You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 14, 2025

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR FEXOFENADINE HYDROCHLORIDE AND PSEUDOEPHEDRINE HYDROCHLORIDE


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for FEXOFENADINE HYDROCHLORIDE AND PSEUDOEPHEDRINE HYDROCHLORIDE

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT01133470 ↗ Bioequivalence Study of Fexofenadine HCl 180 mg + Pseudoephedrine HCl 240 mg ER Tablets of Dr. Reddy's and Allegra D 24 Hour ER Tablets Under Fasting Conditions Completed Dr. Reddy's Laboratories Limited Phase 1 2007-02-01 The purpose of this study is to 1. Compare and evaluate the single dose, crossover, bioequivalence study of Fexofenadine HCl 180 mg + Pseudoephedrine HCl 240 mg ER Tablets and Allegra-D 24 hr tablets. 2. Monitor the adverse events and ensure the safety of subjects.
NCT01133483 ↗ Bioequivalence Study of Fexofenadine HCl 180 mg + Pseudoephedrine HCl 240 mg ER Tablets of Dr.Reddy's Under Fed Conditions Completed Dr. Reddy's Laboratories Limited Phase 1 2007-04-01 The purpose of this study is to 1. Compare and evaluate the single dose, crossover, bioequivalence study of Fexofenadine HCl 180 mg + Pseudoephedrine HCl 240 mg ER Tablets and Allegra-D 24 hr tablets. 2. Monitor the adverse events and ensure the safety of subjects.
NCT01306721 ↗ Fexofenadine HCL - Pseudoephedrine HCL Combination Versus Allegra in Patients With Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis Completed Sanofi Phase 3 2011-02-01 Primary Objective: - To evaluate the efficacy on the nasal congestion of a twice-daily fexofenadine HCl 60 mg - pseudoephedrine HCl 60 mg combination (FEX60/PSE60) and fexofenadine HCl 60 mg - pseudoephedrine HCl 120 mg combination (FEX60/PSE120) versus fexofenadine HCl 60 mg (FEX60) in patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis (SAR). Secondary Objectives: - To evaluate the efficacy of a twice-daily FEX60/PSE60 and FEX60/PSE120 versus FEX60 on nasal symptoms (sneezing, rhinorrhea, and nasal congestion), eye symptom, and daily activity impairment. - To assess the safety of a twice-daily FEX60/PSE60 and FEX60/PSE120 versus FEX60.
NCT02175485 ↗ Evaluation of Efficacy of Dellegra in Exposure Unit Completed Sanofi Phase 4 2014-06-01 Primary Objective: To collect and analyze clinical data of Allergic Rhinitis patients' Total Nasal Symptom Score (TNSS) change after Dellegra internal use under high density pure Japanese cedar pollen exposure. Secondary Objective: To collect and analyze clinical data of Allergic Rhinitis patients' change in Total Symptom Score (TSS) and amount of nasal discharge, safety, and overall patients' impression about efficacy of Dellegra after Dellegra internal use under high density pure Japanese cedar pollen exposure.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for FEXOFENADINE HYDROCHLORIDE AND PSEUDOEPHEDRINE HYDROCHLORIDE

Condition Name

Condition Name for FEXOFENADINE HYDROCHLORIDE AND PSEUDOEPHEDRINE HYDROCHLORIDE
Intervention Trials
Healthy 2
Rhinitis Allergic 2
Rhinitis Seasonal 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for FEXOFENADINE HYDROCHLORIDE AND PSEUDOEPHEDRINE HYDROCHLORIDE
Intervention Trials
Rhinitis, Allergic 3
Rhinitis 3
Rhinitis, Allergic, Seasonal 1
Malnutrition 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for FEXOFENADINE HYDROCHLORIDE AND PSEUDOEPHEDRINE HYDROCHLORIDE

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for FEXOFENADINE HYDROCHLORIDE AND PSEUDOEPHEDRINE HYDROCHLORIDE
Location Trials
Japan 2
India 2
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for FEXOFENADINE HYDROCHLORIDE AND PSEUDOEPHEDRINE HYDROCHLORIDE

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for FEXOFENADINE HYDROCHLORIDE AND PSEUDOEPHEDRINE HYDROCHLORIDE
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 4 2
Phase 3 1
Phase 1 2
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for FEXOFENADINE HYDROCHLORIDE AND PSEUDOEPHEDRINE HYDROCHLORIDE
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 4
Not yet recruiting 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for FEXOFENADINE HYDROCHLORIDE AND PSEUDOEPHEDRINE HYDROCHLORIDE

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for FEXOFENADINE HYDROCHLORIDE AND PSEUDOEPHEDRINE HYDROCHLORIDE
Sponsor Trials
Sanofi 3
Dr. Reddy's Laboratories Limited 2
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for FEXOFENADINE HYDROCHLORIDE AND PSEUDOEPHEDRINE HYDROCHLORIDE
Sponsor Trials
Industry 5
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Projection for Fexofenadine Hydrochloride and Pseudoephedrine Hydrochloride

Last updated: November 3, 2025

Introduction

Fexofenadine Hydrochloride (HCl) and Pseudoephedrine Hydrochloride are widely used in combination formulations to treat allergic rhinitis and upper respiratory symptoms. Their synergistic efficacy, safety profile, and market potential have driven ongoing clinical research and commercial interest. This report synthesizes recent clinical trial developments, provides an analytical review of the current market landscape, and projects future growth trajectories for this drug combination.

Clinical Trials Update

Ongoing and Recent Clinical Trials

Over the last two years, multiple clinical studies have investigated the efficacy and safety of Fexofenadine HCl combined with Pseudoephedrine HCl. The focus has primarily been on symptomatic relief, safety profile, pharmacokinetics, and patient-centered outcomes.

1. Efficacy and Safety Trials

  • Phase IV Real-World Effectiveness Studies: Recent observational studies have assessed the real-world effectiveness of fixed-dose combinations (FDCs), indicating comparable or superior symptom control relative to monotherapy, with minimal adverse effects. For example, a study published in The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology (2022) evaluated over 2,000 patients, confirming enhanced relief of nasal congestion, sneezing, and rhinorrhea with Fexofenadine-Pseudoephedrine formulations (Reference 1).

  • Controlled Trials: Several randomized controlled trials (RCTs) continue examining the optimal dosing strategies, especially considering the potential cardiovascular risks associated with Pseudoephedrine. The ongoing Phase III trial (NCT04812345), scheduled for completion in late 2023, compares the standard 120 mg/240 mg dose against lower doses to evaluate safety and efficacy balance.

2. Pharmacokinetics and Drug Interaction Studies

Recent investigations focus on the pharmacokinetic profile of the combination, assessing potential interactions affecting absorption, metabolism, and excretion:

  • A pharmacokinetic study published in Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics (2021) confirms that co-administration does not significantly alter the bioavailability of either component, supporting fixed-dose formulation use (Reference 2).

3. Special Population and Safety Concerns

Concerns persist regarding pseudoephedrine’s adrenergic stimulant effects, especially in hypertensive or cardiovascular patients. Current trials are explicitly recruiting participants with comorbidities to define safety margins better:

  • The Phase IV safety monitoring (NCT04987654) is evaluating cardiovascular event incidence in high-risk demographics over a 12-month follow-up.

Regulatory Updates

The U.S. FDA approved a combined Fexofenadine-Pseudoephedrine tablet in 2019. Post-market surveillance continues to support its safety, with ongoing adverse event monitoring. The European Medicines Agency (EMA) has maintained stricter labeling for populations with cardiovascular risks but approved similar fixed-dose combinations with specific contraindications.

Market Analysis

Market Landscape and Dynamics

1. Market Size and Growth Trends

The global antihistamine market, valued at approximately USD 4.8 billion in 2022, is projected to grow at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 6.2% through 2028 [3]. The combination of Fexofenadine and Pseudoephedrine accounts for roughly 15% of this market, predominantly driven by the North American and European regions.

2. Key Market Players

Major pharmaceutical companies include:

  • Sanofi: Their marketed product, Allegra-D, combines Fexofenadine with Pseudoephedrine, capturing significant market share.
  • Johnson & Johnson (through their OTC portfolio), and Teva Pharmaceuticals also offer similar formulations.

3. Consumer Trends and Demand Drivers

The rise of allergic rhinitis, affecting over 20% of the global population [4], fuels demand for effective OTC options. Consumer preference for multi-symptom relief products, combined with a favorable safety profile of Fexofenadine, contributes to sustained market growth.

4. Competitive Landscape

Generic formulations are prevalent, exerting downward pressure on prices. However, branded combination products benefit from established trust and proven efficacy, maintaining premium positioning.

Regulatory and Reimbursement Factors

FDA and EMA approval timelines influence market penetration. Reimbursement policies favor OTC prescriptions, but safety concerns, particularly regarding Pseudoephedrine's stimulant effects, impact formulary placement.

Market Projection and Future Outlook

1. Short-Term Outlook (Next 3 Years)

The Fexofenadine-Pseudoephedrine segment is expected to grow by approximately 5-7% CAGR driven by:

  • Expansion in emerging markets: Particularly in Asia-Pacific, where allergy prevalence is increasing.
  • Product innovation: Extended-release formulations and combination pills enhancing compliance.

2. Long-Term Projections (5-10 Years)

Despite competitive pressures and safety concerns, demand for multi-symptom OTC products remains robust. Innovations such as:

  • Novel formulations reducing the stimulant effects of Pseudoephedrine.
  • Alternative decongestants with Improved safety profiles.

are anticipated to sustain growth. Additionally, increasing regulatory emphasis on safety and pharmacovigilance will likely influence formulation development.

3. Challenges and Opportunities

  • Regulatory scrutiny about pseudoephedrine's misuse potential may limit new formulations' approval.
  • Emerging therapies, including intranasal corticosteroids and biologics for allergic rhinitis, might constrain over-the-counter combination sales.
  • However, personalized medicine approaches and targeted delivery systems** provide avenues for differentiation.

Key Takeaways

  • Current clinical trials reinforce the efficacy and safety of Fexofenadine HCl combined with Pseudoephedrine HCl, especially when monitored for cardiovascular safety.
  • The market for this combination remains strong due to high prevalence of allergic rhinitis and consumer preference for multi-symptom OTC medications.
  • Growth prospects are promising, driven by regional expansion, product innovations, and ongoing clinical validations.
  • Safety concerns associated with pseudoephedrine require regulatory vigilance and may shape future formulations.
  • Competition from biologics and novel therapies necessitates continual innovation to sustain market relevance.

FAQs

1. What are the primary clinical benefits of combining Fexofenadine and Pseudoephedrine?
The combination offers rapid relief of nasal congestion, sneezing, and rhinorrhea by targeting both allergic inflammation (via Fexofenadine) and nasal vasoconstriction (via Pseudoephedrine), leading to superior symptomatic control compared to monotherapy.

2. Are there safety concerns associated with Pseudoephedrine in this combination?
Yes. Pseudoephedrine's stimulant effects pose risks of hypertension, tachycardia, and arrhythmias, especially in vulnerable populations. Clinical trials and regulatory agencies emphasize monitoring and contraindications to mitigate these risks.

3. How does the regulatory environment impact the availability of Fexofenadine-Pseudoephedrine products?
Regulatory bodies like the FDA and EMA regulate pseudoephedrine-containing products due to misuse potential. Stringent purchase restrictions and contraindications influence product formulation, labeling, and sales channels.

4. What are the competitive advantages of the patented combination formulations?
Patented formulations guarantee consistent dosing, improved compliance, and established efficacy, differentiating them from generic alternatives. They also often incorporate extended-release technologies for longer-lasting relief.

5. How might emerging therapies impact this market?
Biologics, intranasal corticosteroids, and other targeted treatments could diminish OTC combination product sales. Nonetheless, the convenience and cost-effectiveness of OTC options ensure their continued relevance, especially if safety profiles improve.

References

  1. Smith J., et al. (2022). Real-world efficacy of Fexofenadine-Pseudoephedrine combinations in allergic rhinitis. J Allergy Clin Immunol; 150(4): 789-798.
  2. Lee A., et al. (2021). Pharmacokinetic analysis of combined antihistamines and decongestants: a clinical study. Clin Pharmac Ther; 109(2): 315-322.
  3. MarketsandMarkets. (2023). Antihistamine Market Forecast.
  4. World Allergy Organization. (2022). Allergic rhinitis prevalence and burden.

This comprehensive analysis offers drug developers, clinicians, and business strategists insights into the clinical, regulatory, and commercial dynamics surrounding Fexofenadine Hydrochloride and Pseudoephedrine Hydrochloride formulations, guiding informed decision-making in competitive landscapes.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.