Last Updated: May 11, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR FENOPROFEN CALCIUM


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for FENOPROFEN CALCIUM

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT02017197 ↗ Therapeutic Equivalence Between Branded and Generic WARFArin Tablets in Brazil Completed Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo Phase 4 2014-08-01 The purpose of this study is to assess whether the switch from branded to generic warfarin or between different generic warfarin tablets may cause fluctuation in the results of coagulation tests (International Normalized Rate, acronym INR) in patients, thus predisposing them to unnecessary risks.
NCT02017197 ↗ Therapeutic Equivalence Between Branded and Generic WARFArin Tablets in Brazil Completed Federal University of São Paulo Phase 4 2014-08-01 The purpose of this study is to assess whether the switch from branded to generic warfarin or between different generic warfarin tablets may cause fluctuation in the results of coagulation tests (International Normalized Rate, acronym INR) in patients, thus predisposing them to unnecessary risks.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for FENOPROFEN CALCIUM

Condition Name

Condition Name for FENOPROFEN CALCIUM
Intervention Trials
Atrial Fibrillation 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for FENOPROFEN CALCIUM
Intervention Trials
Atrial Fibrillation 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for FENOPROFEN CALCIUM

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for FENOPROFEN CALCIUM
Location Trials
Brazil 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for FENOPROFEN CALCIUM

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for FENOPROFEN CALCIUM
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 4 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for FENOPROFEN CALCIUM
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for FENOPROFEN CALCIUM

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for FENOPROFEN CALCIUM
Sponsor Trials
Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo 1
Federal University of São Paulo 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for FENOPROFEN CALCIUM
Sponsor Trials
Other 2
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

FENOPROFEN CALCIUM Market Analysis and Financial Projection

Last updated: April 29, 2026

Fenoprofen Calcium: Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Projection

What is fenoprofen calcium and how is it positioned clinically?

Fenoprofen calcium is a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) indicated for pain and inflammation. Commercially, it is typically used for musculoskeletal pain states associated with inflammatory activity, consistent with NSAID class use patterns. In the US, product presence and clinical visibility are constrained by the age of the molecule and the predominance of generics, limiting new interventional trial generation versus ongoing pharmacovigilance, bioequivalence, and formulation work.

What does the current clinical trials landscape show?

Interventional, molecule-defining clinical programs for fenoprofen calcium are not visible at a scale comparable with newer anti-inflammatory development candidates. Public clinical-trials registries show fenoprofen calcium primarily in contexts such as:

  • Bioequivalence and generic product studies
  • Pharmacokinetic or formulation studies
  • Observational or safety follow-up work

A notable signal is that major regulatory and payer attention for fenoprofen is typically not on novel efficacy demonstrations, but on ensuring generic equivalence and safe use in real-world NSAID populations. That pattern is consistent with fenoprofen’s status as an established NSAID and with the US regulatory framework for older, off-patent drugs.

Clinical trials update (high-level):

  • Core molecule-defining Phase 2/3 efficacy programs: not evidenced as a current driver in public registries.
  • Study types most commonly associated with fenoprofen calcium today: bioequivalence, pharmacokinetics, formulation.

Source basis: Clinical trial listing behavior for older generic NSAIDs, and the general US regulatory pathway for generics/bioequivalence for established products, which shifts emphasis away from brand-new efficacy endpoints (clinical trial registry context and FDA generic framework) [1], [2], [3].


What is driving demand for fenoprofen calcium?

Market demand drivers

Fenoprofen calcium demand behaves like other older, non-prescription-adjacent prescription NSAIDs: it is anchored in generics availability, physician familiarity, and price. The key drivers:

  • Low-cost substitution: clinicians and health systems can switch across NSAIDs with similar therapeutic intent, tightening pricing power.
  • Formulary decisions: efficacy is rarely the differentiator; compliance and side-effect profiles within NSAID class influence formulary placement.
  • Safety monitoring: NSAID class warnings (GI bleeding, renal risk, cardiovascular risk) constrain patient selection.

Market constraints

  • Class-wide risk management: payer and provider risk controls for NSAIDs apply uniformly.
  • Competitive NSAID basket: older NSAIDs (ibuprofen, naproxen, diclofenac) have entrenched supply chains and generic competition, making market share stable but not strongly growth-oriented for any single older molecule.
  • Limited patent-driven brand premium: fenoprofen calcium’s value is primarily generic and usage-based.

How big is the fenoprofen calcium market and what segments matter?

Market sizing approach used here

Because fenoprofen calcium is off-patent and is traded through generics and multi-source channels, public “single-molecule” market sizing is often fragmented. The actionable way to project is to treat fenoprofen as part of the broader NSAID market and then allocate based on:

  • US formulary/generic availability
  • utilization persistence typical of established NSAIDs
  • relative adoption versus higher-visibility NSAIDs
  • pricing compression dynamics

Outcome: fenoprofen calcium is best modeled as a mature, low-growth, price-sensitive NSAID with stable but limited expansion.

Segment structure

  • Retail prescription channel: typical for older NSAID utilization.
  • Generic wholesale distribution: bulk purchasing by group practices and health systems.
  • Institutional use: lower likelihood of major hospital-focused “must-stock” status unless local formulary history favors fenoprofen.

What is the pricing and competitive dynamic?

Competitive set

Fenoprofen calcium competes against:

  • Generic NSAIDs with broad coverage (ibuprofen, naproxen, diclofenac, meloxicam, indomethacin)
  • NSAID combinations and adjuvant regimens
  • Non-NSAID analgesics in certain care pathways (acetaminophen; topical agents in osteoarthritis patterns)

Pricing behavior

  • Downward pricing pressure is standard for off-patent NSAIDs due to multi-source supply.
  • Marginal share changes tend to come from local formulary switches rather than from clinical breakthroughs.

What is the regulatory and lifecycle status?

Generic pathway and data requirements

Fenoprofen calcium’s market reality aligns with FDA’s generic approval pathway requiring bioequivalence to a listed reference product for product sameness (active ingredient, dosage form, route, strength, and required performance criteria) [2]. That structure reduces incentives for brand-sponsored clinical trials for efficacy unless a new use is pursued.

Supply and product stability

For molecules without new patent protection, market supply is stable but pricing is capped by generic competition. The near-term business lever tends to be:

  • product quality and manufacturing reliability
  • distribution execution
  • payer alignment and formulary access

Market projection (base, upside, downside)

Projection framework

Fenoprofen calcium projections are driven by:

  • NSAID demand growth in the underlying population (generally low single digits at most, and often offset by safety-focused prescribing shifts)
  • Switching among NSAIDs within formularies
  • Pricing compression (often the dominant effect on revenue)

Base case (most likely)

  • Volume: flat to low growth.
  • Revenue: low growth to mild decline driven by pricing compression, with occasional stabilization from mix shifts.
  • Growth catalysts: none tied to new clinical efficacy approvals.

Upside case

  • Volume gain from formulary preference at the PBM or system level.
  • Mix shift toward specific strengths/dosage forms that improve net price.
  • Short-term uplift from supply stabilization versus competitors rather than from molecule innovation.

Downside case

  • Tighter NSAID safety controls in higher-risk populations, shifting prescribers toward alternatives.
  • Further formulary erosion as competing generics with stronger contracting take share.
  • Manufacturing or distribution shocks typical of generic supply markets.

Business interpretation

Fenoprofen calcium is projected to behave like a mature generic NSAID: stable utilization with limited revenue upside, where execution (contracting and distribution) matters more than R&D spend.


Where do clinical trials and market strategy intersect?

Most plausible near-term trial activity

For off-patent fenoprofen calcium, the highest-probability clinical activity centers on:

  • bioequivalence and formulation optimization
  • safety and pharmacovigilance monitoring
  • comparative pharmacokinetic work for new generics

This does not change competitive positioning meaningfully at the payer level because therapeutic equivalence to existing NSAIDs is already assumed in formularies, and because there is no new clinical differentiation typical of a novel NSAID program.


Key Takeaways

  • Clinical development: Fenoprofen calcium shows limited evidence of new, molecule-defining interventional Phase 2/3 programs; trial activity aligns with generic equivalence and formulation work.
  • Market profile: The drug is a mature, generics-driven NSAID with pricing compression and low growth potential.
  • Projection: Expect flat to low-volume growth and revenue growth that is capped or negative depending on contract pricing and formulary share.
  • Best levers: market execution via contracting, distribution, and product reliability rather than R&D innovation.

FAQs

  1. Is fenoprofen calcium currently in active late-stage clinical trials?
    Public registry signals prioritize equivalence-type studies for mature generics rather than new efficacy-driven Phase 2/3 development.

  2. What determines fenoprofen calcium demand in the US?
    Generic availability, formulary placement, and NSAID class safety constraints.

  3. What is the most likely market direction for fenoprofen calcium revenue?
    Revenue typically tracks pricing compression more than volume growth, with stable or mildly declining outcomes in many generic NSAID segments.

  4. What would change fenoprofen calcium’s market trajectory materially?
    A new labeled indication or a differentiated formulation with payer-relevant clinical advantages, neither of which is supported by current visible development patterns.

  5. How does regulation affect new product entry for fenoprofen calcium?
    Generic approval relies on bioequivalence and product sameness to reference listed requirements, enabling ongoing multi-source competition [2].


References

[1] U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Drug Approval Process: Generic Drugs. https://www.fda.gov/drugs/generic-drugs
[2] U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Bioequivalence Studies for Human Drug Products. https://www.fda.gov/drugs/guidances-drugs-regulatory-information/bioequivalence-studies-human-drug-products
[3] U.S. National Library of Medicine. ClinicalTrials.gov. https://clinicaltrials.gov

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.