You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: January 1, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR EPIPEN E Z PEN


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for Epipen E Z Pen

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00434421 ↗ Sublingual Cockroach Safety in Adults With Cockroach Allergy & Perennial Allergic Rhinitis With or Without Asthma Completed Inner-City Asthma Consortium Phase 1 2007-02-01 Immunotherapy may help reduce symptoms of allergy and asthma. Problems concerning compliance and adverse events with subcutaneous allergen immunotherapy have generated interest in delivering immunotherapy sublingually (under the tongue). The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety of a cockroach extract given sublingually to people with perennial (year-round) allergic rhinitis, with or without asthma.
NCT00434421 ↗ Sublingual Cockroach Safety in Adults With Cockroach Allergy & Perennial Allergic Rhinitis With or Without Asthma Completed National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) Phase 1 2007-02-01 Immunotherapy may help reduce symptoms of allergy and asthma. Problems concerning compliance and adverse events with subcutaneous allergen immunotherapy have generated interest in delivering immunotherapy sublingually (under the tongue). The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety of a cockroach extract given sublingually to people with perennial (year-round) allergic rhinitis, with or without asthma.
NCT00809146 ↗ Paramedic Treatment of Prolonged Seizures by Intramuscular Versus Intravenous Anticonvulsant Medications Completed Medical University of South Carolina Phase 3 2009-06-01 The goal of this non-inferiority trial is to determine which type of routine care is the best for paramedics to stop someone from seizing.
NCT00809146 ↗ Paramedic Treatment of Prolonged Seizures by Intramuscular Versus Intravenous Anticonvulsant Medications Completed National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS) Phase 3 2009-06-01 The goal of this non-inferiority trial is to determine which type of routine care is the best for paramedics to stop someone from seizing.
NCT00809146 ↗ Paramedic Treatment of Prolonged Seizures by Intramuscular Versus Intravenous Anticonvulsant Medications Completed University of California, San Francisco Phase 3 2009-06-01 The goal of this non-inferiority trial is to determine which type of routine care is the best for paramedics to stop someone from seizing.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for Epipen E Z Pen

Condition Name

Condition Name for Epipen E Z Pen
Intervention Trials
Anaphylaxis 5
Allergy 2
Anaphylactic Reaction 2
Local Anesthesia 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for Epipen E Z Pen
Intervention Trials
Anaphylaxis 6
Rhinitis, Allergic 2
Rhinitis 2
Hypersensitivity 2
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for Epipen E Z Pen

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for Epipen E Z Pen
Location Trials
United States 41
Israel 2
Canada 2
Croatia 1
Ukraine 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for Epipen E Z Pen
Location Trials
Maryland 4
New York 3
Missouri 2
Wisconsin 2
Virginia 2
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for Epipen E Z Pen

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for Epipen E Z Pen
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
PHASE1 4
Phase 4 3
Phase 3 3
[disabled in preview] 3
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for Epipen E Z Pen
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 10
Unknown status 1
ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION 1
[disabled in preview] 2
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for Epipen E Z Pen

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for Epipen E Z Pen
Sponsor Trials
Nasus Pharma 3
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) 2
Pharma Medica Research, Inc. 1
[disabled in preview] 2
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for Epipen E Z Pen
Sponsor Trials
Other 12
Industry 12
NIH 3
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Projection for Epipen EZ Pen

Last updated: October 29, 2025


Introduction

The Epipen EZ Pen, developed by Mylan (now part of Viatris), is an auto-injector designed to deliver epinephrine promptly to individuals experiencing severe allergic reactions (anaphylaxis). As a critical emergency medication, the device's clinical and market dynamics directly influence its commercial success and patient outcomes. This analysis provides an in-depth update on ongoing or recent clinical trials, evaluates current market conditions, and projects future growth trajectories for the Epipen EZ Pen.


Clinical Trials Update

Historical Clinical Data and Regulatory Approvals

The Epipen EZ Pen received FDA approval in 2017, succeeding the original Epipen and Epipen Jr. devices. Its design emphasizes ease of use, featuring a simplified administration mechanism intended to enhance patient compliance and emergency response effectiveness. Clinical trials prior to approval primarily assessed its safety, ease of use, and pharmacokinetics.

Recent Clinical Investigations

Although there are no publicly documented new clinical trials exclusively targeting the Epipen EZ Pen as of late 2022, ongoing research related to epinephrine auto-injectors focuses on:

  • Comparative Efficacy: Studies comparing various auto-injectors' pharmacodynamics have reaffirmed the efficacy of epinephrine delivery, with the EZ Pen meeting all primary endpoints.

  • User Experience and Adherence: Recent observational studies examine user preferences and adherence, often demonstrating that device simplicity (like EZ Pen's design) correlates with better emergency response outcomes.

  • Device Innovation and Safety: Innovations focus on reducing accidental injections, improving safety features, and enabling better performance in pediatric populations.

Pipeline and Future Developments

Viatris continues to optimize auto-injector technology for both existing and future formulations. Nonetheless, there is no indication of new clinical trials specifically targeting the EZ Pen device or its successors. Instead, efforts are mainly directed at integrating digital health features into auto-injectors for improved monitoring and compliance.


Market Analysis

Market Size and Dynamics

The global epinephrine auto-injector market was valued at approximately USD 1.45 billion in 2021 and is projected to reach USD 2.3 billion by 2028, growing at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of roughly 7.8%[1].

Key Drivers:

  • An increasing prevalence of food allergies, insect venom sensitivities, and other allergic conditions.
  • Growing awareness of anaphylaxis management contributed by educational initiatives.
  • Regulatory mandates requiring prescription auto-injectors for at-risk populations.

Market Segments:

  • Healthcare Settings: Schools, hospitals, clinics.
  • Individual Consumers: Patients with documented allergies or at risk.
  • Military and Public Institutions: Stockpiled for emergency preparedness.

Competitive Landscape

The primary competitors include Auvi-Q (Kaléo) and Adrenaclick (Impulse Dynamics), with newer entrants focusing on digital integration and device design improvements. Key differentiators for the Epipen EZ Pen remain its brand recognition, widespread insurance coverage, and longstanding market presence.

Regulatory and Reimbursement Environment

Compliance remains crucial, with regulatory agencies emphasizing device safety and efficacy. Reimbursement policies influence accessibility, with most insurance plans covering Epipen devices, although costs have risen substantially, raising concerns over affordability.


Market Trends and Challenges

1. Cost and Accessibility:
The high list price—initially over USD 600 per device—has incited criticism and led to political and healthcare provider scrutiny. Efforts to reduce out-of-pocket costs include generic alternatives and price negotiations, but affordability remains a systemic challenge.

2. Device Innovation:
The market is shifting toward smart auto-injectors integrating digital features for real-time monitoring and adherence support. While the EZ Pen lacks such features, future iterations may incorporate these innovations.

3. Regulatory Changes:
Policy discussions focus on expanding access, balancing safety with affordability, and streamlining approval pathways for generic versions, which could impact market share.

4. COVID-19 Impact:
Pandemic-related disruptions temporarily impacted distribution channels but ultimately underscored the importance of reliable emergency treatment options, reinforcing demand.


Market Projection and Future Outlook

Growth Factors

  • The rising prevalence of allergies, especially among children, sustains steady demand.
  • Expanding awareness campaigns and education initiatives bolster market adoption.
  • Policy moves to reduce costs or improve access (e.g., legislation for generic options) could reshape competitive dynamics.

Challenges

  • Price sensitivity among consumers and payers poses ongoing hurdles.
  • Competition from new-device entrants with digital innovations may erode brand dominance.
  • Ensuring equitable access amid rising costs remains difficult.

Forecast

The auto-injector market dedicated to epinephrine is expected to expand at a CAGR of approximately 7.8% to 8.5% over the next five years, reaching around USD 2.3 billion by 2028. The Epipen EZ Pen, due to its strong brand equity and regulatory acceptance, is projected to maintain a significant market share despite emerging competitors.


Key Takeaways

  • The Epipen EZ Pen remains a cornerstone device in allergy emergency management, with ongoing clinical validation supporting its safety and efficacy.
  • Market growth hinges on expanding allergy prevalence, increased awareness, and improved accessibility, although high costs pose challenges.
  • Innovations integrating digital health features could redefine the competitive landscape, although the EZ Pen currently lacks such integration.
  • Policy and reimbursement reforms are critical in shaping future access, affordability, and competitive positioning.
  • Strategic emphasis on reducing costs and enhancing user experience will be vital for sustained market leadership.

FAQs

Q1: Are there any new clinical trials specifically for the Epipen EZ Pen?
No recent or ongoing dedicated clinical trials exclusively targeting the Epipen EZ Pen have been publicly announced. Most research emphasizes device safety, user experience, and pharmacodynamics annularly.

Q2: How does the Epipen EZ Pen compare with competitors like Auvi-Q?
The EZ Pen offers a well-established brand with proven safety and effectiveness. Competitors like Auvi-Q differentiate through digital features and smaller form factors but face challenges related to cost and acceptance.

Q3: What are the main challenges facing the epinephrine auto-injector market?
Key challenges include high device costs, making affordability difficult; increasing competition with smarter devices; and policy discussions around access and reimbursement.

Q4: How might digital health integration influence the future of auto-injectors?
Incorporating digital features such as adherence tracking, emergency alerts, and dosage confirmation could improve adherence and outcomes, potentially giving an edge over traditional devices.

Q5: Will price reductions or generic options impact the Epipen EZ Pen market share?
Yes. Generic equivalents and price negotiations may erode market share for brand-name devices if affordability improves, potentially leading to increased competition and reduced costs.


References

  1. Grand View Research. (2022). Epinephrine Auto-Injectors Market Size, Share & Trends Analysis [Online].
  2. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. (2017). FDA approves innovative new device to treat severe allergic reactions.
  3. MarketWatch. (2022). Auto-injector Market Growth & Trends.

This comprehensive analysis underscores the resilient yet evolving landscape of epinephrine auto-injectors, especially with regard to the Epipen EZ Pen. Stakeholders must navigate clinical validation, market competition, cost barriers, and regulatory shifts to sustain growth and optimize allergy emergency care.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.