Last Updated: June 25, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR FENTANYL-62


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


505(b)(2) Clinical Trials for FENTANYL-62

This table shows clinical trials for potential 505(b)(2) applications. See the next table for all clinical trials
Trial Type Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
New Combination NCT00620828 ↗ The Role of Intra-Operative Intracapsular Blocks in Post-Operative Pain Management Following Total Knee Arthroplasty Completed Pfizer Phase 4 2007-05-01 The purpose of this study is to use a new combination of anesthesia techniques in an attempt to minimize early pain after surgery and improve the patient's ability to participate more fully with physical therapy. Total knee replacement patients who participate will receive the standard anesthesia. This includes a spinal nerve block as well as a femoral nerve block. The study is looking at the added benefits of including an injection of numbing medication (Bupivicaine) to the back of the knee. This injection occurs during surgery. In order to compare the outcomes we will also have a group of patients who will receive a saline injection as opposed to the numbing medication. Patients are randomly assigned to a group. Outcomes are measured up until twenty-four hours following the surgery.
New Combination NCT00620828 ↗ The Role of Intra-Operative Intracapsular Blocks in Post-Operative Pain Management Following Total Knee Arthroplasty Completed Duke University Phase 4 2007-05-01 The purpose of this study is to use a new combination of anesthesia techniques in an attempt to minimize early pain after surgery and improve the patient's ability to participate more fully with physical therapy. Total knee replacement patients who participate will receive the standard anesthesia. This includes a spinal nerve block as well as a femoral nerve block. The study is looking at the added benefits of including an injection of numbing medication (Bupivicaine) to the back of the knee. This injection occurs during surgery. In order to compare the outcomes we will also have a group of patients who will receive a saline injection as opposed to the numbing medication. Patients are randomly assigned to a group. Outcomes are measured up until twenty-four hours following the surgery.
New Formulation NCT01349140 ↗ EXPAREL Dose-Response for Single-Injection Femoral Nerve Blocks Completed Pacira Pharmaceuticals, Inc Phase 1 2012-02-01 EXPAREL™, an investigational drug product, is a new formulation of a local anesthetic (numbing medicine) that is designed to be longer acting than the currently-available local anesthetics. The purpose of this study is to define the dose-response curve of EXPAREL, an investigational extended-duration formulation of the local anesthetic bupivacaine, on both motor and sensory block when applied in a fixed volume adjacent to the femoral nerve.
New Formulation NCT01349140 ↗ EXPAREL Dose-Response for Single-Injection Femoral Nerve Blocks Completed University of California, San Diego Phase 1 2012-02-01 EXPAREL™, an investigational drug product, is a new formulation of a local anesthetic (numbing medicine) that is designed to be longer acting than the currently-available local anesthetics. The purpose of this study is to define the dose-response curve of EXPAREL, an investigational extended-duration formulation of the local anesthetic bupivacaine, on both motor and sensory block when applied in a fixed volume adjacent to the femoral nerve.
OTC NCT01691690 ↗ Analgesic Effect of IV Acetaminophen in Tonsillectomies Completed Nationwide Children's Hospital Phase 2 2012-10-01 Acetaminophen (paracetamol) is a first-line antipyretic and analgesic for mild and moderate pain for pediatric patients. Its common use (particularly in oral form) is underscored by its wide therapeutic window, safety profile, over the counter accessibility, lack of adverse systemic effects (as compared with NSAIDS and opioids) when given in appropriate doses. Although the exact anti-nociceptive mechanisms of acetaminophen continue to be elucidated, these mechanisms appear to be multi-factorial and include central inhibition of the cyclo-oxygenase (COX) enzyme leading to decreased production of prostaglandins from arachidonic acid, interference with serotonergic descending pain pathways, indirect activation of cannabinoid 1 (CB1) receptors and inhibition of nitric oxide pathways through N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) or substance P. Of the above mechanisms, the most commonly known is that of central inhibition of COX enzymes by which the decreased production of prostaglandins diminish the release of excitatory transmitters of substance P and glutamate which are both involved in nociceptive transmission (Anderson, 2008; Smith, 2011). To date, several studies have shown acetaminophen's opioid sparing effect in the pediatric population when given by the rectal or intravenous routes (Korpela et al, 1999; Dashti et al, 2009; Hong et al, 2010).
>Trial Type >Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

All Clinical Trials for FENTANYL-62

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00000273 ↗ A Laboratory Model for Heroin Abuse Medications - 8 Completed National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA) Phase 2 1995-08-01 The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effects of treatment medications (methadone, buprenorphine, LAAM, naltrexone, naltrexone microcapsules, and methoclocinnamox) on I.V. and smoked heroin self-administration."
NCT00000273 ↗ A Laboratory Model for Heroin Abuse Medications - 8 Completed New York State Psychiatric Institute Phase 2 1995-08-01 The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effects of treatment medications (methadone, buprenorphine, LAAM, naltrexone, naltrexone microcapsules, and methoclocinnamox) on I.V. and smoked heroin self-administration."
NCT00003000 ↗ Morphine for the Treatment of Pain in Patients With Breast Cancer Completed Roswell Park Cancer Institute 1992-05-01 RATIONALE: Morphine helps to relieve the pain associated with cancer surgery. Giving morphine in different ways may offer more pain relief. PURPOSE: This randomized clinical trial is studying how well morphine injected directly into the underarm area works compared with morphine injected into the back of the shoulder in treating pain in patients who have breast cancer and who are undergoing axillary lymph node dissection.
NCT00004424 ↗ Randomized Study of Propofol Versus Fentanyl and Midazolam in Pediatric Patients Requiring Mechanical Ventilation and Sedation Therapy Completed Case Western Reserve University N/A 1996-07-01 OBJECTIVES: I. Assess the degree of amnesia afforded by study sedatives relative to the patient's intensive care unit experiences. II. Evaluate the efficacy and safety of propofol monotherapy compared to a conventional sedative regimen consisting of continuous infusion fentanyl and midazolam. III. Perform a detailed pharmacoeconomic evaluation of propofol sedation compared to combination drug therapy in acutely ill, mechanically ventilated pediatric patients.
NCT00004424 ↗ Randomized Study of Propofol Versus Fentanyl and Midazolam in Pediatric Patients Requiring Mechanical Ventilation and Sedation Therapy Completed FDA Office of Orphan Products Development N/A 1996-07-01 OBJECTIVES: I. Assess the degree of amnesia afforded by study sedatives relative to the patient's intensive care unit experiences. II. Evaluate the efficacy and safety of propofol monotherapy compared to a conventional sedative regimen consisting of continuous infusion fentanyl and midazolam. III. Perform a detailed pharmacoeconomic evaluation of propofol sedation compared to combination drug therapy in acutely ill, mechanically ventilated pediatric patients.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for FENTANYL-62

Condition Name

Condition Name for FENTANYL-62
Intervention Trials
Pain 165
Postoperative Pain 124
Pain, Postoperative 101
Anesthesia 95
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for FENTANYL-62
Intervention Trials
Pain, Postoperative 293
Acute Pain 62
Agnosia 51
Vomiting 47
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for FENTANYL-62

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for FENTANYL-62
Location Trials
United States 902
Egypt 361
Canada 107
China 88
Korea, Republic of 71
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for FENTANYL-62
Location Trials
California 81
New York 70
Texas 65
North Carolina 54
Illinois 45
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for FENTANYL-62

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for FENTANYL-62
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
PHASE4 76
PHASE3 26
PHASE2 24
[disabled in preview] 585
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for FENTANYL-62
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 962
Recruiting 315
Unknown status 195
[disabled in preview] 249
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for FENTANYL-62

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for FENTANYL-62
Sponsor Trials
Ain Shams University 66
Cairo University 60
Assiut University 49
[disabled in preview] 69
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for FENTANYL-62
Sponsor Trials
Other 2029
Industry 259
U.S. Fed 33
[disabled in preview] 44
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial
Last updated: April 27, 2026

FENTANYL-62: What clinical trials, market dynamics, and 2026-2032 projections indicate

Summary: No authoritative, source-backed public trail links the name “FENTANYL-62” to a specific marketed fentanyl product, investigational new drug, or unique active ingredient/code in clinical-trials registries, regulatory review documents, or commercial market datasets. Without a verifiable target (INN, salt form, sponsor, formulation, registration identifiers, or trial registry IDs), a clinical-trials update, market sizing, and projection for “FENTANYL-62” cannot be produced with the precision required for R&D and investment decisions.

Is “FENTANYL-62” a registered drug name or clinical-stage identifier?

“FENTANYL-62” is not a recognized, regulator-standard identifier on its own. In practice, fentanyl programs are tracked by:

  • INN + salt/formulation (for example, fentanyl citrate; fentanyl base; fentanyl sublingual; transdermal fentanyl)
  • Brand/product name in national markets
  • Sponsor + program code in trial registries
  • Regulatory application identifiers (NDA/BLA in the US; CHMP/EPAR in EU; national MAs elsewhere)
  • Clinical trial registry IDs (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT, EU CTR, WHO ICTRP)

No source-supported mapping exists between “FENTANYL-62” and a unique fentanyl program that can be audited across clinical, regulatory, and market channels.

What clinical trial updates can be verified for FENTANYL-62?

A clinical-trials update requires at minimum one of:

  • ClinicalTrials.gov / EU CTR / WHO ICTRP listing tied to the program
  • Sponsor pipeline disclosures that explicitly define “FENTANYL-62”
  • Regulatory assessment documents that disclose an investigational product name

No such verifiable link exists for “FENTANYL-62” as provided, so the following cannot be compiled in a compliant, audit-ready way:

  • Trial phases, recruitment status, endpoints, or safety signals
  • Enrollment numbers, timelines, or topline efficacy results
  • Comparative trial design vs marketed fentanyl products
  • PK/PD readouts for conversion ratios, exposure metrics, or abuse-deterrent performance
  • FDA/EMA request-for-information activity or review milestones

How does the fentanyl market behave, and what can be projected without a defined product?

Fentanyl market behavior depends heavily on the exact product type:

  • Transdermal patches (chronic pain)
  • Immediate-release products (breakthrough cancer pain and other labeled indications)
  • Buccal/sublingual/nasal formulations (titration and pharmacokinetic performance)
  • Abuse-deterrent formulations (policy-driven procurement and payer decisions)
  • Country-level regulatory controls affecting availability and prescribing

A projection must define:

  • Indication (cancer breakthrough pain vs chronic non-cancer pain, etc.)
  • Product modality and dosing form
  • Competitor set (specific brands and authorized generics)
  • Geography and pricing basis (ex-manufacturer, gross-to-net, tender prices)
  • Patent/market exclusivity posture and expected generic entry timing

Because “FENTANYL-62” is not tied to a specific formulation and authorization status, no defensible market forecast (revenue, units, penetration, or share) can be generated without inventing the missing product identity.

What are the constraints for investing or building an R&D plan here?

For fentanyl, the investment case is extremely sensitive to:

  • Regulatory classification and scheduling constraints
  • Abuse-deterrence evidence thresholds
  • Conversion and titration safety controls
  • Public health risk posture that affects labeling and payer uptake
  • Exclusivity and patent estate tied to formulation, manufacturing process, and delivery system

If the program cannot be uniquely identified, all downstream decisions (trial roadmap, CMC strategy, comparator selection, and launch timing) become non-auditable.

Market reference points (only what can be supported without “FENTANYL-62” mapping)

The only accurate market-facing statement that can be made is structural: fentanyl markets are shaped by regulation and controlled-substance frameworks plus modality-specific clinical and labeling constraints.

However, a projection for “FENTANYL-62” specifically cannot be produced because it requires a product definition.

Key Takeaways

  • “FENTANYL-62” cannot be matched to a uniquely identifiable fentanyl drug program using standard, auditable clinical and regulatory naming conventions.
  • Without a verifiable program mapping, a clinical-trials update, market analysis, and 2026-2032 projection for “FENTANYL-62” cannot be produced with the required precision.
  • Any attempt to forecast would require asserting unknown product attributes (formulation, indication, sponsor, geography, regulatory status), which is not supportable from the provided input.

FAQs

  1. What information is needed to update clinical trials for a fentanyl program?
    A verifiable program identifier in a clinical-trials registry (for example, NCT/CTR/ICTRP) or an explicit sponsor-linked program code tied to the product’s formulation and route.

  2. Why can’t you forecast market revenue from “FENTANYL-62” alone?
    Fentanyl market value varies materially by modality (transdermal vs immediate-release vs buccal/sublingual), indication, exclusivity status, and geography. “FENTANYL-62” does not define those attributes.

  3. How do abuse-deterrent formulations affect fentanyl market outcomes?
    They can change labeling scope, formulary acceptance, and procurement decisions, and they require specific evidence packages, which are product-specific.

  4. What role does patent and exclusivity play in fentanyl projections?
    Patent claims tied to formulation, delivery technology, and manufacturing processes determine generic entry timing and price erosion curves.

  5. Can a fentanyl market projection be generic without a product mapping?
    General fentanyl market trends can be described, but a product-specific forecast for “FENTANYL-62” cannot be generated without identifying the product’s regulatory and trial profile.


References (APA)

[1] U.S. National Library of Medicine. (n.d.). ClinicalTrials.gov. https://clinicaltrials.gov/
[2] European Medicines Agency. (n.d.). EPAR and medicines related information. https://www.ema.europa.eu/
[3] World Health Organization. (n.d.). International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP). https://www.who.int/clinical-trials-registry-platform

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.