You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 19, 2025

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR FERRIC DERISOMALTOSE


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for FERRIC DERISOMALTOSE

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT02642562 ↗ Intravenous Iron Treatment in Patients With Heart Failure and Iron Deficiency: IRONMAN Active, not recruiting NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde Phase 4 2016-08-01 This study will address whether the additional use of Intravenous (IV) iron on top of standard care will improve the outlook for patients with heart failure and iron deficiency. One group of participants will receive treatment with iron injections and the other group will not receive any iron injections.
NCT02642562 ↗ Intravenous Iron Treatment in Patients With Heart Failure and Iron Deficiency: IRONMAN Active, not recruiting University of Glasgow Phase 4 2016-08-01 This study will address whether the additional use of Intravenous (IV) iron on top of standard care will improve the outlook for patients with heart failure and iron deficiency. One group of participants will receive treatment with iron injections and the other group will not receive any iron injections.
NCT02905539 ↗ A Study Comparing the Iron Substitution With the Medicinal Products Ferinject or Monofer Completed Saarland University Phase 4 2016-07-01 The purpose of this study is to determine to what extend a treatment with the iron compounds Iron Isomaltoside 1000 or Ferric Carboxymaltose is leading to hypophosphatemia and to study the potential clinical impact of hypophosphatemia.
NCT02905539 ↗ A Study Comparing the Iron Substitution With the Medicinal Products Ferinject or Monofer Completed Universität des Saarlandes Phase 4 2016-07-01 The purpose of this study is to determine to what extend a treatment with the iron compounds Iron Isomaltoside 1000 or Ferric Carboxymaltose is leading to hypophosphatemia and to study the potential clinical impact of hypophosphatemia.
NCT02940860 ↗ Iron Isomaltoside/Ferric Derisomaltose vs Iron Sucrose for Treatment of Iron Deficiency Anemia in Non-Dialysis-Dependent Chronic Kidney Disease Completed Pharmacosmos A/S Phase 3 2016-11-29 Evaluation of safety and efficacy of iron isomaltoside/ferric derisomaltose compared with iron sucrose, in subjects with both non-dialysis-dependent chronic kidney disease (NDD-CKD) and iron deficiency anaemia (IDA).
NCT02940886 ↗ Iron Isomaltoside/Ferric Derisomaltose vs Iron Sucrose for the Treatment of Iron Deficiency Anemia (IDA) Completed Pharmacosmos A/S Phase 3 2016-11-08 Evaluate safety and efficacy of iron isomaltoside/ferric derisomaltose (Monofer®/Monoferric®) compared with iron sucrose (Venofer®), in subjects diagnosed with IDA.
NCT02962648 ↗ An Extension Trial to Assess the Safety of Re-dosing of Iron Isomaltoside/Ferric Derisomaltose (Monofer®/Monoferric®) Completed Pharmacosmos A/S Phase 3 2017-01-09 Evaluate safety and efficacy of intravenous (IV) iron isomaltoside/ferric derisomaltose re-dosing, in subjects who were previously treated with iron isomaltoside/ferric derisomaltose.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for FERRIC DERISOMALTOSE

Condition Name

Condition Name for FERRIC DERISOMALTOSE
Intervention Trials
Iron Deficiency Anemia 9
Iron Deficiency Anaemia 5
Anemia 4
Anemia, Iron Deficiency 3
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for FERRIC DERISOMALTOSE
Intervention Trials
Anemia, Iron-Deficiency 18
Anemia 18
Deficiency Diseases 7
Iron Deficiencies 4
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for FERRIC DERISOMALTOSE

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for FERRIC DERISOMALTOSE
Location Trials
United States 87
China 3
Denmark 2
India 2
Germany 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for FERRIC DERISOMALTOSE
Location Trials
California 6
Florida 5
Michigan 4
Louisiana 4
Texas 4
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for FERRIC DERISOMALTOSE

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for FERRIC DERISOMALTOSE
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
PHASE4 2
PHASE3 1
Phase 4 9
[disabled in preview] 13
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for FERRIC DERISOMALTOSE
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Not yet recruiting 10
Recruiting 7
Completed 6
[disabled in preview] 2
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for FERRIC DERISOMALTOSE

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for FERRIC DERISOMALTOSE
Sponsor Trials
Pharmacosmos A/S 12
China-Japan Friendship Hospital 2
Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College 1
[disabled in preview] 4
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for FERRIC DERISOMALTOSE
Sponsor Trials
Other 36
Industry 12
NIH 2
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Projection for Ferric Derisomaltose

Last updated: November 2, 2025

Introduction

Ferric Derisomaltose, a high-dose intravenous iron formulation, has garnered increasing attention within the pharmaceutical landscape due to its potential to address iron deficiency anemia (IDA). As oral iron therapies face absorption challenges and gastrointestinal side effects, the demand for effective IV alternatives grows. This article offers an in-depth analysis of recent clinical trial developments, comprehensive market insights, and future growth projections for Ferric Derisomaltose.

Clinical Trials Update

Current Clinical Landscape

Ferric Derisomaltose, marketed mainly under brand names like Monofer® (by CSL Behring), has undergone extensive clinical evaluation. The therapy's core appeal lies in delivering a high dose of iron safely and efficiently, often reducing infusion sessions compared to more traditional iron therapies.

Recent Trial Outcomes

Recent randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have confirmed Ferric Derisomaltose's efficacy and safety profile:

  • Efficacy: Multiple studies demonstrate significant hemoglobin increases within two weeks post-infusion, with sustained effects over several months. The high bioavailability of Ferric Derisomaltose ensures rapid iron repletion, especially beneficial for patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and those undergoing chemotherapy.

  • Safety Profile: A comprehensive safety assessment across trials confirms a low incidence of adverse events. Notably, serious allergic reactions are rare, and the risk of iron overload remains minimal due to controlled dosing protocols.

Regulatory and Pipeline Developments

The drug's approval status varies globally:

  • FDA & EMA: Ferric Derisomaltose (Monofer®) is approved in multiple regions, with ongoing post-market surveillance reinforcing its safety credentials.
  • New Trials: Emerging studies explore expanded indications, including use in heart failure-related anemia and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Some trials evaluate combination therapies with erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) to optimize anemia management.

Ongoing Clinical Trials

Several trials are in progress:

  • Phase IV Post-Marketing Surveillance: Monitoring long-term adverse effects and real-world effectiveness.
  • Expanded Indications: Trials assessing efficacy in pediatric populations and pregnant women.
  • Comparative Studies: Head-to-head evaluations with other IV iron formulations like Ferric Carboxymaltose and Iron Sucrose, focusing on safety, efficacy, and infusion efficiency.

Market Analysis

Market Overview

The global iron deficiency anemia therapeutics market is projected to grow substantially, driven by increasing prevalence and advances in IV iron therapies. Ferric Derisomaltose competes in a niche marked by high patient preference for rapid, well-tolerated infusions.

Key Market Drivers

  • Rising Prevalence of IDA: Approximately 1.62 billion people globally suffer from anemia, with iron deficiency accounting for ~50% of cases, primarily affecting women, children, and CKD patients[^1].

  • Limitations of Oral Iron: Gastrointestinal side effects and poor absorption limit use, escalating demand for IV alternatives.

  • Advancements in IV Iron Formulations: The development of high-dose, low-risk formulations like Ferric Derisomaltose increases adoption, especially within hospital and outpatient settings.

  • Chronic Disease Management: Growing focus on managing anemia related to chronic illnesses enhances market scope.

Competitive Landscape

Ferric Derisomaltose faces competition primarily from:

  • Ferric Carboxymaltose: Market leader with broader approval in multiple regions.
  • Iron Sucrose and Low-Molecular-Weight Iron Dextran: Used in specific clinical settings.
  • Developing Generics: Patent expirations and manufacturing innovations are increasing generic options, pressuring brand-name pricing.

Market Penetration & Adoption

In North America and Europe, the adoption rate of Ferric Derisomaltose is steady, supported by clinical support and favorable safety profiles. Hospital formularies increasingly prefer high-dose iron formulations due to reduced infusion sessions, which improve patient throughput and reduce healthcare costs.

Regulatory & Reimbursement Factors

Insurance coverage and reimbursement policies significantly influence market penetration. Positive coverage decisions by CMS (Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) and EU health authorities accelerate adoption in institutional settings.

Market Projection

Short-term Outlook (Next 3–5 Years)

  • Growth Rate: The global intravenous iron market is projected to register a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 8–10%[^2].
  • Sales Forecast: Ferric Derisomaltose is expected to claim a substantial share due to its safety profile and convenience, with global sales reaching an estimated USD 600–800 million by 2027.

Long-term Outlook (Beyond 5 Years)

  • Expanded Indication Pipeline: Clinical trials in new patient populations will broaden its application.
  • Innovations and Formulation Improvements: Next-generation formulations may further boost efficacy and safety, enhancing market share.
  • Emerging Markets: Countries in Asia-Pacific and Latin America present high growth potential due to increasing anemia prevalence and improving healthcare infrastructure.

Potential Barriers

  • Pricing Pressures: Cost competitiveness challenges from generics and biosimilars.
  • Regulatory Delays: Additional approvals or post-marketing restrictions could temper growth.
  • Clinical Competition: Efficacy and safety advantages must be continually validated against competing therapies.

Conclusion

Ferric Derisomaltose maintains a robust position within the intravenous iron market, underpinned by favorable clinical data and growing demand for efficient anemia management solutions. Ongoing clinical trials, coupled with expanding indications, are poised to enhance its market penetration. However, pricing strategies, regulatory environments, and competitive dynamics will remain critical influences on its long-term success.


Key Takeaways

  • Ferric Derisomaltose has demonstrated strong efficacy and safety in recent clinical trials, supporting its role in treating iron deficiency anemia, especially where oral iron is inadequate or poorly tolerated.
  • The global IV iron market is expanding, driven by the rising prevalence of anemia and clinical advantages over traditional therapies.
  • Market growth projections indicate a CAGR of 8–10%, with sales potentially surpassing USD 800 million by 2027, driven by regulatory approvals, clinical validation, and enhanced healthcare infrastructure.
  • Competition from other high-dose IV iron formulations necessitates continuous clinical innovation and strategic positioning.
  • Key growth opportunities lie in expanding indications, emerging markets, and optimizing delivery models within healthcare systems.

FAQs

  1. What are the primary clinical advantages of Ferric Derisomaltose over other IV iron therapies?
    It enables high-dose infusions in fewer sessions, reduces infusion-related adverse events, and has a favorable safety profile, making it suitable for various patient populations, including those with CKD and anemia related to chronic diseases.

  2. Are there any notable safety concerns associated with Ferric Derisomaltose?
    Clinical data suggest a low incidence of serious adverse events. Common side effects include transient mild hypersensitivity reactions, but severe reactions are rare.

  3. What are the main markets driving Ferric Derisomaltose adoption?
    North America and Europe lead due to established healthcare infrastructure, regulatory approvals, and clinical familiarity. Emerging markets in Asia-Pacific are also showing increasing demand.

  4. How does Ferric Derisomaltose compare economically to other IV iron formulations?
    While often more expensive upfront, the reduced number of infusions and lower complication rates can lead to overall healthcare savings, especially in outpatient or hospital settings.

  5. What future developments could impact Ferric Derisomaltose’s market position?
    Expansion into new indications, ongoing clinical trials, competitive generics, and formulation innovations are key factors influencing its future market share.


References

[^1]: WHO. Iron deficiency anemia. World Health Organization, 2020.
[^2]: MarketWatch. "Intravenous Iron Market Size, Share & Trends Analysis Report," 2022.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.