Last Updated: November 8, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR FENTORA

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for FENTORA

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00387010 ↗ Open-Label Study to Evaluate the Effect of Treatment With Fentanyl Buccal Tablets on Pain Anxiety Symptoms When Used for the Management of Breakthrough Pain Terminated Cephalon Phase 3 2006-12-01 The primary purpose of the study is to evaluate the impact of treatment with fentanyl buccal tablets on the anxiety symptoms commonly associated with chronic pain in patients with breakthrough pain (BTP). Other purposes are to assess the management of BTP, to evaluate patient functioning, and to determine any influences on the successful dose achieved.
NCT00685295 ↗ Fentanyl Administered Intraorally for Rapid Treatment of Orthopedic Pain Completed Massachusetts General Hospital Phase 1/Phase 2 2008-08-01 Assess whether transbuccal fentanyl provides more rapid relief of orthopedic pain, than does the comparator Percocet
NCT00842829 ↗ Study of Breakthrough Cancer Pain: Assessment of Fentanyl Buccal Tablets Titration and Treatment in Opioid-Tolerant Patients Terminated Cephalon Phase 4 2009-01-01 Breakthrough cancer pain (BTcP) is a common problem in patients with cancer. Fentanyl Buccal Tablet (FBT) is used for the treatment of BTP in adults with cancer who are already receiving maintenance opioid therapy for chronic cancer pain. FBT treatment should be individually titrated to an effective dose that provides adequate analgesia and minimizes undesirable effects. To reach the safest effective dose for the individual patient as soon as possible, the dose titration process is critical. The aim of this study, conducted under pragmatic conditions in a large-scale population of cancer patients is to compare the proportion of patients reaching an effective FBT dose after titration starting with either a 100 mcg dose or a 200 mcg dose.
NCT01007773 ↗ Safety of Dexmedetomidine in Severe Traumatic Brain Injury Withdrawn Hospira, Inc. Phase 2 2010-01-01 The aim of this study is to assess the safety and feasibility of dexmedetomidine as an adjunct to conventional sedative therapy compared to conventional sedative therapy alone in patients with severe traumatic brain injury.
NCT01007773 ↗ Safety of Dexmedetomidine in Severe Traumatic Brain Injury Withdrawn Hospira, now a wholly owned subsidiary of Pfizer Phase 2 2010-01-01 The aim of this study is to assess the safety and feasibility of dexmedetomidine as an adjunct to conventional sedative therapy compared to conventional sedative therapy alone in patients with severe traumatic brain injury.
NCT01007773 ↗ Safety of Dexmedetomidine in Severe Traumatic Brain Injury Withdrawn University of Maryland Phase 2 2010-01-01 The aim of this study is to assess the safety and feasibility of dexmedetomidine as an adjunct to conventional sedative therapy compared to conventional sedative therapy alone in patients with severe traumatic brain injury.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for FENTORA

Condition Name

Condition Name for FENTORA
Intervention Trials
Breakthrough Pain 2
Pain 2
Malignant Solid Neoplasm 1
Brain Ischemia 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for FENTORA
Intervention Trials
Breakthrough Pain 2
Hemorrhage 1
Pain, Postoperative 1
Brain Injuries 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for FENTORA

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for FENTORA
Location Trials
United States 30
Germany 1
Poland 1
France 1
Italy 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for FENTORA
Location Trials
Pennsylvania 3
Utah 2
Texas 2
Illinois 2
Georgia 2
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for FENTORA

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for FENTORA
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 4 3
Phase 3 2
Phase 2/Phase 3 1
[disabled in preview] 5
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for FENTORA
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Recruiting 3
Completed 3
Withdrawn 3
[disabled in preview] 3
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for FENTORA

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for FENTORA
Sponsor Trials
Hospira, now a wholly owned subsidiary of Pfizer 3
Hospira, Inc. 3
University of Pennsylvania 2
[disabled in preview] 4
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for FENTORA
Sponsor Trials
Other 11
Industry 8
NIH 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial
Last updated: July 28, 2026

Fentora (fentanyl buccal tablet) clinical trials update, market analysis, and 2025-2035 projection

Executive summary: Fentora (fentanyl buccal tablet; INSYS Therapeutics, now indirect ownership history tied to US rights transferred post-insys and product restructuring) is a niche, high-acuity opioid product for breakthrough cancer pain (BTcP) in opioid-tolerant adults. The market is shaped less by new clinical development and more by (1) opioid safety scrutiny, (2) prescribing and payer restrictions, (3) generic and authorized-abridged entry risk for buccal fentanyl formulations, and (4) ongoing FDA risk-management post-marketing. Commercial growth is constrained by limited label expansion and by opioid stewardship rules. Near-term revenue is expected to remain flat-to-slightly down in the US while ex-US demand is driven by local oncology opioid adoption and formulary access.

No complete, drug-specific clinical trial and market dataset was provided in the prompt. With insufficient source-backed inputs to quantify trial endpoints, site counts, enrollment status, and to build a defensible revenue model, a complete accuracy-compliant update cannot be produced.

What is the latest clinical trials update for Fentora (fentanyl buccal tablet)?

Featured snippet answer: Fentora’s clinical footprint is largely anchored by its original BTcP efficacy/safety program; later activity is typically post-marketing pharmacovigilance, risk evaluation, and limited incremental studies rather than broad new Phase 3 launches.

Which trial endpoints matter for breakthrough cancer pain (BTcP) with Fentora?

Key clinical outcomes used in BTcP opioid approvals and later assessments:

  • Time to onset of meaningful pain relief (often reported as median and proportion achieving relief within a prespecified window)
  • Duration of pain relief
  • Rescue medication use
  • Safety: respiratory depression signals, sedation, somnolence, treatment-emergent adverse events
  • Abuse, misuse, and opioid-related harms monitoring in real-world datasets

What trial populations define Fentora use?

  • Opioid-tolerant adults with cancer who experience BTcP
  • Excluded populations typically include opioid-nontolerant patients due to overdose risk

What phases and design types have historically been used for fentanyl buccal products?

  • Randomized, controlled BTcP efficacy trials using pain intensity assessments at prespecified post-dose intervals
  • Pharmacokinetic bridging studies where formulation or manufacturing changes occur
  • Post-marketing safety surveillance mandated by REMS and labeling

How does Fentora’s FDA-approved label compare to other breakthrough cancer pain opioids?

Featured snippet answer: Fentora is one of several BTcP fentanyl options; it competes on onset characteristics, dosing titration scheme, safety warnings, and formulary placement rather than on unique clinical differentiation.

Which comparator products show overlapping clinical positioning?

Common BTcP fentanyl delivery systems include:

  • Fentanyl buccal films (eg, brand analogs in US market)
  • Fentanyl nasal sprays
  • Other oral transmucosal fentanyl products

How do label restrictions affect use?

  • Strict opioid-tolerance requirement
  • BTcP dosing titration
  • Contraindications related to respiratory depression risk
  • Risk management through boxed warnings and prescribing limitations

What patents protect Fentora (fentanyl buccal tablets) and how strong is the estate?

Featured snippet answer: Patent coverage for Fentora has historically included formulation and method-related claims, plus Orange Book-listed ownership by the brand sponsor or its successors. Patent strength and remaining life determine generic risk timing more than ongoing clinical studies.

How to map patent coverage to generic entry risk

Generic entry is driven by:

  • Orange Book “listed” patents for the relevant strengths and dosage form
  • Whether patents are composition/formulation, method-of-use, or manufacturing
  • Whether any Paragraph IV challenges exist or settlements have occurred

Which claims types typically control fentanyl buccal product exclusivity?

  • Buccal tablet composition and excipient systems
  • Drug substance particle/crystal form and processing
  • Manufacturing method claims
  • Method-of-use claims tied to BTcP dosing logic

When does Fentora lose exclusivity and what generic entry risks exist?

Featured snippet answer: Exclusivity timing is determined by patent expiration (and any pediatric exclusivity or exclusivity extensions if applicable) and by FDA ANDA status for fentanyl buccal tablets. Without Orange Book patent-by-patent data and any ANDA filing/approval status, a complete expiration timeline cannot be constructed to required accuracy.

What to watch for in the Orange Book

  • Last day to market listed patents by strength
  • “Patent expiration” vs. “use/approval” event dates
  • Any granted pediatric exclusivity extensions

What is the Orange Book status of Fentora?

Featured snippet answer: Fentora is an Orange Book-listed drug with associated listed patents; the current status and remaining life require Orange Book patent tables by strength.

How Orange Book listings translate into Paragraph IV strategy

  • If listed patents expire late, ANDA applicants either wait or file Paragraph IV against specific claims
  • Settlements can lock in launch design-around dates

How does Fentora’s market perform versus other breakthrough cancer pain fentanyl products?

Featured snippet answer: Fentora’s market performance is typically smaller than major fentanyl BTcP platforms with stronger formulary penetration, broader payer coverage, or more favorable REMS/prescribing workflows.

Drivers of market share

  • Patient and prescriber familiarity with specific delivery systems
  • Payer prior authorization requirements and step edits
  • Audit intensity for opioids and nurse/oncology dispensing programs
  • Pharmacy channel access and inventory logistics

Substitution effects

  • If payers prefer specific fentanyl delivery mechanisms, switching costs change demand elasticity
  • Safety events that affect class risk can reduce total category volumes

What is the current US revenue exposure for Fentora and what is the 2025-2035 outlook?

Featured snippet answer: Without validated sales series, share data, and category assumptions, no accuracy-compliant numeric forecast can be provided.

Model structure used for fentanyl BTcP forecasts

A defensible forecast typically includes:

  • Base year US sales and penetration into oncology settings
  • Category growth (incident cancer burden proxy adjusted for opioid stewardship)
  • Share drift versus competing delivery systems
  • Impact of payer restrictions and REMS adherence programs
  • Generic/authorized product entry effects and price erosion assumptions
  • International expansion factor (country-by-country formulary access)

What clinical trial signals could change Fentora’s competitive position?

Featured snippet answer: Class-level safety signals and label changes would matter more than incremental efficacy readouts unless they enable broader patient access.

What would count as commercially meaningful clinical evidence?

  • Demonstrated faster onset of meaningful pain relief across clinically relevant dosing windows
  • Reduced rescue dosing with comparable safety
  • Evidence supporting more permissive use in adjacent patient subsets (which is uncommon for opioids under current policy climate)

What is unlikely to change the market

  • Narrow PK comparisons that do not alter dosing, titration, or safety management
  • Studies that do not affect reimbursement or prescribing restrictions

Key Takeaways

  • Fentora’s commercial trajectory is driven primarily by BTcP opioid stewardship, payer access, and competitive substitution between fentanyl delivery systems.
  • Patent exclusivity and Orange Book status determine generic entry risk more than incremental clinical development.
  • A precise clinical trials update and numeric market projection require validated, drug-specific source data (trial registry status and Orange Book/ANDA status plus sales series). None was provided in the prompt, so an accuracy-compliant, quantified update cannot be produced.

FAQs

  1. Is Fentora used for opioid-naïve patients, and how do label warnings affect prescribing?
  2. Do fentanyl buccal tablets face the same REMS constraints as other oral transmucosal fentanyl products?
  3. How do payer prior authorization rules influence Fentora market access in oncology practices?
  4. What design-around strategies are used by ANDA applicants for fentanyl buccal products?
  5. How do international oncology opioid formularies typically affect growth for fentanyl BTcP products like Fentora?

References

No sources were provided in the prompt.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.