALLERGY RELIEF
Intervention Trials
Rhinitis 14
Rhinitis, Allergic 13
Rhinitis, Allergic, Seasonal 5
Conjunctivitis 4
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for FLONASE ALLERGY RELIEF

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for FLONASE ALLERGY RELIEF
Location Trials
United States 25
Canada 1
Ireland 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for FLONASE ALLERGY RELIEF
Location Trials
Massachusetts 3
California 3
Florida 2
Minnesota 2
Illinois 2
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for FLONASE ALLERGY RELIEF

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for FLONASE ALLERGY RELIEF
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 4 9
Phase 3 7
Phase 2/Phase 3 1
[disabled in preview] 3
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for FLONASE ALLERGY RELIEF
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 16
Terminated 3
Recruiting 2
[disabled in preview] 2
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for FLONASE ALLERGY RELIEF

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for FLONASE ALLERGY RELIEF
Sponsor Trials
Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. 7
University of Chicago 2
GlaxoSmithKline 2
[disabled in preview] 2
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for FLONASE ALLERGY RELIEF
Sponsor Trials
Industry 16
Other 13
NIH 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

FLONASE ALLERGY RELIEF Market Analysis and Financial Projection

Last updated: May 9, 2026

FLONASE ALLERGY RELIEF: Clinical Trial Update, Market Analysis, and Projection

What is FLONASE ALLERGY RELIEF (drug, target, and dosing context)?

FLONASE ALLERGY RELIEF is the brand name for fluticasone propionate administered as an intranasal corticosteroid for allergic rhinitis. The active ingredient targets the glucocorticoid receptor pathway to reduce nasal inflammation, including congestion, rhinorrhea, sneezing, and itching.

Typical product positioning (consumer and formulary use)

  • Indication: Allergic rhinitis (seasonal and perennial, depending on jurisdiction labeling)
  • Modality: Intranasal corticosteroid
  • Market role: OTC and prescription-grade fluticasone propionate products compete within the intranasal allergy category.

Source anchored details below reflect publicly available regulatory and labeling records for fluticasone propionate intranasal products and associated safety/efficacy review materials. [1–4]


What do the clinical trials landscape and updates show?

FLONASE (fluticasone propionate intranasal) sits in a mature class with a long clinical record. Clinical “updates” in this category tend to be incremental: post-marketing safety, comparative effectiveness among intranasal corticosteroids, formulation iterations, and outcome studies in real-world settings rather than single-definitive new phase programs.

Current practical view for decision-makers

  • No single, newly published global phase program is required to underwrite class effectiveness; the core efficacy and safety package was established across prior randomized studies.
  • Recent activity in the fluticasone intranasal space is commonly driven by:
    • Comparative trials vs other intranasal corticosteroids
    • Subgroup analyses (adults, pediatrics, multi-morbidity)
    • Safety surveillance and labeling maintenance
    • Outcome studies aligned with guideline endpoints (symptom score improvement, rescue-medication reduction)

How to read “clinical trial updates” for FLONASE For mature intranasal steroids, the most decision-relevant evidence is not “first-in-class novelty” but:

  • consistent control of daytime and nighttime symptom burden
  • reduced need for antihistamine rescue in some study designs
  • tolerability across chronic or seasonal use
  • low systemic exposure relative to oral corticosteroids (class mechanism and pharmacokinetics support this)

Evidence anchor points

  • The FDA reviews and labeling records for fluticasone propionate intranasal products summarize the evidence base, including efficacy endpoints and safety observations across trials. [1–4]

What is the market: size, competitive structure, and FLONASE’s role?

FLONASE competes in the intranasal allergy market, dominated by intranasal corticosteroids and antihistamine sprays. Within this category, fluticasone propionate products have maintained strong share due to:

  • established guideline inclusion for allergic rhinitis
  • consistent symptom-control profile
  • OTC accessibility (depending on market)
  • strong pharmacy and retail presence for seasonal demand peaks

Competitive set (category-level)

  • Intranasal corticosteroids: fluticasone, fluticasone furoate, mometasone, budesonide, triamcinolone (depending on brand availability)
  • Intranasal antihistamines: azelastine (often used standalone or in combination products)
  • Combination products: intranasal corticosteroid plus intranasal antihistamine (in some markets)

Pricing and channel dynamics

  • OTC access compresses pricing versus prescription-only specialty products.
  • Seasonalality drives short-cycle demand spikes; sustained off-season use supports baseline volume.
  • Market share typically responds to:
    • formulary placement (prescription markets)
    • OTC visibility and promo intensity
    • pharmacy shelf position and pack-size strategy
    • substitution among steroid sprays at switch time

Regulatory and compliance effects on market

  • Labeling and safety communications influence clinician and consumer confidence and can affect category switching behaviors. FDA labeling and review documents provide the structure for ongoing market access and claims. [1–4]

How is the intranasal allergy market projected to grow?

Growth in allergic rhinitis treatment markets typically tracks:

  • prevalence trends of allergic rhinitis and comorbidities
  • penetration of intranasal therapies
  • patient persistence and adherence
  • expansion of OTC availability and retailer distribution
  • product launches of combination sprays and differentiated delivery formats

For a mature active ingredient like fluticasone propionate, FLONASE’s growth usually comes less from “new efficacy” and more from:

  • share maintenance and mild share gains from competitor substitution
  • seasonal scaling
  • pack engineering and retail execution
  • continued guideline adherence

Projection framing for business planning A defensible projection for FLONASE should be treated as a category-and-share model:

  • Category growth: low-to-mid single digits in many mature markets (driven by patient numbers, persistence, and replacement of older therapies)
  • Share: competitive drift based on brand marketing and substitution between steroid sprays
  • Net: modest growth with seasonal peaks, unless new competitive combinations shift use patterns materially

Key constraints

  • Steroid sprays already represent standard first-line care; there is limited room for “total class expansion” without a major guideline shift or new patient-identification surge.
  • Combination products can draw incremental share, but steroid monotherapy remains central for symptom control.

What is the most decision-relevant risk map for FLONASE?

1) Competitive substitution risk

  • Combination intranasal therapies and alternative intranasal steroids can capture patients who want faster onset or reduced rescue medication use.

2) Label and safety handling risk

  • Ongoing post-marketing surveillance and labeling updates can alter perceived tolerability.

3) Adherence and technique risk

  • Intranasal steroid performance depends on correct technique and consistent daily use. Any market-wide usability disadvantage can reduce realized outcomes and retention.

4) Supply chain and retail execution risk

  • Seasonal products are sensitive to availability, shelf stock, and promo calendar execution.

Regulatory anchor for ongoing access FDA labeling and review documentation for fluticasone propionate intranasal products establish the safety and efficacy claims and support market access. [1–4]


What is the clinical trial status you should track next (high-signal watchlist)?

For FLONASE specifically, the high-signal items are not general allergic rhinitis efficacy trials already supported by the class, but:

  • head-to-head studies in relevant populations (pediatric subsets, high-burden seasonal periods)
  • trials testing comparative outcomes against combination products
  • persistence and real-world adherence studies tied to patient technique
  • safety updates on long-term intranasal steroid use in labeled populations

These are the trial types most likely to change net share rather than restate known efficacy.


Key Takeaways

  • FLONASE ALLERGY RELIEF is fluticasone propionate intranasal, a mature intranasal corticosteroid used for allergic rhinitis with a well-established efficacy and safety package supported by FDA review and labeling materials. [1–4]
  • Clinical “updates” for this product category tend to be incremental (comparative, subgroup, and real-world adherence/safety) rather than new foundational phase-defining evidence.
  • Market growth for FLONASE is most effectively modeled through a category-and-share approach driven by seasonal demand, intranasal steroid penetration, and substitution pressure from combination sprays and alternative intranasal steroids.
  • The primary execution levers are retail/prescriber visibility, pack strategy, and adherence outcomes; the primary threat is formulation and regimen switching toward faster-acting or combination intranasal products.

FAQs

1) Is FLONASE’s efficacy supported by randomized clinical evidence?

Yes. FDA review and labeling documents for fluticasone propionate intranasal products consolidate randomized trial evidence and describe efficacy endpoints used for approval and labeling. [1–4]

2) What class of drug is FLONASE?

FLONASE ALLERGY RELIEF contains fluticasone propionate, an intranasal corticosteroid used to treat allergic rhinitis by reducing nasal inflammation through glucocorticoid receptor-mediated effects. [1–4]

3) Are new phase trials still necessary for FLONASE?

For a mature product, incremental studies (comparative effectiveness, subgroups, and real-world evidence) are typically more relevant than new single-definitive phase programs, since the core efficacy and safety package already exists in regulatory review materials. [1–4]

4) What market factors most influence FLONASE volume?

Seasonality, OTC retail execution, patient persistence, correct nasal technique, and competitive substitution between intranasal steroids and combination therapies are the main drivers. (Regulatory labeling supports the basis for use and claims.) [1–4]

5) What regulatory documents matter for ongoing market access and claims?

FDA labeling and review records for fluticasone propionate intranasal products define approved indications, safety information, and claim boundaries. [1–4]


References

[1] U.S. Food and Drug Administration. (n.d.). Drugs@FDA: Flonase (fluticasone propionate) nasal spray, suspension; FDA approval history and labeling. FDA.
[2] U.S. Food and Drug Administration. (n.d.). Label (package insert) for Flonase (fluticasone propionate) nasal spray. FDA.
[3] U.S. Food and Drug Administration. (n.d.). Drugs@FDA: Flonase Sensimist (fluticasone furoate) nasal spray, suspension; FDA approval history and labeling. FDA.
[4] U.S. Food and Drug Administration. (n.d.). FDA review documents and pharmacology/toxicology notes for fluticasone intranasal products (as available in public records). FDA.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.